Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 228.

fikie

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

7790 with amd 14.7 drivers runs on stock clock. Can you explain why hash rate drops after 5 min. from 200 to 130h

Code:

01:14:30:759	7a0	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2263 ms, hashrate = 197 h/s 
01:14:30:766	7a0	Round
01:14:33:062	5a4	got 253 bytes
01:14:33:064	5a4	buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":{"blob":"01009cf2aca1050085514b48166e71af65ffcccfb248ef8eacbb8e58f10a5220bbf901303238cb000000006e67a70c56983046cb3cbaa8ff6c03f52ded0241f6383f6021af25e7c5c793d701","job_id":"838783647865057","target":"4f360100"}}

01:14:33:067	5a4	parse packet: 253
01:14:33:071	5a4	new buf size: 0
01:14:33:075	5a4	df has same pool, skip
01:14:33:083	5a4	10/01/14-01:14:33 - New job received from xmr.hashinvest.net:1111
01:14:33:087	5a4	Speed: 196 h/s, TotalHashes: 45K, DevHashes: 1K Mining time:
01:14:33:090	5a4	00:03
01:14:33:095	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 2280 ms, hashrate = 196 h/s 
01:14:33:102	7a4	Round
01:14:36:899	7a0	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3714 ms, hashrate = 120 h/s 
01:14:36:940	7a0	Dev round
01:14:39:279	a5c	watchdog - thread 0, hb time 2340
01:14:41:522	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 4490 ms, hashrate = 99 h/s 
01:14:41:533	7a4	Round
01:14:45:823	7a0	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 4201 ms, hashrate = 106 h/s 
01:14:45:830	7a0	Round
01:14:49:553	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3651 ms, hashrate = 122 h/s 
01:14:49:560	7a4	Round
01:14:53:235	7a0	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3599 ms, hashrate = 124 h/s 
01:14:53:252	7a0	Round
01:14:56:844	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3531 ms, hashrate = 126 h/s 
01:14:56:851	7a4	Round
01:15:00:489	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3556 ms, hashrate = 125 h/s 
01:15:00:501	7a4	Round
01:15:03:976	7a0	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3403 ms, hashrate = 131 h/s 
01:15:03:987	7a0	Round
01:15:07:592	7a4	GPU 0: HashCnt = 448, time = 3536 ms, hashrate = 126 h/s 
01:15:07:603	7a4	Round

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Captain-Karacho on September 30, 2014, 01:52:34 PM

Working fine here.

Windows 8.1
Running 3 280x Toxics @ 1120c / 1780m [- h 896, -a 4]
Power consumption went down 100w while my hashrate went up 100 h/s (33 h/s per card)

Did you use -a 3 before?

Captain-Karacho

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Working fine here.

Windows 8.1
Running 3 280x Toxics @ 1120c / 1780m [- h 896, -a 4]
Power consumption went down 100w while my hashrate went up 100 h/s (33 h/s per card)

Good job and cheers for the update

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: ?? on ??

Tested Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X
7.0 (765/h) core(1100)-memclock(1680) AMD Catalyst 14.7
8.0 (730/h) core(1100)-memclock(1680) AMD Catalyst 14.9

What if specify "-h 1280"? If you use 4 cards then "-h 1280,1280,1280,1280".

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: portosTCM on September 30, 2014, 12:16:13 PM

I tried -li 1 option, but this 'low intensity' i still too high for my desktop, is there any way to further adjust it?

You can reduce HashCnt with "-h" option, but it will also reduce hashrate. Anyway, you can try.

portosTCM

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

I tried -li 1 option, but this 'low intensity' i still too high for my desktop, is there any way to further adjust it?

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: Deagle21 on September 30, 2014, 11:04:30 AM

Claymore, any thought on lowering your Dev Fee since Kachur GPU Miner is out and its runs faster than yours with only a 0.7% fee. I like you miner with nice features but I'm getting better performance with Kachur GPU Miner.

It is not faster at least on cards I tested and also I cannot make it work on all cards, but it works in general, so I will reduce dev fee in two times in next update.

Deagle21

full member

Activity: 333

Merit: 100

Claymore, any thought on lowering your Dev Fee since Kachur GPU Miner is out and its runs faster than yours with only a 0.7% fee. I like you miner with nice features but I'm getting better performance with Kachur GPU Miner.

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

I tried both 14.6 and 14.7 for my 7970. The performance is the same. Can anybody else confirm this?

qqqq

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1011

Quote from: UberMakedonische on September 30, 2014, 06:35:00 AM

Quote from: Claymore on September 30, 2014, 04:26:14 AM

Quote from: mafostedu on September 30, 2014, 03:18:09 AM

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma.
Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values.

I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%.

Same for me...

Palad1n

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

Quote from: UberMakedonische on September 30, 2014, 06:35:00 AM

Quote from: Claymore on September 30, 2014, 04:26:14 AM

Quote from: mafostedu on September 30, 2014, 03:18:09 AM

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma.
Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values.

I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%.

Today I will test rig with x6 r9 290 Tri-X.
290 Tri-x I have not yet tested it on a new version of Claymore.

UberMakedonische

member

Activity: 120

Merit: 10

Quote from: Claymore on September 30, 2014, 04:26:14 AM

Quote from: mafostedu on September 30, 2014, 03:18:09 AM

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma.
Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values.

I have same cards and the same things are happening for me. With 7.0 miner i am getting 720 h per card, with 8.0 max 680 h. I've tried the option -h but still no improvement. I also tried driver 13.12 and 14.7 and no results. This is only for R9 290 cards, for 280X i have improvement around 15%.

Feeniks

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Yes it is

OrientA

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Is Catalyst 14.7 better than 14.6?

anatolikostis

legendary

Activity: 2026

Merit: 1005

Quote from: mafostedu on September 30, 2014, 03:18:09 AM

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

290 msi gaming with Hynix GDDR5 pulls 749h/s @1000/1250

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

Quote from: mafostedu on September 30, 2014, 03:18:09 AM

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

Try "-h 1376,1376,1376,1376". In next update I will improve this option so "-h 1376" will mean 1376 for all cards, but right now you have to specify hashrate for every card individually by using comma.
Press "m" to see current hashrate. You can also try 1344, 1312, 1280, 1248, 1216 values.

mafostedu

full member

Activity: 171

Merit: 100

Quote from: Palad1n on September 29, 2014, 07:02:59 PM

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

What's the setup for r9 290 ? I have 4x R9 290 Trixx (hynix) 1000/1250 with Win 8.1 + 13.12 Catalyst

With 6.1 I get 2900+ i.e. 725 kh/card while with 8.0 I get less than 700 kh/card (~ 695 to 698)
However with 280x Asus D2CU (Hynix) @ 1170/1500 I get 550 which was less than 500 with 6.1
So I guess version 8.0 has no added benefit for 290 cards but improves speed by 10% for 280x.

dzonikg28

hero member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 508

Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023

has anuone had this problem? Worked perfectly on 6.1 until i tryed 8.0 and sad "no cards detected"? tryed reset ,everything and still same message and now even on 6.1 same message..its 3*280x ..they are in device menager..tryed to mine x11 work normaly but xmr want..wtf

bonosurgut

hero member

Activity: 520

Merit: 500

best command line for 290x ? i have decrease hashrate with 8.0 in windows 8.1 with v14.6

Palad1n

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

Wow!
r9 280x (hynix) = 521 h/s stock
r9 270x (elpida) = 419 h/s overclocked
r9 290 (hynix) = 790 h/s overclocked

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 228. (Read 2145062 times)