Is there a way to set different -a modes in one rig? I have one 290 and one 5850. I tried -a 23 and -a 2,3 - it gives me only mode 3 for all cards.
Ok, I will add this feature in next update.
Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 258. (Read 2145040 times)
Ok, I will add this feature in next update.
yes, linux miner version please!!! On windows i can only manage to get up to 5 x GPU, but with BAMT it recognizes all 6 x GPU on my same board, too bad i cant use BAMT to mine Cryptocoins
In progress...
Is there a way to set different -a modes in one rig? I have one 290 and one 5850. I tried -a 23 and -a 2,3 - it gives me only mode 3 for all cards.
yes, linux miner version please!!! On windows i can only manage to get up to 5 x GPU, but with BAMT it recognizes all 6 x GPU on my same board, too bad i cant use BAMT to mine Cryptocoins
Still waiting Linux version. Any hopes?
Is there new version that works with 14.7 RC 
thanks to claymore for 6xxx cards support
+50% hashrate confirmed with 6990 now at 747h/s
+50% hashrate confirmed with 6990 now at 747h/s
Win8.1 set today and saw an interesting result: Gigabyte 7950 - 490h/s - 1100/1500/1090mV
very nice !only 390h/s for my hd7950 (elpida memory
) 1050/1400v5 stable with -li 1 (slower and unstable without)
My 5 x Club 3d 7950 cards went from around 2580 to 2620, over 520 pr. card, so i can't complain 
They are getting hot in this summerweather though, like mining scrypt.
The problem i had earlier with my 5 x 280x elpida rig, seems to be gone after i have used low intensity (-li) settings. The 16 gig memory error is gone and the rig is running stable at last
There is no significant speed increase/decrease on the 280x's.
They are getting hot in this summerweather though, like mining scrypt.
The problem i had earlier with my 5 x 280x elpida rig, seems to be gone after i have used low intensity (-li) settings. The 16 gig memory error is gone and the rig is running stable at last
There is no significant speed increase/decrease on the 280x's.
I just used the -a 1 option with my elpida cards. Does not crash unless I load to many web pages or videos. Lowers the speed from 792 to about 760. Really need to get that memory type better optomized and srable.... if thats even possible anyway
confirmed v5.0 run slower than v4.2, i'm back old version
Join Monero Pool http://hashinvest.net / EU / Low 1.5% fees
XMR mining Getting Started for Linux, Windows and Mac users.
I take care of this pool all the time. Stable pool with instant online support.
Enable desktop notifications and always stay in tune!
Instant support
HashInvest won't speculate on volatile luck and hardware.
Just stable, well-maintained pool, kind support will help your even at night.
Win8.1 set today and saw an interesting result: Gigabyte 7950 - 490h/s - 1100/1500/1090mV
edit1: Powercolor 270X - 400h/s - 1175/1500/1093mV - v4.2
edit1: Powercolor 270X - 400h/s - 1175/1500/1093mV - v4.2
I'm getting random system crashes on my older mining rig 7990, 750 ti, Athlon 64 X2, 2 gigs ram, with -a 2. Trying -li 1 right now maybe that will help. On my New computer 280(non x) it works fine
PCs are randomly freezing since 4.2, moving back to v4.0 and the issue goes away. Virtual RAM set to 16GB+ on each system
System1: 2x290x,290,7950
System2: 290x
System3: 4x280x
locking up to a point where I can't use teamviewer to reach them. 6 hours of downtime now until I can get home from work to reboot it and revert back to v4 on the one that crashed (running v5 mining dash).
System1: 2x290x,290,7950
System2: 290x
System3: 4x280x
locking up to a point where I can't use teamviewer to reach them. 6 hours of downtime now until I can get home from work to reboot it and revert back to v4 on the one that crashed (running v5 mining dash).
works great on my 6950, from 194 to 330h/s.
brought my 7950's up from 987 to 995h/s
hynix 280x's have no speed increase that i can see
elpida 280x's just crash the driver....
any chance of looking further into elpida cards claymore to see if its possible to increase thier output? my 2 7950's do 995 while my 2 gigabyte 280x's with elpida cant even break 800h/s..........
any news on update or optimizations for you cpu miner?
brought my 7950's up from 987 to 995h/s
hynix 280x's have no speed increase that i can see
elpida 280x's just crash the driver....
any chance of looking further into elpida cards claymore to see if its possible to increase thier output? my 2 7950's do 995 while my 2 gigabyte 280x's with elpida cant even break 800h/s..........
any news on update or optimizations for you cpu miner?
How to configure for 6950 ? I use version 5.0 (drivers 13-12) only run 270 h/s (core 820,mem 1250).
please help me, thanks !
i had a modded bios so mine runs 6970 specs, with OC values of 925/1425.
works great on my 6950, from 194 to 330h/s.
brought my 7950's up from 987 to 995h/s
hynix 280x's have no speed increase that i can see
elpida 280x's just crash the driver....
any chance of looking further into elpida cards claymore to see if its possible to increase thier output? my 2 7950's do 995 while my 2 gigabyte 280x's with elpida cant even break 800h/s..........
any news on update or optimizations for you cpu miner?
brought my 7950's up from 987 to 995h/s
hynix 280x's have no speed increase that i can see
elpida 280x's just crash the driver....
any chance of looking further into elpida cards claymore to see if its possible to increase thier output? my 2 7950's do 995 while my 2 gigabyte 280x's with elpida cant even break 800h/s..........
any news on update or optimizations for you cpu miner?
How to configure for 6950 ? I use version 5.0 (drivers 13-12) only run 270 h/s (core 820,mem 1250).
please help me, thanks !
welcome to our pool - http://xmr.prohash.net
stable payments
Dedicated server in the Netherlands
The low percentage - Fee: 0.5%
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://xmr.prohash.net/:7777 -u YOUR_ADDRESS -p x
with -r 1 it still crashes
Why miner find only 28 ROPs in HD7950? In this chip 32 ROPs
Why miner find only 28 ROPs in HD7950? In this chip 32 ROPs
v5.0 goes slower for me in -a mode 1 that is
4 x R9 280X used to go:
- on v4.2 1550 h/s
- on v5.0 1100 h/s (while windows is slow all the time and the driver crash, crashes and crashed.. restarting all the time after a few min)
Using -a 2 and they go 1550 h/s again
Using -a 1 -li 1 it also goes 1550 h/s
which one is better to use? they give the same speed for me anyway... -a 2 for less power usage or -a -li 1 as lower intensity (uses more power?)
-a 1 with -li 1 or just -a 2
4 x R9 280X used to go:
- on v4.2 1550 h/s
- on v5.0 1100 h/s (while windows is slow all the time and the driver crash, crashes and crashed.. restarting all the time after a few min)
Using -a 2 and they go 1550 h/s again
Using -a 1 -li 1 it also goes 1550 h/s
which one is better to use? they give the same speed for me anyway... -a 2 for less power usage or -a -li 1 as lower intensity (uses more power?)
-a 1 with -li 1 or just -a 2
I am also in this boat! Same exact findings. Thanks for the -a 1 and -li 1 options though!
i went for the -li 1 option, with -a 2 it still crashes sometimes.. and windows is slow..
with the -li 1 option it just works like v 4.2
V5 is working for me on 14.6 drivers with -a 2(-a 1 slows down my computer and ups the temps with no increase in hash)
r9 280 (non X
) 429hs (62c)
7990 (1000/1500 1.08v) 900-915hs (63-64c)
My numbers look about right? Or can I get more speed?
r9 280 (non X
) 429hs (62c)7990 (1000/1500 1.08v) 900-915hs (63-64c)
My numbers look about right? Or can I get more speed?
Jump to: