Author

Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 - page 273. (Read 2145040 times)

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
no slowdown.  Just having to maintain 2 daemons...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?
No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.
EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
That's impossible. Miners give zero shits what you tell them to hash, they just hash away. If it would lower the hashing speed, that's a problem with your implementation - not a problem with merged mining.
Yes but you have to use a special miner to mine merged crypto right ?
no

We'll test it.
It can potentially slow down because there a 2 times more blocks, right ?



not exactly sure about cryptonote coins, but i don't think so.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?
No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.
EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
That's impossible. Miners give zero shits what you tell them to hash, they just hash away. If it would lower the hashing speed, that's a problem with your implementation - not a problem with merged mining.
Yes but you have to use a special miner to mine merged crypto right ?
no

Ok then.
We'll test it.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%
It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?
No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.
EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
That's impossible. Miners give zero shits what you tell them to hash, they just hash away. If it would lower the hashing speed, that's a problem with your implementation - not a problem with merged mining.

Yes but you have to use a special miner to mine merged crypto right ?

no                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131
monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%
It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?
No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.
EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
That's impossible. Miners give zero shits what you tell them to hash, they just hash away. If it would lower the hashing speed, that's a problem with your implementation - not a problem with merged mining.

Yes but you have to use a special miner to mine merged crypto right ?
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
+1 on linux build, really need one.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Still no Linux build? Embarrassed
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I use latest claymore with my hd6870.
My pc directly crash when I launch the bat

Someone was in same situation and can help me out Huh

cheers
member
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying

Is your 6950 a 1GB or 2GB version? I have no problems with a 2GB 6950, but the 1GB version I do. The 6970 have has no issues.


hi  

6970 2go  and 6950@6970 ,no OC,  drivers still crashing  with all version of claymore :/
try  with 5 and 4 cards in same rig
try with -di 0  ...1...2...3....no effect,1 card but crash

setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://pool adreess -u wallet -p x


i d ont know what i miss :/

idem  on motherboard intel and amd ,driver 13.12  and 14.4

i m lost

here the log
2:38:36:758   964   º          Claymore XMR/QCN/FCN/BCN GPU Miner  v4.0 Beta         º
22:38:36:758   964   ÈÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍͼ
22:38:38:651   964   
Cards available: 4
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #0: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #1: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 22 units
22:38:38:651   964   GPU #2: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:666   964   GPU #3: name: Cayman, 2048 MB available, 24 units
22:38:38:666   964   Total cards: 4
22:38:38:666   964   Initializing...

22:38:38:698   964   card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:713   964   0 m = 2
22:38:38:745   964   card 1, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 176
22:38:38:745   964   1 m = 2
22:38:38:791   964   card 2, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:791   964   2 m = 2
22:38:38:823   964   card 3, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 192
22:38:38:823   964   3 m = 2
22:38:38:823   964   POOL version
22:38:38:823   964   b103
22:38:41:682   964   GPU 0: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:682   964   GPU 1: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   GPU 2: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   GPU 3: -a 1 mode selected
22:38:41:698   964   5 pools specified.
22:38:41:823   bcc   Stratum - connecting to 'duck.extremepool.org' <216.119.175.92> port 5555
22:38:41:839   bc8   Stratum - connecting to 'duck.extremepool.org' <216.119.175.92> port 5555
22:38:42:323   bcc   Stratum - Connected
22:38:42:323   bc8   Stratum - Connected
22:38:42:526   bcc   got 303 bytes
22:38:42:526   bcc   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"928043222054839","job":{"blob":"0100a5cfbc9d05b9db437416fec0049e247519e55251dd5e3754a60b9622ac7a42d98e340015130 0000000fd1f2c23019c967d0fd330f924800ed4b8544e922c501fbfaa239c87b4a8476001","job_id":"847114724223502","target":"9bc42000"},"status":"OK"}}

22:38:42:526   bcc   parse packet: 303
22:38:42:526   bcc   new buf size: 0
22:38:42:526   bcc   DevFee: Pool Diff 2000
22:38:42:542   bc8   got 303 bytes
22:38:42:542   bc8   buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"612573677813634","job":{"blob":"0100a5cfbc9d05b9db437416fec0049e247519e55251dd5e3754a60b9622ac7a42d98e340015130 0000000165cdb944c5488422862f945a85acdcde506db91a06e80bfac09b7091c46c79601","job_id":"155769770382903","target":"9bc42000"},"status":"OK"}}

22:38:42:542   bc8   parse packet: 303
22:38:42:542   bc8   new buf size: 0
22:38:42:542   bc8   Pool Diff 2000
22:38:42:542   bc8   df has same pool, skip
22:38:42:573   ae8   Round
22:38:42:573   be4   Round
22:38:42:573   77c   Round
22:38:42:573   a54   Round
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131
monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%
It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.
I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.
Do you have plans in the future to do that?

No I didn't think about it. Let me see what I can do.

EDIT : it seems that merged mining lower the overall hashing speed resulting in lower gain...
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Hi.

I am mining since several hours with a hashrate of 8.5 kh/s but i don't have any XMR in my balance or wallet .

What happen ?    the blocks request a long time to be found  ?? Huh

I assume you are on a standard CryptoNote pool, do you see your total hashes submitted increasing but not receiving any XMR? Most likely cause is pool not finding a block, you can see under the "pool blocks" menu - you will only receive XMR for green blocks that you have mined on. Small pool only finding a few blocks a day isnt bad, you still get paid much the same over a few days, just make sure you have backup pools configured in case of downtime.

If there are blocks mined but you have no XMR then something else is wrong, maybe pool admin can help you, or if you try mining on my pool http://cryptonotepool.org.uk and pm me in IRC (#monero - CryptoNotePoolUK) then I can check the pool logs for you and see if we can find the problem.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500

monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%

It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.



I would definitely mine at you pool again, if you have merge mining.

Do you have plans in the future to do that?
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1131

monero.crypto-pool.fr --> Pool Efficiency: 113%

It means that we find more blocks on average than other pools or solo miners.

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine


Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.

No, 1gb card, 1gb buffer mirrored on each core. 1gb usable mem.

I know that...
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.

No, 1gb card, 1gb buffer mirrored on each core. 1gb usable mem.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying

Is your 6950 a 1GB or 2GB version? I have no problems with a 2GB 6950, but the 1GB version I do. The 6970 have has no issues.
member
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
hi

driver still crash with this version 4  ati  6950/6970 :: crying
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

Technically that's a 2GB card, 2x 1GB 5870's.
jr. member
Activity: 90
Merit: 1
well version 4.0 and drivers 14.6 on 6950's seems to be way touchy, driver crash and thread hangs 98% of the time..... will test 4.0 on 13.12 drivers and report results.
asus 280x's 2x achieve 1068H/s at 1190-1800 and stable on 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
x2 7950's achieve 950h/s at 1145-1250 and stable with 4.0 miner with 13.12 drivers.
X2 Gb 280x's with elpida memory do 791 at stock clocks and stable with 4.0 miner and 14.6 drivers. have yet to OC to gain higher results....

Edit*
Asus 6950 runs 90% stable with v3.4 miner with 13.12 drivers. 200H/s at stock clocks, 925-1200 nets 215h/s stable.
x2 GB 280x's do 401H/s each netting 802h/s at 1170-1500, OC'ed. High OC seems to not really be worth it given the small gain's from the much higher clocks... althou its stable for now.

Works fine on a HD 6950 with 2GB of memory, but the 1GB version crashes. Seems like the old cards have to have 2GB memory  or more to run proper with the new 4.0 miner.

My 5970 with 1gb of memory works fine

please post your hashrate with a 5970, also mem/core freq, catalyst version

i get 225h/s , 880/1000 , catalyst 13.12

newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Claymore, please check 14.6 driver for AMD. I get 385 h/s per card. I use 3x270X (Sapphire Toxic)
4.0+14.6=400h/s per card (270X Sapphire-Hynix)
4.0+14.4=360h/s per card (270X Gigabyte-Elpida)
Jump to: