Pages:
Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 46. (Read 6590718 times)

jr. member
Activity: 152
Merit: 8
Well, talking about heping people with his miner. Its a liitle not fair send it to unsupported voyage. If your are rich and happy why not give your code to some developers , let them continue after you with solving at least current issues ( 4Gb Ram GPUs, new GPUs support etc.)

Silently saing I dont give a f... . Hmmm.....

The code is already available on github. So if there was a developer that was inclined to continue they should be able to do so with little effort. To support this theory there are a few unofficial version of Claymore and PhoenixMiner that reduces or eliminates the devfee. Kind of a shitty move in my opinion.
d33z0r-reloaded and digitalpara for example. Perhaps you can find them and ask them to continue their work... if they don't mind the possibility of being sued for copyright infringement.
Making these mining programs isn't a simple task. Otherwise everyone would be doing it. Developers have lives. They have professions, family, health issues, etc. They aren't genies that will just answer everyone's beck and call. So let's not look down on them for their absence. After all, it may be the very reason why they don't show up anymore. Who knows? They might still be active on this forum under a different user name. Wink

Please, point me , there mr. Claymore put the code of his miner for furfer dev.

I assume it was any message from him like " here guys , thats the code, go on with it, im giving all rights to anyone who wants it", but i suppose ive missed this message, right ?
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Well, talking about heping people with his miner. Its a liitle not fair send it to unsupported voyage. If your are rich and happy why not give your code to some developers , let them continue after you with solving at least current issues ( 4Gb Ram GPUs, new GPUs support etc.)

Silently saing I dont give a f... . Hmmm.....

The code is already available on github. So if there was a developer that was inclined to continue they should be able to do so with little effort. To support this theory there are a few unofficial version of Claymore and PhoenixMiner that reduces or eliminates the devfee. Kind of a shitty move in my opinion.
d33z0r-reloaded and digitalpara for example. Perhaps you can find them and ask them to continue their work... if they don't mind the possibility of being sued for copyright infringement.
Making these mining programs isn't a simple task. Otherwise everyone would be doing it. Developers have lives. They have professions, family, health issues, etc. They aren't genies that will just answer everyone's beck and call. So let's not look down on them for their absence. After all, it may be the very reason why they don't show up anymore. Who knows? They might still be active on this forum under a different user name. Wink
jr. member
Activity: 152
Merit: 8
Well, talking about heping people with his miner. Its a liitle not fair send it to unsupported voyage. If your are rich and happy why not give your code to some developers , let them continue after you with solving at least current issues ( 4Gb Ram GPUs, new GPUs support etc.)

Silently saing I dont give a f... . Hmmm.....
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 6
I agree. But some people will never be satisfied. If they had their way the developers would be dragged back out of retirement and forced to spend hours or days to rewrite their code from scrap in hopes that their RX 570's that are currently hashing at 32MH/s will be stable at 34MH/s. Some people just don't know how much work goes into it and thus don't respect it.
My opinion is that it works fine and I thank the developers. Claymore and Phoenix.

Developers would be back out of retirement only if they see their e-wallets have remained unchanged for couple of weeks!

Then, they know something has gone wrong affecting their labours - so time to get back to work! Grin
jr. member
Activity: 60
Merit: 2
The negative powlim is to reduce the amount of electricity the card uses to mine.  Reducing the powlim will save you on ur electric bill and will also reduce the amount of heat (temp) of the card.  Its all about finding the right efficiency with these GPUs. 

Thanks I appreciate that help and explanation.  Definitely helps in getting all this started.
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?

If it ain’t broken ...!! Grin

Exactly. In my opinion it's because previous updates yielded better results so people like him are hoping for a huge improvement each time and can never get enough. Yet they don't understand that there will always be limitations which are mostly due to the drivers or the equipment itself. Not everything relies on the developer. If it was up to them they would make my GTX 1070's hash at 100MH/s with only 50w from the wall. But it's simply not possible. Yet some people think that with each update it might bring it ever so closer to being a possibility. It's very likely that the program has reached it's most optimal potential already. Yet... they persist that there will always be another which will outshine the previous versions. And so on, so forth.

Based on my experience with updates this isn't always the case. Examples being updates with Windows 10 operating systems. On rare occasions it makes thing so much worse! Or updates to your cellphone operating system. Sometimes drivers or bios for hardware can get botched and mess something up. All because people were crying for an update.

Bottom line, leave good enough alone. There are only so many ways to make a wheel.
Seriously, Claymore is making a fortune based on the work that he already did. What else is he obligated to do? Whether he improves his software or not he's making pretty good money from our 1% devfee's and he doesn't even have to log on to play Tech Support. He can retire... or as Digital_Seytan asked... die (let's hope not) and still have a very nice and somewhat stable income.

Well said and 100% agreed with everything there.

I am not sure why some folks are a little concerned with 1% dev fees. I like how Claymore (and others) remind us .. “if you don’t like it, don’t use it”!

Simple. Write your own mining code and save your 1%. Smiley

But, the fact is many of us are not capable of doing that! So, it’s a fair business!

My problem however is with those wanna-be coders who have copied from certain open-source APIs / codes, closed source theirs and charge 4 times more - and you can’t even keep your rigs up and running for an hour straight!!

Those folks never see a penny (??) from me no matter how much I love certain coins. Instead, I buy them directly!!

Both Claymore and Phoenix deserve to enjoy early retirement! Grin

I agree. But some people will never be satisfied. If they had their way the developers would be dragged back out of retirement and forced to spend hours or days to rewrite their code from scrap in hopes that their RX 570's that are currently hashing at 32MH/s will be stable at 34MH/s. Some people just don't know how much work goes into it and thus don't respect it.
My opinion is that it works fine and I thank the developers. Claymore and Phoenix.
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 6
Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?

If it ain’t broken ...!! Grin

Exactly. In my opinion it's because previous updates yielded better results so people like him are hoping for a huge improvement each time and can never get enough. Yet they don't understand that there will always be limitations which are mostly due to the drivers or the equipment itself. Not everything relies on the developer. If it was up to them they would make my GTX 1070's hash at 100MH/s with only 50w from the wall. But it's simply not possible. Yet some people think that with each update it might bring it ever so closer to being a possibility. It's very likely that the program has reached it's most optimal potential already. Yet... they persist that there will always be another which will outshine the previous versions. And so on, so forth.

Based on my experience with updates this isn't always the case. Examples being updates with Windows 10 operating systems. On rare occasions it makes thing so much worse! Or updates to your cellphone operating system. Sometimes drivers or bios for hardware can get botched and mess something up. All because people were crying for an update.

Bottom line, leave good enough alone. There are only so many ways to make a wheel.
Seriously, Claymore is making a fortune based on the work that he already did. What else is he obligated to do? Whether he improves his software or not he's making pretty good money from our 1% devfee's and he doesn't even have to log on to play Tech Support. He can retire... or as Digital_Seytan asked... die (let's hope not) and still have a very nice and somewhat stable income.

Well said and 100% agreed with everything there.

I am not sure why some folks are a little concerned with 1% dev fees. I like how Claymore (and others) remind us .. “if you don’t like it, don’t use it”!

Simple. Write your own mining code and save your 1%. Smiley

But, the fact is many of us are not capable of doing that! So, it’s a fair business!

My problem however is with those wanna-be coders who have copied from certain open-source APIs / codes, closed source theirs and charge 4 times more - and you can’t even keep your rigs up and running for an hour straight!!

Those folks never see a penny (??) from me no matter how much I love certain coins. Instead, I buy them directly!!

Both Claymore and Phoenix deserve to enjoy early retirement! Grin
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?

If it ain’t broken ...!! Grin

Exactly. In my opinion it's because previous updates yielded better results so people like him are hoping for a huge improvement each time and can never get enough. Yet they don't understand that there will always be limitations which are mostly due to the drivers or the equipment itself. Not everything relies on the developer. If it was up to them they would make my GTX 1070's hash at 100MH/s with only 50w from the wall. But it's simply not possible. Yet some people think that with each update it might bring it ever so closer to being a possibility. It's very likely that the program has reached it's most optimal potential already. Yet... they persist that there will always be another which will outshine the previous versions. And so on, so forth.

Based on my experience with updates this isn't always the case. Examples being updates with Windows 10 operating systems. On rare occasions it makes thing so much worse! Or updates to your cellphone operating system. Sometimes drivers or bios for hardware can get botched and mess something up. All because people were crying for an update.

Bottom line, leave good enough alone. There are only so many ways to make a wheel.
Seriously, Claymore is making a fortune based on the work that he already did. What else is he obligated to do? Whether he improves his software or not he's making pretty good money from our 1% devfee's and he doesn't even have to log on to play Tech Support. He can retire... or as Digital_Seytan asked... die (let's hope not) and still have a very nice and somewhat stable income.
jr. member
Activity: 84
Merit: 6
Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?

If it ain’t broken ...!! Grin
member
Activity: 180
Merit: 10
Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?

Maybe. You've been asking for at least two months now and he hasn't answered you.
What updates are you hoping for? There are other people here that can help you with basic questions if you need something. Is it something that only the dev can fix for you?

If it's just because you haven't had an update then perhaps stop using the program. That way his dev fee gets cut and he'll be forced to develop again. Meanwhile, he's still getting hundreds if not thousands of dollars a day from it.
jr. member
Activity: 222
Merit: 2
 Huh  ShockedHuh Huh Huh Shocked Huh Huh Huh

Why no update claymore miner is the dev dead ?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
hash decreased from 32 Mh/s to 22 Mh/s. I have two cards : Nvidia GTX 1070it.
How to solve this problem ?
jr. member
Activity: 155
Merit: 6
The negative powlim is to reduce the amount of electricity the card uses to mine.  Reducing the powlim will save you on ur electric bill and will also reduce the amount of heat (temp) of the card.  Its all about finding the right efficiency with these GPUs. 
jr. member
Activity: 60
Merit: 2
New to mining, but have my rig setup and it's currently mining away.

12 x MSI/AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)

I'm reading through a number of posts and I'm seeing that my hashrate is really low per card compared to what others are mentioning.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 122.407 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 10.192 Mh/s, GPU1 10.197 Mh/s, GPU2 10.227 Mh/s, GPU3 10.205 Mh/s, GPU4 10.205 Mh/s, GPU5 10.201 Mh/s, GPU6 10.195 Mh/s,
GPU7 10.191 Mh/s, GPU8 10.219 Mh/s, GPU9 10.202 Mh/s, GPU10 10.183 Mh/s, GPU11 10.191 Mh/s

Here's claymore's report on my system
Code:
GPU0 t=59C fan=91% P=99W, GPU1 t=56C fan=88% P=98W, GPU2 t=56C fan=91% P=97W, GPU3 t=51C fan=90% P=96W, GPU4 t=56C fan=90%
 P=98W, GPU5 t=57C fan=91% P=99W, GPU6 t=52C fan=92% P=101W, GPU7 t=54C fan=89% P=96W, GPU8 t=55C fan=90% P=98W, GPU9 t=58C
 fan=91% P=87W, GPU10 t=54C fan=91% P=90W, GPU11 t=62C fan=92% P=102W
Total GPUs power consumption: 1161 Watts

I've downloaded the most recent version of the AMD drivers.  
When I initially ran claymore I did have to run the command "-drivers uninstall" as it was telling me a problem with that.  Did that and that error has gone away during startup of mining.
I'm thinking the next step is to overclock?  But even with my gaming machine I'm touchy about that due to the damage it could inflict. Is there an app that will test where I can safely set it up to?

Have you switched to Compute mode instead of Graphics mode on the amd drivers?  If you haven't do it for each gpu.  Don't worry about overclocking.  Just don't put the memory over 2250.  so set powerlimit to -10, cclock 1150-1200 mclock 2100-2250.  If you go to 2250 and it starts getting invalid shares, back the memory down to 2225, 2200, 2175 ect, until it is stable.  Also at one of the -straps to ur command line to apply good bios timings to maximize cards potential.  

I hadn't actually switched to compute mode.  So I'll add [-y 1] but will do that for all cards automatically or do I need to list 0 to b?
I'll add the other recommendations
-powlim -10
-cclock 1200
-mclock 2250
and I'll try [-strap 1]

MOdified mclock to 2200 after a couple lockups.

Slightly better hashrate, but still not what I was expecting.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 142.059 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 11.837 Mh/s, GPU1 11.837 Mh/s, GPU2 11.826 Mh/s, GPU3 11.844 Mh/s, GPU4 11.845 Mh/s, GPU5 11.829 Mh/s, GPU6 11.830 Mh/s, GPU7 11.844 Mh/s, GPU8 11.854 Mh/s, GPU9 11.826 Mh/s, GPU10 11.849 Mh/s, GPU11 11.838 Mh/s

GPU0 t=52C fan=93% P=70W, GPU1 t=50C fan=92% P=69W, GPU2 t=50C fan=94% P=68W, GPU3 t=46C fan=93% P=69W, GPU4 t=50C fan=93% P=70W, GPU5 t=50C fan=94% P=70W, GPU6 t=47C fan=94% P=71W, GPU7 t=48C fan=92% P=68W, GPU8 t=51C fan=94% P=70W, GPU9 t=51C fan=94% P=67W, GPU10 t=49C fan=94% P=67W, GPU11 t=54C fan=95% P=71W
Total GPUs power consumption: 830 Watts

To help further with your recommendations I figure I should add my BAT file.

Code:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://us2.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal [ewallet#] -eworker bigdog1 -dbg -1 -mport 3333 -mpsw [secret#] -etha 0 -tt 80 -tstop 90 -eres 0 -rxboost 1 -y 1 -powlim -10 -cclock 1200 -mclock 2200 -strap 1

pause

It doesn't appear that compute mode was enabled successfully. In order to enable compute mode you need to have ran the miner/bat file as admin. It's not just right click and run as administrator. You have to open the command line as administrator, path to the folder (Cd \folder\miner location\) run the .bat file from the command windows. After it runs for about a min, reboot your pc. Then you won't need to run it as administrator the next time. You should see hashrates in the high 28MH/s when done correctly.

Thanks for that.  That was the apparent issue.  After you mentioned it I did some digging and learned I needed to open the AMD software and the setting was still set to GRAPHICS and not COMPUTE.  So I fixed that.
Then I went back and re-ran my bat file as a proper admin and it's now hashing better.
Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 279.807 Mh/s, Total Shares: 175, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:44
ETH: GPU0 23.322 Mh/s, GPU1 23.318 Mh/s, GPU2 23.321 Mh/s, GPU3 23.310 Mh/s, GPU4 23.318 Mh/s, GPU5 23.308 Mh/s, GPU6 23.323 Mh/s,
 GPU7 23.314 Mh/s, GPU8 23.320 Mh/s, GPU9 23.311 Mh/s, GPU10 23.323 Mh/s, GPU11 23.319 Mh/s

I had to remove the powlim, cclock, mclock and strap settings as they kept crashing Windows.

I guess the question I have at this point is, is this the highest hashrate I should see out of my cards?  Should I be expecting more?
After removing the mclock and cclock settings I have played around with the MSI Afterburner app settings.  I don't know if they affect Claymore the same or not.  I seem to get a lot less errors out of it at least.
Currently the afterburner settings are;
power Limit +30
temp limit 90   (does this automatically with the increase in power)
core clock 1360
mem clock 1904
fan speed 100


Now that you have it in compute mode that will help in your efficiency.  no just do the following settings in bat.file and don't even use MSI afterburner.  -10 powlim cclock 1200 cvddc 820 mclock 2150 mvddc 900.  Give rxboost 1 and -strap 1 another try.  If that crashes the system try just -strap 1 without rxboost to see if it is stable.  All these cards should be in the 29-31mhs range.

Thanks, that just made a huge difference.  I'm now at 32.2mhs

Though I'm just looking back and I made a typo in my bat file and wrote   [-powlim +18]  instead of [-powlim -10]

why is it that it's typically a negative number?  I've seen this in a couple places and just wondering
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 102
Well according to,

https://etherscan.io/chart/hashrate

The hashrate is completely constant so most likely he has some 4GB GPUs and he is getting slower speeds with them due to the DAG limit being hit on the 4GB cards.

Like it was discussed in this thread many times, nothing to do but downgrade to Windows 7 or Switch to Linux or sell the 4GB and buy a 8GB instead. However most likely due to the low profitability nobody will want to go thru the hassle of doing that.


Have a couple of dozen 4Gb's , hashing at the same speed as before. So its about something else. And agree , selling 4Gbs for buying 8Gbs is nothing but pain and suffer Smiley ( done it few times not long ago ). We will see tons of 4Gbs very soon on second hand market.

BR.
I am happy I made the decision to only buy 8GB cards when I started. It has paid off wisely. I had a few friends that just bought what they could get and then had to sell when the DAG started to swell.
jr. member
Activity: 152
Merit: 8
Well according to,

https://etherscan.io/chart/hashrate

The hashrate is completely constant so most likely he has some 4GB GPUs and he is getting slower speeds with them due to the DAG limit being hit on the 4GB cards.

Like it was discussed in this thread many times, nothing to do but downgrade to Windows 7 or Switch to Linux or sell the 4GB and buy a 8GB instead. However most likely due to the low profitability nobody will want to go thru the hassle of doing that.


Have a couple of dozen 4Gb's , hashing at the same speed as before. So its about something else. And agree , selling 4Gbs for buying 8Gbs is nothing but pain and suffer Smiley ( done it few times not long ago ). We will see tons of 4Gbs very soon on second hand market.

BR.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
Well according to,

https://etherscan.io/chart/hashrate

The hashrate is completely constant so most likely he has some 4GB GPUs and he is getting slower speeds with them due to the DAG limit being hit on the 4GB cards.

Like it was discussed in this thread many times, nothing to do but downgrade to Windows 7 or Switch to Linux or sell the 4GB and buy a 8GB instead. However most likely due to the low profitability nobody will want to go thru the hassle of doing that.
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 102
Actual ETH hashrate felt down 10-15% in the last two days. Is this a common cause?
Are you talking about network hashrate or your hashrate on your cards over the last few days?
full member
Activity: 474
Merit: 101
Actual ETH hashrate felt down 10-15% in the last two days. Is this a common cause?
jr. member
Activity: 155
Merit: 6
New to mining, but have my rig setup and it's currently mining away.

12 x MSI/AMD Radeon RX 570 (8GB)

I'm reading through a number of posts and I'm seeing that my hashrate is really low per card compared to what others are mentioning.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 122.407 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 10.192 Mh/s, GPU1 10.197 Mh/s, GPU2 10.227 Mh/s, GPU3 10.205 Mh/s, GPU4 10.205 Mh/s, GPU5 10.201 Mh/s, GPU6 10.195 Mh/s,
GPU7 10.191 Mh/s, GPU8 10.219 Mh/s, GPU9 10.202 Mh/s, GPU10 10.183 Mh/s, GPU11 10.191 Mh/s

Here's claymore's report on my system
Code:
GPU0 t=59C fan=91% P=99W, GPU1 t=56C fan=88% P=98W, GPU2 t=56C fan=91% P=97W, GPU3 t=51C fan=90% P=96W, GPU4 t=56C fan=90%
 P=98W, GPU5 t=57C fan=91% P=99W, GPU6 t=52C fan=92% P=101W, GPU7 t=54C fan=89% P=96W, GPU8 t=55C fan=90% P=98W, GPU9 t=58C
 fan=91% P=87W, GPU10 t=54C fan=91% P=90W, GPU11 t=62C fan=92% P=102W
Total GPUs power consumption: 1161 Watts

I've downloaded the most recent version of the AMD drivers.  
When I initially ran claymore I did have to run the command "-drivers uninstall" as it was telling me a problem with that.  Did that and that error has gone away during startup of mining.
I'm thinking the next step is to overclock?  But even with my gaming machine I'm touchy about that due to the damage it could inflict. Is there an app that will test where I can safely set it up to?

Have you switched to Compute mode instead of Graphics mode on the amd drivers?  If you haven't do it for each gpu.  Don't worry about overclocking.  Just don't put the memory over 2250.  so set powerlimit to -10, cclock 1150-1200 mclock 2100-2250.  If you go to 2250 and it starts getting invalid shares, back the memory down to 2225, 2200, 2175 ect, until it is stable.  Also at one of the -straps to ur command line to apply good bios timings to maximize cards potential.  

I hadn't actually switched to compute mode.  So I'll add [-y 1] but will do that for all cards automatically or do I need to list 0 to b?
I'll add the other recommendations
-powlim -10
-cclock 1200
-mclock 2250
and I'll try [-strap 1]

MOdified mclock to 2200 after a couple lockups.

Slightly better hashrate, but still not what I was expecting.

Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 142.059 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 11.837 Mh/s, GPU1 11.837 Mh/s, GPU2 11.826 Mh/s, GPU3 11.844 Mh/s, GPU4 11.845 Mh/s, GPU5 11.829 Mh/s, GPU6 11.830 Mh/s, GPU7 11.844 Mh/s, GPU8 11.854 Mh/s, GPU9 11.826 Mh/s, GPU10 11.849 Mh/s, GPU11 11.838 Mh/s

GPU0 t=52C fan=93% P=70W, GPU1 t=50C fan=92% P=69W, GPU2 t=50C fan=94% P=68W, GPU3 t=46C fan=93% P=69W, GPU4 t=50C fan=93% P=70W, GPU5 t=50C fan=94% P=70W, GPU6 t=47C fan=94% P=71W, GPU7 t=48C fan=92% P=68W, GPU8 t=51C fan=94% P=70W, GPU9 t=51C fan=94% P=67W, GPU10 t=49C fan=94% P=67W, GPU11 t=54C fan=95% P=71W
Total GPUs power consumption: 830 Watts

To help further with your recommendations I figure I should add my BAT file.

Code:
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool ssl://us2.ethermine.org:5555 -ewal [ewallet#] -eworker bigdog1 -dbg -1 -mport 3333 -mpsw [secret#] -etha 0 -tt 80 -tstop 90 -eres 0 -rxboost 1 -y 1 -powlim -10 -cclock 1200 -mclock 2200 -strap 1

pause

It doesn't appear that compute mode was enabled successfully. In order to enable compute mode you need to have ran the miner/bat file as admin. It's not just right click and run as administrator. You have to open the command line as administrator, path to the folder (Cd \folder\miner location\) run the .bat file from the command windows. After it runs for about a min, reboot your pc. Then you won't need to run it as administrator the next time. You should see hashrates in the high 28MH/s when done correctly.

Thanks for that.  That was the apparent issue.  After you mentioned it I did some digging and learned I needed to open the AMD software and the setting was still set to GRAPHICS and not COMPUTE.  So I fixed that.
Then I went back and re-ran my bat file as a proper admin and it's now hashing better.
Code:
ETH - Total Speed: 279.807 Mh/s, Total Shares: 175, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:44
ETH: GPU0 23.322 Mh/s, GPU1 23.318 Mh/s, GPU2 23.321 Mh/s, GPU3 23.310 Mh/s, GPU4 23.318 Mh/s, GPU5 23.308 Mh/s, GPU6 23.323 Mh/s,
 GPU7 23.314 Mh/s, GPU8 23.320 Mh/s, GPU9 23.311 Mh/s, GPU10 23.323 Mh/s, GPU11 23.319 Mh/s

I had to remove the powlim, cclock, mclock and strap settings as they kept crashing Windows.

I guess the question I have at this point is, is this the highest hashrate I should see out of my cards?  Should I be expecting more?
After removing the mclock and cclock settings I have played around with the MSI Afterburner app settings.  I don't know if they affect Claymore the same or not.  I seem to get a lot less errors out of it at least.
Currently the afterburner settings are;
power Limit +30
temp limit 90   (does this automatically with the increase in power)
core clock 1360
mem clock 1904
fan speed 100


Now that you have it in compute mode that will help in your efficiency.  no just do the following settings in bat.file and don't even use MSI afterburner.  -10 powlim cclock 1200 cvddc 820 mclock 2150 mvddc 900.  Give rxboost 1 and -strap 1 another try.  If that crashes the system try just -strap 1 without rxboost to see if it is stable.  All these cards should be in the 29-31mhs range.
Pages:
Jump to: