try mining with no dev fee and see if it helps
I'll try this, but I would rather be able to mine with fee. 
Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 475. (Read 6590565 times)
January 16, 2018, 03:29:28 PM
January 16, 2018, 03:10:55 PM
DevFee connecting to ethermine crashes miner:
When DevFee connects to dwarfpool it works fine.
What can I do to fix this?
try mining with no dev fee and see if it helps Code:
ETH: Stratum - Cannot connect to us1.ethermine.org:4444
DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
30 seconds of dual mining success
Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
Rebooting
When this happens my entire rig reboots.DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
30 seconds of dual mining success
Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
Rebooting
When DevFee connects to dwarfpool it works fine.
Code:
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:06 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (101 ms)!
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-us-eastl.nanopool.org:9999 ETH - Total Speed: ...
ETH: GPUO ...
LBC - Total Speed:...
DevFee: stop mining and disconnect
Because of this both me and the developer are losing mining time.DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (101 ms)!
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-us-eastl.nanopool.org:9999 ETH - Total Speed: ...
ETH: GPUO ...
LBC - Total Speed:...
DevFee: stop mining and disconnect
What can I do to fix this?
January 16, 2018, 02:47:29 PM
DevFee connecting to ethermine crashes miner:
When DevFee connects to dwarfpool it works fine.
What can I do to fix this?
Code:
ETH: Stratum - Cannot connect to us1.ethermine.org:4444
DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
30 seconds of dual mining success
Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
Rebooting
When this happens my entire rig reboots.DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
30 seconds of dual mining success
Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
Rebooting
When DevFee connects to dwarfpool it works fine.
Code:
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:06 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (101 ms)!
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-us-eastl.nanopool.org:9999 ETH - Total Speed: ...
ETH: GPUO ...
LBC - Total Speed:...
DevFee: stop mining and disconnect
Because of this both me and the developer are losing mining time.DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ETH: Share accepted (101 ms)!
DevFee: ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 01/12/18-16:16:12 - New job from eth-us-eastl.nanopool.org:9999 ETH - Total Speed: ...
ETH: GPUO ...
LBC - Total Speed:...
DevFee: stop mining and disconnect
What can I do to fix this?
January 16, 2018, 02:08:54 PM
Hi,
I'm new here, I don't know if other have this problem.
Mining just ethereum work great, really stable for days at fast rate.
Dual with lbry make the rig crash/reboot every 2-5 minutes or so... max I got was 17 minutes
I also re-flash with original bios, without OC and it's still rebooting...
my rig:
-win 10
-Biostar Motherboard TB250-BTC Core
-4x sapphire nitro+ rx 570 8gb samsung
-2x sapphire nitro+ rx 570 8gb hynix
-4gb ram
-120G ssd
-virtual memory 20-60gb (I know it's excessive)
one thing I found interresting is when claymore dual is used by nicehash, the computer doesn't reboot.
I also tried the -ethi 2 option without change.
tried 10.0 10.3 and 10.4
I tried for many hours, but I'll mine just ethereum untill it's stable for me.
I can try things if you want. Will sure try the next version. But want to informe you in case it help.
here the last part of logfile...
thank you!
I'm new here, I don't know if other have this problem.
Mining just ethereum work great, really stable for days at fast rate.
Dual with lbry make the rig crash/reboot every 2-5 minutes or so... max I got was 17 minutes
I also re-flash with original bios, without OC and it's still rebooting...
my rig:
-win 10
-Biostar Motherboard TB250-BTC Core
-4x sapphire nitro+ rx 570 8gb samsung
-2x sapphire nitro+ rx 570 8gb hynix
-4gb ram
-120G ssd
-virtual memory 20-60gb (I know it's excessive)
one thing I found interresting is when claymore dual is used by nicehash, the computer doesn't reboot.
I also tried the -ethi 2 option without change.
tried 10.0 10.3 and 10.4
I tried for many hours, but I'll mine just ethereum untill it's stable for me.
I can try things if you want. Will sure try the next version. But want to informe you in case it help.
here the last part of logfile...
thank you!
Code:
09:22:54:907 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:22:54:907 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:22:55:017 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:22:55:017 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x39fa8daae61ea9271acb4e190cfa33638ff5c908cded462db2fc75c7af23cc51","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:22:55:032 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:22:55:032 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:22:55:032 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:22:56:220 1e94 LBC: put share nonce 93a5ed enonce 98d
09:22:56:236 1e94 LBC round found 1 shares
09:22:56:251 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:22:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:22:56:251 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "8d090000", "5a5e0aa2", "0093a5ed"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:22:56:283 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:22:56:283 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:22:56:283 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:22:56:283 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (16 ms)!
09:22:56:298 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:04:924 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:04:924 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:05:049 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:05:049 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x39fa8daae61ea9271acb4e190cfa33638ff5c908cded462db2fc75c7af23cc51","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:05:049 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:05:049 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:05:065 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:10:346 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:10:346 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf52876b64c18f696f331750fa60d61aaa3735b479e57b81c6c3b09d48e4edf03","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:10:346 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:10:346 1ea0 ETH: job changed
09:23:10:362 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:10:362 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:10 - New job from eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999
09:23:10:362 1ea0 target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 163(2.27GB)
09:23:10:378 1ea0 ETH - Total Speed: 174.988 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
09:23:10:378 1ea0 ETH: GPU0 28.119 Mh/s, GPU1 29.672 Mh/s, GPU2 29.690 Mh/s, GPU3 29.692 Mh/s, GPU4 29.700 Mh/s, GPU5 28.115 Mh/s
09:23:10:378 1ea0 LBC - Total Speed: 448.404 Mh/s, Total Shares: 6, Rejected: 0
09:23:10:378 1ea0 LBC: GPU0 72.054 Mh/s, GPU1 76.034 Mh/s, GPU2 76.081 Mh/s, GPU3 76.086 Mh/s, GPU4 76.106 Mh/s, GPU5 72.043 Mh/s
09:23:10:596 1e84 LBC: put share nonce 6229b8 enonce e45
09:23:10:612 1e84 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:10:628 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
09:23:10:628 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "450e0000", "5a5e0aa2", "006229b8"], "id": 12, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:10:659 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:10:659 1eb0 buf: {"id":12,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:10:659 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:10:659 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:10:674 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:14:003 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:14:003 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:14:003 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:14:019 1ea0 ETH: job changed
09:23:14:019 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:14:019 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:14 - New job from eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999
09:23:14:019 1ea0 target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 163(2.27GB)
09:23:14:034 1ea0 ETH - Total Speed: 173.727 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
09:23:14:034 1ea0 ETH: GPU0 27.865 Mh/s, GPU1 29.571 Mh/s, GPU2 29.407 Mh/s, GPU3 29.407 Mh/s, GPU4 29.584 Mh/s, GPU5 27.893 Mh/s
09:23:14:034 1ea0 LBC - Total Speed: 445.172 Mh/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0
09:23:14:050 1ea0 LBC: GPU0 71.403 Mh/s, GPU1 75.776 Mh/s, GPU2 75.356 Mh/s, GPU3 75.354 Mh/s, GPU4 75.808 Mh/s, GPU5 71.475 Mh/s
09:23:14:675 1e24 em hbt: 15, dm hbt: 15, fm hbt: 62,
09:23:14:675 1e24 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 140
09:23:14:691 1e24 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 94
09:23:14:691 1e24 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 16
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 109
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 78
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 15
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 6 (gpu3), hb time 78
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 7 (gpu3), hb time 31
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 8 (gpu4), hb time 125
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 9 (gpu4), hb time 62
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 10 (gpu5), hb time 47
09:23:14:737 1e24 watchdog - thread 11 (gpu5), hb time 141
09:23:14:894 1ea0 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xa04a645", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004c5d5488"]}
09:23:14:941 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:14:941 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:15:050 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:15:066 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:15:066 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:15:066 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:15:112 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:15:831 1e7c LBC: put share nonce 1fedd4 enonce fe7
09:23:15:831 1e7c LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:15:847 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:15 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
09:23:15:847 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "e70f0000", "5a5e0aa2", "001fedd4"], "id": 11, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:15:878 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:15:878 1eb0 buf: {"id":11,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:15:878 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:15:878 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
09:23:15:894 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:19:582 1e88 ETH: put share nonce ad68f22c0965c4a5
09:23:19:597 1e88 ETH round found 1 shares
09:23:19:613 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
09:23:19:613 1ea0 send: {"id":13,"method":"eth_submitWork","params":["0xad68f22c0965c4a5","0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xd23d945fd9c7ec7f2baa1449d9efb5184d3a56d4b8d101651bd763296c1f64cd"]}
09:23:19:738 1ea0 got 40 bytes
09:23:19:738 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":13,"result":true}
09:23:19:754 1ea0 parse packet: 39
09:23:19:769 1ea0 ETH: Share accepted (156 ms)!
09:23:19:769 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:20:660 1eb0 got 649 bytes
09:23:20:660 1eb0 buf: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["9c21","777aa9cb6e50a36f3870ee91bf56d240673fe4bcca0eaf59e414bb261ed2a8ad","dc093acdf48832de3c94cfd0c710b6f172d694488985161e332dca93af5d4fd1","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff1d0368ac0404d90a5e5a08","0a2f436f696e4d696e652f0000000001e07823c1080000001976a9140f67e4482043a67dc028142eba63ba77a509c3d388ac00000000",["a344233225b4abac438740605ccdd3fcfae183dc9b4d22c2504d0334e6440b39","86b4f6de38cbfebadf4f114144055ee66cf15c17f6c8c4066928cf8ed356de2d","4e8d54e9533c59653ec5edaaa85dae36f970d49e615374a3c2a9e4142c9c56ef"],"20000000","1a0aafc9","5a5e0ad9",false]}
09:23:20:660 1eb0 parse packet: 648
09:23:20:676 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:20:676 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:20 - New job from lbc.coinmine.pl:8787
09:23:20:676 1eb0 target: 0x00000000ffff0000 (diff: 4295MH)
09:23:21:504 1e94 LBC: put share nonce 39a53f enonce 39
09:23:21:504 1e94 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:21:519 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:23:21:519 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "39000000", "5a5e0ad9", "0039a53f"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:21:551 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:21:551 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:21:551 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:21:551 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
09:23:21:566 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:23:535 1e28 GPU0 t=61C fan=49%, GPU1 t=57C fan=42%, GPU2 t=55C fan=37%, GPU3 t=59C fan=47%, GPU4 t=58C fan=47%, GPU5 t=58C fan=43%
09:23:24:957 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:24:957 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:25:067 1e90 LBC: put share nonce 20c96a enonce 158
09:23:25:082 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:25:082 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:25:098 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:25:098 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:25:114 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:25:114 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:23:25:114 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "58010000", "5a5e0ad9", "0020c96a"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:25:082 1e90 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:25:145 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:25:145 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:25:145 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:25:145 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (16 ms)!
09:23:25:160 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:28:614 1e7c LBC: put share nonce 8695b6 enonce 27f
09:23:28:614 1e7c LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:28:630 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
09:23:28:630 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "7f020000", "5a5e0ad9", "008695b6"], "id": 11, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:28:661 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:28:661 1eb0 buf: {"id":11,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:28:661 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:28:661 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:28:676 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:30:317 1e84 LBC: put share nonce 66f32b enonce 311
09:23:30:317 1e84 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:30:333 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
09:23:30:333 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "11030000", "5a5e0ad9", "0066f32b"], "id": 12, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:30:364 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:30:364 1eb0 buf: {"id":12,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:30:364 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:30:364 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:30:380 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:34:911 1ea0 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xa543fb3", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004c5d5488"]}
09:23:34:974 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:34:974 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:35:099 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:35:099 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:35:115 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:35:115 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:35:130 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:22:54:907 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:22:55:017 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:22:55:017 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x39fa8daae61ea9271acb4e190cfa33638ff5c908cded462db2fc75c7af23cc51","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:22:55:032 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:22:55:032 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:22:55:032 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:22:56:220 1e94 LBC: put share nonce 93a5ed enonce 98d
09:22:56:236 1e94 LBC round found 1 shares
09:22:56:251 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:22:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:22:56:251 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "8d090000", "5a5e0aa2", "0093a5ed"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:22:56:283 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:22:56:283 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:22:56:283 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:22:56:283 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (16 ms)!
09:22:56:298 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:04:924 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:04:924 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:05:049 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:05:049 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x39fa8daae61ea9271acb4e190cfa33638ff5c908cded462db2fc75c7af23cc51","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:05:049 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:05:049 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:05:065 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:10:346 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:10:346 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xf52876b64c18f696f331750fa60d61aaa3735b479e57b81c6c3b09d48e4edf03","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:10:346 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:10:346 1ea0 ETH: job changed
09:23:10:362 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:10:362 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:10 - New job from eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999
09:23:10:362 1ea0 target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 163(2.27GB)
09:23:10:378 1ea0 ETH - Total Speed: 174.988 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
09:23:10:378 1ea0 ETH: GPU0 28.119 Mh/s, GPU1 29.672 Mh/s, GPU2 29.690 Mh/s, GPU3 29.692 Mh/s, GPU4 29.700 Mh/s, GPU5 28.115 Mh/s
09:23:10:378 1ea0 LBC - Total Speed: 448.404 Mh/s, Total Shares: 6, Rejected: 0
09:23:10:378 1ea0 LBC: GPU0 72.054 Mh/s, GPU1 76.034 Mh/s, GPU2 76.081 Mh/s, GPU3 76.086 Mh/s, GPU4 76.106 Mh/s, GPU5 72.043 Mh/s
09:23:10:596 1e84 LBC: put share nonce 6229b8 enonce e45
09:23:10:612 1e84 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:10:628 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
09:23:10:628 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "450e0000", "5a5e0aa2", "006229b8"], "id": 12, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:10:659 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:10:659 1eb0 buf: {"id":12,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:10:659 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:10:659 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:10:674 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:14:003 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:14:003 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:14:003 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:14:019 1ea0 ETH: job changed
09:23:14:019 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:14:019 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:14 - New job from eth-us-east1.nanopool.org:9999
09:23:14:019 1ea0 target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 163(2.27GB)
09:23:14:034 1ea0 ETH - Total Speed: 173.727 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
09:23:14:034 1ea0 ETH: GPU0 27.865 Mh/s, GPU1 29.571 Mh/s, GPU2 29.407 Mh/s, GPU3 29.407 Mh/s, GPU4 29.584 Mh/s, GPU5 27.893 Mh/s
09:23:14:034 1ea0 LBC - Total Speed: 445.172 Mh/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0
09:23:14:050 1ea0 LBC: GPU0 71.403 Mh/s, GPU1 75.776 Mh/s, GPU2 75.356 Mh/s, GPU3 75.354 Mh/s, GPU4 75.808 Mh/s, GPU5 71.475 Mh/s
09:23:14:675 1e24 em hbt: 15, dm hbt: 15, fm hbt: 62,
09:23:14:675 1e24 watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 140
09:23:14:691 1e24 watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 94
09:23:14:691 1e24 watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 16
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 109
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 78
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 15
09:23:14:706 1e24 watchdog - thread 6 (gpu3), hb time 78
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 7 (gpu3), hb time 31
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 8 (gpu4), hb time 125
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 9 (gpu4), hb time 62
09:23:14:722 1e24 watchdog - thread 10 (gpu5), hb time 47
09:23:14:737 1e24 watchdog - thread 11 (gpu5), hb time 141
09:23:14:894 1ea0 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xa04a645", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004c5d5488"]}
09:23:14:941 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:14:941 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:15:050 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:15:066 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:15:066 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:15:066 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:15:112 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:15:831 1e7c LBC: put share nonce 1fedd4 enonce fe7
09:23:15:831 1e7c LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:15:847 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:15 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
09:23:15:847 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c20", "e70f0000", "5a5e0aa2", "001fedd4"], "id": 11, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:15:878 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:15:878 1eb0 buf: {"id":11,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:15:878 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:15:878 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
09:23:15:894 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:19:582 1e88 ETH: put share nonce ad68f22c0965c4a5
09:23:19:597 1e88 ETH round found 1 shares
09:23:19:613 1ea0 ETH: 01/16/18-09:23:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
09:23:19:613 1ea0 send: {"id":13,"method":"eth_submitWork","params":["0xad68f22c0965c4a5","0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xd23d945fd9c7ec7f2baa1449d9efb5184d3a56d4b8d101651bd763296c1f64cd"]}
09:23:19:738 1ea0 got 40 bytes
09:23:19:738 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":13,"result":true}
09:23:19:754 1ea0 parse packet: 39
09:23:19:769 1ea0 ETH: Share accepted (156 ms)!
09:23:19:769 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:20:660 1eb0 got 649 bytes
09:23:20:660 1eb0 buf: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["9c21","777aa9cb6e50a36f3870ee91bf56d240673fe4bcca0eaf59e414bb261ed2a8ad","dc093acdf48832de3c94cfd0c710b6f172d694488985161e332dca93af5d4fd1","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff1d0368ac0404d90a5e5a08","0a2f436f696e4d696e652f0000000001e07823c1080000001976a9140f67e4482043a67dc028142eba63ba77a509c3d388ac00000000",["a344233225b4abac438740605ccdd3fcfae183dc9b4d22c2504d0334e6440b39","86b4f6de38cbfebadf4f114144055ee66cf15c17f6c8c4066928cf8ed356de2d","4e8d54e9533c59653ec5edaaa85dae36f970d49e615374a3c2a9e4142c9c56ef"],"20000000","1a0aafc9","5a5e0ad9",false]}
09:23:20:660 1eb0 parse packet: 648
09:23:20:676 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:20:676 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:20 - New job from lbc.coinmine.pl:8787
09:23:20:676 1eb0 target: 0x00000000ffff0000 (diff: 4295MH)
09:23:21:504 1e94 LBC: put share nonce 39a53f enonce 39
09:23:21:504 1e94 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:21:519 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:23:21:519 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "39000000", "5a5e0ad9", "0039a53f"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:21:551 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:21:551 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:21:551 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:21:551 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
09:23:21:566 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:23:535 1e28 GPU0 t=61C fan=49%, GPU1 t=57C fan=42%, GPU2 t=55C fan=37%, GPU3 t=59C fan=47%, GPU4 t=58C fan=47%, GPU5 t=58C fan=43%
09:23:24:957 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:24:957 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:25:067 1e90 LBC: put share nonce 20c96a enonce 158
09:23:25:082 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:25:082 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:25:098 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:25:098 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:25:114 1ea0 new buf size: 0
09:23:25:114 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
09:23:25:114 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "58010000", "5a5e0ad9", "0020c96a"], "id": 14, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:25:082 1e90 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:25:145 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:25:145 1eb0 buf: {"id":14,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:25:145 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:25:145 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (16 ms)!
09:23:25:160 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:28:614 1e7c LBC: put share nonce 8695b6 enonce 27f
09:23:28:614 1e7c LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:28:630 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
09:23:28:630 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "7f020000", "5a5e0ad9", "008695b6"], "id": 11, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:28:661 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:28:661 1eb0 buf: {"id":11,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:28:661 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:28:661 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:28:676 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:30:317 1e84 LBC: put share nonce 66f32b enonce 311
09:23:30:317 1e84 LBC round found 1 shares
09:23:30:333 1eb0 LBC: 01/16/18-09:23:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
09:23:30:333 1eb0 send: {"params": ["bMwKZkz6R2qZ9by1f9cw9PM24amrCvh2K6.miner2", "9c21", "11030000", "5a5e0ad9", "0066f32b"], "id": 12, "method": "mining.submit"}
09:23:30:364 1eb0 got 37 bytes
09:23:30:364 1eb0 buf: {"id":12,"result":true,"error":null}
09:23:30:364 1eb0 parse packet: 36
09:23:30:364 1eb0 LBC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
09:23:30:380 1eb0 new buf size: 0
09:23:34:911 1ea0 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0xa543fb3", "0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004c5d5488"]}
09:23:34:974 1ea0 ETH: checking pool connection...
09:23:34:974 1ea0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
09:23:35:099 1ea0 got 243 bytes
09:23:35:099 1ea0 buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x1db9a600cf7799c6d4f7a7e995fa3fa58f8d2d7f896eadf775ac40c15a60a415","0xec6e8e0d8056cf9eb61046eaeb754b8e71f48e10a86c61f4d287b4ac5244653f","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}
09:23:35:115 1ea0 parse packet: 242
09:23:35:115 1ea0 ETH: job is the same
09:23:35:130 1ea0 new buf size: 0
January 16, 2018, 11:52:27 AM
claymore starts and run and Immediately internet connection drops 
why? how to fix it
with that info i think is a windows problem, not a problem of the miner, make a troubleshoot more accurate why? how to fix it
January 16, 2018, 11:51:39 AM
Hello i have this problem with 1 of the cards in my rig.
Its a 7 card rig.
GPU hangs in OpenCL call, exit error
I have try alot of things. Right now i run
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2250,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 880,850,850,850,850,850,850 -mvddc 920,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
It is GPU0 there get this error. Any ideas? It can happen after minutes or hours
Its a 7 card rig.
GPU hangs in OpenCL call, exit error
I have try alot of things. Right now i run
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2250,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 880,850,850,850,850,850,850 -mvddc 920,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
It is GPU0 there get this error. Any ideas? It can happen after minutes or hours
you should try lowering mem clock for the GPU that fails.
Also why do you think that setting core volts lower then vrm would work?
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2000,2250,2000,2000,2000,2200,2250, -cvddc 960,900,900,900,900,900,900 -mvddc 960,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 1 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
But its the same.
I think i will try to buy some other raisers. 009 from
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/riser-quality-riser-amazon-2745606
At the moment i have https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B073F1QHZ5/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVCPMRF6NI2O
But i think they are shit
Change the riser is your best option, but could be a problem in GPU, I had this problem once... try something like this:
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1150,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2150,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 950,850,850,850,850,850,850 -mvddc 950,850,850,850,850,850,850 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 80 -fanmin 45 -fanmax 100
or
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2200,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 1000,900,900,900,900,900,900 -mvddc 1000,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 80 -fanmin 45 -fanmax 100
----
to confirm that the setup stick in the gpus, start claymore, wait until the last DAG creation file and then close the software... do this 2 more times.
if GPU0 continues getting error... change it riser with other gpu and try to put other card in GPU0.
January 16, 2018, 11:49:34 AM
claymore starts and run and Immediately internet connection drops
why? how to fix it
why? how to fix it
January 16, 2018, 11:07:04 AM
Hello i have this problem with 1 of the cards in my rig.
Its a 7 card rig.
GPU hangs in OpenCL call, exit error
I have try alot of things. Right now i run
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2250,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 880,850,850,850,850,850,850 -mvddc 920,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
It is GPU0 there get this error. Any ideas? It can happen after minutes or hours
Its a 7 card rig.
GPU hangs in OpenCL call, exit error
I have try alot of things. Right now i run
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2250,2250,2200,2200,2250,2200,2250, -cvddc 880,850,850,850,850,850,850 -mvddc 920,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 0 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
It is GPU0 there get this error. Any ideas? It can happen after minutes or hours
you should try lowering mem clock for the GPU that fails.
Also why do you think that setting core volts lower then vrm would work?
-epsw x -mode 1 -cclock 1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2000,2250,2000,2000,2000,2200,2250, -cvddc 960,900,900,900,900,900,900 -mvddc 960,900,900,900,900,900,900 -gser 8 -dcri 5 -wd 1 -ftime 10 -lidag 3,0,0,0,0,0,0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 10 -fanmax 100
But its the same.
I think i will try to buy some other raisers. 009 from
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/riser-quality-riser-amazon-2745606
At the moment i have https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B073F1QHZ5/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVCPMRF6NI2O
But i think they are shit
January 16, 2018, 10:47:22 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
I changed to H110 after about 2 months. Had ASUS Prime Z270-A - which gave me a lot of unstability with 6 cards. H110 was almost plug&Play
How do you measure stale shares?
Which pool you using? I am using ethermine pool. Dashboard will display Hashrate, Valid Shares, Stale Shares, Invalid Shares.
Nanopool. Can't find stale shares anywhere - even looked at the API now.
Yeap. Nanopool does not show Stale shares. I find ethermine pool yield higher shares compared to Nanopool. Have you tried ethermine pool?
I am thinking of moving to Biostar TP250 BTC 6gpu motherboard.
Thanks for the tip. Will test ethermine after my next payout. Let me know how the Biostar mobo is working for you.
January 16, 2018, 10:38:06 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
I changed to H110 after about 2 months. Had ASUS Prime Z270-A - which gave me a lot of unstability with 6 cards. H110 was almost plug&Play
How do you measure stale shares?
Which pool you using? I am using ethermine pool. Dashboard will display Hashrate, Valid Shares, Stale Shares, Invalid Shares.
Nanopool. Can't find stale shares anywhere - even looked at the API now.
Yeap. Nanopool does not show Stale shares. I find ethermine pool yield higher shares compared to Nanopool. Have you tried ethermine pool?
I am thinking of moving to Biostar TP250 BTC 6gpu motherboard.
January 16, 2018, 10:36:07 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
I changed to H110 after about 2 months. Had ASUS Prime Z270-A - which gave me a lot of unstability with 6 cards. H110 was almost plug&Play
How do you measure stale shares?
Which pool you using? I am using ethermine pool. Dashboard will display Hashrate, Valid Shares, Stale Shares, Invalid Shares.
Nanopool. Can't find stale shares anywhere - even looked at the API now.
January 16, 2018, 10:29:17 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
I changed to H110 after about 2 months. Had ASUS Prime Z270-A - which gave me a lot of unstability with 6 cards. H110 was almost plug&Play
How do you measure stale shares?
Which pool you using? I am using ethermine pool. Dashboard will display Hashrate, Valid Shares, Stale Shares, Invalid Shares.
January 16, 2018, 10:22:17 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
I changed to H110 after about 2 months. Had ASUS Prime Z270-A - which gave me a lot of unstability with 6 cards. H110 was almost plug&Play
How do you measure stale shares?
January 16, 2018, 10:10:05 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
Is there any advantage of using a BTC motherboard vs a normal motherboard? OS Windows10 Pro build 1709. I am using the Asus Maximus Hero VIII and facing PC hangup in every 36 hours of continuous mining. High Stale shares from 8 to 15%.
Do you get high Stale shares?
January 16, 2018, 10:03:15 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
ASRock H110 BTC+
MSI RX 580 Gaming X 8GB (Hynix)
Used the BIOS from Anorak: https://anorak.tech/t/msi-rx-580-gaming-x-8gb-hynix/6917
January 16, 2018, 09:56:41 AM
Used these instructions there:
https://www.techpowerup.com/228536/amd-bios-signature-check-re-enabled-with-relive-locks-out-polaris-bios-modders
And modded ASUS RX570 4GB Expedition orginal BIOS (extracted with GPU-Z) with Polaris BIOS editor and one key memory mod button.
I try with that 17.12.2 Adrenalin after work. Thank you!
https://www.techpowerup.com/228536/amd-bios-signature-check-re-enabled-with-relive-locks-out-polaris-bios-modders
And modded ASUS RX570 4GB Expedition orginal BIOS (extracted with GPU-Z) with Polaris BIOS editor and one key memory mod button.
I try with that 17.12.2 Adrenalin after work. Thank you!
Did you run atikmdag-patcher after bios mod? Otherwise you will have problems with driver signature in Windows.
January 16, 2018, 09:55:26 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
What 580 gpu you having? Mind to share the parameter settings for the Rx580 to hash at 30MH/s?
Do you get high Stale shares? What motherboard are you using?
January 16, 2018, 09:52:10 AM
Finally, made my ETH-rig stable (for more than a few hours).
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
The single most important thing I have learned over the past weeks/months, is that chasing the last Mh never pay off.
I have 2x RX 580 gaming X, 2x Vega56 (modded to 64) and 2x Vega64's. 580's have been stable at 30.6 all along, Vega 64 @ 44.2, but have really struggeled with the modded 56's. I think I have tried everything. Managed to get them to 44.1 for 4-6 hours, then suddely one (always the same card) had a Open CL call and needed to write a script to stop miner, disable/enable cards, restart miner etc. Just time-consuming and a lot of headace.
Now, I'm seeng higher shares reward at 225 Mh, than I ever had at 237 Mh.
Waiting for my 2 new 580's arriving next week.
BTW; Claymore; excellent miner with all the options/params needed. Only thing I noticed, is that over a certain period of time, the numer of shares at nanopool is higher than the number of shares in the miner. Maybe something I'm missing.
Cheers
January 16, 2018, 09:36:01 AM
Is there any improvement on RX500 series?
January 16, 2018, 08:07:43 AM
With the latest 17.12.2 Adrenalin drivers, all parameters on Afterburner 4.4.2 were grey out and not able to change GPU, MEM, Power etc settings.
Can anyone in the forum comment?
Tks
Can anyone in the forum comment?
Tks
Jump to: