FREE RIG STATUS TOOL!
BTCTalk: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/minerstat-mining-monitor-and-management-mining-os-windows-asic-1772780
Supports every Claymore miner!
ZEC / ETH / ETC / XMR /
Site screenshot: http://prnt.sc/e3l3ru
TELEGRAM BOT (instant notification, if rig down): http://prnt.sc/e411qb
Public Profile working example: https://minerstat.xyz/public/bFwoCrBXlL.html
Register here: https://minerstat.xyz/
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 181. (Read 3839201 times)
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
yes.yes
It may depend on particular card. I do not see that high difference.
In my case Tahiti with opti is exactly the same speed 260 (R9 280), Pitcairn is slightly faster 184 vs 178 (R7 370) and Hawaii also a bit faster 385 vs 360 (R9 290).
Nice about opti is that it has slightly lower power usage and no so sharp and high power spikes.
Fijis are slover on win optiminer
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
yes.yes
It may depend on particular card. I do not see that high difference.
In my case Tahiti with opti is exactly the same speed 260 (R9 280), Pitcairn is slightly faster 184 vs 178 (R7 370) and Hawaii also a bit faster 385 vs 360 (R9 290).
Nice about opti is that it has slightly lower power usage and no so sharp and high power spikes.
best pool for zcash mining???
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
yes.yes
News Flash Steve Balmer has been hospitalized for anxiety after been informed that Microsoft Windows operating system is now trailing behind all Linux distributions
I rather they not try to beat these numbers anymore and work on better efficiency. Right now all we're doing is killing the GPU by working them too hard and since everyone's hash rate increase, we're not truly gaining anything as difficulty moves up with it. This is only increasing our power and cooling cost, heat and faster death for GPUs. I'm starting to see more and more of my rigs with at least 1 GPU doing 0 hash as they're starting to choke.
your card choke because power supply is not up to the job nothing to do with miner,for us windows miners we are a long way behind Linux speeds and Optiminer is faster which makes your argument mute,looking forwards to Claymore releasing something soon
I rather they not try to beat these numbers anymore and work on better efficiency. Right now all we're doing is killing the GPU by working them too hard and since everyone's hash rate increase, we're not truly gaining anything as difficulty moves up with it. This is only increasing our power and cooling cost, heat and faster death for GPUs. I'm starting to see more and more of my rigs with at least 1 GPU doing 0 hash as they're starting to choke.
Really strange, I've got a 390 that isn't being detected by the miner, it's fine in afterburner, and i'm sure I removed the -di flag just to be sure, restarts, re-sat my gpu, etc. nothing. And, this is a new problem, it was running v11.1 fine since it came out, save for a few freeze-up overnight usually within a half hour of starting.
lol guys. GPU mining is never dead. "There is always a coin to mine". Anyways, yes optiminer is much faster now with v 1.6.0 for R9 models and 280x. I get 385-400 for 390, 220-230 for 380 and 300 for 280x. OF course your results will vary depending on what clocks you are running, etc. But so far it runs good. Which is why I can't wait to see what claymore has...maybe he delays the new version to be sure of beating those numbers, who knows lol.
Personally, I'm not sure optiminer's v1.6 can be beat, because I think it probably represents the best that can be achieved with current (I don't mean new) GPUs. So, while Claymore will likely match optiminer v1.6 in the near future, I'm not so sure he can surpass it.
lol guys. GPU mining is never dead. "There is always a coin to mine". Anyways, yes optiminer is much faster now with v 1.6.0 for R9 models and 280x. I get 385-400 for 390, 220-230 for 380 and 300 for 280x. OF course your results will vary depending on what clocks you are running, etc. But so far it runs good. Which is why I can't wait to see what claymore has...maybe he delays the new version to be sure of beating those numbers, who knows lol.
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
I'll try it tonight. My 290x mod as 390x does 330 under claymore
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
I've tried it and get 240 on my rx480 ad opposed to 280 and 3 (yes three) on my 7950 as opposed to 270
optiminer-zcash-1.6.0 is 15% faster on Pitcairn.
Claymore?
Claymore?
Jump to: