Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 214. (Read 3839201 times)

legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Nice

R9 280X finally broke the 300 H/S barrier with 11.1


Great WORK!!!

Hi adaseb, could please share what settings are you using for getting such high hash. I am only getting 250-260 on my 280x.
Thanks

Stock settings, bios memory straps are tweaked. Hynix memory type.

And maybe you could share how much power (watt) it needs with v11.1?
Regards

Nice

R9 280X finally broke the 300 H/S barrier with 11.1


Great WORK!!!

Hi adaseb, could please share what settings are you using for getting such high hash. I am only getting 250-260 on my 280x.
Thanks

I'm too lazy to turn off the rig and plug in the KillAWatt meter since there is a new version almost every week. Either way it uses alot of power. I think with version 8.0 or 9.0 it used 1 H/S = 1 Watt. The GPUs were also slightly undervolted.

Pretty sure its much higher now.

newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
I have 2 x RX 480 cards (1 MSI Gaming 8GB and 1 Sapphire OC+ 8GB). With Claymore 11 Beta, it run all long day without problem. I just tried Claymore 11.1 Beta with the same settings, the performance is slightly better but it only run 2-3 hours then auto restart.
Could you please give me a hint to keep it running for long time? Thank you.
sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 250
And maybe you could share how much power (watt) it needs with v11.1?
Regards

Nice

R9 280X finally broke the 300 H/S barrier with 11.1


Great WORK!!!

Hi adaseb, could please share what settings are you using for getting such high hash. I am only getting 250-260 on my 280x.
Thanks
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
v11.1:

- improved speed, about 365H/s on stock 390X, 385H/s on stock Nano, 260H/s on stock 280X, 260H/s on stock RX480.
- improved compatibility.
- some bug fixes and minor improvements.

NOTES:
1. It seems there is no way to get full speed on latest drivers for Fiji and Polaris cards, at least in Windows. So don't use latest drivers for Fury, use 15.12 or 16.3.2. Since old drivers don't support Polaris, there is no way to get full speed for these cards at all, at least in Windows.
2. Tonga - currently I cannot get enough speedup from assembler for this card so I did not include assembler kernel for this card.

Still no linux build?

sr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 250
Nice

R9 280X finally broke the 300 H/S barrier with 11.1


Great WORK!!!

Hi adaseb, could please share what settings are you using for getting such high hash. I am only getting 250-260 on my 280x.
Thanks
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
For me v11.1 started making a lot of invalid shares for 0 card which is Rx480 8g.
I use 16.10.3 drivers and in new version it is recommended to use 16.12.2. Will have to check whether drivers upgrade gonna resolve this issue.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1048
Ok, I know I'm a few days late but I finally have the numbers for the Sapphire Fury Nitros I promised last Thursday/Friday.  I was dragging my feet after Claymore hinted that v11.1 would include compatibility for asm with the 16.11.3 driver set.  I busied myself tweaking my eco rom for 16.11.3 which appears to have been wasted effort.  The implication being that I am unsatisfied with the performance of the "eco" rom, but will post the data with the caveat that I strongly believe there is room for improvement (and will work on further tweaks this week).

Disclaimer: This rig has several components that are overkill.  I have plenty of 'computer crap' collecting dust so I don't hesitate to grab things that work.  I guess I'm pleading that I don't have to waste time responding to posts about how i5s are stupid and/or PSU density is a waste of money.



CPU: i5 4570
MB: ASRock H81 Pro BTC R2.0
RAM: 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X series DDR3 1600 Mhz
PSU: EVGA 1600 G2 (PSU1) & EVGA 1300 G2 (PSU2)
HDD: 128GB SSD with 20GB virtual memory
OS: Windows 10 Pro
GPU: x6 Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro 100379NTOC+SR
Risers: x5 Version 6 USB 3.0 PCIE Riser 1x to 16x
Riser: x1 Shielded 16x Riser Ribbon
Driver: Radeon Software Version: 15.12
Cooling: x4 Noctua NF-F12 IPPC 3000 (blowing on cards)
Cooling: x2 Corsair SP120 High Performance Edition (blowing on MB)

Configuration:
PSU1 - 3 Cards, 2 Risers, MB (including ribbon riser for the 3rd card), CPU, HDD, Fans
PSU2 - 3 Cards, 3 Risers

Required Info: The kilowatt meter on the left is PSU1.  The kilowatt meter on the right is PSU2.  Each GPU was delivered to the door for $271.81/GPU.

RESULTS

Bone Stock
1050/500



Hashrate: 2,503 H/s
Power: 1,657 W at the wall.

Analysis: Each card is drawing 271.33 W from the wall and producing 417.16 H/s.  The system is drawing a measly 30 W (the Noctuas are basically just idling).

H/W = 1.54
H/$ = 1.53


"Eco" Rom Installed
900/400 with -171mV & 50% PL



Hashrate: 2,025 H/s
Power: 885 W at the wall.

Analysis: Each card is drawing 142 W from the wall and producing 337.5 H/s.  The system is drawing 33 W.

H/W = 2.38
H/$ = 1.24

Summary: The goal is to crank the wattage down to 100 W at the PSU resulting in ~110 W at the wall.  To accomplish this I need to shave another 30 W per card, which appears doable.  The sticker is that I would like to keep it at or above 1,800 H/s in pursuit of a H/W ratio of 3.  If anyone has a Fury rom they wouldn't mind sharing I would be greatly appreciative.  Likewise, I am willing to share what I've been working on (more work to come).
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
r9 280x-245h/s.  Tell me. BIOS for mining r9 280x powercolor
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Ubuntu 16.04
amd-pro 16.40
7x R9-290X
Code:
[ 2194.912108] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x000021F0, 0x000021F0, 0x00002200)
[ 2305.861640] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x0000B060, 0x0000B060, 0x0000B070)
[ 7768.133750] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0388440c
[ 7768.133947] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0016289C
[ 7768.134180] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0814400C
[ 7768.134411] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 4) at page 1452188, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.366154] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034e440c
[ 8462.366349] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.366579] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0E04400C
[ 8462.366810] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 7) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (68)
[ 8462.427870] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344440c
[ 8462.428065] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428295] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0414400C
[ 8462.428526] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.428532] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344080c
[ 8462.428723] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428953] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0408400C
[ 8462.429183] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC5' (0x54433500) (132)
[ 9079.228076] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[ 9079.228272] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 9079.228502] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[ 9079.228732] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.492617] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[11544.492813] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[11544.493042] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[11544.493273] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.861240] perf interrupt took too long (2506 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[42403.116988] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x00047624
[42403.117182] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x00100000
[42403.117412] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x04076024
[42403.117642] VM fault (0x24, vmid 2) at page 1048576, read from 'CPF' (0x43504600) (118)
root@S2-P1:~/claymore_zec# dmesg -c
[ 2194.912108] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x000021F0, 0x000021F0, 0x00002200)
[ 2305.861640] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x0000B060, 0x0000B060, 0x0000B070)
[ 7768.133750] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0388440c
[ 7768.133947] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0016289C
[ 7768.134180] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0814400C
[ 7768.134411] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 4) at page 1452188, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.366154] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034e440c
[ 8462.366349] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.366579] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0E04400C
[ 8462.366810] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 7) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (68)
[ 8462.427870] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344440c
[ 8462.428065] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428295] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0414400C
[ 8462.428526] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.428532] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344080c
[ 8462.428723] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428953] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0408400C
[ 8462.429183] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC5' (0x54433500) (132)
[ 9079.228076] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[ 9079.228272] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 9079.228502] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[ 9079.228732] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.492617] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[11544.492813] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[11544.493042] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[11544.493273] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.861240] perf interrupt took too long (2506 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[42403.116988] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x00047624
[42403.117182] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x00100000
[42403.117412] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x04076024
[42403.117642] VM fault (0x24, vmid 2) at page 1048576, read from 'CPF' (0x43504600) (118)
Put cards in PCI-E 4-16X slots. Don't touch 1X.
full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Ok, I know I'm a few days late but I finally have the numbers for the Sapphire Fury Nitros I promised last Thursday/Friday.  I was dragging my feet after Claymore hinted that v11.1 would include compatibility for asm with the 16.11.3 driver set.  I busied myself tweaking my eco rom for 16.11.3 which appears to have been wasted effort.  The implication being that I am unsatisfied with the performance of the "eco" rom, but will post the data with the caveat that I strongly believe there is room for improvement (and will work on further tweaks this week).

Disclaimer: This rig has several components that are overkill.  I have plenty of 'computer crap' collecting dust so I don't hesitate to grab things that work.  I guess I'm pleading that I don't have to waste time responding to posts about how i5s are stupid and/or PSU density is a waste of money.



CPU: i5 4570
MB: ASRock H81 Pro BTC R2.0
RAM: 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X series DDR3 1600 Mhz
PSU: EVGA 1600 G2 (PSU1) & EVGA 1300 G2 (PSU2)
HDD: 128GB SSD with 20GB virtual memory
OS: Windows 10 Pro
GPU: x6 Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro 100379NTOC+SR
Risers: x5 Version 6 USB 3.0 PCIE Riser 1x to 16x
Riser: x1 Shielded 16x Riser Ribbon
Driver: Radeon Software Version: 15.12
Cooling: x4 Noctua NF-F12 IPPC 3000 (blowing on cards)
Cooling: x2 Corsair SP120 High Performance Edition (blowing on MB)

Configuration:
PSU1 - 3 Cards, 2 Risers, MB (including ribbon riser for the 3rd card), CPU, HDD, Fans
PSU2 - 3 Cards, 3 Risers

Required Info: The kilowatt meter on the left is PSU1.  The kilowatt meter on the right is PSU2.  Each GPU was delivered to the door for $271.81/GPU.

RESULTS

Bone Stock
1050/500



Hashrate: 2,503 H/s
Power: 1,657 W at the wall.

Analysis: Each card is drawing 271.33 W from the wall and producing 417.16 H/s.  The system is drawing a measly 30 W (the Noctuas are basically just idling).

H/W = 1.54
H/$ = 1.53


"Eco" Rom Installed
900/400 with -171mV & 50% PL



Hashrate: 2,025 H/s
Power: 885 W at the wall.

Analysis: Each card is drawing 142 W from the wall and producing 337.5 H/s.  The system is drawing 33 W.

H/W = 2.38
H/$ = 1.24

Summary: The goal is to crank the wattage down to 100 W at the PSU resulting in ~110 W at the wall.  To accomplish this I need to shave another 30 W per card, which appears doable.  The sticker is that I would like to keep it at or above 1,800 H/s in pursuit of a H/W ratio of 3.  If anyone has a Fury rom they wouldn't mind sharing I would be greatly appreciative.  Likewise, I am willing to share what I've been working on (more work to come).

What is the maximum that you can undervolt with stock clocks 1050/500? It's interesting to know the difference in consumption not only between stock and underclock + undervolt, but specially between stock undervolt and underclock + undervolt.

Also I have been having some problems when undervolting with msi afterburner. Cards crash with BSOD if I undervolt them cold. If I undervolt them when they are already hot, they tolerate it. Did anything of this happen to you as well?
sr. member
Activity: 465
Merit: 250
On 280x speed increase is negligible but power consumption increased 15w
sr. member
Activity: 512
Merit: 260
@claymore I get a. Message that my RX480 4Gb does not have enough memory and that the intensity is reduced to 7. So no improvement in speed.

Windows 10 driver 16.12.2

Cant seem to be able to install any other driver such as 16.11.3 or before

i think 16.12.2 does something where you can't go back... I've had the same thing happen.  Once i installed 16.12.2, i wasn't able to go back to install anything else after that.  DDU didn't work completely, i couldn't install anything else be 16.12.2 again.

I tried AMD clean uninstaller but that did not help. tried everything short of reinstalling windows 10

I see my Pro Duo that has two Fiji's are running with 16.3.2. cV11.1 Thay got 4GB ram and running on i 8 at +420 sol/s per GPU with no overclocking.

I hope @claymore give the RX480 4Gb some love. But 242 Sol/s is not bad

member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
What is yours speed with Sapphire Vapor-X 280x Elpida memory only - my is 220h with 11.1 - 1120/1550 . I have other Sapphire Vapor-X 280x Hynix memory and i have 265h with same settings 1120/1550. Why elpida is only 220h
sr. member
Activity: 703
Merit: 272
@claymore I get a. Message that my RX480 4Gb does not have enough memory and that the intensity is reduced to 7. So no improvement in speed.

Windows 10 driver 16.12.2

Cant seem to be able to install any other driver such as 16.11.3 or before

i think 16.12.2 does something where you can't go back... I've had the same thing happen.  Once i installed 16.12.2, i wasn't able to go back to install anything else after that.  DDU didn't work completely, i couldn't install anything else be 16.12.2 again.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Ubuntu 16.04
amd-pro 16.40
7x R9-290X
Code:
[ 2194.912108] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x000021F0, 0x000021F0, 0x00002200)
[ 2305.861640] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x0000B060, 0x0000B060, 0x0000B070)
[ 7768.133750] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0388440c
[ 7768.133947] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0016289C
[ 7768.134180] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0814400C
[ 7768.134411] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 4) at page 1452188, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.366154] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034e440c
[ 8462.366349] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.366579] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0E04400C
[ 8462.366810] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 7) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (68)
[ 8462.427870] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344440c
[ 8462.428065] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428295] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0414400C
[ 8462.428526] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.428532] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344080c
[ 8462.428723] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428953] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0408400C
[ 8462.429183] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC5' (0x54433500) (132)
[ 9079.228076] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[ 9079.228272] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 9079.228502] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[ 9079.228732] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.492617] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[11544.492813] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[11544.493042] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[11544.493273] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.861240] perf interrupt took too long (2506 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[42403.116988] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x00047624
[42403.117182] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x00100000
[42403.117412] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x04076024
[42403.117642] VM fault (0x24, vmid 2) at page 1048576, read from 'CPF' (0x43504600) (118)
root@S2-P1:~/claymore_zec# dmesg -c
[ 2194.912108] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x000021F0, 0x000021F0, 0x00002200)
[ 2305.861640] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: IH ring buffer overflow (0x0000B060, 0x0000B060, 0x0000B070)
[ 7768.133750] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0388440c
[ 7768.133947] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0016289C
[ 7768.134180] amdgpu 0000:08:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0814400C
[ 7768.134411] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 4) at page 1452188, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.366154] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034e440c
[ 8462.366349] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.366579] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0E04400C
[ 8462.366810] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 7) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (68)
[ 8462.427870] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344440c
[ 8462.428065] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428295] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0414400C
[ 8462.428526] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[ 8462.428532] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x0344080c
[ 8462.428723] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 8462.428953] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0408400C
[ 8462.429183] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 2) at page 1386906, read from 'TC5' (0x54433500) (132)
[ 9079.228076] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[ 9079.228272] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[ 9079.228502] amdgpu 0000:07:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[ 9079.228732] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.492617] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x034c440c
[11544.492813] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x0015299A
[11544.493042] amdgpu 0000:02:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x0C14400C
[11544.493273] VM fault (0x0c, vmid 6) at page 1386906, read from 'TC1' (0x54433100) (324)
[11544.861240] perf interrupt took too long (2506 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[42403.116988] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0: GPU fault detected: 146 0x00047624
[42403.117182] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR   0x00100000
[42403.117412] amdgpu 0000:06:00.0:   VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS 0x04076024
[42403.117642] VM fault (0x24, vmid 2) at page 1048576, read from 'CPF' (0x43504600) (118)
sr. member
Activity: 512
Merit: 260
@claymore I get a. Message that my RX480 4Gb does not have enough memory and that the intensity is reduced to 7. So no improvement in speed.

Windows 10 driver 16.12.2

Cant seem to be able to install any other driver such as 16.11.3 or before
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Nice

R9 280X finally broke the 300 H/S barrier with 11.1


Great WORK!!!
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
  I'm running a Linux 14.04 rig with (4) MSI R9-380 4Gb & (1) XFX R9-380x 4Gb cards in it.  On Claymore's 10.0 it's getting about 812H/s while drawing 850 watts at the wall.

  So I'm only getting about 160H/s per card.

  Is anyone else running 380s?  If so, what are you getting for a rate on them?   Is there any way to bring the voltage down and/or hash rate up on these cards on Linux?  If so, what program are you using?  At this point they are just slightly profitable

  Thanks for the help.

hero member
Activity: 635
Merit: 500
@Claymore........have you considered writing your own drivers?
copper member
Activity: 416
Merit: 105
rx 480 not improving speed... got 280 - 284 sol 1390/2150
Jump to: