Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 257.

cracker666

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

Quote from: klondike_bar on January 06, 2017, 04:29:17 PM

Quote from: cracker666 on January 06, 2017, 03:51:24 PM

any one got any stats for R9 380 would be greatfull

270x does ~150 with a bit of underclocking applied.

280/380 should be in the 200-240 range depending on power limit

it says its recognized as 285/380 28 compute cores im getting 181 stable overclocked gpu 1120 mem 1600 power is at + 8% in wattman 16.12.1
am i doing something wrong. And if use the 15.12 it just crashes so am i thinking i got a problem with my card and thanks for the info

chronek

sr. member

Activity: 273

Merit: 250

BD People Are Legend

Quote from: oldisoft on January 07, 2017, 03:43:07 AM

What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...

Pools was gambling with your money, and after btc price drop they have to cover losses somehow... Roll Eyes

oldisoft

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

https://iota.org/

Hi Friends!

What a shit with almost all pools? They are stilling our money or it was so hard difficulty recently? I have second day minus 30% of usually profit...

Cheers

G_Crypt

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: mindragon on January 07, 2017, 12:05:20 AM

I'm mining on a Windows Server 2012 (I know...I know).

In any case, I have 2x 7970's but the miner is recognizing it as AMD 280X ... Is there a command switch to set it to 7970?

Thanks

They are the same chip set. Not really any difference with the two. I have both running together in a few old 6 card rigs using simplemining o/s with claymore 9.3 and have no issues.
Great cards seeing they were soo cheap second hand before zcash 😁 at one stage I was getting them for less than $50 Aussie dollars a card.

mindragon

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 100

I'm mining on a Windows Server 2012 (I know...I know).

In any case, I have 2x 7970's but the miner is recognizing it as AMD 280X ... Is there a command switch to set it to 7970?

Thanks

TheRider

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Quote from: BenCodie on January 06, 2017, 03:18:56 PM

okay so we can use Nvidia cards aswell right?

No, the miner is called "Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner" for a reason.

If you want to mine using Nvidia cards, you need other miners.

JJ12880

hero member

Activity: 671

Merit: 501

Blockchain and stuff

Quote from: QuintLeo on January 06, 2017, 05:32:08 PM

Quote from: JJ12880 on January 06, 2017, 01:33:51 PM

What drivers have people found to be best (performance wise) for 480's and old Tahiti's? (separate rigs) My drivers auto updated because I forgot to turn that off. I'm on the latest with no stability issues atm.

JJ12880

16.9.2 or 16.10.1 both work well with my RX 470 - probably any of the 16.9.x or 16.10.x versions would work equally well, but I prefer to go with 16.10.1 for WQHL cert.

15.12 is still THE "go-to" for pre-RX series cards, though I noted in my limited testing that 16.10.1 didn't run noticeably slower on the R9 2xx series cards I tried it on.

16.12.1 is definite junk - 5-10% lower hashrate on EVERYTHING I tried it on vs. 16.10.1 or 15.12 as applicable.

THANKYOU! I read for about 10 pages, and found nothing and gave up and decided to ask. Cheesy

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: laik2 on January 06, 2017, 06:18:38 PM

Quote from: klondike_bar on January 06, 2017, 04:31:14 PM

Quote from: bitoc2015 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

damn, nice hashrate. my 1070 cards run about 380H/s on the eqm 1.0.3 miner (1.0.4 promises a small bump). Thats at 65% powerlimit though, so i suppose 420 at 100% and 465 at 122% is possible. however, better to cut down power use by 40% in exchange for only ~20% of the hashrate

5x1070 MSI Armor 8G OC 55% Power Limit

Quote

GPU0: 402 Sol/s GPU1: 398 Sol/s GPU2: 400 Sol/s GPU3: 407 Sol/s GPU4: 405 Sol/s
Total speed: 2012 Sol/s

Quote

FAN=65
PL=110
CLOCK=150
MEM=700

4x RX480 Sapphire Nitro OC 8GB VDDC -75mV, 1190 cclk, 2100 mclk

Quote

ZEC - Total Speed: 869.822 H/s, Total Shares: 5253, Rejected: 5, Time: 03:21
ZEC: GPU0 219.701 H/s, GPU1 219.127 H/s, GPU2 215.449 H/s, GPU3 215.545 H/s

Feel the difference

Your calculation is wrong for me. You can not compare the power limit for various manufacturers of graphics cards. You can not compare the power limit of different models of the same manufacturer. Your 55% MSI 1070 power limit is not equal to 55% of my power limit for nVIDIA EVGA FTW 1070. My 55% power limit for nVIDIA EVGA FTW 1070 is not the same as my 55% power limit for nVIDIA 1070 EVGA ACX 3.0 SC . The actual and objective consumption electricity is measured with an instrument which called "energy meter". My EVGA FTW nVIDIA 1070 on 100% power limit consumes 50 W more than EVGA NVIDIA 1070 SC ACX 3.0 on 100% power limit. Also, you pay one price of electricity and I pay another. Measure your consumption of MSI in 1070 with the energy meter so you know. Then measure the consumption on other models nVIDIA 1070 and you will see that the power limit of different models of graphics cards can not be compared.My electricity price is extremely cheap and for me it is always better to get the maximum from graphics cards. The difference should feel you and not I.

laik2

sr. member

Activity: 652

Merit: 266

Quote from: klondike_bar on January 06, 2017, 04:31:14 PM

Quote from: bitoc2015 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

damn, nice hashrate. my 1070 cards run about 380H/s on the eqm 1.0.3 miner (1.0.4 promises a small bump). Thats at 65% powerlimit though, so i suppose 420 at 100% and 465 at 122% is possible. however, better to cut down power use by 40% in exchange for only ~20% of the hashrate

5x1070 MSI Armor 8G OC 55% Power Limit

Quote

GPU0: 402 Sol/s GPU1: 398 Sol/s GPU2: 400 Sol/s GPU3: 407 Sol/s GPU4: 405 Sol/s
Total speed: 2012 Sol/s

Quote

FAN=65
PL=110
CLOCK=150
MEM=700

4x RX480 Sapphire Nitro OC 8GB VDDC -75mV, 1190 cclk, 2100 mclk

Quote

ZEC - Total Speed: 869.822 H/s, Total Shares: 5253, Rejected: 5, Time: 03:21
ZEC: GPU0 219.701 H/s, GPU1 219.127 H/s, GPU2 215.449 H/s, GPU3 215.545 H/s

Feel the difference

Viperho

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Quote from: Claymore on January 06, 2017, 01:15:46 PM

Currently I'm working on improvements for Polaris cards mainly, you will see good speedup in next version, I will release it in a few days.

Thanks Claymore, some Hawaii lovin' would be great too Grin

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: klondike_bar on January 06, 2017, 04:31:14 PM

Quote from: bitoc2015 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

damn, nice hashrate. my 1070 cards run about 380H/s on the eqm 1.0.3 miner (1.0.4 promises a small bump). Thats at 65% powerlimit though, so i suppose 420 at 100% and 465 at 122% is possible. however, better to cut down power use by 40% in exchange for only ~20% of the hashrate

For me, the electricity prices are low and I not take care of consumption. Also, the room is very cold so the temperature graphics card only 47 degrees Celsius (with fan speed of only 1069). Also, in that the "freezer" I sleep . Grin

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses

The difficulty for ZEC seems the same as before even with the faster 1070/1080 miners.

Proof that the Nvidia 1070/1080 probably account for 5% or less of the entire network GPU hashrates.

I think most GPUs mining right now are the 7970/280x/290/390/470/480 those probably account for 95% of the network hashrates.

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: bitoc2015 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

EWBF, Version 0.1.0b : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ewbfs-cuda-zcash-miner-1707546

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: JJ12880 on January 06, 2017, 01:33:51 PM

What drivers have people found to be best (performance wise) for 480's and old Tahiti's? (separate rigs) My drivers auto updated because I forgot to turn that off. I'm on the latest with no stability issues atm.

JJ12880

16.9.2 or 16.10.1 both work well with my RX 470 - probably any of the 16.9.x or 16.10.x versions would work equally well, but I prefer to go with 16.10.1 for WQHL cert.

15.12 is still THE "go-to" for pre-RX series cards, though I noted in my limited testing that 16.10.1 didn't run noticeably slower on the R9 2xx series cards I tried it on.

16.12.1 is definite junk - 5-10% lower hashrate on EVERYTHING I tried it on vs. 16.10.1 or 15.12 as applicable.

Golku

full member

Activity: 263

Merit: 100

Quote from: BenCodie on January 06, 2017, 04:37:48 PM

One of my 290's Rig starting to hang after every 2 to 3 hours approx
here is what i get

Quote

12:07:10:633   cf0   ZEC: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
12:07:13:258   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:16:305   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:414   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:649   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:836   f8c   GPU0 t=46C fan=70%, GPU1 t=45C fan=70%, GPU2 t=0C fan=0%, GPU3 t=47C fan=0%
12:07:19:852   f8c   em hbt: 9297, fm hbt: 79,
12:07:19:867   f8c   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 47
12:07:19:867   f8c   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 94
12:07:19:914   f8c   watchdog - thread 2, hb time -31
12:07:19:914   f8c   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 31
12:07:19:930   f8c   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 47
12:07:19:945   f8c   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 0
12:07:19:977   f8c   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 0
12:07:19:992   f8c   watchdog - thread 7, hb time -63
12:07:20:008   f8c   watchdog - thread 8, hb time -110
12:07:20:024   f8c   watchdog - thread 9, hb time -141
12:07:20:055   f8c   watchdog - thread 10, hb time -188
12:07:20:070   f8c   watchdog - thread 11, hb time -188
12:07:20:086   f8c   watchdog - thread 12, hb time 79547
12:07:20:102   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:117   f8c   watchdog - thread 13, hb time 79719
12:07:20:133   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:133   f8c   watchdog - thread 14, hb time 79609
12:07:20:133   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:149   f8c   watchdog - thread 15, hb time 79672
12:07:20:164   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:305   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:21:516   f8c   Restarting OK, exit...

driver 16.9.2 CM v9.3

Any suggestion please

Same problem i would get this error in 4 hours
I swapped the gpu with a other slot and it works now a bit better 23-25 hours

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote

damn, nice hashrate. my 1070 cards run about 380H/s on the eqm 1.0.3 miner (1.0.4 promises a small bump). Thats at 65% powerlimit though, so i suppose 420 at 100% and 465 at 122% is possible. however, better to cut down power use by 40% in exchange for only ~20% of the hashrate

You should upgrade your miner, there was like 4 new version since 1.0.3 (about 10% more speed at least since), i do 420h/s with 1.0.4c @60% tdp.

BenCodie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1037

6.25 ---> 3.125

One of my 290's Rig starting to hang after every 2 to 3 hours approx
here is what i get

Quote

12:07:10:633   cf0   ZEC: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...
12:07:13:258   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:16:305   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:414   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:649   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:19:836   f8c   GPU0 t=46C fan=70%, GPU1 t=45C fan=70%, GPU2 t=0C fan=0%, GPU3 t=47C fan=0%
12:07:19:852   f8c   em hbt: 9297, fm hbt: 79,
12:07:19:867   f8c   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 47
12:07:19:867   f8c   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 94
12:07:19:914   f8c   watchdog - thread 2, hb time -31
12:07:19:914   f8c   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 31
12:07:19:930   f8c   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 47
12:07:19:945   f8c   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 0
12:07:19:977   f8c   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 0
12:07:19:992   f8c   watchdog - thread 7, hb time -63
12:07:20:008   f8c   watchdog - thread 8, hb time -110
12:07:20:024   f8c   watchdog - thread 9, hb time -141
12:07:20:055   f8c   watchdog - thread 10, hb time -188
12:07:20:070   f8c   watchdog - thread 11, hb time -188
12:07:20:086   f8c   watchdog - thread 12, hb time 79547
12:07:20:102   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:117   f8c   watchdog - thread 13, hb time 79719
12:07:20:133   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:133   f8c   watchdog - thread 14, hb time 79609
12:07:20:133   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:149   f8c   watchdog - thread 15, hb time 79672
12:07:20:164   f8c   WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
12:07:20:305   f8c   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
12:07:21:516   f8c   Restarting OK, exit...

driver 16.9.2 CM v9.3

Any suggestion please

klondike_bar

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe

Quote from: bitoc2015 on January 06, 2017, 04:26:26 PM

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

damn, nice hashrate. my 1070 cards run about 380H/s on the eqm 1.0.3 miner (1.0.4 promises a small bump). Thats at 65% powerlimit though, so i suppose 420 at 100% and 465 at 122% is possible. however, better to cut down power use by 40% in exchange for only ~20% of the hashrate

klondike_bar

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe

Quote from: cracker666 on January 06, 2017, 03:51:24 PM

any one got any stats for R9 380 would be greatfull

270x does ~150 with a bit of underclocking applied.

280/380 should be in the 200-240 range depending on power limit

bitoc2015

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 504

Quote from: Lucky - Luciano on January 06, 2017, 02:14:00 PM

Quote from: V_I_T_A_L_Y on January 06, 2017, 07:14:33 AM

390 the new version will catch up in speed 1070?

May be

:

What miner you use?

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 257. (Read 3839163 times)