Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 368. (Read 3839163 times)

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
Claymore should not mind peoples who do not know how to power their cards,
My rx480 cards can be powered 400W each safely (i even build own modular cables), my rig can work stable till 2,5kW (now using 760W), i am prepared for any algo with overclocking


ummm... dare I say that this seems like a huge waste of headroom?  Yes, I understand that it is ideal to have a max load of about 25% less than your PSU's wattage rating, but you indicate that your system has 70% headroom.  Not sure how you can ever ROI a system that includes excessive costs from idle PSU wattage capabilities, but you're right lol... you are certainly prepared to max out those 480's  Grin

He is probably using a server PSU with an adapter board to break out the connections into a usable configuration. This is actually a pretty typical configuration and the server PSU's can be bought for little to nothing ($20-$50) depending on efficiency and capacity. Running at 240V inputs, a 2,000W-2,900W capacity server PSU is not that uncommon and readily available on places like eBay and Amazon.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
Anyone try new AMD driver RELIVE ? work ? more performance or minor consuption ? .
hero member
Activity: 848
Merit: 500
v9.1:
Timeout for new job should be increased from 10 to atleast 15minutes.
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Did I ever mention that I'm mining via thethering on a oneplus2?  Grin Grin Grin
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 253
VeganAcademy
Are f2pool can using ssl?

dont think f2pool stands for that kind of stuff.. kind of a no frills pool but cant hurt to bring up as a feature request in their thread.. its one of the main bitcoin pools so their thread is in the bitcoin mining section.

i would bring it up but i post there far too often as it stands.
sr. member
Activity: 600
Merit: 261
Claymore should not mind peoples who do not know how to power their cards,
My rx480 cards can be powered 400W each safely (i even build own modular cables), my rig can work stable till 2,5kW (now using 760W), i am prepared for any algo with overclocking


ummm... dare I say that this seems like a huge waste of headroom?  Yes, I understand that it is ideal to have a max load of about 25% less than your PSU's wattage rating, but you indicate that your system has 70% headroom.  Not sure how you can ever ROI a system that includes excessive costs from idle PSU wattage capabilities, but you're right lol... you are certainly prepared to max out those 480's  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 251
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

After using the SSL/TLS, the share rejection is 1.0 to 1.5% now. The rejection rate was 0.3 to 0.5 previously.

my reject rate, with ssl, is 0.71% and 0.83% on my two rigs. more or less what it was before.

People don't understand that a rejected share is one that cross with a new job somewhere along the way. If the pool is slow processing incoming shares you also may get a reject. My rejects were around 1% at flypool going as high as 3% with timeouts that are frequent there. On the other end at dwarf the reject rate is 0.2%. So before blaming the miner you should be blaming the pool
My stale rate on suprnova went from ~0.25% before to 0.3% to 0.5% with SSL (Not running for long, need more time to get better number).  My response time went from 62ms to 140ms, due to not being on the US server anymore.  Before when on non US server response was ~125ms.  The increased stalerate seems roughly correlated with server response time, mining from US to Europe. Pool will probably add another SSH server in future.  I could also reduce my ping by ~30ms switching to gigabit fiber from the Comcast I have right now.....

Server response time would effect Ethereum a lot more, due to 10x faster blocktime.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505
I don't think so that there is any need for the fee reduction, 2.5% is pretty much fine. I'll continue to use the non-encrypted connection and provide you a bit more fee, you deserve it. Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
v9.1:

- additional range checks in code for better stability.
- reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, currently Flypool and Suprnova pools support encrypted connections, see Readme for samples.
- improved "-di detect" option: now after GPU order detection miner starts mining with the detected order.
- added ability to use environment variables in "epools.txt" and "config.txt" files. For example, define "WORKER" environment varibale and use it as "%WORKER%" in config.txt.


Great! Thanks!
rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

After using the SSL/TLS, the share rejection is 1.0 to 1.5% now. The rejection rate was 0.3 to 0.5 previously.

my reject rate, with ssl, is 0.71% and 0.83% on my two rigs. more or less what it was before.

People don't understand that a rejected share is one that cross with a new job somewhere along the way. If the pool is slow processing incoming shares you also may get a reject. My rejects were around 1% at flypool going as high as 3% with timeouts that are frequent there. On the other end at dwarf the reject rate is 0.2%. So before blaming the miner you should be blaming the pool
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3614
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

After using the SSL/TLS, the share rejection is 1.0 to 1.5% now. The rejection rate was 0.3 to 0.5 previously.

my reject rate, with ssl, is 0.71% and 0.83% on my two rigs. more or less what it was before.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
Are f2pool can using ssl?
hero member
Activity: 760
Merit: 500
CryptoZilla
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

After using the SSL/TLS, the share rejection is 1.0 to 1.5% now. The rejection rate was 0.3 to 0.5 previously.

so the 2.5% is then more profitable?
since you lose around 1%?
sr. member
Activity: 425
Merit: 250
v9.1:

- additional range checks in code for better stability.
- reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, currently Flypool and Suprnova pools support encrypted connections, see Readme for samples.
- improved "-di detect" option: now after GPU order detection miner starts mining with the detected order.
- added ability to use environment variables in "epools.txt" and "config.txt" files. For example, define "WORKER" environment varibale and use it as "%WORKER%" in config.txt.


Much better!  More stable so far - 30 minutes with no issues.  I also like the decreased devfee. 

Thanks Claymore!

+11111

I think the same!
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

I can confirm that if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, the development fee is 2% for the time being.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
v9.1:

- additional range checks in code for better stability.
- reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, currently Flypool and Suprnova pools support encrypted connections, see Readme for samples.
- improved "-di detect" option: now after GPU order detection miner starts mining with the detected order.
- added ability to use environment variables in "epools.txt" and "config.txt" files. For example, define "WORKER" environment varibale and use it as "%WORKER%" in config.txt.


Much better!  More stable so far - 30 minutes with no issues.  I also like the decreased devfee. 

Thanks Claymore!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Ok, you miners can't read:

 reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection

After using the SSL/TLS, the share rejection is 1.0 to 1.5% now. The rejection rate was 0.3 to 0.5 previously.
sr. member
Activity: 290
Merit: 250
hi

for each gpu how much RAM and CPU my need for best mining Zcash???

rig 1 ..4 rx 470 4gb- 835h/s v9 claymore ..im used 4gb ram and my cpu is intel g3240 3.1GHz

http://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1YdKS8sstWxxdNs8Vz5TMtEAogSfAaXg4s

my share found 187-200ms


rpg
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
v9.1:

- additional range checks in code for better stability.
- reduced devfee, it's 2% now (72sec instead of 90sec) if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, currently Flypool and Suprnova pools support encrypted connections, see Readme for samples.
- improved "-di detect" option: now after GPU order detection miner starts mining with the detected order.
- added ability to use environment variables in "epools.txt" and "config.txt" files. For example, define "WORKER" environment varibale and use it as "%WORKER%" in config.txt.



The power spike is associated with a drop in GPU load and memory control load, as reported on gpuz. Is the driver doing some sort of cleanup ?
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
How to backup to Catalyst (Crimson) 15.12? I have 16.11.5. Overinstalling - no success.
Help please.

I join this question

How do I get the Catalyst (Crimson) 15,12?

I'm sorry I'm a newbie.

Google is your friend. You have to uninstall the current drivers from safe mode

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/amd-radeon-software-crimson-15-12-driver-download.html


thank you very much friend.
Jump to: