v8
ASUS FURY 285H/s 1020/500
2x fury 500w on wall
v9
ASUS FURY 330H/s 1020/500
2x fury 525w on wall
5% power more but 15% speed increase!!!
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 392. (Read 3839163 times)
RX 480 (ASUS Strix 8 GB) getting 230 h/s (200 h/s on v8) on v9, and power usage is the same as before on v8.
Thank you clay. Good job as always.
Thank you clay. Good job as always.
Nice speed improvement! Let's see price evolution.
all cards i6 stock clocks, changed timings on all exept 390X
http://imgur.com/a/MMmm9
Is everybody has the same with GPU usage?
Is everybody has the same with GPU usage?
I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
What settings are you using for your 280, I'm on full stock bios and clocks and getting 188h/s?
I meant by stock settings The bios is stock, I use afterburner and have boost turned off and set the clock and memory to:.
Mines watered cooled the temps never go over 50c for the GPU and the vram form time to time may go little higher but not over 55 c.
CM 9
Quote
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:11 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.752 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.752 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:17 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.632 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.632 H/s
GPU0 t=48C fan=60%
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:42 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.665 H/s, Total Shares: 202, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.665 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:45 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.752 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.752 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:17 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.632 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.632 H/s
GPU0 t=48C fan=60%
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:42 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.665 H/s, Total Shares: 202, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.665 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:45 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
Thankyou for sharing that sharing that top, my card has the stock fans but I guess overclocking the GPU to 1100 should help a little
Any results on Claymore V9 and 380X ?
Posted earlier: 173-176H/s with -i 8 and 1150/1500 
7950 from 180 to 193
Rx480 from 205 to 240
Edit: make it 246 on the rx480 @ 1395/2195
Rx480 from 205 to 240
Edit: make it 246 on the rx480 @ 1395/2195
Originally, I was quite skeptical of Claymore and I apologize in regards to that suspicion.
Claymore, thank you for everything you have done for us sir.
The miner and work is impressive!
Claymore, thank you for everything you have done for us sir.
The miner and work is impressive!
Any results on Claymore V9 and 380X ?
I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
What settings are you using for your 280, I'm on full stock bios and clocks and getting 188h/s?
I meant by stock settings The bios is stock, I use afterburner and have boost turned off and set the clock and memory to:.
Mines watered cooled the temps never go over 50c for the GPU and the vram form time to time may go little higher but not over 55 c.
CM 9
Quote
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:11 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.752 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.752 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:17 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.632 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.632 H/s
GPU0 t=48C fan=60%
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:42 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.665 H/s, Total Shares: 202, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.665 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:45 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.752 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.752 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:17 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.632 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.632 H/s
GPU0 t=48C fan=60%
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:27 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:42 - New job from us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 214.665 H/s, Total Shares: 202, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:33
ZEC: GPU0 214.665 H/s
ZEC: 12/07/16-11:01:45 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
v8
R9 280X - 203
R9 290 - 220
v9
R9 280X - 222
R9 290 - 231
Both on stock.
R9 280X - 203
R9 290 - 220
v9
R9 280X - 222
R9 290 - 231
Both on stock.
v9 -i 8
280x ~225 h/s 1110, 1500
390 ~304 h/s 1130, 1500
290x ~286 h/s 1100, 1500
480 ~245 h/s 1380, 2200
fury ~330 h/s 1065, 550
time to sleep
280x ~225 h/s 1110, 1500
390 ~304 h/s 1130, 1500
290x ~286 h/s 1100, 1500
480 ~245 h/s 1380, 2200
fury ~330 h/s 1065, 550
time to sleep
I'm running bone stock Sapphire Nitro R9 Furys (4GB)
v8 - 285 sol/s
v9 - 330 sol/s
~15.5% increase. Keep up the great work!
v8 - 285 sol/s
v9 - 330 sol/s
~15.5% increase. Keep up the great work!
claymore v9
R7 370 4GB GPU:1175 MEM:1475
147 H/s
R7 370 4GB GPU:1175 MEM:1475
147 H/s
ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.usa.nicehash.com' <198.11.195.136> port 3357 (unsecure)
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357) (unsecure)
This (unsecure) message is new with V9 anyone else seeing this?
Claymore, THANKS for the new Miner
ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.usa.nicehash.com:3357) (unsecure)
This (unsecure) message is new with V9 anyone else seeing this?
Claymore, THANKS for the new Miner
This is because Claymore added TLS/SSL support. Nothing has changed form the old one, the new version just lets you know that the connection isn't 'secure' (the older wasn't either) but gives you secure connection option when available from pool.
v9.0 -i 8
2x480 8 gb
Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000
Gpu1: 240 h/s, gpu2: 220h/s
390w from wall
2x480 8 gb
Gpu clock: 1400, voltage: 1100
Memory clock: 2030, voltage: 1000
Gpu1: 240 h/s, gpu2: 220h/s
390w from wall
390w from wall for both ?
wait for the new AMD drives that release tomorrow you may see a drop in Power usages and heat , probable no speeds increase.
just because the leaked info says in games doesn't mean in games . remember it's leaked info and the tester are still under NDA .
yes from both
v8 was working fine for me in v9 system hangs. i have to reboot system manully
RX 470 - 202 H/s - 1250/1750
RX 480 - 242 H/s - 1350/2200
R9 390x - 309 H/s - 1100/1500
RX 480 - 242 H/s - 1350/2200
R9 390x - 309 H/s - 1100/1500
I'm guessing the R9280 not the X version are maxed out, CM 9 didn't do any thing for it speed wise, time to edit the bios, i guess to see if that does any thing.
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
it DID improve my R7370 by 10 or so Sol . they were doing 131 to 134 sol tops now they do 143 sol or more with CM 9 haven't tried my RX 400 series cards, yet .
Nm didn't wait long enough for the R9280 not x version it does 215 Sols up from 209. not much more but it's still more, it looks like it may be reaching it's max limits at stock setting .
What settings are you using for your 280, I'm on full stock bios and clocks and getting 188h/s?
Jump to: