Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 400. (Read 3839163 times)

member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy

To control the price u need one of two, absence of free market so only controlled partys that agree on some price can trade. Or control over supply so decreasing it the price will rise by itself.
One way or another, u will decrease volume but problem is, zec supply is constant. What u gonna do about that?

"socialist card" is about planned economics, u plan supply and u plan price and u never hit the target of demand. U either have overproduction or deficit. And with "controlled" price of ZEC u have over production that u cant sell unless the price will go down.

I never stated that full control of the price can be achieved. It only can be manipulated to the point people still are willing to buy it. Who is allowed to trade or who is not allowed cannot be controlled by any measure these days. Can you share a quote where i stated that? I made a scenario where the price of the currency could be manipulated on the free market. You seriously haven´t heard of what European Unions central bank has been doing for this entire decade? They manipulate the price of the Euro as some may have noticed. As i also stated we would need majority of the network (hashrate) so more than half of the constant supply is still under our control.

Planned economics in soviet union meant that the price of the ruble was not only manipulated but it was fully controlled buy the state no matter the supply or demand. In Europe the price of the Euro is manipulated through a central bank but even them cannot fully decide what it´s price should be . Most of the Europeans still call it a free market. This scenario was an image of the latter.

Ok, u get most of hashers onboard and u start manipulating price... at the same time u promise to pay all miners that higher price. Unless u have some big buffer of btc (that will dry out), how on earth will u do both things at the same time? So we get to the first question, who will u sell it to?

Miners get a higher price when the biggest pools sell the mined zcash centralized in the normal marketplaces where they try to manipulate to current price.

There are some same ideas like in the nicehash -system, where you get a share from your hashing power proportionately but you are not necessarily compensated with the coins you were currently mining. The pool will sell the "randomcoins" for you and compensate you with bitcoins. No news here. Though in this scenario we only mine zcash and you are compensated through fiat currencies, for example. That would somewhat reduce the effect of what coin dumping currently has on zcash´s price and maybe give a better share for miners.

So u need to spend assets to drive price higher. Yea, that works but who will pay for that? Pool just gives that away? For that u dont need to control hashrate, u just buy as much zec as it takes to drive price to desired rate. And thats dead bagfull cause selling it will drive price back down.

I'll take ur word that u are absolute noob Grin
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy

To control the price u need one of two, absence of free market so only controlled partys that agree on some price can trade. Or control over supply so decreasing it the price will rise by itself.
One way or another, u will decrease volume but problem is, zec supply is constant. What u gonna do about that?

"socialist card" is about planned economics, u plan supply and u plan price and u never hit the target of demand. U either have overproduction or deficit. And with "controlled" price of ZEC u have over production that u cant sell unless the price will go down.

I never stated that full control of the price can be achieved. It only can be manipulated to the point people still are willing to buy it. Who is allowed to trade or who is not allowed cannot be controlled by any measure these days. Can you share a quote where i stated that? I made a scenario where the price of the currency could be manipulated on the free market. You seriously haven´t heard of what European Unions central bank has been doing for this entire decade? They manipulate the price of the Euro as some may have noticed. As i also stated we would need majority of the network (hashrate) so more than half of the constant supply is still under our control.

Planned economics in soviet union meant that the price of the ruble was not only manipulated but it was fully controlled buy the state no matter the supply or demand. In Europe the price of the Euro is manipulated through a central bank but even them cannot fully decide what it´s price should be . Most of the Europeans still call it a free market. This scenario was an image of the latter.

Ok, u get most of hashers onboard and u start manipulating price... at the same time u promise to pay all miners that higher price. Unless u have some big buffer of btc (that will dry out), how on earth will u do both things at the same time? So we get to the first question, who will u sell it to?

Miners get a higher price when the biggest pools sell the mined zcash centralized in the normal marketplaces where they try to manipulate to current price.

There are some same ideas like in the nicehash -system, where you get a share from your hashing power proportionately but you are not necessarily compensated with the coins you were currently mining. The pool will sell the "randomcoins" for you and compensate you with bitcoins. No news here. Though in this scenario we only mine zcash and you are compensated through fiat currencies, for example. That would somewhat reduce the effect of what coin dumping currently has on zcash´s price and maybe give a better share for miners.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
Hello.
I've got a problem that I can repeat using different equipment

If the main card is not AMD and it can not be Mine, the Claymore
It will not show the video card temperature on all the others.
Even if they are 6 pieces.

I would like to offer the opportunity to add a point card numbers that
are not involved in mining or cards that do not need to read the temperature.
Ready to provide their own equipment for testing.
Asrock Anniversary and other


This issue is on the version for claymore ethereuim or zec
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy

To control the price u need one of two, absence of free market so only controlled partys that agree on some price can trade. Or control over supply so decreasing it the price will rise by itself.
One way or another, u will decrease volume but problem is, zec supply is constant. What u gonna do about that?

"socialist card" is about planned economics, u plan supply and u plan price and u never hit the target of demand. U either have overproduction or deficit. And with "controlled" price of ZEC u have over production that u cant sell unless the price will go down.

I never stated that full control of the price can be achieved. It only can be manipulated to the point people still are willing to buy it. Who is allowed to trade or who is not allowed cannot be controlled by any measure these days. Can you share a quote where i stated that? I made a scenario where the price of the currency could be manipulated on the free market. You seriously haven´t heard of what European Unions central bank has been doing for this entire decade? They manipulate the price of the Euro as some may have noticed. As i also stated we would need majority of the network (hashrate) so more than half of the constant supply is still under our control.

Planned economics in soviet union meant that the price of the ruble was not only manipulated but it was fully controlled buy the state no matter the supply or demand. In Europe the price of the Euro is manipulated through a central bank but even them cannot fully decide what it´s price should be . Most of the Europeans still call it a free market. This scenario was an image of the latter.

Ok, u get most of hashers onboard and u start manipulating price... at the same time u promise to pay all miners that higher price. Unless u have some big buffer of btc (that will dry out), how on earth will u do both things at the same time? So we get to the first question, who will u sell it to?
sr. member
Activity: 365
Merit: 250
can you guys please advise?

i am running 4x480 and 2x280, and the machine is connected via onboard video. now in this instance i cannot control anything, but will the default settings keep the cards running normally, or do i need afterburner to up the fans just to be sure?
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Here I come to try to undermine the zcash with claymore

But I crash after a few seconds

I get 180H / S per card, (rx 480)

This is what I put in the bat:

GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x


Do you have an idea why this crash?

thank you in advance

On Windows you have to add set before GPU...

set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x

And don't forget: Virtual memory >16 MB.

?!? set or setx is true?

set modifies the current shell's (window) environment values, and the change is available immediately, but it is temporary. The change will not affect other shells that are running, and as soon as you close the shell, the new value is lost until such time as you run set again.

setx modifies the value permanently, which affects all future shells, but does not modify the environment of the shells already running. You have to exit the shell and reopen it before the change will be available, but the value will remain modified until you change it again.

Thanks for comprehensive answer, but I asked what is more properly used and not the differences between the set and setx?

Well i use setx as global, I don't think there is a "proper" way, you either set it temporary or permanently.
I guess if you have various different cards you would use set, and if they were all the same use setx.

My cards is all the same /RX480 Nitro+ OC 8 GB/ and i will use setx! Thanks!

set needs =
setx doesn't
so good thing that you're going to use setx


use
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100



Hello

I changed my order, and I set set, or setx.


Ca walk but ca crash after about 5 minutes,

BSOD.

My rx 480 on the bios mod. It are set for the hethereum with claymore 7.4

Clock = 0.920mv / 1200mhz
Memory = 0.950mv / 2250mhz

I wonder if the problem comes from the gpu settings.

Anyone has this problem with rx480?

thank you in advance

0.950 on the memory is low, from what i know. Mine need around .1 more then that to run stable 2250.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy

To control the price u need one of two, absence of free market so only controlled partys that agree on some price can trade. Or control over supply so decreasing it the price will rise by itself.
One way or another, u will decrease volume but problem is, zec supply is constant. What u gonna do about that?

"socialist card" is about planned economics, u plan supply and u plan price and u never hit the target of demand. U either have overproduction or deficit. And with "controlled" price of ZEC u have over production that u cant sell unless the price will go down.

I never stated that full control of the price can be achieved. It only can be manipulated to the point people still are willing to buy it. Who is allowed to trade or who is not allowed cannot be controlled by any measure these days. Can you share a quote where i stated that? I made a scenario where the price of the currency could be manipulated on the free market. You seriously haven´t heard of what European Unions central bank has been doing for this entire decade? They manipulate the price of the Euro as some may have noticed. As i also stated we would need majority of the network (hashrate) so more than half of the constant supply is still under our control.

Planned economics in soviet union meant that the price of the ruble was not only manipulated but it was fully controlled buy the state no matter the supply or demand. In Europe the price of the Euro is manipulated through a central bank but even them cannot fully decide what it´s price should be . Most of the Europeans still call it a free market. This scenario was an image of the latter.
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
Word is flying about the internet that a whale got hacked and all their assets where dumped apparently its happened to a few. This may explain the price drop on most of the alt coins

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/5gsc6z/augur_rep_hack/

https://twitter.com/zoidbergbtc/status/806101156002988033




It was mentioned on polo this morning that a eth whale was hacked and his stash dumped on the market.  as you say it may account for a few other coins as well
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
Word is flying about the internet that a whale got hacked and all their assets where dumped apparently its happened to a few. This may explain the price drop on most of the alt coins

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/5gsc6z/augur_rep_hack/

https://twitter.com/zoidbergbtc/status/806101156002988033


newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0

Hello

I changed my order, and I set set, or setx.


Ca walk but ca crash after about 5 minutes,

BSOD.

My rx 480 on the bios mod. It are set for the hethereum with claymore 7.4

Clock = 0.920mv / 1200mhz
Memory = 0.950mv / 2250mhz

I wonder if the problem comes from the gpu settings.

Anyone has this problem with rx480?

thank you in advance

I think 0.920mv for 1200mhz is too low voltage for your gpu. First try with 1000mv then decrease it until crash. And leave default memory voltage at least in the begining...
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
Here I come to try to undermine the zcash with claymore

But I crash after a few seconds

I get 180H / S per card, (rx 480)

This is what I put in the bat:

GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x


Do you have an idea why this crash?

thank you in advance

On Windows you have to add set before GPU...

set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -allpools 1 -zwal my address wallet.rig -zpsw x

And don't forget: Virtual memory >16 MB.

?!? set or setx is true?

set modifies the current shell's (window) environment values, and the change is available immediately, but it is temporary. The change will not affect other shells that are running, and as soon as you close the shell, the new value is lost until such time as you run set again.

setx modifies the value permanently, which affects all future shells, but does not modify the environment of the shells already running. You have to exit the shell and reopen it before the change will be available, but the value will remain modified until you change it again.

Thanks for comprehensive answer, but I asked what is more properly used and not the differences between the set and setx?

Well i use setx as global, I don't think there is a "proper" way, you either set it temporary or permanently.
I guess if you have various different cards you would use set, and if they were all the same use setx.

My cards is all the same /RX480 Nitro+ OC 8 GB/ and i will use setx! Thanks!

set needs =
setx doesn't
so good thing that you're going to use setx


use
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100



Hello

I changed my order, and I set set, or setx.


Ca walk but ca crash after about 5 minutes,

BSOD.

My rx 480 on the bios mod. It are set for the hethereum with claymore 7.4

Clock = 0.920mv / 1200mhz
Memory = 0.950mv / 2250mhz

I wonder if the problem comes from the gpu settings.

Anyone has this problem with rx480?

thank you in advance

Dude with bios mid 2250 is too high. Start with 2000 and ramp up slow. I use 2100 for @ 975mv which is the most stable for me.
Increase core voltage to 1000 mv and start lowering slowly and test for stability over 2-3 hours at a time.
I get 29.4mh at core 1110 @ 975mv and 2100 memory @975mv.
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy

To control the price u need one of two, absence of free market so only controlled partys that agree on some price can trade. Or control over supply so decreasing it the price will rise by itself.
One way or another, u will decrease volume but problem is, zec supply is constant. What u gonna do about that?

"socialist card" is about planned economics, u plan supply and u plan price and u never hit the target of demand. U either have overproduction or deficit. And with "controlled" price of ZEC u have over production that u cant sell unless the price will go down.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
not that it's terribly important, but lots of people use claymore's miner.
two indications: watching closely the hashrate on flypool(about 40% of total zec hashrate) when the new miner is released  it would look like everyone is using it... Smiley also if you calculate the amount claymore made on his devfee zec account (the one posted here earlier) - it's 2.5% of the 10% of the total zec in circulation .. also it could be not the only one...

yes lots use it but do you want to be the one to suggest the proposal to and coordinate it all with the miners.  Dont forget Claymore will have got more users when version 8 was bundled with the nicehash miner.

As was stated earlier all you would be doing if you mananged to make the deal with all the miners is create a artificial price point.



In the end it is artificial indeed, though sustained through guessing how much people are willing to pay from zcash when the supply is manipulated. Zcash being VAT free (at least if traded to bitcoin) and  it´s supposed anonymity may be the natural growing factors that make the price go boom by itself in the future. Though it doesn´t mean that we should allow coin dumping to reduce the price too much right now and centralized selling would reduce it´s effect in the meanwhile + the suppliers of zcash get a better share for their efforts? I´m just speculating though. One would first need to contact the pools and make the deal happen somehow. Not going to do that by myself that´s for sure Cheesy. How about you @claymore? Maybe you could try?
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
dunno about temp benefits. I guess the miner is not the key here, the market and adoption is.
I'm actually kinda hoping that founders fee would be the long term support buffer for ZEC, also their marketing efforts seems to be pretty good, so I'm cautiously optimistic.  
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Yeah right, and who would those pools sell it to? At prices higher than of a free market. Say, they put the price at 1btc. What then?

U people miss the experience of living in soviet union. These kind of plans dont work.

Market manipulation or cartels have nothing to do with predetermined production in Soviet union mate. More likely this can be mocked as an attempt to make a "central bank" for zcash. To be honest, mildly controlling the price of a currency is what central banks do. If you meant "you people" by Finnish people, we are nowadays basically anti communism as a whole.

If you actually read my last post, you would see that what i meant was to manipulate the zcash price so the coin dumping wouldn´t have such a detrimental effect on the prices. Therefore the prices could be better adjusted to the current demand (through centralized selling=pool collaboration). As i originally posted, there is a risk that if the price is too high, people wont buy it and if it was the 100 dollars each i originally hypothesized, we would still need to make the majority of the network to collaborate with this plan. To control the risks i threw out ideas of pool collaboration and an idea to adjust the price to the point people would actually buy it (read "leftover demand", which of whom may or may not buy zcash even if they can´t get it for 50 dollars each). This is also 100% theoretical speculation as you may have noticed.    

Though i´m not sure if you are trolling with that "socialist - card" Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250

the reason I'm mentioning the devfee is because it's a good indication that at least 10% of all zec was mined with claymore.
as for the devfee itself: my opinion was always the same - great incentive to support and update miners, so I'm good with this investment.

I understood you were using it a measure of how many were using Claymore's miner, he couldnt be getting that income if it wasnt in use by so many. Sorry if I came across as if meaning something else

I was just pointing out what has been said before.  people are eager for his miners new version as is to be expected but any benefits felt from it will only last so long.
sr. member
Activity: 857
Merit: 262
not that it's terribly important, but lots of people use claymore's miner.
two indications: watching closely the hashrate on flypool(about 40% of total zec hashrate) when the new miner is released  it would look like everyone is using it... Smiley also if you calculate the amount claymore made on his devfee zec account (the one posted here earlier) - it's 2.5% of the 10% of the total zec in circulation .. also it could be not the only one...

yes lots use it but do you want to be the one to suggest the proposal to and coordinate it all with the miners.  Dont forget Claymore will have got more users when version 8 was bundled with the nicehash miner.

As was stated earlier all you would be doing if you mananged to make the deal with all the miners is create a artificial price point.



That is right. When the V9 comes out in the next few days, the Claymore will earn more. but that is fair deal.

I have no problem with claymore having a fee in his miner, its thanks to him I am able to mine (no coding knowledge so I wouldnt know where to start to even try to make my own).

Main problem I can see is the early adopters of the miners will get a slight income boost as they get the boost from the extra speed early but as more start to use it that extra income will vanish as the hashrate and difficulty rise.

the reason I'm mentioning the devfee is because it's a good indication that at least 10% of all zec was mined with claymore.
as for the devfee itself: my opinion was always the same - great incentive to support and update miners, so I'm good with this investment.
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
not that it's terribly important, but lots of people use claymore's miner.
two indications: watching closely the hashrate on flypool(about 40% of total zec hashrate) when the new miner is released  it would look like everyone is using it... Smiley also if you calculate the amount claymore made on his devfee zec account (the one posted here earlier) - it's 2.5% of the 10% of the total zec in circulation .. also it could be not the only one...

yes lots use it but do you want to be the one to suggest the proposal to and coordinate it all with the miners.  Dont forget Claymore will have got more users when version 8 was bundled with the nicehash miner.

As was stated earlier all you would be doing if you mananged to make the deal with all the miners is create a artificial price point.



That is right. When the V9 comes out in the next few days, the Claymore will earn more. but that is fair deal.

I have no problem with claymore having a fee in his miner, its thanks to him I am able to mine (no coding knowledge so I wouldnt know where to start to even try to make my own).

Main problem I can see is the early adopters of the miners will get a slight income boost as they get the boost from the extra speed early but as more start to use it that extra income will vanish as the hashrate and difficulty rise.
hero member
Activity: 884
Merit: 500
0xedA39AF25b25f179bed410EcC6d33060952b7Db3
not that it's terribly important, but lots of people use claymore's miner.
two indications: watching closely the hashrate on flypool(about 40% of total zec hashrate) when the new miner is released  it would look like everyone is using it... Smiley also if you calculate the amount claymore made on his devfee zec account (the one posted here earlier) - it's 2.5% of the 10% of the total zec in circulation .. also it could be not the only one...

yes lots use it but do you want to be the one to suggest the proposal to and coordinate it all with the miners.  Dont forget Claymore will have got more users when version 8 was bundled with the nicehash miner.

As was stated earlier all you would be doing if you mananged to make the deal with all the miners is create a artificial price point.



That is right. When the V9 comes out in the next few days, the Claymore will earn more. but that is fair deal.
sr. member
Activity: 410
Merit: 250
not that it's terribly important, but lots of people use claymore's miner.
two indications: watching closely the hashrate on flypool(about 40% of total zec hashrate) when the new miner is released  it would look like everyone is using it... Smiley also if you calculate the amount claymore made on his devfee zec account (the one posted here earlier) - it's 2.5% of the 10% of the total zec in circulation .. also it could be not the only one...

yes lots use it but do you want to be the one to suggest the proposal to and coordinate it all with the miners.  Dont forget Claymore will have got more users when version 8 was bundled with the nicehash miner.

As was stated earlier all you would be doing if you mananged to make the deal with all the miners is create a artificial price point.

Jump to: