Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 472. (Read 3839163 times)

member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
I'm beginning to believe my motherboard is not capable of handling more than 2 cards ugh! Msi z170a gaming pro carbon either on boot (windows 8 or 10) doesn't recognize cards, afterburner doesn't show temps and card crashes or opencl hangs on miner
I heard that chipset Z170 causes problems with more graphics cards for mining (in concretely following motherboard: https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Z170-PRO/). However, I can not guarantee that this is true. Maybe someone colleague miner has experience with chipset Z170.

It's rock solid for 2 cards just no more :/

Edit: finally got both my 380s and a 280x running both 380s are mounted on motherboard with a riser plugged into the other x16 slot ...trying to use any of the X1 slots causes instability and can't use more than 3 cards (I'm hoping for stability with these 3)
hero member
Activity: 711
Merit: 500
I'm beginning to believe my motherboard is not capable of handling more than 2 cards ugh! Msi z170a gaming pro carbon either on boot (windows 8 or 10) doesn't recognize cards, afterburner doesn't show temps and card crashes or opencl hangs on miner
I heard that chipset Z170 causes problems with more graphics cards for mining (in concretely following motherboard: https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Z170-PRO/). However, I can not guarantee that this is true. Maybe someone colleague miner has experience with chipset Z170.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
I'm beginning to believe my motherboard is not capable of handling more than 2 cards ugh! Msi z170a gaming pro carbon either on boot (windows 8 or 10) doesn't recognize cards, afterburner doesn't show temps and card crashes or opencl hangs on miner
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
It's Not Enough
Hi All,

I've just created a page where one can share your experiance with your graphical card in order to have a benchmark.

http://cryptolex.ch/gpu-mining-hardware-for-z-cash-comparison/?lang=en

Of corse I'm using Claymore since beginning and v8 works perfectly ! Thanks claymore for your job and effort Smiley ... waiting for version 9 ... 10 ...


waiting for rev, after I sent the info... really?
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Hi All,

I've just created a page where one can share your experiance with your graphical card in order to have a benchmark.

http://cryptolex.ch/gpu-mining-hardware-for-z-cash-comparison/?lang=en

Of corse I'm using Claymore since beginning and v8 works perfectly ! Thanks claymore for your job and effort Smiley ... waiting for version 9 ... 10 ...
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
did someone have more than 189 h\s on ref rx 480 8Gb?

yep getting 200 from all of mine (see earlier post)
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
I have few rx470 from xfx, the single fan ones, and with 1500 straps bios mod and clocks: 1200/1000mv 1750/1000mv they are doing 173h/s at 127W from the wall measured with smart plug. This is with V8 and -i 4 setting. This xfx model is the cheapest but it's very silent, running at 70C with 35% fan speed, the room temp is 25C. The nice thing about them is dual bios Wink

Now this is some valuable information, thanks for posting this!

What is this smart plug?
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
Certainly better to take new cards from three-year warranty, I think card Rx series is the best choice now!

R9 vs. Rx has it's pros and cons,

RX
-lower power consumption
-One 6 or 8pin connector
-higher resale value
(CONS)
-slightly scaled back hashrates, especially at stock bios (modding the bios voids warranty)
-expensive

R9/HD 7000
-higher hashrate
-high bus width (384 and 512 depending model)
-generally less expensive
-fantastic if you have free electricity.
(CONS)
-harder to source
-likely less support and optimization moving forward
-probably used (and abused) for up to 4-5 years.
-takes up as much power as a stovetop
-hot as a stovetop
-as heavy as a stovetop
-not a stovetop.

So much wrong in this post.



R9/HD 7000
- Better price per hash
- Much better build quality compared to most RX series GPUs
- Never have to worry about melting SATA cables since they use max 20 Watts from PCIe slot compared to 100 Watts like the RX 480.
- Already ROI'd for most
- Use a little more power but it shouldn't make a difference since your profit is much much greater than your electricity cost anyways. If the 280x is too costly for you to run, so will be the 470 and you shouldn't be mining anyways due to your electricity costs. The difference is maybe 5cents daily on 10c/kwh power.
- End of depreciation curve. Pretty much won't depreciate 50% like the RX series. Buy today, mine, and sell in 1 year for almost same price.
- Much more stable AMD drivers. When a GPU hangs, it doesn't freeze your entire system or BSOD.
- Doesn't require HDMI Dummy plugs.
- Easier to use in Linux due to temp management
- No stupid RGB LEDs which are crazy annoying at night and pose a security risk.
- Southern Islands Architecture is more geared towards GPU Compute rather than Polaris which is more geared towards gaming and VR.

Only con I can think of is due to the Tahiti's bad speed in ETH. Hawaii is still fine.








newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
I have few rx470 from xfx, the single fan ones, and with 1500 straps bios mod and clocks: 1200/1000mv 1750/1000mv they are doing 173h/s at 127W from the wall measured with smart plug. This is with V8 and -i 4 setting. This xfx model is the cheapest but it's very silent, running at 70C with 35% fan speed, the room temp is 25C. The nice thing about them is dual bios Wink
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Certainly better to take new cards from three-year warranty, I think card Rx series is the best choice now!

It must be, just do not whine on claymore's thread.

sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
Certainly better to take new cards from three-year warranty, I think card Rx series is the best choice now!
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Try 700/750/800/850/900/950/1000 // 1000/1125/1250/1375/1500.

-100mV is a good starting point, this is not some king of voodoo magic, this info has been floating around the net for years.

Guys show some effort, from your posts it looks like 480 can do what 150s/ 110watts?
member
Activity: 127
Merit: 10
Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

No it is not. It is because 290/ 390(x) are high end cards vs 470 low-mid/ 480 mid level, amd has not released that high performance gpu yet.

470/ 480 owners were lucky to enjoy hig end hashing rates at one algo with some bios modding. Today ancient 290 hashes more than 470/ 480 with the same or better hash/ watt ratio, better get used to it.

ps. what where those every other currencies where 480 matched 390?

ETH and SC
full member
Activity: 263
Merit: 100
Need some advice

I need a couple of new cards i can get these 2

280x for 115 usd
470 for  220 usd

The 470 sounds like more future proof but getting like 180 sol
280x looks much better it can get like 210 sol


[/quotehttp://www.ebay.com/itm/Sapphire-AMD-Radeon-RX-480-8GB-GDDR5-PCI-E-Video-Card-HDMI-DP-Crossfire-VR-Ready-/192037361455?hash=item2cb651972f:g:c6cAAOSwj85YOPhh


Im not in the US so ebay is not a option for me unfortunately
legendary
Activity: 1001
Merit: 1005

I can get 295 s/s out of 390 without bios mod but there is no reason to push it to the limits when you can do 240 with -50% on power consumption.

ok, add new info

480*5 900h/s  1145/2100 (bios mod starp 1750) -60mv 650w from wall
650/900= 0.72 best result)

and
i get 285 h/s on sapphire 390 1100/1500 -50mv but i dont know power consumption.
full member
Activity: 258
Merit: 100
So I downgraded from a 16.x.x on my other rig (390 and a 380) down to 15.12 (finally got that to work...)

Increased my 390 from ~230 sol/s to 260 sol/s and my R9 380 went from 120 sol/s to 130 sol/s on Clay's 8.0 release.

So I'm fairly satisfied with that, and I'll likely just leave it be for now.

However, on my rig with two RX 480's, I seem to be getting "miner thread hangs, needs to restart" and then I need to reset it manually. Would a lower intensity stop that problem? I do use this rig while I mine, so maybe other things (like video playback) taxing the GPU is causing issue? Not totally sure. Maybe I'll just leave it alone and see if it still happens, who knows. Tongue
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

The R9 390's have more memory bandwidth (384 bit i believe) which makes them ideal for the Zcash mining algorithm. RX 480's only have 256 bit.

512 bit actually Wink
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Ok, so it looks like everyone else is getting approximately the same hashrate difference for R9 390 vs. RX 480. I get 260 H/s and 190 H/s respectively with mine (both 8 GB). So my question is, is it expected that the 480 hashrate is only 73% of the 390? Is it because of the lower power consumption on the 480? With every other miner/currency so far, my 480s hash at about the same rate as my 390s. Is this something new with v8.0?

No it is not. It is because 290/ 390(x) are high end cards vs 470 low-mid/ 480 mid level, amd has not released that high performance gpu yet.

470/ 480 owners were lucky to enjoy hig end hashing rates at one algo with some bios modding. Today ancient 290 hashes more than 470/ 480 with the same or better hash/ watt ratio, better get used to it.

ps. what where those every other currencies where 480 matched 390?

While R9 serie has better hash, I don't quite agree about the hash/watt ratio. My RX 470 has better hash ratio than my 290x and the R9 is undervolted, not the the RX.
it depend on chance

390*6    1600 h/s    1030/1500                                 -60mv    1480W(gold psu) from wall (with -100mv 1300W)
480*5    1000 h/s    1288/2100 (mod bios 1750 straps) -60mv    850W(platinum) from wall
actually 390 works at -100mv, but to compare with RX480 I set Vcore to -60mv)

1480/1600 = 0.925 w/h (or 1300/1600=0.8125)
850/1000  = 0.825 w/h

so 390 better)


I can get 295 s/s out of 390 without bios mod but there is no reason to push it to the limits when you can do 240 with -50% on power consumption.
hero member
Activity: 935
Merit: 1001
I don't always drink...
After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.

I don't really believe in coincidences... But I'm not sure. Maybe usage went up, and so did temps? Maybe they got hot enough to melt the solder, or something like that. I have a pretty aggressive fan curve on afterburner, even though my cards stay fairly cool. Around 75% fan at all times, or more if temps go anywhere over 80C.
I had same problem, it is thermopaste problem, i changed it and the problem was gone. temp went about 20C down.

Yeah, I've had that problem before, too.  I replaced some fans via ebay purchase for some 280x's and it shipped with some white thermopaste.  Tried it out.  It was total crap!  Replaced it with some Tuniq TX-2, wow, what a difference!  Never use the white crap from china, never.
legendary
Activity: 1405
Merit: 1001
did someone have more than 189 h\s on ref rx 480 8Gb?
I get about 190-192h/s on the Sapphire RX480 Reference Cards (8GB).
My 4GB Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ do get 185-186h/s
Jump to: