Author

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 578. (Read 3839163 times)

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
280x 120 sols... stock Smiley
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 502
280x ~125.5 ( -i 4)
470 4GB ~145 ( -i 4)
480 8GB ~150 ( -i 4)

470s almost kicking their big brothers asses.

Great update !
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
116h/s r9 280x norm?
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 508
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023
Great job..but still favor stronger CPYs ...have 15 sols more per card where quad core is then where dual core is
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
~ 115 per card on R9 290x
~ 114 per card on R9 280x
~ 113 per card on 7970
~ 154 per card RX 480

All stock settings Smiley

Thanks!

Seems odd. I get 125 sol/s on 290 (not 290x) with 5.0 stock
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
148H/s on reference RX480 is OK?
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
How are your speeds with "-i 3" vs "-i 4" ?

same
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
Up to 300% + 200 FS deposit bonuses
How are your speeds with "-i 3" vs "-i 4" ?
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
~ 114 per card on R9 280x
~ 113 per card on 7970
Got about the same on stock 7970, while one with modded bios gives 137+ sol/s, peaking at almost 150sol/s
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
Very small difference in hashrate with -i 4, I get maybe 5-10 hashes more per rig. Almostno change in wattage though.

i also noticed this, cpu % is also same.. Wonder what's the difference Cheesy
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100
This version 6.0 is more stable than the previous.. like eth miner.. the hashrate don't fluctuate so much.. with the previous version the number go from 120 to 135 H/s (sometimes 140) .. this version the number go from 153 to 155 H/s... very stable..

Great job!!

hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
Can someone point me in the direction to mod the bios on the following for low power consumption or at least better than stock bios mining:

I have rigs with the following :

Powercolor red devil 1330mhx RX 480 8GB
Sapphire nitro rx 470 4gb
sapphire nitro rx 480 4 gb
sapphire nitro rx 480 8 gb

All will use powered risers 1x - 16x if that matters.


These are all about to get installed into rigs for minining and I want to set it right up at the start.



wrong thread.
go here : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hacked-modified-memory-strap-bios-database-for-zec-mining-1676474
sr. member
Activity: 487
Merit: 266
Very small difference in hashrate with -i 4, I get maybe 5-10 hashes more per rig. Almostno change in wattage though.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Can someone point me in the direction to mod the bios on the following for low power consumption or at least better than stock bios mining:

I have rigs with the following :

Powercolor red devil 1330mhx RX 480 8GB
Sapphire nitro rx 470 4gb
sapphire nitro rx 480 4 gb
sapphire nitro rx 480 8 gb

All will use powered risers 1x - 16x if that matters.


These are all about to get installed into rigs for minining and I want to set it right up at the start.

newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
4x the speed with Claymores V6 Miners with my rx470 since the beginning!


Amazing Stuff! Smiley
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
It seems that with this release

ETH POWER CONSUMPTION = ZEC Claymore V6 POWER CONSUMPTION


Hopefully I can undervolt most cards to like 900Mhz Engine Core and keep only the Memory clock high.

yap, watt up 10-15 watt per card
no it doesn't. I get 720 at the wall compared to 900 on ETH with downvolt.
hero member
Activity: 2548
Merit: 626
Difference in -i 2 and -i 4 in POWER CONSUMPTION ?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
~ 115 per card on R9 290x
~ 114 per card on R9 280x
~ 113 per card on 7970
~ 154 per card RX 480

All stock settings Smiley

Thanks!
Your 290x should be getting at least 130 or more.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1024
I have the weirdest problem. I start hashing quite stable and well. After I leave the rig (stop using the mouse etc), hashrate starts to drop a lot. When I move the mouse again the hashrate is back up. Same problem was with v5 too. Anyone else having this weird issue?
Jump to: