Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 677.

xelbyb

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Quote from: Arsenay on November 09, 2016, 10:42:29 AM

Quote from: xelbyb on November 09, 2016, 10:14:25 AM

Quote from: Taxidermista on November 09, 2016, 09:50:58 AM

Quote from: Arsenay on November 09, 2016, 07:46:54 AM

- пpивязкa к питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

do not be rude, I'm not Russian ))

Senya, protect your hand!

CoRpO

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: Claymore on November 09, 2016, 10:31:32 AM

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Nice work

mikewetminer88

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: bardacuda on November 09, 2016, 10:42:10 AM

Quote from: Claymore on November 09, 2016, 10:31:32 AM

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Noice! I think those haters were mostly ppl who were butthurt that they were the only ones getting good speeds because they were on linux, and you levelled the playing field, so they decided to start some FUD. You punched em right in the profits! Cheesy

Well said... Cheesy

carlo_0000

legendary

Activity: 1281

Merit: 1003

V 3.0 i m getting

73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g

Arsenay

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: xelbyb on November 09, 2016, 10:14:25 AM

Quote from: Taxidermista on November 09, 2016, 09:50:58 AM

Quote from: Arsenay on November 09, 2016, 07:46:54 AM

- пpивязкa к питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

do not be rude, I'm not Russian ))

bardacuda

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 254

Quote from: Claymore on November 09, 2016, 10:31:32 AM

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Noice! I think those haters were mostly ppl who were butthurt that they were the only ones getting good speeds because they were on linux, and you levelled the playing field, so they decided to start some FUD. You punched em right in the profits! Cheesy

xelbyb

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Quote from: lamouser on November 09, 2016, 09:41:19 AM

Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data

I cut off one by one gpu
I disabled the gpu one by one and found a video card problem.
I increased the power to 1.2 volts per core.
This high. But there is no data error

I do not use -i x

Claymore

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1325

Miners developer

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Ursul0

sr. member

Activity: 857

Merit: 262

@Claymore
there's some weird behavior with -cclock & -mclock
On a rig of four I'm running zec miner on a single card, like this:

Code:

-di 2

Yet I need to specify that the other clocks should not be touched:

Code:

-cclock 0,0,0,1080
-mclock 0,0,0,1500

Otherwise all cards get these settings.

Is this because you don't know the proper enum order, or you can fix it?

CoRpO

full member

Activity: 185

Merit: 100

Quote from: lamouser on November 09, 2016, 09:41:19 AM

Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data

stop using -i 2 with 280(x) / 79x0, this is the root cause

xelbyb

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Quote from: Taxidermista on November 09, 2016, 09:50:58 AM

Quote from: Arsenay on November 09, 2016, 07:46:54 AM

- пpивязкa к питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

kiffner

hero member

Activity: 505

Merit: 500

Quote from: klondike_bar on November 09, 2016, 02:29:24 AM

for some reason, first time i used 2.1 with "-i 2" on my 270x cards, now im having all sorts of problems.

2.1 wont mine (no text past the [CLAYMORE] header), and nicehashminer crashes the system when initializing devices.

-i 2 is to high for 270.... Use 1

pwpwpw

hero member

Activity: 908

Merit: 503

Quote from: lamouser on November 09, 2016, 09:41:19 AM

Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data

Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)

Master-Peter

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: carlo_0000 on November 09, 2016, 09:42:29 AM

Quote from: Master-Peter on November 09, 2016, 09:19:31 AM

Dear folks,

after killing the mobo of my old XW8600 when squeezing to much Sols out of my 2 290x cards I'm in need of a new system.

For the ready made systems there are 2 Options right now to be optained "cheap" (around 600,-- €). Both come with ~1100W PSU.

Dell T7500 - 2x Xeon X5650 SSD 128GB HDD 1TB Ram 48GB - 1100 watt 85PLUS Power Factor Correcting (PFC) power supply
HP Z800 - 2x Xeon L5640 SSD 128GB Ram 24GB - 1110 watts 89% efficient power supply

Any preferences ?

Shall be used for working and mining in the background or when idle.

Thanks
Peter

i don't think this miner kills your motherboard it use less power than other miner

how can poeple buy so expensive hardware ? for mining
it s already hard to pay back cheap one

better buy all the piece separately and build you a cheaper miner computer
you can use 2 psu lot cheaper than 1, use a asrock motherboard, 4gig of ram is enough and you probably alredy have a hard drive

and using a computer you need for work and mining is not a good idea

Anyway, it's toasted. :-( I shutdown the miner after playing exzessive with the clock/memory speeds, got a blackscreen and cannot go higher than std. res. with 4 different cards. The cards work in other PC's. So it's quite sure the PCI Slot is toast.

I need a new WS for work now anyway ...

Using a computer at all is never a good idea. Wink

bardacuda

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 254

Quote from: carlo_0000 on November 09, 2016, 09:42:29 AM

Quote from: Master-Peter on November 09, 2016, 09:19:31 AM

Dear folks,

after killing the mobo of my old XW8600 when squeezing to much Sols out of my 2 290x cards I'm in need of a new system.

For the ready made systems there are 2 Options right now to be optained "cheap" (around 600,-- €). Both come with ~1100W PSU.

Dell T7500 - 2x Xeon X5650 SSD 128GB HDD 1TB Ram 48GB - 1100 watt 85PLUS Power Factor Correcting (PFC) power supply
HP Z800 - 2x Xeon L5640 SSD 128GB Ram 24GB - 1110 watts 89% efficient power supply

Any preferences ?

Shall be used for working and mining in the background or when idle.

Thanks
Peter

i don't think this miner kills your motherboard it use less power than other miner

how can poeple buy so expensive hardware ? for mining
it s already hard to pay back cheap one

better buy all the piece separately and build you a cheaper miner computer
you can use 2 psu lot cheaper than 1, use a asrock motherboard, 4gig of ram is enough and you probably alredy have a hard drive

and using a computer you need for work and mining is not a good idea

I second this. Is there a reason you need 2 x slow hexacores from pre sandy bridge days? Why not just replace the motherboard and PSU on your current system? I don't recommend doing any mining at all with dell or hp no-name PSUs.

Taxidermista

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Arsenay on November 09, 2016, 07:46:54 AM

- пpивязкa к питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

carlo_0000

legendary

Activity: 1281

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Master-Peter on November 09, 2016, 09:19:31 AM

Dear folks,

after killing the mobo of my old XW8600 when squeezing to much Sols out of my 2 290x cards I'm in need of a new system.

For the ready made systems there are 2 Options right now to be optained "cheap" (around 600,-- €). Both come with ~1100W PSU.

Dell T7500 - 2x Xeon X5650 SSD 128GB HDD 1TB Ram 48GB - 1100 watt 85PLUS Power Factor Correcting (PFC) power supply
HP Z800 - 2x Xeon L5640 SSD 128GB Ram 24GB - 1110 watts 89% efficient power supply

Any preferences ?

Shall be used for working and mining in the background or when idle.

Thanks
Peter

i don't think this miner kills your motherboard it use less power than other miner

how can poeple buy so expensive hardware ? for mining
it s already hard to pay back cheap one

better buy all the piece separately and build you a cheaper miner computer
you can use 2 psu lot cheaper than 1, use a asrock motherboard, 4gig of ram is enough and you probably alredy have a hard drive

and using a computer you need for work and mining is not a good idea

lamouser

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data
http://savepic.ru/12141547.png

ghostfaceuk

sr. member

Activity: 410

Merit: 250

Quote from: isma on November 09, 2016, 09:32:23 AM

I tried to configure my batch Claymore file to work/mine ZCL Zcash Classic(new coin) on https://pool.mn/zclassic , but keeps crashing.

Anyone knows if is possible and if yes what do we put in the batch file?

This is my batch file for mining zclassic on coinmine.pl. this is for a r9 280 GPU (non x version).

set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR=0
set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE=100
set GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
set GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT=100

ZecMiner64.exe -tt 76 -zpool zcl.coinmine.pl:7007 -zwal xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx -zpsw 1 -allpools 1

carlo_0000

legendary

Activity: 1281

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Nabicoma on November 09, 2016, 03:29:46 AM

Quote from: carlo_0000 on November 08, 2016, 04:52:41 PM

Quote from: Kevinatin on November 08, 2016, 04:12:40 PM

Quote from: GH on November 08, 2016, 03:17:43 PM

Quote from: marvykkio on November 08, 2016, 02:59:06 PM

it seems to me not so much profitable.

Zcash 24 our 380 h/s = $15.45

ETH 24 our 350 mh/s = $26.39

ETHC 24 our 350 mh/s = $24.03

if for cards 470 480 380x 390x do not get to 100 h / s to not see well card

Huh

Your equihash rate is way too low. If done right it should be double of what ethash rates are.

That is about right. For my AMD R9 390, it can do 30MH/s. For the ZEC, it can do 60 slol/s or 30H/s. 1H/s = 2 Sol/s.

60 on a r9 390 (not x ?) mine does 56-57 what clock you run at?

in total i do 410mh on ether and 860 on zcash (r9 270 has very good speed, close to 380's)

I had 58-60 sols/s for 390 nonx, the frequency is 1120/1250. The memory frequency does not need to be too high.

hum ok ,but mine cannot run above 1090/1525 for 1100 i have to use +13mv, you decrease memory? i though it speed high memory speed
with msi afterburner i cannot under clock

i m running now 1090/1525 for 59mh
for r9 380 i keep stock speed, overclock very bad and make mostly no difference

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 677. (Read 3839163 times)