Around 75 on the 390s (2 are running 80-82), 37-38 on the 380s, 55-60 on the 470s480s, and 62 on the 280x
not bad at all. about 25% increase from previous version for me.
A bit off topic, but I have the sapphire nitro 470 I got (return from RMA)...and in atiflash it always fails....cant read rom. Unless claymore is running then it reads it and "pass". any ideas ? I want to flash it but so far the only way would be to flash it while its working....which doesnt sound too good.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 676. (Read 3839163 times)
System Crash with v3.0 (all 3 mining intensity combinations) on my Main System (2 x RX480 w. Crossfire on I7-6950X)
v2.0 works flawless
Will test it on my rigs in a few minutes ..
cg
Gary
v2.0 works flawless
Will test it on my rigs in a few minutes ..
cg
Gary
v3.0:
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
pulling high 70s with my 390s with -i 2, mid 30s on my 380 with -i 1 (the 380 wont take -i 2)
sweet.
v3.0:
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
i'm getting between 54-57h/s on a 280 (non x)
Is that with i=2 ? i=1 gives me 50 for 280x. If i=2 don't you get incorrect gpu data errors?
v3 is epic! 66Sol/s on RX 480 
Which one exactly? Which BIOS?Getting ~58MH/s with my Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 4GB, great job!
damn i've seen my 480 hit 67 h/s, stock bios with overclocks ...but mostly at more or less 60 h/s
V 3.0 i m getting
73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g
73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g
I'm getting 50-55 on r9 390, what drivers and i setting you use?
R9 390 without i setting I'm getting 70-74, cpu is 100% on i 2. 280x with i=1 has no incorrect gpu data.
How about that linux version? Any ETA? Thanks for the hard work!
Never
How about that linux version? Any ETA? Thanks for the hard work!
v3.0:
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
i'm getting between 54-57h/s on a 280 (non x)
v3 is epic! 66Sol/s on RX 480
Which one exactly? Which BIOS?Getting ~58MH/s with my Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 4GB, great job!
RX 480 Nitro + 8gb using -i 2. Bios i am using is the v4 bios found here:
https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/9650/sapphire-rx-480-nitro-oc-8gb-11260-01-20g-modded-bios-29-mh-downvolt
v3 is epic! 66Sol/s on RX 480
Which one exactly? Which BIOS?Getting ~58MH/s with my Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 4GB, great job!
Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data
Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)
Saphire R9 390 GPU returned incorrect data!!!
Identical graphics and is caught pc
v3 is epic! 66Sol/s on RX 480
Help!!! GPU returned incorrect data
Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)
Saphire R9 390 GPU returned incorrect data!!!
Try "-i 0". And don't overclock GPU too much. Every new version loads GPU more and more...
Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)
Saphire R9 390 GPU returned incorrect data!!!
V 3.0 i m getting
73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g
73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g
I'm getting 50-55 on r9 390, what drivers and i setting you use?
For the first time I am actually getting less than advertised for a stock 390X, though I am using 290(non-X) with 2560 cores, so perhaps the cores are finally starting to get to where they are being fully utilized?
That said, I am seeing ~15% increase going from 2.1 to 3.0. Only slightly higher CPU usage.
v2.1 (Stable for over 40 hours)
v3.0
CPU Usage before and after
That said, I am seeing ~15% increase going from 2.1 to 3.0. Only slightly higher CPU usage.
v2.1 (Stable for over 40 hours)
v3.0
CPU Usage before and after
With the new v3.0 version, without anything of oc. Crashes the pc
Had to restart one of my rigs before v3 worked, try it
With the new v3.0 version, without anything of oc. Crashes the pc
v3.0:
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.
PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!
YEAH!
280x 55-60 h/s
390 74-80 h/s
290x 75-81 h/s
rx 480 59-61.x h/s
fury up to 86.x h/s
rx 480 seems to beat 280x now..
Jump to: