Is there an option to show power consumption of individual GPU?
Not in the software.
Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 98. (Read 3839201 times)
Not in the software.
Is there an option to show power consumption of individual GPU?
Guys, do you want ZEC to rise? If you do, why you put 40-50-60 btc sell walls on poloniex during pumps? Do you really think that your lazy trading will bring you profit? Place small bids several times during the pump if you are so eager to sell at that price. Thank you!
Doubtful it is the miners, as most who are going to sell, sell small amounts daily and not accumulate 40-60 BCT worth of ZEC to just to place a sell wall as you describe a few pennies higher than the market rate. Much more likely the action of speculators and/or whales trying to manipulate the price.
What speed are you guys getting with a R390x on the current version claymore miner ? And how much power does it consume?
Guys, do you want ZEC to rise? If you do, why you put 40-50-60 btc sell walls on poloniex during pumps? Do you really think that your lazy trading will bring you profit? Place small bids several times during the pump if you are so eager to sell at that price. Thank you!
Can you elaborate this? How this will help? I don't have much BTC but I want ZEC to rise.
My solution to the issue is to mine and hold 1 Zec, Sell the next, Hold the next, Sell the next. Etc.. A way to build up your holdings for it just in case it ever skyrockets but still puts some money back into whatever you want to spend it on.
Guys, do you want ZEC to rise? If you do, why you put 40-50-60 btc sell walls on poloniex during pumps? Do you really think that your lazy trading will bring you profit? Place small bids several times during the pump if you are so eager to sell at that price. Thank you!
Can you elaborate this? How this will help? I don't have much BTC but I want ZEC to rise.
Does anyone know what causes the
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
Lower the clock.
a sick gpu can also cause it. very high temps can also cause it in particular the vrm temperature that unfortunately is not reported by all cards
Tried this and not having much luck at all. I have 4 x ASUS RX 470s . Windows 10, Using 16.12.2 drivers. 8GB system RAM, 20GB virtual set. On a SSD
Underclocking the core seems to drop the hashrate. I have between ~265 to ~280 on each card currently.
-i 7
-tt 0
-powlim 7
-mclock 1800
-mvddc 995
-cvddc 1050
Temperatures are 71C on the hottest card with around 70% fan. I tried raising the memory clock up but ended up with errors. The cards are in an open frame and the power supply is one of those 1200W server ones wired with PCIe connectors myself.
Any hints?
What tool are you using to tune(OC/UV) your cards?
for a quick workaround if I'm starting from a fresh driver install I reduce CPU Freq by ~13-17% and then undervolt your top 2 clocks to ~940. So, it'd be around 1020 @ 940, duplicate the second highest rate to the same, then go back through all the voltages and just duplicate 940 until you reach an actual value that has been automatically tuned down to roughly the same voltage and then just save that.
so..
-asm 1 / works well for my Strix 470, however my Nitro+ 480 seems to work better when set via -a 0
-tt 0 / if you are setting your fan temps in Wattman or other Software
-i 4,5,9 - test out how the speed differs between -i 5 and your current -i 7. I get better RX480 speeds using -i 5/-i 6 than -i 7/8/9. -i 7 is usually good for the 470 tho.
-> -12.5% CPU Frequency -> Manual Voltage -> reduce down to at least 990 or lower.
-> Memory Clock -> Increase to 1900 -> Undervolt to 960.
-> Give all cards some Additional Power if possible, it keeps the RX470's from becoming 'complacent' when finding shares.
I run that kind of configuration on my Strix 470 and I hash at 300 with -i 7 and -asm 1...
HOWEVER - these are only a few things that work for me, running 1x RX470 along side 2x nvidia cards and an RX480, so I found the Undervolting kept the 470 under 55 degrees C while hashing @ 290-300.
You might just want to cranking up the memory frequency and core frequency and just cutting down the Core voltages by 100 or so.. then get the fans running fast.. Shit, I dunno - you're pretty much bottlenecked by how well the 470/AMD drivers interact with the equihash algorithm - so experiment then just wait for Software updates.
Underclocking the core seems to drop the hashrate. I have between ~265 to ~280 on each card currently.
-i 7
-tt 0
-powlim 7
-mclock 1800
-mvddc 995
-cvddc 1050
Temperatures are 71C on the hottest card with around 70% fan. I tried raising the memory clock up but ended up with errors. The cards are in an open frame and the power supply is one of those 1200W server ones wired with PCIe connectors myself.
Any hints?
For the Claymore Miner v 12.4 using 4 Sapphire RX470 Nitro 4GB, I am using this bat:
ZECMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.supernova.cc:2242 -zwal username.worker -zpsw password -i 7
Im only getting about .15 zcash every 25-26 hours
What can I do to improve performance? Miner speeds read 276 - 288, Driver date 3-16-17 version 21.19.525.258.
ZECMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.supernova.cc:2242 -zwal username.worker -zpsw password -i 7
Im only getting about .15 zcash every 25-26 hours
What can I do to improve performance? Miner speeds read 276 - 288, Driver date 3-16-17 version 21.19.525.258.
What tool are you using to tune(OC/UV) your cards?
for a quick workaround if I'm starting from a fresh driver install I reduce CPU Freq by ~13-17% and then undervolt your top 2 clocks to ~940. So, it'd be around 1020 @ 940, duplicate the second highest rate to the same, then go back through all the voltages and just duplicate 940 until you reach an actual value that has been automatically tuned down to roughly the same voltage and then just save that.
so..
-asm 1 / works well for my Strix 470, however my Nitro+ 480 seems to work better when set via -a 0
-tt 0 / if you are setting your fan temps in Wattman or other Software
-i 4,5,9 - test out how the speed differs between -i 5 and your current -i 7. I get better RX480 speeds using -i 5/-i 6 than -i 7/8/9. -i 7 is usually good for the 470 tho.
-> -12.5% CPU Frequency -> Manual Voltage -> reduce down to at least 990 or lower.
-> Memory Clock -> Increase to 1900 -> Undervolt to 960.
-> Give all cards some Additional Power if possible, it keeps the RX470's from becoming 'complacent' when finding shares.
I run that kind of configuration on my Strix 470 and I hash at 300 with -i 7 and -asm 1...
HOWEVER - these are only a few things that work for me, running 1x RX470 along side 2x nvidia cards and an RX480, so I found the Undervolting kept the 470 under 55 degrees C while hashing @ 290-300.
You might just want to cranking up the memory frequency and core frequency and just cutting down the Core voltages by 100 or so.. then get the fans running fast.. Shit, I dunno - you're pretty much bottlenecked by how well the 470/AMD drivers interact with the equihash algorithm - so experiment then just wait for Software updates.
Does anyone know what causes the
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
In my case, was memory OC too high. "GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
Ubuntu 15.10
Catalyst 15.2
GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290
Command: ./zecminer64 -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal xx.xx -zpsw x -tt 60,90,90,90,90,90 -tstop 96,96,96,96,96,96 -powlim 0,-10,-10,-10,-10,0 -r -1
I'm running the miner (v.1.1) since today and noticed the following. At the start it runs fine, but after an half hour or so the zecminer64 process is taking 99% cpu load.
Also, bind errors (notice GPU0 jumping to 0 sometimes btw):
And also GPU incorrect data errors:
Any clues?
Catalyst 15.2
GPU0/1/2/3/4/5: 380/290x/290/290/290
Command: ./zecminer64 -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal xx.xx -zpsw x -tt 60,90,90,90,90,90 -tstop 96,96,96,96,96,96 -powlim 0,-10,-10,-10,-10,0 -r -1
I'm running the miner (v.1.1) since today and noticed the following. At the start it runs fine, but after an half hour or so the zecminer64 process is taking 99% cpu load.
Also, bind errors (notice GPU0 jumping to 0 sometimes btw):
Code:
ZEC - Total Speed: 141.329 H/s, Total Shares: 200, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:09
ZEC: GPU0 28.519 H/s, GPU1 23.528 H/s, GPU2 21.890 H/s, GPU3 23.123 H/s, GPU4 22.991 H/s, GPU5 21.277 H/s
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=29%, GPU3 t=84C fan=58%, GPU4 t=91C fan=59%, GPU5 t=85C fan=26%
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=90C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=31%, GPU3 t=84C fan=56%, GPU4 t=91C fan=61%, GPU5 t=85C fan=25%
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:20 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 112.830 H/s, Total Shares: 105, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s, GPU1 23.295 H/s, GPU2 22.808 H/s, GPU3 21.948 H/s, GPU4 22.337 H/s, GPU5 22.442 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 144.112 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 29.249 H/s, GPU1 24.831 H/s, GPU2 21.970 H/s, GPU3 22.697 H/s, GPU4 23.528 H/s, GPU5 21.839 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
ZEC: GPU0 28.519 H/s, GPU1 23.528 H/s, GPU2 21.890 H/s, GPU3 23.123 H/s, GPU4 22.991 H/s, GPU5 21.277 H/s
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=29%, GPU3 t=84C fan=58%, GPU4 t=91C fan=59%, GPU5 t=85C fan=26%
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
GPU0 t=57C fan=25%, GPU1 t=90C fan=25%, GPU2 t=91C fan=31%, GPU3 t=84C fan=56%, GPU4 t=91C fan=61%, GPU5 t=85C fan=25%
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:20 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 112.830 H/s, Total Shares: 105, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s, GPU1 23.295 H/s, GPU2 22.808 H/s, GPU3 21.948 H/s, GPU4 22.337 H/s, GPU5 22.442 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - New job from eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 144.112 H/s, Total Shares: 201, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:10
ZEC: GPU0 29.249 H/s, GPU1 24.831 H/s, GPU2 21.970 H/s, GPU3 22.697 H/s, GPU4 23.528 H/s, GPU5 21.839 H/s
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (53 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-23:36:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (52 ms)!
server: bind failed with error: 98, next attempt in 10sec...
And also GPU incorrect data errors:
Code:
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35396c83
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396cb3
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU0 t=51C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=88C fan=25%, GPU3 t=90C fan=64%, GPU4 t=88C fan=25%, GPU5 t=90C fan=25%
GPU returned incorrect data! 35196c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 15396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35316c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c5c
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c0f
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35394c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35396c83
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396cb3
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU0 t=51C fan=25%, GPU1 t=89C fan=25%, GPU2 t=88C fan=25%, GPU3 t=90C fan=64%, GPU4 t=88C fan=25%, GPU5 t=90C fan=25%
GPU returned incorrect data! 35196c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 15396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9c3c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35316c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c5c
GPU returned incorrect data! 1c9a6c0f
GPU returned incorrect data! 25396c93
GPU returned incorrect data! 35394c93
Any clues?
This is what happening to me. Its always the last card. So If I run all 7 it says GPU6 and If i start it with 6 diabled it does with with GPU5
This was not my data, I am getting the exact same thing tho. I have 7 x rx470 MSI gaming x. custom 1625 strap, 1180c, 2025 memory, -50mV
Does anyone know what causes the
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
Lower the clock.
Does anyone know what causes the
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
Lower intensity, remove overclock, and possibly use the '-old 1' command to drop back to 12.0.
Does anyone know what causes the
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
"GPU #0 returns incorrect data"
warning ?
when is new update 
need more faster sol here
need more faster sol here
The miner doesnt work for me anymore since Creators Update
edit: actually latest amd drivers
edit: actually latest amd drivers
will a 600W PSU be enough for a Kaby Lake rig running 2 x RX480 (Sapphire Nitro 8GB)?
A Kaby Lake CPU has a TDP between 4.5W and 91W, so not much information in here.
But never mind, for 2x480 a 600W PSU should be a good choice. Not very high costs, proper reserves and good load point for high efficiency during normal operation.
Happy mining!
Guys, do you want ZEC to rise? If you do, why you put 40-50-60 btc sell walls on poloniex during pumps? Do you really think that your lazy trading will bring you profit? Place small bids several times during the pump if you are so eager to sell at that price. Thank you!
Hello guys
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
For the ZEC, it will be around or lower than 180W.
Hello guys
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
How much energy consumes RADEON R9 FURY Nitro Tri-X OC+ setting -100mv default setting ... very need 180 watt .. possible ?
Thank you
will a 600W PSU be enough for a Kaby Lake rig running 2 x RX480 (Sapphire Nitro 8GB)?
Jump to: