How is the production coming along, any eta?
When I spoke with Marto a few days ago he mentioned that he expects the first devices today or Monday.
bomb diggity so by next friday they could be in the mail?
Topic: [CLOSED] NanoFury NF1 USB stick - Group Buy + Product Assembly - page 9. (Read 74354 times)
October 25, 2013, 07:24:57 PM
When I spoke with Marto a few days ago he mentioned that he expects the first devices today or Monday.
bomb diggity so by next friday they could be in the mail?
October 25, 2013, 04:27:03 AM
How is the production coming along, any eta?
When I spoke with Marto a few days ago he mentioned that he expects the first devices today or Monday.
October 25, 2013, 02:48:58 AM
How is the production coming along, any eta?
October 25, 2013, 02:31:02 AM
And long live Luke-Jr and BFGMINER!!! :-)
two devices at 52 bits on one machine: (one is a bit overvoltaged - I think you can spot which one
- the other is stock )
and at 54 bits another one on another machine: (that's the slightly undervoltaged one)
I'll leave that one run overnight and post the average from bitminter tomorrow.
two devices at 52 bits on one machine: (one is a bit overvoltaged - I think you can spot which one
- the other is stock )Code:
bfgminer version 3.3.0 - Started: [2013-10-24 23:58:24] - [ 0 days 00:24:49]
[M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit
Connected to stratum.bitcoin.cz diff 3 with stratum as user vs3.nanofury2
Block: ...46f41298 #265919 Diff:268M ( 1.92Ph/s) Started: [23:58:24]
ST:2 F:0 NB:1 AS:0 BW:[ 53/ 42 B/s] E:22.83 I: 361uBTC/hr BS:940
2 | 2.13/ 4.50/ 4.45Gh/s | A:533 R:0+0(none) HW:16/.45%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0: | 2.22/ 2.24/ 2.19Gh/s | A:270 R:0+0(none) HW: 5/.52%
NFY 1: | 2.33/ 2.26/ 2.27Gh/s | A:263 R:0+0(none) HW:11/.38%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-10-25 00:22:55] Accepted 1883610d NFY 0 Diff 10/3
and at 54 bits another one on another machine: (that's the slightly undervoltaged one)
Code:
bfgminer version 3.3.0 - Started: [2013-10-24 22:49:51] - [ 0 days 01:38:00]
[M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit
Connected to mint.bitminter.com diff 1 with stratum as user vs3_nanofury1
Block: ...c330b15f #265920 Diff:268M ( 1.92Ph/s) Started: [00:24:25]
ST:2 F:0 NB:15 AS:0 BW:[ 60/ 67 B/s] E:8.84 I: 185uBTC/hr BS:2.35k
1 | 2.43/ 2.43/ 2.37Gh/s | A:3152 R:9+0(.31%) HW:48/1.5%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0: | 2.44/ 2.43/ 2.37Gh/s | A:3154 R:9+0(.31%) HW:48/1.5%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-10-25 00:26:58] Accepted 304192a6 NFY 0 Diff 5/1
[2013-10-25 00:26:59] Accepted 88ee8e60 NFY 0 Diff 1/1
[2013-10-25 00:26:59] Accepted 58d55f6a NFY 0 Diff 2/1
[2013-10-25 00:27:00] Accepted dfafe7fd NFY 0 Diff 1/1
[2013-10-25 00:27:00] Accepted 060a55c0 NFY 0 Diff 42/1
October 24, 2013, 11:02:58 PM
Here are the same stats running at 53 bits for about a day:
Or in other words - the 1-bit difference was 2.224GH/s vs 2.14GH/s
Code:
No. Completed Duration Total Ghps Difficulty Your score Total score Your work Total work My % My GH
18985 10/25/2013 3:44 0h 40m 192,559.21 267,731,249 0.00000456 0.40307092 1,220 107,914,681 0.0000113052 2.1769
18984 10/25/2013 3:03 0h 40m 191,228.66 267,731,249 0.00000446 0.40011946 1,193 107,124,483 0.0000111366 2.1296
18983 10/25/2013 2:23 0h 40m 190,384.85 267,731,249 0.00000446 0.40315534 1,194 107,937,284 0.0000110620 2.1060
18982 10/25/2013 1:42 0h 40m 188,139.84 267,731,249 0.00000436 0.40200088 1,166 107,628,198 0.0000108336 2.0382
18981 10/25/2013 1:01 0h 41m 186,461.62 267,731,249 0.00000479 0.4031175 1,282 107,927,152 0.0000118784 2.2149
18980 10/25/2013 0:19 0h 40m 189,475.87 267,731,249 0.00000441 0.40139529 1,180 107,466,063 0.0000109802 2.0805
18979 10/24/2013 23:38 0h 40m 190,490.06 267,731,249 0.00000467 0.40387512 1,250 108,129,990 0.0000115602 2.2021
18978 10/24/2013 22:57 0h 41m 186,994.80 267,731,249 0.00000452 0.40101782 1,211 107,365,003 0.0000112793 2.1092
18977 10/24/2013 22:16 0h 41m 188,263.32 267,731,249 0.00000484 0.40406566 1,296 108,181,003 0.0000119799 2.2554
18976 10/24/2013 21:34 0h 40m 187,644.43 267,731,249 0.00000452 0.40012641 1,209 107,126,343 0.0000112857 2.1177
18975 10/24/2013 20:53 0h 41m 188,295.79 267,731,249 0.00000436 0.40397159 1,167 108,155,818 0.0000107900 2.0317
18974 10/24/2013 20:12 0h 40m 188,937.12 267,731,249 0.00000454 0.40008967 1,216 107,116,507 0.0000113521 2.1448
18973 10/24/2013 19:31 0h 40m 190,594.11 267,731,249 0.00000458 0.40376422 1,226 108,100,299 0.0000113413 2.1616
18972 10/24/2013 18:50 0h 40m 188,682.02 267,731,249 0.00000449 0.40250302 1,202 107,762,636 0.0000111541 2.1046
18971 10/24/2013 18:09 0h 40m 189,075.18 267,731,249 0.00000437 0.40054645 1,170 107,238,802 0.0000109102 2.0629
18970 10/24/2013 17:28 0h 40m 191,763.14 267,731,249 0.00000453 0.40090427 1,212 107,334,600 0.0000112918 2.1653
18969 10/24/2013 16:47 0h 40m 189,429.14 267,731,249 0.00000467 0.40063734 1,251 107,263,135 0.0000116629 2.2093
18968 10/24/2013 16:06 0h 40m 189,140.87 267,731,249 0.00000461 0.40068561 1,233 107,276,058 0.0000114937 2.1739
18967 10/24/2013 15:25 0h 40m 187,813.82 267,731,249 0.00000462 0.40097759 1,236 107,354,232 0.0000115133 2.1624
18966 10/24/2013 14:44 0h 40m 190,044.65 267,731,249 0.00000458 0.40226968 1,225 107,700,164 0.0000113742 2.1616
------
2.1404
Code:
Summary of runtime statistics:
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Started at [2013-10-23 21:34:17]
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Pool: stratum+tcp://mint.bitminter.com:3333
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Runtime: 23 hrs : 21 mins : 1 secs
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Average hashrate: 2150.4 Megahash/s
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Solved blocks: 0
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Best share difficulty: 33K
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Share submissions: 42056
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Accepted shares: 41721
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Rejected shares: 335
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Accepted difficulty shares: 41751
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Rejected difficulty shares: 335
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Reject ratio: 0.8%
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Hardware errors: 0
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Utility (accepted shares / min): 29.78/min
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 30.04/min
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Work items generated locally: 67460
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] New blocks detected on network: 215
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] Summary of per device statistics:
[2013-10-24 20:55:18] BITFURY0 (5s):2.447G (avg):2.150Gh/s | A:41751 R:335 HW:0 WU:30.0/m
[2013-10-24 20:55:18]
Or in other words - the 1-bit difference was 2.224GH/s vs 2.14GH/s
October 23, 2013, 11:52:03 PM
Taugeran - I'll give it a try.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
fair enough
So, I left one of the slightly under-voltaged sticks run at 54 bits for a bit and that's what I got:
Code:
No. Completed Duration Total Ghps Difficulty Your score Total score Your work Total work My % My GH
18951 10/24/2013 4:28 0h 41m 188,383.90 267,731,249 0.00000455 0.40399681 1,217 108,162,570 0.0000112516 2.1196
18950 10/24/2013 3:47 0h 41m 187,203.10 267,731,249 0.00000457 0.40179013 1,223 107,571,773 0.0000113692 2.1283
18949 10/24/2013 3:05 0h 40m 189,955.13 267,731,249 0.00000493 0.40174980 1,319 107,560,976 0.0000122628 2.3294
18948 10/24/2013 2:25 0h 41m 187,332.84 267,731,249 0.00000502 0.40337190 1,345 107,995,263 0.0000124542 2.3331
18947 10/24/2013 1:43 0h 40m 187,984.87 267,731,249 0.00000461 0.40101584 1,235 107,364,471 0.0000115029 2.1624
18946 10/24/2013 1:02 0h 41m 186,340.49 267,731,249 0.00000495 0.40091102 1,326 107,336,409 0.0000123537 2.3020
18945 10/24/2013 0:20 0h 41m 187,377.36 267,731,249 0.00000465 0.40183825 1,246 107,584,656 0.0000115816 2.1701
18944 10/23/2013 23:39 0h 42m 182,619.49 267,731,249 0.00000464 0.40116362 1,241 107,404,036 0.0000115545 2.1101
18943 10/23/2013 22:56 0h 42m 182,848.92 267,731,249 0.00000489 0.40166762 1,308 107,538,974 0.0000121630 2.2240
18942 10/23/2013 22:14 0h 41m 186,041.04 267,731,249 0.00000454 0.40382612 1,216 108,116,872 0.0000112471 2.0924
18941 10/23/2013 21:32 0h 41m 185,877.88 267,731,249 0.00000501 0.40347196 1,341 108,022,052 0.0000124141 2.3075
18940 10/23/2013 20:50 0h 41m 184,525.07 267,731,249 0.00000483 0.40181929 1,294 107,579,581 0.0000120283 2.2195
18939 10/23/2013 20:08 0h 41m 187,276.17 267,731,249 0.00000481 0.40145836 1,288 107,482,948 0.0000119833 2.2442
18938 10/23/2013 19:26 0h 42m 183,265.94 267,731,249 0.00000479 0.40433683 1,283 108,253,605 0.0000118518 2.1720
18937 10/23/2013 18:44 0h 42m 183,798.82 267,731,249 0.00000486 0.40343460 1,301 108,012,049 0.0000120450 2.2138
18936 10/23/2013 18:01 0h 42m 183,698.71 267,731,249 0.00000472 0.40401361 1,264 108,167,069 0.0000116856 2.1466
18935 10/23/2013 17:19 0h 42m 182,855.88 267,731,249 0.00000496 0.40311408 1,329 107,926,237 0.0000123140 2.2517
18934 10/23/2013 16:36 0h 42m 183,825.20 267,731,249 0.00000505 0.40397210 1,351 108,155,954 0.0000124912 2.2962
18933 10/23/2013 15:54 0h 43m 179,528.50 267,731,249 0.00000525 0.40374113 1,406 108,094,118 0.0000130072 2.3352
18932 10/23/2013 15:10 0h 43m 179,000.77 267,731,249 0.00000526 0.40379965 1,409 108,109,784 0.0000130330 2.3329
------
2.2246
and according to cgminer:
Code:
Summary of runtime statistics:
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Started at [2013-10-23 04:42:38]
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Pool: stratum+tcp://mint.bitminter.com:3333
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Runtime: 16 hrs : 51 mins : 14 secs
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Average hashrate: 2231.9 Megahash/s
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Solved blocks: 0
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Best share difficulty: 29.9K
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Share submissions: 31528
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Accepted shares: 31296
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Rejected shares: 232
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Accepted difficulty shares: 31296
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Rejected difficulty shares: 232
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Reject ratio: 0.7%
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Hardware errors: 0
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Utility (accepted shares / min): 30.95/min
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 31.18/min
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Work items generated locally: 51412
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] New blocks detected on network: 160
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] Summary of per device statistics:
[2013-10-23 21:33:52] BITFURY0 (5s):3.107G (avg):2.231Gh/s | A:31296 R:232 HW:0 WU:31.2/m
[2013-10-23 21:33:52]
I've restarted the exact same test and same device at 53 bits and will post the statistics in 10-12 hrs.
October 23, 2013, 12:02:06 PM
Here's the specs from the mfg website:
http://www.orico.com.cn/en/ProductInfo.aspx?typeid=237&id=2078
It says the brick is only 4A; 400mA per port seems low. Isn't USB3.0 specs 900mA per port?
48 W / 5V = 9.6A = 10 ports at 0.9A each + 0.6A leftover
Aha, didn't notice the voltage.
Thanks for clarifying.
October 23, 2013, 11:54:38 AM
Here's the specs from the mfg website:
http://www.orico.com.cn/en/ProductInfo.aspx?typeid=237&id=2078
It says the brick is only 4A; 400mA per port seems low. Isn't USB3.0 specs 900mA per port?
48 W / 5V = 9.6A = 10 ports at 0.9A each + 0.6A leftover
October 23, 2013, 08:14:34 AM
Yeah im really amazed to get them. Lets hope Marto will give some information out soon.
October 23, 2013, 07:34:11 AM
Here's the specs from the mfg website:
http://www.orico.com.cn/en/ProductInfo.aspx?typeid=237&id=2078
It says the brick is only 4A; 400mA per port seems low. Isn't USB3.0 specs 900mA per port?
October 22, 2013, 10:07:38 PM
My webserver will build any bfgminer branch for Windows: http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/webisect/webisect.php?dobuild=nanofury
Every Linux-based OS really needs its own package/binary - there is no good runs-everywhere solution.
Every Linux-based OS really needs its own package/binary - there is no good runs-everywhere solution.
Luke - I don't know if I've mentioned that before, but ... YOU ROCK!!!
October 22, 2013, 09:52:20 PM
My webserver will build any bfgminer branch for Windows: http://luke.dashjr.org/tmp/code/webisect/webisect.php?dobuild=nanofury
Every Linux-based OS really needs its own package/binary - there is no good runs-everywhere solution.
Every Linux-based OS really needs its own package/binary - there is no good runs-everywhere solution.
October 22, 2013, 09:13:07 PM
I'll follow up with Luke-Jr to see if we can get pre-compiled binaries for Linux.
I'm currently trying to set up my Windows box for compiling bfgminer and as soon as I get through the various missing pieces I'll post a zip with the exe and all other required dlls.
In the mean time we're also working on final tweaks to cgminer - I'll post a link to the Windows executable in the next few days as well.
We'll be publishing all source code as well, so anyone can compile his or her own binaries. On a theory everything should be compile-able for Linux too but I don't have the experience there to do a proper testing, so any help in that regard would certainly be welcome.
I'm currently trying to set up my Windows box for compiling bfgminer and as soon as I get through the various missing pieces I'll post a zip with the exe and all other required dlls.
In the mean time we're also working on final tweaks to cgminer - I'll post a link to the Windows executable in the next few days as well.
We'll be publishing all source code as well, so anyone can compile his or her own binaries. On a theory everything should be compile-able for Linux too but I don't have the experience there to do a proper testing, so any help in that regard would certainly be welcome.
October 22, 2013, 12:55:11 PM
@Vs3: as i will shortly receive my sticks. is it possible to give an update how to start those sticks ?
On Linux and on Windows please.
Regards.
On Linux and on Windows please.
Regards.
from Microchip's MCP2210 webpage:
Uses standard HID drivers (built-in support on Windows® XP, Vista, 7, Linux and Mac OS®)
So on both OSes it should be a matter of plug and play. it should be auto detected i believe and with cgminer the only thing cg looks for is the USB VID:PID combo to identify the device.
bfminer you will probably have to add -S ......
heres an example from his dev work with cgminer
October 22, 2013, 09:09:35 AM
@Vs3: as i will shortly receive my sticks. is it possible to give an update how to start those sticks ?
On Linux and on Windows please.
Regards.
On Linux and on Windows please.
Regards.
October 21, 2013, 07:20:49 PM
Taugeran - I'll give it a try.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
fair enough
October 21, 2013, 04:58:46 PM
Taugeran - I'll give it a try.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
Have in mind that no two chips are the same, so you might get slightly varying results. Also - since the hashrate fluctuates it will have to be run for at least 12-24hrs before we have some statistically accurate numbers for comparison.
October 21, 2013, 04:02:36 PM
@vs3 or ljr: how much does each osc6 bit increase appear to increase hashrate by? my math is saying anywhere from 35mh/s up to 50mh/s.
just curious on your results
edit: my math is probably fudged. :/
just curious on your results
edit: my math is probably fudged. :/
October 19, 2013, 06:54:17 PM
I had a few of them they like a better brick but with a better 5 amp or 6 amp brick they are good.
October 19, 2013, 10:52:19 AM
Jump to: