Pages:
Author

Topic: [CLOSED] Ophion Signature Campaign - page 4. (Read 7552 times)

hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 505
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
May 21, 2016, 04:07:22 AM
Mr.notaek said that he want spreadsheet of members so he can determine who is he gonna pay i think thats reasonable for  escrow so he can fix the problem.

Dont say sorry to the members theres escrow fixing things.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
May 21, 2016, 04:06:48 AM
I'm around and will never leave or avoid a situation like this. Only here in Netherlands it's was nighttime and just waking up to the responses.

I was against the decision of the escrow. He only listened to Hazelnutter and did not concidder all who did the signature tasks. This is exactly the purpose of having an escrow to be neutral towards both sides. With having no funds this campaign has ended. 

This is my only account I work with so I'm not the escrow or any other person that was involved with Ophion. I've had contact with Ophion only since last week.

It seems hostility from people that lost money comes this way but you are barking against the wrong trees. I never even had control over any funds and it's not my project. My Twitter account has nothing to do with this, it's suspended because I have too many automated crypto news.

Talking about a spreadsheet, usually I would keep such records just for managing purpose in private. All the information is in the thread, who applied, their Bitcoin address and posts can be counted. Without having the 1 btc funds it has become meaningless to even produce it. If someone like the escrow is willing to pay out of pocket then all the info's are here.

Sorry to the people that have signed up and did not get paid.   

I think you should make the spreadsheet because you are the campaign manager? and send it to the escrow of this campaign, then it's escrow's responsibility to pay the participants.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1010
May 21, 2016, 03:57:23 AM
I'm around and will never leave or avoid a situation like this. Only here in Netherlands it's was nighttime and just waking up to the responses.

I was against the decision of the escrow. He only listened to Hazelnutter and did not concidder all who did the signature tasks. This is exactly the purpose of having an escrow to be neutral towards both sides. With having no funds this campaign has ended. 

This is my only account I work with so I'm not the escrow or any other person that was involved with Ophion. I've had contact with Ophion only since last week.

It seems hostility from people that lost money comes this way but you are barking against the wrong trees. I never even had control over any funds and it's not my project. My Twitter account has nothing to do with this, it's suspended because I have too many automated crypto news.

Talking about a spreadsheet, usually I would keep such records just for managing purpose in private. All the information is in the thread, who applied, their Bitcoin address and posts can be counted. Without having the 1 btc funds it has become meaningless to even produce it. If someone like the escrow is willing to pay out of pocket then all the info's are here.

Sorry to the people that have signed up and did not get paid.   
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 505
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
May 21, 2016, 03:04:55 AM
I will not take off my signature until I didnt getting paid i cannot do archieve cause im only using smart phone i will not post outside this thread then hope the issue will be cleared out tomorrows payday.
hero member
Activity: 3066
Merit: 536
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 21, 2016, 02:30:40 AM
i'm also remove the signature and here's my archive as a proof
http://archive.is/tor0a
hero member
Activity: 668
Merit: 500
May 21, 2016, 02:20:35 AM
I also remove the signature campaign and waiting to get payment too.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 21, 2016, 02:16:29 AM
Quote from: notaek link=topic=1472638.msg14915320#msg14915320

It was the signed message, which I'm afraid had me convinced to return the funds.

I apologise for not being sensible enough with my decicion but all I can do now is to partially payout the participants from the service fee he sent me.
Why would a signed message get you to agree to return the funds? The only thing that proves is that you were receiving a message from the person you thought you were receiving it from.

How much exactly did he pay you and how much is owed to participants? What is going to happen with the difference?

Exactly this. Which Signature manager (which he is) would ever do this or allow this?
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
May 21, 2016, 01:34:38 AM
What the hell going on here? How notaek can do this even he knows that very well 40 participants worn the signature from 1 week and yesterday is the payment day..
Notaek you don't suppose to help a scammer here. if the funds were escrowed by you you are responsible to pay us now.

Edit: I am removing my signature after archiving my profile and posts link(suggested by Lutpin,) I hope I'll get payment too..

Profile Link: http://archive.is/C2ikh
Posts Link: http://archive.is/Q16lh

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
May 21, 2016, 01:30:07 AM
An escrow is supposed to protect both sides, which u didn't do in this case. It is the escrows fault to refund the coins, without knowing sbout the rest of the situation. If I don't receive the 0.025btc, either the scammers are going to give me that, which not is going to happen, or the escrow has to pay everyone since he was so stupid to refund the coins. If the escrow decides to not do anything, say goodbye to your trust level.

Edit:

Profile: https://web.archive.org/web/20160521065846/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=301282
Posts: https://web.archive.org/web/20160521065238/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=301282;sa=showPosts
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 533
May 21, 2016, 01:28:16 AM
I don't think BTcat will come here and make any spreadsheet. I think Notaet should take this responsibility and count all posts and pay them..
Notaek did a rally unexpected mistake.. he's very experience person and he shouldn't do this..
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
May 20, 2016, 10:59:59 PM
Quote from: notaek link=topic=1472638.msg14915320#msg14915320

It was the signed message, which I'm afraid had me convinced to return the funds.

I apologise for not being sensible enough with my decicion but all I can do now is to partially payout the participants from the service fee he sent me.
Why would a signed message get you to agree to return the funds? The only thing that proves is that you were receiving a message from the person you thought you were receiving it from.

How much exactly did he pay you and how much is owed to participants? What is going to happen with the difference?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 503
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
May 20, 2016, 09:59:41 PM
I need a spreadsheet ASAP! Where's BTCat?
Witch hunting will lead you into nothing.

BTCAT is no where , hes gone, It was fraud from the start. He never make spreadsheet and never check quality of the posters.
So it was from his point of view the biggest fraud.

But i smell a much greater fraud in Signature Campaign as it has given a way to other think on the same ways.

See and wait for another better Fraud coming soon
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Cryptocurrency Wallet - Denaro.io
May 20, 2016, 09:59:12 PM
Btcat must answer this allegation and he must online know to give the spreadsheet to notaek so it will be resolve as soon as possible so they can protect the participants right to be payed.

But theres nothing we can do now since btcat is offline for now To resolve the issue for this problem.
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 101
May 20, 2016, 09:55:58 PM
I need a spreadsheet ASAP! Where's BTCat?
Witch hunting will lead you into nothing.

i think he will come soon and pay us
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
May 20, 2016, 09:42:46 PM
So what do the members on DT think about all of this shenanigans?
I'm currently waiting on BTCat to come forward and join the discussion over here.
I've contacted notaek via PM (right after he posted that email) and from my judgement, he doesn't seem like a scammer,
but rather like a guy who did a big mistake and is now trying to sort out the aftermath.

I've been asked for (/and offered) my help with that, but more regarding this later.
Based on all the above, I don't think it's necessary to issue a negative feedback on notaek (yet), others might disagree though.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 7011
Top Crypto Casino
May 20, 2016, 09:36:22 PM
So what do the members on DT think about all of this shenanigans?  Looks like Notaek 1) Made a boneheaded mistake, or 2) Is bullshitting and is a scammer.  I only see the one negative trust in a sea of positive trust.  I know it's hard to believe someone would ruin all of that for so little, but you know we've seen it happen before.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 20, 2016, 09:18:51 PM
This is very interesting to read, bitcoin-hunter is a bit hard  on some people, but with full right in my opinion.
I think situation was pretty clear with this campaign, when they shut down everything, escrow should give that money to people from campaign. I don`t know how manager of campaign is paid, but he also need to fight for justice here. At least that will help him with reputation here.  What to think now about people who needs to protect us from scammers?

LOL how am I hard. I am just stating facts. Notaek and BTCat followed the scammers just to easily. To a sense which doesn't make it realistic.  

Thing is they both are dealing in signature, escrow etc. so they should never and, I repeat, never be in a position to trust funds or be responsible of funds.

This is real money and we are dealing with adults.  Adults are the ones who should take responsibility for their actions right?

Look at the facts and think again, Am I too hard, Is this a witchhunt?

No/ Nein/ Non, I just lost some money of this signature campaign. 10 dollars. Don't worry I will survive that Wink But like I said above, the reason I do this is that people like them who support scammers, should never be able to do it again...

Suppose?
hero member
Activity: 1694
Merit: 502
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
May 20, 2016, 09:06:59 PM
This is very interesting to read, bitcoin-hunter is a bit hard  on some people, but with full right in my opinion.
I think situation was pretty clear with this campaign, when they shut down everything, escrow should give that money to people from campaign. I don`t know how manager of campaign is paid, but he also need to fight for justice here. At least that will help him with reputation here.  What to think now about people who needs to protect us from scammers?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 20, 2016, 08:56:24 PM
I think escrow on sig cam
p is to ensure that the participants got paid by his service but now escrow here lost its function

Yeah. People lost money and there will be end to that story.

Other people lost through an incompetent escrow and so called manager.
Since the escrow  Notaek was at fault more (money) and Notaek start to blame BTCat for a missing list:

I need a spreadsheet ASAP! Where's BTCat?
Witch hunting will lead you into nothing.

Which is crazy since a list will give you nothing. Check the OP and count down to page 3 where you find applicants.. idiot!

The scammers did cover some tracks, but you my idiot friend, you did not cover well enough.
legendary
Activity: 1268
Merit: 1009
May 20, 2016, 08:47:33 PM
I need a spreadsheet ASAP! Where's BTCat?
Witch hunting will lead you into nothing.
Pages:
Jump to: