Obsi, do you have anything to say in response to the accusation that you are running a ponzi scam? Or are you just going to ignore it and hope people keep investing anyway?
Have you read the thread? What more can he say? I admit, I would like to see answers to the questions posted here:
1. I appreciate you taking the time to lay out examples of the issuers business operations. However, your examples do not include many important factors such as:
a. lag-time regarding employing newly raised capital.
b. lag-time regarding conversion and transfer back for dividends.
c. any form of estimated default rate (which has to be somewhere in the double digits on such high risk, high interest loans)
d. your equation assumes 100% of capital is employed 100% of the time.
e. as the total amount of working capital increases, it will become more difficult for the issuer to employ it all. With 10,000,000 shares issued, the current potential marketcap is about $1,439,200. Of course, we are a long ways from that, but it is important to note. As total working capital increases, it is a risk for shareholders.
I know you probably left most of these points out intentionally to keep is as basic as possible for people to understand. It is good to highlight these potential risks though. I am just trying to help provide clarity; just as your are.
2. As stated before, I would just like to see a greater dialogue between the issuer, investors, and potential investors. Bitcoinbear has already responded that today's dialogue has helped him understand the issuance better. I think helping create a dialogue for the sake of investor awareness is a very good thing.
However, as far as I am concerned, accusations without basis don't deserve a response. On that note, have you ever read previous threads with similar accusations? From what I've seen (regardless of whether or not Pirate's operation was one), responding only serves to feed the trolls. I would ignore your post just like I have been ignoring all of the accusatory ones, but you seem at least a bit legit based on your earlier post regarding the thread-bumping vs just looking at GLBSE (where I was subsequently glad to see I wasn't the only one that didn't realize the dividend information was there).