Already the name "LottoCoin" keeps me away from trading. I wan't to make business and profit, not playing lotto.
So i'll better invest in EarthCoin for long term and hope that it will get a worldwide method of payments.
But it's OK when kids like to play with things that are nothing worth in the real world. For that we have lotto, doge, cats, mouse, pigs, chickens, manga ... ... ...
exactly how I see it... what is so striking is that none of those guys here see this problem... when you mention it, they cry: but gambling blablabla...
as if that is something normal shops or serious businesses care for or want to be associated with...
imagine some electronics store having a "lottocoin accepted" sticker... anyone who is not totally into crypto will see the name and decide that they'd rather buy their ipod headphones somewhere else...
it just sounds sleazy
then imagine a fruits and vegetables store with "earthcoin accepted"... it just fits.
it has this green, responsible tinge to it. people respond well to the name.
the only ones that respond well to lotto are people who can't do math. hint: you always lose in the long runHalf of Bitcoins transactions are involved in online gambling.
Pokerstars has more then 50M Customers world wide.
One of the largest industrys in the world no matter where you are from or what your background is. Once in your life you make a gamble.
Your points are invalid.
Also, Earthcoin great for buying fruits? Let me: Lmao.
Cheers!
look dude, no one is saying that there is not money involved in gambling.
but if you had read my posts here, you'd see that I am basically saying what you just said in your post:
gambling can be done in any currency. you quote bitcoin is so much used in gambling. great.
but how does that help or speak for lottocoin?
the point here is: a clean, serious coin can be used to buy drugs, buy a hooker or waste on gambling.but a sleazy coin that has already such a sleazy business in its name has a hard time on other markets.
imagine a hookercoin. or an illegaldrugscoin or a gamblingcoinpeople do not necessarly want to be associated with such a market or such a use. even if the very same people who object to such a coin go buy a hooker 20 minutes later with bitcoin.
money is best when it is as unobjectionable as possible. even when used for the worst things humans can come up with.
a currency that is connected, even if only in name, with gambling has a self limiting factor built into itself
I am not trolling this thread to scoff at some competition. I am simply making a point that people outside of this community will easily understand.
people not totally involved with lottocoin will instinctively object to its name. lotto is the business of desperate lower class people, the stupid or the addicted. that is the PUBLIC perception. NOT my personal opinion.
that is all I wanted to sayI support both, I think they are both great coins with good potential and a solid community backing but seriously you sound like a hippie and you completely negate any possible credit you might have by stating your own personal perception as public perception ;P "Lotto is the business of desperate lower class people"... you've obviously never brushed shoulders with high class people...
No need to bash a coin just because YOU don't like it, with the numbers both LOT and EAC have chances are they will both be added to coin payments.
I fail to see anything a hippie might say in my post.
I did not even mention EAC. I mentioned bitcoin.
that money is best when it is as unobjectionable as possible is not a hippie idea... hippies don't care about money
it's a simple fact of life.
I know it is hard to see that I'm right when you're paid to post here, but think about it again, in a few days, when you've sold the last lottocoin. it might seem a lot more intuitive