Oh, you're a Bitinstant shill. Now I get it. Bitinstant has given plenty of reason for people to attack them. They deserve to be smothered, because they are a proven ponzi scheme. They were given a chance, and they have shown themselves to be scammers. Coingator, as of this moment, has not.
Since you don't understand sarcasm, how can I expect you to understand the concept of "anonymous = trustless"?
Anonymous cannot be trustless, or no one would ever transfer a single bitcoin to anyone else. So, your argument is false on its face. No one would ever exchange goods or services, or sell or buy Bitcoins, because either you have to send BTC first, or they have to give you the goods/services/money first. Either way, there is trust involved. If you use an escrow service, there is trust involved there. Economies, regardless of the means of exchange, do not exist without trust. It's obvious that you have chosen not to trust Coingator. That doesn't mean that you are correct, or that your opinion should be posted all over their thread in the absence of any kind of proof that they should not be trusted. Again, this is nothing more than old-fashioned bullying.