here's mine:
CoinLenders
ninjaboon:75:0:U
Topic: CoinLenders, Inputs.io, Tradefortress (HACK) - page 19. (Read 39752 times)
1.80BTC Coinlenders (Daytona)
coinlenders: inspiredinvestorcurrencyforall:21.84629652:0:U
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.Fingers cross all works out for the best.
EDIT wrong username sorry have since edited to correct one.
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.Fingers cross all works out for the best.
EDIT wrong username sorry have since edited to correct one.
All entries are unverified until OP gets data from TF.
coinlenders: inspiredinvestor:21.84629652:0:U
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.
The larger the balance, the smaller proportion you will get.
coinlenders: inspiredinvestorcurrencyforall:21.84629652:0:U
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.Fingers cross all works out for the best.
EDIT wrong username sorry have since edited to correct one.
inputs: bitcoincasinoprojof:.26:.26:U
I don't quite get what the verified is about.
Trade fortress refunded my inputs wallet though it was under 1btc and he did so in less than 24 hours, which I was grateful for.Fingers cross all works out for the best.
EDIT wrong username sorry have since edited to correct one.
Coinlenders
Xrim: 3.5423:0:U
Xrim: 3.5423:0:U
If there are current outstanding Coinlender loans that TF cannot or will not collect for us then he needs to provide us with the loan data so we can pursue those collections ourselves.
I bet .1 BTC that he will never provide those datas because there are no such datas since this is a ponzi scheme.
If there are current outstanding Coinlender loans that TF cannot or will not collect for us then he needs to provide us with the loan data so we can pursue those collections ourselves for distribution to the depositors.
Hi all,
CoinLenders
BTCWarrior 35.62:0
CoinLenders
BTCWarrior 35.62:0
We are over 3800 in listed unreimbursed (unverified) coins so far.
This is from a wallet I opened for my brother:
Inputs.io
Anonymous:1.0:0.74
Inputs.io
Anonymous:1.0:0.74
inputs had a nice little bitcoin foundation badge. That should probably count for something.
Silver member, as I recall. Yes, this reflects poorly on the Foundation. Hope that means something.
"To promote transparency and enforce fair voting procedures, we require a real name and address for all members."
Apparently he lied to several people about his id so no telling if he told them the truth, plus doubt they'd give it up for anything less than a warrant/subpoena.
inputs had a nice little bitcoin foundation badge. That should probably count for something.
Silver member, as I recall. Yes, this reflects poorly on the Foundation. Hope that means something.
"To promote transparency and enforce fair voting procedures, we require a real name and address for all members."
Add the wallet I started for my friend:
Inputs.io
Anonymous:0.5:0.4
Inputs.io
Anonymous:0.5:0.4
Thanks DumbFruit
Inputs.io
HereToTrade:7.74:3.54:U
Inputs.io
HereToTrade:7.74:3.54:U
It's too arbitrary. I hope that he's consulting with others before he makes these decisions. He should understand that there are many people -like myself- that would like to assist, and aren't out with pitchforks.
The thing is if he would actually care about that, he would investigate the alleged "hack"/get the information to somebody that would be able to help, but he simply doesn't do, but he has time to bring his coinchat service up again.
Won't be for too long anyway, it's pretty much running until December 1st, unless someone takes over, which seems to be the plan.
coinlender: ezacarias 3.593:0:U
I tried to tag the donation address but couldn´t. Please anybody knows how to do it?
It's too arbitrary. I hope that he's consulting with others before he makes these decisions. He should understand that there are many people -like myself- that would like to assist, and aren't out with pitchforks.
The thing is if he would actually care about that, he would investigate the alleged "hack"/get the information to somebody that would be able to help, but he simply doesn't do, but he has time to bring his coinchat service up again.
You don't want our CL username or inputs login? Do you need to be able to associate a compromised account with our bitcointalk UN? I guess I'm not really sure what this is for. I do not want to be part of any legal action.
Also, there might be a third category. BTCINVEST people got liquidation payments sent to CL after the hack occurred. Most BTCINVEST people already lost a lot in their intended investment, and didn't want to invest in CL.
Coinlenders/BTCINVEST
gotpetum@bitcointalk:43.51560284:0
Also, there might be a third category. BTCINVEST people got liquidation payments sent to CL after the hack occurred. Most BTCINVEST people already lost a lot in their intended investment, and didn't want to invest in CL.
Coinlenders/BTCINVEST
gotpetum@bitcointalk:43.51560284:0
No, don't send me any login information, in fact most of this will be somewhat useless unless TradeFortress cooperates and sends me supporting documentation. Though it will still give some idea as to the scale of the problem.
This is to inform, gather information, and hopefully assist in recovering the loss and do some badly needed oversight.
If there is some more shenanigans going on with BTCINVEST, then hopefully someone else will start a thread about that. I don't want to conflate different issues.
Am i the only one that thinks slinding scale repayment is not very fair in this case?
It's too arbitrary. I hope that he's consulting with others before he makes these decisions. He should understand that there are many people -like myself- that would like to assist, and aren't out with pitchforks. Jump to: