Ask your wall street "who's-who" how to accurately calculate market cap (which is a term USED FOR STOCKS. not for commodities.) and they will undoubtedly agree with me.
I didn't say you're wrong. I'm saying that cryptocurrencies are not stocks and the total value of such an asset should not be calculated in the same way as stocks. I used the analogy of gold to show that we would count the gold reserves held by a central bank as part of the total value of all the gold in the world. Because cryptocurrency is treated as "property" (i.e. like a commodity) by the IRS, we have to count its value in that way, not in the way we count the value of stocks issued by a company. Premined cryptocurrency is like gold or whatever other commodity asset held in trust by a central bank.
You didn't answer my question. Should we count the total number of coins to be mined for all of the coins out there? Should bitcoin's market cap be based on the 21 million that will eventually be mined It's no different than the pre-mine in that they will exist on the market some day...obviously this is a terrible way to do it and is precisely what counting pre-mined coins do.
No, in fact it's very different. 21 million bitcoins have not yet been created, only 12.5 million. The extra 8.5 million bitcoins are
nonexistent at this time. For example, let's say somebody wanted to try to steal them. They couldn't, because they literally do not exist. On the other hand, if somebody wanted to try to steal premined coins, they could, because they do exist. It would be like robbing a bank of its gold reserves or dollar reserves or whatever other reserves being held in vaults which is not circulating in the market.
Admittedly, that is a huge risk of premined cryptocurrencies. There are a lot of premined coins sitting in a vault somewhere, and possibly they could be stolen. The market should decide how much they are worth, based on taking this risk into consideration. And I'm sure people do think about it. I certainly did before I bought my SolarCoins. And that's why I'm helping the SolarCoin Foundation to finalize their governing documents so that the control over the premined coins will be strictly governed by a legal structure.
If you're at all intelligent, you know that I'm right, but keep shilling for the coins you want to magically appear high on the list.
Ask yourself this: If I'm just a shill, would I be pointing out the risks associated with premined cryptocurrencies? SolarCoin and other premined cryptos are essentially trying to create alternative central banks. I happen to think SolarCoin is by far the most legitimate attempt out there, and I like the idea of a currency backed by a system of rewarding people for generating clean renewable electricity. But let's not fool ourselves: The growing trend of premined cryptocurrencies is a trend of people trying to create alternative central banking institutions that release reserves of currency into the marketplace based on whatever is their philosophical criteria. This is something very different from bitcoin, and it may in fact be the future of crypto as bitcoin gradually fades away and is overtaken by premined cryptos based on philanthropic purposes. Premining by institutions that manage cryptocurrencies is a major new trend in the crypto sector, and we would be wise to take it seriously rather than relegate it to "automatic scam" or "pump and dump" status.