Your argument doesn't actually suggest the oil industry is in any way robust in the face of collapsing oil prices, or that banks would be unaffected. You're just saying, "hey look over there, fraud!"
Hihi, first you would have to realize that I'm not at all arguing at how robust the oil industry or the banking industry
Okay, well that's the topic at hand, so......
I'm just pointing at the overreacting and exaggerations that have made ZH such garbage, and I'm also pointing at some flaws you have in your reasoning. Rather than trying to arrive at a conclusion based on the information, you are trying to pick bits of info so that you arrive at the point you want to!
You haven't refuted anything. You've pulled some random numbers out of your ass and done some irrelevant hand waving that has nothing to do with the topic.
Nothing I'm saying hinges on anything ZH has ever said. I didn't mention a single piece of data from ZH. Let it go.
And what conclusion was that anyway? That the threat of bankruptcies and defaults on a large chunk of the energy bond market poses a systemic risk to banks, who may soon be reeling from losses in commercial and consumer loans? What is unreasonable about that?
Take for example your starting point, you've selected a troubled company (which cooked its books with a lot of sauce) and you're trying to paint this situation all over the industry.
Actually, I pointed out that the industry is highly leveraged and highly unprofitable and provided a multitude of data to that effect. I used Hin Leong as a single example of how the collapse of oil prices can catalyze the demise of struggling oil companies. I used Whiting Petroleum's recent bankruptcy as another, then pointed to the ~100 industry bankruptcies expected over the next year to emphasize the sector-wide risk.
I'm getting a little tired of you ignoring 99% of what I write and then completely misrepresenting me. Try responding to my last post next time, instead of repeating nonsense arguments about the OP which I've already responded to.
At the same time, when I give you a good example, you dismissed it because one company out of 100 is not relevant, this is not analyzing facts, it's picking the facts that back up your analysis.
First, you are confusing two different articles. That company was presumably not included in the ~100 expected bankruptcies.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/02/business/oil-crash-bankruptcies-whiting/index.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/business/energy-environment/coronavirus-oil-companies-debt.html Second, I dismissed it as being indicative of the entire sector for good reason: that company refinanced its debt months ago. No other companies in the industry can refinance debt now because no banks are funding energy bonds anymore. On top of that, their 5-year projected cushion is based on oil holding above $30. Oil is trading at $10 now, meaning they could go broke years earlier than projected.
Third, I never said every company in the industry would go bankrupt. Even then, Parsley was supposed to be an example of
one of the well-capitalized oil companies. At $10 a barrel they are broke in 1.5 years based on their own projection. Will oil still be trading at $10 by then? Probably not, but this has to make you wonder about the companies that are struggling with principals due in 2020 or 2021. And while I don't expect this, if the global economy goes into a long term depression (like the 1930s) then the entire US shale industry will probably go under. In another Great Depression type context, who can compete with Saudi Arabia at $2.80 a barrel? Nobody in the US.
Are you?
The point of this thread is that banks are heavily exposed to oil companies, who are unprofitable or collapsing due to low oil prices, which poses systemic risk to the banking system.
So it is a risk or a certitude? Because you were pretty certain things will happen! That's why we have this debate after all!
I have spoken repeatedly in terms of risk and possibilities. The emphasis on
certainty is just one of your inventions:
The oil crash threatens to push highly leveraged firms into bankruptcy
This may be the first domino to fall in that respect.
the collapse of oil prices can act as a catalyst for shuttering already struggling oil companies.
This is one systemic risk among several to consider.
I really don't know what's going to happen but it seems silly to assume oil prices are just going to skyrocket in the near future to bail out the oil industry.
I would change my tune on the oil industry when WTI is trading above $50 a barrel again, because that's the minimum before even the most profitable US producers can get cash flow positive.
You know that's not true and you know that oil is just like bitcoin mining, You're not making money at 6 cents per kWh normally but
if enough people drop out of mining you might make profits even at 8.
Another terrible analogy. Oil does not have a difficulty adjustment algorithm. Shale production is extremely capital intensive no matter what. $50-55 a barrel is the break-even cost of production in the US shale patch, period.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-whiting-petroleum-is-just-the-first-domino-to-fall-in-us-shale-wipeout-strategist-says.htmlIf some of them shut off their production the supply and demand ration will take care of the rest.
Nobody cares if oil companies go belly up. The issue is how leveraged the sector is and what happens if a big chunk of the sector does go belly up, in terms of banking liquidity, and given the expected liquidity crunch in Q2.
Something to keep in mind as we rationalize why Trump is now trying to get a direct bailout for the oil industry, even though it would be incredibly unpopular with voters:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump/trump-calls-for-us-oil-industry-bailout-as-prices-plunge-idUSKCN2231Z6Let me tell you something, I've been through a lot of far worse situations in my life, not family or personally related.
I've endured the communist regime, I saw the warsaw and caer pacts crumble, I saw inflation above 1000%, I saw a recovery period and another crash at the end of the '90, I lived through 2008 which was like a breeze compared to the previous ones and every time people were acting like it is the end of the world.
It wasn't!
Who is talking about the end of the world?
All I'm talking about is the possibility of a banking crisis like 2008.