Pages:
Author

Topic: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them) - page 2. (Read 26824 times)

hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 838
It is the second forum for bitcoin, only after this one:
http://bitcoin.sourceforge.net/boards/index.php
Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum! (by our beloved @satoshi)
The forum plays important roles to help bitcoin's spread over the world over years.
This is  a 'good old' stlye forum, and it's still working fine for the purpose...
It is the elder usually don't like new style forum, and funny things inside, which they consider as annoying stuffs.
However, everything has to adapt to new trend, new style, I think.
If the forum, or anything else lack of ability to adapt changes, trends, it will be wipened out, or degraded gradually over time.
It happen in all areas, not only in crypto, and crypto forum.
However, bitcointalk is the biggest crypto forum for ages, and for now, and to be honest I feel very unrealistic to say the the forum will be suprassed by other later-born forums.
Quote
People will choose another forum if that another forum would have the features of this forum plus something additional that's missing here now.
But people are still here and using this forum, so we should not hurry implementing new untested features...
Anyway the new forum software (a really brand new) is under testing now, so the new feature requests should go there directly, it has better chance to get it implemented in the new forum software...
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 629
Vires in Numeris
I don't understand what so hard about implementing it?
There's one very busy Admin with a long Todo list who gets many requests. Anything that can be created by users provides extra functionality without taking Admin's time.

More importantly don't forget every single feature added is a potential back door security risk for the forum. Making sure it is not also takes time. I would be happier with a stale featureless SECURE forum than an unsecure one with lots of bells and whistles.

This is  a 'good old' stlye forum, and it's still working fine for the purpose...
People will choose another forum if that another forum would have the features of this forum plus something additional that's missing here now.
But people are still here and using this forum, so we should not hurry implementing new untested features...
Anyway the new forum software (a really brand new) is under testing now, so the new feature requests should go there directly, it has better chance to get it implemented in the new forum software...

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
I don't understand what so hard about implementing it?
There's one very busy Admin with a long Todo list who gets many requests. Anything that can be created by users provides extra functionality without taking Admin's time.

More importantly don't forget every single feature added is a potential back door security risk for the forum. Making sure it is not also takes time. I would be happier with a stale featureless SECURE forum than an unsecure one with lots of bells and whistles.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I don't understand what so hard about implementing it?
There's one very busy Admin with a long Todo list who gets many requests. Anything that can be created by users provides extra functionality without taking Admin's time.
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 952
It would be really good to have 'inbuilt' alerts on forum for quoted comments.
See: [RELEASED] @mention notification bot - now with Telegram

I knew someone was going to comment this, that's why I quoted 'inbuilt' word.

I don't understand what so hard about implementing it? Users won't have to find these tools and it will help in keeping track of discussions.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 952
It would be really good to have 'inbuilt' alerts on forum for quoted comments.

Sorry if it's been already suggested.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
I'm starting to think we should be able to declare ourselves as "rank outsiders". Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Requirements: 3000 Merit, 2000 Activity
Currently, anybody who fits the requirements has rank "Administrator". I don't think theymos is going to give only himself a new rank.

This is to keep the relative proportions between getting ranks and that the Legendaries would have the hard but ambitious goal.




- can use animated avatars;
I'm with you right up until here.  Animated avatars should be taken out to the woodshed and shot--regular avatars are bad enough, which is why I have them blocked, and their existence should end right there.  No frills, no more space, no animation....ever.

I believe, the most experienced members which have 2000 Activity and 3000 Merit will not use annoying animations.
For example, some users didn't even guess that Vod has an animated avatar.




I kind of like the "deity" rank, but have we heard anything from Theymos lately about whether he's considering adding any more ranks?

Theymos said about the new rank: "No. Or not yet. Or the idea would need to be significantly modified."
But I think that the advanced users, who continue to help making the forum a better place in years, definitely should receive some bonuses.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Requirements: 3000 Merit, 2000 Activity
Currently, anybody who fits the requirements has rank "Administrator". I don't think theymos is going to give only himself a new rank.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
- can use animated avatars;
I'm with you right up until here.  Animated avatars should be taken out to the woodshed and shot--regular avatars are bad enough, which is why I have them blocked, and their existence should end right there.  No frills, no more space, no animation....ever.

I kind of like the "deity" rank, but have we heard anything from Theymos lately about whether he's considering adding any more ranks?  I always got the feeling (or maybe he wrote it somewhere) that Legendary is as far as anyone is every going to go.  At one point I thought that that would lead to an overabundance of Legendaries, but since the merit system came into existence and it's much harder to rank up, I don't think that's going to be the case. 

My view has kind of changed since January of last year, and perhaps Legendary is as high a rank as needs to exist.  Don't know.  Something higher than that would be nice, however--and I'm not even talking about for myself.  There are some members here who've been around for many years, and it'd be cool to make a distinction between them and some of the "newer" Legendaries.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Add a new rank above Legendary, eg "Deity".

"Deities" could receive some special features. Don't know what exactly but they should get something for sure.

Rank 'Deity'

Requirements: 3000 Merit, 2000 Activity

Features:
- can edit a Custom Title;
- can use animated avatars;
- can use images in the signatures.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
Add information to the users' profiles how much merit had been received and sent.
I like your suggestion very much and maybe we can do it like that: right now there is a possibility to display the post count in addition to Merit and Activity. That's quite useful to see how many posts the person made so far. It's only an additional feature and those who don't want it because they like it clearer can switch it off.

Merit begging should not be a problem, most of the beggars are well aware that it won't be succesful.

Enable post count can be found here and adding another checkbox if you want to display earned Merit should be no problem:





And if you like it how it is now it's always possible to switch it off:



I dislike sending Merit to Accounts which never send some, too  Wink
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 629
Vires in Numeris
Add information to the users' profiles how much merit had been received and sent.
...
I won't display it like that because it is taking up more space in the profile, but would make the merit text clickable instead.
If someone is interested, he/she will click on the merit link and will get to the user's merit profile.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
This amendment will facilitate the identification of merit sources and thus increase Merit begging.
Beggars, generally, are receiving the red trust. Therefore I see no problem in publishing information about merit sources.


Even if there is a benefit, you can use some alternatives like BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP).
In my opinion, such statistics should display directly on the forum, because it's more convenient than searching for it on another site.



In addition, if I see that the member has received 100 merit and sent 0, then I would rather will give merit to someone else. I suppose many users will do the same.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 4002
Add information to the users' profiles how much merit had been received and sent.
This amendment will facilitate the identification of merit sources and thus increase Merit begging.
Even if there is a benefit, you can use some alternatives like BitcoinTalk Public Information Project (BPIP).
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Add information to the users' profiles how much merit had been received and sent.

Example



legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Add a warning to the Private Message window that users should be very cautious about links and codes from unknown senders.

Inspired by this topic.

LoyceV: "General warning to anyone: you should never execute any code you don't understand on your computer!"
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
Show in Outbox which of private messages were read by recipients.

No please. This will be used as a tool to pester people. Removes privacy and unnecessary. Just check when they last logged in.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
Show in Outbox which of private messages were read by recipients.
Pages:
Jump to: