OK, so your claim is that "no one ever used violence against these children-turned-murderers, no one raped them, no one beat them up, no one yelled at them, in short, no one terrorized them enough to damage them and make them propense to violent acts including murder".
You're, in effect, disputing my contention that they were indeed abused. (I don't think you're disputing the contention that abuse leads to dysfunctional individuals, some of whom turn very violent. IF you were disputing that, you would be going against decades of medical and psychiatric evidence.).
No, I am not disputing that they may had suffered abuse.
And that is excellent, because we're finally making progress (thanks for the grammar fixup, by the way!).
Now prove that your claim is true. If you dispute this claim, you surely must have some evidence you're relying on. Let's have it, now.
We'll get to asking you to prove your other claims later.
You admitted that parents or authorities of the state taught that children to murder. This is your claim and you did not provide any reference to prove it. Your request to me prove what I did not claimed is a failed attempt of deception.
What you see in the prison is the inevitable result of having taught these adolescents that violence was how you get your way -- they become violent individuals and use violence themselves.
I have absolutely no doubt that every child in that prison was taught violence by authorities (probably their parents) on a first-hand basis, if you know what I mean. Go into a prison and interview violent offenders for their childhood, then tell us what the common thread in their lives is (spoiler: child abuse).
Since your claim is a hasty generalization, I am challenging you to indicate to me who, beyond the parents or the authorities of the state, could teach the children to murder. Your failure to present an alternative claim to answer my question indicates that you are unable to answer objectively.
So there is no reason to further this discussion if you do not wish:
1. To substantiate your claim with appropriate evidence, which will prove that only parents or authorities of the state teach children to murder, or
2. Provide an alternative claim which satisfy my question.
Moreover, I provided another reference to you formulate an answer, but you ignored:
http://arazao.com.br/policia/menor-mata-homem-em-rosario-do-sul/The lesser of 15 years was apprehended by Police Civil Rosario South yesterday. He is accused of killing Alessandro Silva Moreira with an ax ritual with quite aggressive. In addition to the blows of the ax, the lowest Alessandro also assaulted with a filtered straw in the mouth with a serrated knife, which eventually reaching the throat.
In recognition of the scene, the lowest would have lifted the cloth covering the body and spat at the victim's face. By the time the Delegate Thiago Firppo worked with the hypothesis larceny. The smallest act of spitting on the victim caused the Delegate also works with the hypothesis Crime Passional. According to information gathered by the newspaper Gazeta de Rosario, the victim's girlfriend would be harassed less and this may have prompted the disagreement.
The crime, which happened on Sunday night at Rua Thedy Guimarães, Ana Luiza in the neighborhood, when the minor, the victim and others consumed alcohol and crack. Ezequiel de Souza Rodrigues 21, was arrested as a co-author, for he was at the crime scene with those involved and did nothing to prevent crime. The delegate Thiago Firppo heard those involved in crime and two other witnesses.
The smaller the victim, the co-author and another girl who was with them moments before they would have sold to television with the victim's consent Noreira to consume more drugs. The cash machine was not found by police.
Regarding the video I presented and the news in the above quote:
What or who, beyond the parents or the authorities of the state could teach children to murder?
