Pages:
Author

Topic: Craig Wright Satoshi Claim Case Update (Read 912 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1045
Goodnight, ohh Leo!!! 🦅
June 28, 2024, 04:53:35 PM
#67
Don't these guys ever quit? Craig's drama has been flooding the net and at some point, without too much investigation on the real deal, a newbie would think he's right for his claims...

Since he decided to pull everyone on a run that he faked, just for his selfish interest, he should be sued to serve time. Well, it was pretty obvious how this was gonna end since his proves were baseless and he was simply trying to capitalize on the fact that Satoshi himself hid under the radar.
He is a clown, what the point was to spread misinformation without any way to proof it
That's the most concerning part of the story.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 13, 2024, 11:10:02 AM
#66
I find it's hard to believe a third party actually pay £6m for faketoshi. Although i also wonder if faketoshi manage to make a loan and use it to make payment under someone else name.

ALL of CSW income is a loan. he collateralised his life story and gave it a value. his whole charade is fame production to try and get ROI from all this social drama

https://mylegacykit.medium.com/the-craig-wright-may-2016-signing-sessions-debacle-in-full-context-338e2b316310
to avoid a long read about all of it. just do
(browser function: find in page: "the prelude")
or here's my snippet of it


CSW entire game was telling his sponsors he has all these patents, all these potential law suit wins all these book and movie deals that are worth billions if combined as a package, and all he wants is an ongoing "R&D income stream"

the companies (in first court order) were meant to be frozen by law over a £6m court ordered valuation..  which the sponsors seen as a hindrance on the CSW promises of "billions" of future ROI so logically its obvious they(mcgregor and mathews) would be the ones paying the £6m to untie the court order
and same will probably happen again with this second court order too

as to why CSW asks for income in the form of R&D.. hint (tax relief)
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/corporation-tax-research-and-development-rd-relief
also by calling it R&D, he doesnt need to promise giving a final product for all his work..
yep.. verbally he promised his sponsors "completed work".. but contractually he duped them into R&D which never needs to result in "completed work".. so mcgregor and mathews are getting duped too, as ayres is finding out now

CSW is not personally wealthy. its all locked or wrapped or false accounted into his businesses which are wrapped up in some shell companies and contracts.. which is why COPA needed/wanted those things court ordered to be frozen

and i hope you are all caught up now on the finances of CSW and his sponsors
member
Activity: 589
Merit: 10
April 13, 2024, 10:44:28 AM
#65
He is a clown, what the point was to spread misinformation without any way to proof it
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 13, 2024, 07:16:17 AM
#64
They're just trying to screw him even harder so the stain that's on his name sticks even more and would linger more than it should, they need to implicate that he did lie about a lot of his claims that he's the person behind the legendary user Satoshi Nakamoto, definitely not a bad idea if you ask me for the court and COPA to do that, that way, there's no way that they can make mistakes that Craig and his team might exploit to make the case against him a bit weaker thus having more chances of lighter sentencing. It's a good thing that this fiasco with Craig is almost over, I'm getting tired seeing this as headlines on crypto news, it's not a fun story to read and it topples over those that really need some attention, I hope that he does change as a person after this is all over, lying really won't get you so far, it's difficult to keep it up and once you're busted, it's difficult to get out of it.
I don't like CW and I never believed he was Satoshi, but I also don't want him to continue being attacked. We have the results, CW is just Faketoshi, that's enough for the market. The best way to punish a fame seeker is to make him forgotten in the history of the crypto market, not to keep mentioning him to give him more media exposure. I don't even want to write his full name!

I've also removed BSV from my watchlist, it should rest in peace with CW's notoriety.

But don't forget there are some damage remaining (e.g. Bitcoin whitepaper on bitcoin.org still blocked for UK visitor) and BSV holder doesn't seem to care much about that CW is faketoshi.

update:
after the march 27th order to freeze assets to the total value of £6m... to avoid asset freezing the sum had to be paid in full to the courts
.. a third party paid £6m to the courts which the courts are holding onto whilst COPA calculate their costs.
the court acknowledge that someone that is not CSW paid the £6m

on april 12th copa filed and the court agreed to a second order to freeze accounts of CSW and 2 businesses to a total value of £1m, again giving CSW the chance to pay in full (by the 16th of april) to avoid asset freezing

there will be a further court update on the 26th of april

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/bitcoin-high-court-london-b1151135.html


I find it's hard to believe a third party actually pay £6m for faketoshi. Although i also wonder if faketoshi manage to make a loan and use it to make payment under someone else name.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 13, 2024, 05:51:35 AM
#63
update:
after the march 27th order to freeze assets to the total value of £6m... to avoid asset freezing the sum had to be paid in full to the courts
.. a third party paid £6m to the courts which the courts are holding onto whilst COPA calculate their costs.
the court acknowledge that someone that is not CSW paid the £6m

on april 12th copa filed and the court agreed to a second order to freeze accounts of CSW and 2 businesses to a total value of £1m, again giving CSW the chance to pay in full (by the 16th of april) to avoid asset freezing

there will be a further court update on the 26th of april

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/bitcoin-high-court-london-b1151135.html
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 46
₿itcoin maximalist
April 12, 2024, 06:34:11 PM
#62
They're just trying to screw him even harder so the stain that's on his name sticks even more and would linger more than it should, they need to implicate that he did lie about a lot of his claims that he's the person behind the legendary user Satoshi Nakamoto, definitely not a bad idea if you ask me for the court and COPA to do that, that way, there's no way that they can make mistakes that Craig and his team might exploit to make the case against him a bit weaker thus having more chances of lighter sentencing. It's a good thing that this fiasco with Craig is almost over, I'm getting tired seeing this as headlines on crypto news, it's not a fun story to read and it topples over those that really need some attention, I hope that he does change as a person after this is all over, lying really won't get you so far, it's difficult to keep it up and once you're busted, it's difficult to get out of it.
I don't like CW and I never believed he was Satoshi, but I also don't want him to continue being attacked. We have the results, CW is just Faketoshi, that's enough for the market. The best way to punish a fame seeker is to make him forgotten in the history of the crypto market, not to keep mentioning him to give him more media exposure. I don't even want to write his full name!

I've also removed BSV from my watchlist, it should rest in peace with CW's notoriety.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 334
April 11, 2024, 01:00:06 AM
#61
It was already proven that he is indeed not satoshi nakamoto so he has a lot of explaining to do. He will be in even worse trouble if the money he has accumulated came from illegal activities. I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes right now.
They're just trying to screw him even harder so the stain that's on his name sticks even more and would linger more than it should, they need to implicate that he did lie about a lot of his claims that he's the person behind the legendary user Satoshi Nakamoto, definitely not a bad idea if you ask me for the court and COPA to do that, that way, there's no way that they can make mistakes that Craig and his team might exploit to make the case against him a bit weaker thus having more chances of lighter sentencing. It's a good thing that this fiasco with Craig is almost over, I'm getting tired seeing this as headlines on crypto news, it's not a fun story to read and it topples over those that really need some attention, I hope that he does change as a person after this is all over, lying really won't get you so far, it's difficult to keep it up and once you're busted, it's difficult to get out of it.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 11, 2024, 12:52:58 AM
#60
I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

You would not believe how many degrees this man has. He has bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and even theology’s degree. Which is crazy. But I wouldn’t be surprised if those degrees turn out to be fake lol.

But if it is indeed true then imagine studying all those years and gaining recognition just for you to mess everything in your life by pretending to be someone you’re not. To top of it all off, he did all these lies by presenting badly made evidences. As a graduate of multiple degrees in different fields, he should have known better.

Highly educated people can still be emotionally unstable or they simply think they are better than other people. (They call that an inflated ego or just arrogance)

We have a few highly educated family members in my broader family and some of them do not mix with the rest of the family, because they think that they are in a different class and that their shit does not stink. A lot of their social lives are in a mess, but they keep up a fake front to protect their own inflated ego.

CW thought he was the smartest guy in Crypto currency, but he was proven wrong by people that were smarter than him. He did fool Gavin and some fanboys, but the truth and facts exposed him.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 11, 2024, 12:32:17 AM
#59

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC


No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:


I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it. Cool

Quote from: frankandbeans

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere


In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.


i had my opinions on core being a central point of failure BEFORE CSW and jonald ..
thats not an admission of being part of some altnetwork group.. thats called independent research and scrutiny
when idiots like CSW and jonald then copied what i said i called them out on it.. yep they are idiots too..


 Roll Eyes

"Independent".

You can have your opinions, but I also have mine and in my opinion your opinions are not "independent".

Quote

as for windfurys failing to understand logic reason, research, data, fact and history
if he did do his research he will see CSW first appearance publicly in the cryptosphere was not the signing session with gavin.. not the self doxing and running away to the UK. it was months earlier in 2015 at a conference nick szabo was at.


Gaslighting again, and without addressing the fact that frankandbeans claimed that it was Nick Szabo that "introduced" Craig Wright to the public, and making it look that it was Nick Szabo's fault that this "CSW is Satoshi" nonesense started. Everyone should take screenshots of your posts frankandbeans, you change your claims.

Quote

---Snip---


Hahaha! The post continues of what was said to him about Nick Szabo and that conference.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 10, 2024, 03:31:34 AM
#58

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC


No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:


I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it. Cool

Quote from: frankandbeans

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere


In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.

i had my opinions on core being a central point of failure BEFORE CSW and jonald ..
thats not an admission of being part of some altnetwork group.. thats called independent research and scrutiny
when idiots like CSW and jonald then copied what i said i called them out on it.. yep they are idiots too..

im not looking to form a group. im not part of a group. i dont like nor tolerate nor want ass-kissers.. i dont want mindless zombies copying stuff without understanding it.. people should do their own research and not sound like zombie copy/paste reciting idiots
im not interested in other networks nor promote people should move to other networks(unlike the doomad/windfury group, that sound more like CSW games)

as for windfurys failing to understand logic reason, research, data, fact and history
if he did do his research he will see CSW first appearance publicly in the cryptosphere was not the signing session with gavin.. not the self doxing and running away to the UK. it was months earlier in 2015 at a conference nick szabo was at.
(CSW was skype called live-streamed in on a big screen)
most peoples interest in that conference was due to nick szabo being there, he was the lead guest of interest. CSW was an unknown entity but then treated as secondary lead guest.
the host bitcoinbabe made an article later about her regrets of hosting that conference with CSW in it.. where she says CSW had been previously introducing himself to the big players of crypto and the big names like nick szabo and trying to mingle and get associated with and recognition via trying to get close to the big names(during 2015),
which she then thought he was a big player worthy of being in the conference panel due to the association he wiggled his way into of certain others like nick szabo
if it wasnt for CSW name dropping nickszabo as a contact he would not have been on the panel with nick szabo

i call this crap out because this crap needs to be called out as a way showing history of events.. now go do your research
yep CSW was trying to mingle and wedge his way into bitcoin ecosphere/recognition before he doxxed himself and moved to the UK
CSW first bitcoin purchase was 2013 and first appearance was oct 2015 before the self doxing to media in december 2015
the public had no opinion of CSW before oct 2015
CSW had no bitcoin association, relevance, participation, recognition earlier then this

so i did not form my opinions around stuff CSW said nor had personal contact with CSW.. so windfury trying to pretend im associated with CSWthe scammer are where windfury gets its all wrong

when CSW done the signing thing and published it. i even was trying to tell people the signature was a fake, where it was pulled from publicly available blockdata and not a real newly signed thing soon after CSW published it. i was calling out CSW as fake early on

windfury just hates having his gas enlightened and hates getting burned so then wants to pretend people that burn him with enlightened facts must be part of some alternate group
windfury wants to confuse things and re arrange history purely because doomad does, and its their gameplan to be like CSW and promote some other network(LN) as bitcoin that they think people should move over to it if peoples dont like cores business plan
they are the ones that sound like CSW and emulate him
sr. member
Activity: 2618
Merit: 439
April 10, 2024, 12:50:03 AM
#57
I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

You would not believe how many degrees this man has. He has bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and even theology’s degree. Which is crazy. But I wouldn’t be surprised if those degrees turn out to be fake lol.

But if it is indeed true then imagine studying all those years and gaining recognition just for you to mess everything in your life by pretending to be someone you’re not. To top of it all off, he did all these lies by presenting badly made evidences. As a graduate of multiple degrees in different fields, he should have known better.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 10, 2024, 12:39:43 AM
#56

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC


No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:


I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it. Cool

Quote from: frankandbeans

CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere


In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 09, 2024, 05:56:20 PM
#55
CSW is my inspiration???

sorry but my opinion exists BEFORE CSW because i have been in bitcoin and pointing out cores faults before CSW was even a name in the cryptosphere

i dont want him or anyone just echo chambering my words..
read my footnote.. its clear people should do their own research

CSW takes other peoples work and claims it as his own.. as we all know.. and no one wants him to do that, including me
i dont want nor need a cult. i am not part of a cult. and scammer CSW is not proof of me being in a cult. he is just an idiot

however windfury is a acolyte/disciple/mentee of doomad... much as ayres was a disciple fo CSW

i have called out many people that try to copy my words verbatim but then show they lack actual independent research to actually understand it

the difference is
doomad adores windfury, blackhat and oeleo copying doomads stupidity.. CSW adores ayres reciting CSW

there is the difference

if a twit thinks that someone that scrutinises or points out core issues must be in some CSW cult. then the twit that thinks that, is an idiot

people need to do research review and scrutinise core devs. doomad doesnt want people scrutinising core devs and will do anything to try to stop anyone from reviewing, scrutinising or pointing things out. including trying to pidgeon hole them into some lame group as his way to try to quieten the scrutiny
but in the end it makes doomad and his ilk look more like the scammer group of cultish games he tries to pideon hole associate people in
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 09, 2024, 09:55:28 AM
#54
He says people are following my cult, but clearly no one in their right mind would be following his.    Roll Eyes

Is your cult one of the fun ones with lots of orgies and free love? Or one of the boring ones that we sit around chanting for inner calm?

Looking for something to do this summer since it looks like my motorcycle is going to be in for warranty work for the foreseeable future and a free love orgy cult sounds like fun.

Anyway, I don't know all the ins and outs of the courts on the other side of the Atlantic, but here in the US there really is no way to go back and say you didn't say something in a civil trial. You said it, it's on you, and people suing you can use it against you with just about 0% possibility of you being able to dispute it.

-Dave
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
April 09, 2024, 07:32:06 AM
#53

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC


No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Craig Scammer Wanker is franky1's greatest inspiration.  He's basically sucking the guy's cock.  He is #1 member of the Faketoshi cult in terms of how they both perceive Bitcoin:

also those few people that have slow internet because they are home users actually bottleneck the propogation. and thus they are not helping the network. so just being a full node for the sake of thinking they are helping, is actually doing the opposite.



look at cores tactics
1. go soft, avoid node decision of consensus vote
2. go soft to give only pools the vote
3. if pools say no, UASF bomb the pools.
4. if the community say no to UASF then do a mandatory activation with a trigger for late 2018 no matter how many pools or nodes vote or veto



BUT the usefulness and function of btc has stalled.

LN is not a BTC saviour. dont scream it can never die. instead scream it can comatose and then dmand th devs actually do something to prevent it stagnating.
again LN is not the saviour.. devs are already planning o letting other coins use LN while keping btc stalled in a effort that people lock up their BTC move it into LN and then not want to ever sttle back to btc due to all th things the devs have done to stall btc onchain innovation

to all those that think just screaming btc is utopia and gonna take over the world. should look back to 2011-2013 where the same was said.. and then the devs started to show their weakness by calling it a beta experiment and btc cant scale.



Looks like you two have got a great deal in common.  Like two peas in a pod bits of corn in a turd.

He says people are following my cult, but clearly no one in their right mind would be following his.    Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 09, 2024, 06:19:51 AM
#52

i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC


No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 09, 2024, 04:32:17 AM
#51
i mention CSW because its THIS TOPIC

also your gang of idiots form your own lies and echo chamber it and then approach moderators to then get moderators involved by telling moderators that you dont like what others say, then you use the moderators that hug you as your claim..

sucking up and ass kissing like a cult does not form fact.. the cult games are not fact creators. they are echo chambers of lies. same as CSW
creatng a narrative,recruiting idiots to repeat a narrative, popularise a narrative .. doesnot then make that narrative fact.. instead it just circle jerks stupidity and becomes confirmation bias of a lie.. digging your own hole until you cant escape your own grave

now go learn from the block data and code. not from some cult group of social drama and ass kissing idols circle jerking each other

i have no mentor, you are stuck in the cult games that you think everyone not in your cult must be in another
try a new mindset.. escape the cults and have an independent opinion without idols

i dont want ass kissers i am not an ass kisser.. there is a good reason i have said many times and even have it in my footnote
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH

there have been people over the years that then try to copy my words, word for word without independent thought, and i have called them idiots too.. yep when i highlight flaws in core dev policy and altcoiners and other people then use that 'word for word' for their own attack. i do call them out for not even doing their own research and instead sounding like a sheep repeating something
i am not looking to form a group. i have not been or want to be part of a group.. and just because others say something i said does not mean im pigeon holed into a group

just do your own research and stop playing the cult games or you will become just as stupid as CSW with his games
and by research, i mean actual research using real code and data sources.. NOT repetition of someone you idolise that has their own agenda
... stop playing the games of trust of idols. it wont help you.. as shown by the last few years of your posts
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 09, 2024, 04:09:30 AM
#50
"Group of idiots"

is yourself, oeleo blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other couple people in the echo chamber group of idiots that treat themselves like a cult club repeating the same mantra hosted by doomad as lead idiot(playing the same games as CSW)


We're idiots because we listen to those two people, Gregory Maxwell and A. Chow both Bitcoin Core Developers, that have given you those two negative trust-ratings? But you're not because you listen to your mentor Roger Ver? You also try to bring Craig Wright in the conversation, but the only person that spreads lies, disinformation, and gaslights like him is you ser.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 08, 2024, 05:13:02 AM
#49
"Group of idiots"

is yourself, oeleo blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other couple people in the echo chamber group of idiots that treat themselves like a cult club repeating the same mantra hosted by doomad as lead idiot(playing the same games as CSW)

your idiot group even keep trying to define lightning network as being the bitcoin network

you are not a core dev, nor is your mentor or his acolytes.. you lot are just a silly fanclub.. learn the difference.. you dont even understand nor want to learn code, so how can you claim that "group of idiots" refers to core devs, when its clear that when i call you a group of idiots and you know who im talking about, you pretend im talking about another group

i know you want to pretend you are in the same league as core devs because, but your not. so stop trying to associate yourself

the group of idiots is clearly you and your mentor.. yep blackhatcoiner, doomad and the other idiots are not core devs.. they are just a cultish fanbase of certain core devs(that desire a full migration of bitcoin users to move to their favoured lightning network) you lot formed a religion around this philosophy, chanting it

learn the difference
you are playing the same games as CSW. and your not even smart enough to realise it
its time you start having thoughts of your own, and stop blindly idolising and copying what some cult leader says, before you become as poisonous in social drama as CSW crowd
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
April 08, 2024, 04:19:59 AM
#48
I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.
Pages:
Jump to: