Pages:
Author

Topic: Craig Wright Satoshi Claim Case Update - page 2. (Read 782 times)

legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 07, 2024, 07:43:39 AM
#46

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..


You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?

you keep mentioning the trust rating.. its meaningless because your group of idiots caused it

people should learn from actual blockdata, code and understanding of bitcoin.. not some idiot group of social drama queens like your silly cult and their agenda. i dont want suck-ups either im not looking to form a fanbase of people trusting me either, people should do their own research and learn the facts..

as for the trust rating:
the debates 8+ years ago that heightened over the years into discourse, is that i kept informing people that segwit will/did/has triggered an exploit that allows JUNK DATA
and guess what.. years later ordinals proved my case

also the promises of segwit being the solution to allow more transactions on the bitcoin network were fake/broken/empty promises
because many devs even back in 2010 said that bitcoin can handle over 4000tx... and yet in 2024 we are still not going way above 4k tx average. even when blocks are 4x of the satoshi days.. meaning we should be averaging or expecting 16k but nope still at 4k average(and less)

now go do your research and realise the biggest idiot you idolise(doomad) was the biggest cry baby wanting me moderated and banned from this forum because i kept correcting him.

even your rhetoric of "big blocker" is not even a thought of your own its the implications made by doomad that you blindly recite that those calling out on CORES short comings must be some "big blocker" group. where there is an attempt of social drama to pidgeon hole anyone not religiously following core like god/idols must be some altcoin group
you shamefully do not even think that me and thousands of people are discussing bitcoin scaling. which is not the rhetoric you blindly think it is.
so go learn what real bitcoin scaling is and stop just reciting silly rhetoric from a group of idiots that have been debunked many times via data and code(real source information). bitcoin scaling is not "big blocker" exaggerations..
bitcoin scaling is not "idolise core as central government or f**k off to another network"
learn what bitcoin scaling actually is

i dare you to try and find some REAL mis information i gave and show me hard data, code that proves your case
realise something upfront though
all your belligerent posts of using insults you cant even come up with yourself but using doomads words and references, are just copies of doomads silliness and i have already debunked his mindset of how he thinks of things like consensus and segwit.. so actually do some proper research before you post because if you just want to recite doomad rhetoric, you will instantly loose

try to learn for once to not trust people blindly/unchecked.. and instead use data and code as your source of bitcoin information. trusting a mentor like you had admitted even in your post.. shows you are not ready to learn bitcoin and instead just want to play social games of trusting cult players
and just reciting silly stories that earn you the title of also being called an idiot by showing your repeated idiocy

so take some time to actually do some research away from doomads rhetoric. and please dont just reply acting like a victim refusing to learn or pretending you have learned things from idiots or crying that i call them idiots.. actually be prepared to learn or stop playing your cultish games. dont cry about it

your cultish games and social drama's are as bad as CSW's games.. stop being a copycat.. and no dont pretend your copycat tactics are actually your own independent idea's... as it really would be you doing a CSW
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1552
Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013
April 07, 2024, 07:25:48 AM
#45
his game is distancing himself..
his next stance would be that his tweets over many years were done by his employee's and not him, whereby he allowed them access to his account and nothing ever said were his words from his human self.. he just allowed them because there was no "proof" either way
(in courts its called plausible deniability/reasonable doubt)
so he can escape any criminal acts of promotin a scammer/fraudster by making suggestions his tweets were never his and he this year completely separated from the account once courts found out his tweets about CSW were lies
Distancing is probably a sound advice coming from his lawyer. But the tweets aren't going to absolve him very much because there's the lies to those people that he talked to and those aren't going to be easily dismissed that his employees did it when he's the one that's been seen. The argument about the tweets are probably just some kind of hail Mary to at least try to make the sentence a bit more shorter or at the least make it more or less that he's not guilty of all that he's been accused of, such a determination from this man to be able to do this and keep on lying when he's been debunked time and time again.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 07, 2024, 05:57:17 AM
#44

i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..


You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?
legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 03, 2024, 02:25:35 PM
#43
i have no mentors but your mindset of you needing one makes you beleive other people need one too
cult members always think the rest of the world belongs in other religions..

im independent and atheist and i laugh at the foolish games of idiots in their silly groups using beleif and trust to fool each other into scamming each other using nothing but faith and idolisations

as for research DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH
look at the data and code.. learn from actual sources
research from quotes of the people you talk about from years ago.. actually learn stuff
not your mentor

stop relying on being spoonfed then you wont need to cry like a baby when you get spoonfed
try for once to be independent

99% of your posts are not independant posts with unique thoughts of your own mind. they are simply reciting words told to you by your mentor.. you cant even think of your own insult for me, you even became so enslaved that you use your mentors insults
the reason i call you an idiot, because that is how you chose to act. by choosing to act like the shadow/echo of your mentor
try to escape acting like an idiot if you dont want to be assumed/accused of being one. learn about bitcoin and actual real facts away from the echo chamber you trapped yourself in.. your current path is not making yourself any better then the drones/zombies/idiots of BSV

i have never asked you or told you to beleive me i have always told you and others to do your own research.. so for once try it
and no research is not to ask your mentors what to think, instead try to have your own mind for once an look at the source material.. and just stop asking your mentor to spoon feed you sauces.. your mentors sauces are not sources

here is other examples:
when you learn that gavin took a payday from the NYA group via their sponsorship of BLOQ you will see all the bait and switch stuff too
you can google it and learn stuff independently away from your mentor
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 03, 2024, 06:40:00 AM
#42

they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009


That sort of gaslighting will not work anymore. How stupid do they actually believe the community currently is after Craig Wright was condemned by the very people who have revolted, in some way, against Bitcoin. I have come to respect Vitalik Buterin, Marc Andresen, and Roger Ver for saying that Craig is NOT Satoshi. That shows that their hearts are in the right place, although opinions, beliefs, and understanding of things in Bitcoin Land differ.

you need to learn alot more about EVERYTHING


From who? You? Hahaha! Laughable.

Quote

gavin andressen wanted to retire from bitcoin.. he said in like 2010-11 that he would only spend 5 more years invovled in bitcoin.... so knowing 2015-16 was his retirement plan he took whatever golden handshake he could find and leave.. knowing his reputation didnt matter
so he took the money to say bullcrap. thinking it would not lead to anything big, and thought the drama would die out in months. so no harm no foul
yes later when he was out of contract he come clean..

R.Ver is a business man and with the troubled of bitinstant debacle he needed to pivot. he didnt intend to create BCH, BCH was created for him via the mandated rejection of old versionbit blocks(via the core sponsores(nya) bait and switch). and so he took that opportunity. and then done a deal with CSW a year later to help break BCH to BSV and was bought into promoting CSW. again for a payday..
even calvin ayres and nguyen and others sponsoring BSV dont truly believe in CSW they are just looking for riches from promoting his schemes with empty promises of huge returns


Is that the truth, or are you gaslighting/making things up again, frankandbeans? Because by saying that through a written post, and making everyone believe that to be true, could be considered libel.

Quote

its obvious no one believed in CSW and then wised up..  but instead they were guided by payouts thinking they can get rich and then CSW drama would kill itself instantly thus not cause long term issues, thus didnt care to promote a nonsense story for a while

even your mentor is not guided by information or proof, nor care for things that actually benefit bitcoiners. he is guided by empty promises of his own possible future riches if he promotes stupid stuff like recruiting people to move to other networks.. as for your motives to ignore actual block data, actual code, actual history, actual things that can benefit bitcoin.. to instead just idolise and trust idiots because they show friendliness(or make promises to you).. well thats your own story to tell one day


Is this 4D Chess? You're making false statements against your mentors for me to defend them? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 03, 2024, 05:59:03 AM
#41
Thank you for the information. It's really deceptive move though, average reader would wrongfully assume it's written by Calvin himself.

his game is distancing himself..
his next stance would be that his tweets over many years were done by his employee's and not him, whereby he allowed them access to his account and nothing ever said were his words from his human self.. he just allowed them because there was no "proof" either way
(in courts its called plausible deniability/reasonable doubt)
so he can escape any criminal acts of promotin a scammer/fraudster by making suggestions his tweets were never his and he this year completely separated from the account once courts found out his tweets about CSW were lies
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 7410
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 03, 2024, 05:29:27 AM
#40
Calvin Ayre won't be wasting more of his own money on something that will never make him a return on his investment.

Do you have source for that statement? I just checked coingeek (BSV propaganda website) and it seems Calvin Arye just write another propaganda yesterday.

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1768619693449883862
march 15th

Quote
Good bye everyone.  This is my last post before I take off on an adventure I have been planning for the last year.  I have now handed this account over to a team that will work with the BSV Blockchain Association, London Blockchain conference and other organizations dedicated to educating on how Enterprise Blockchain brings together and completes AI, IoTs, Web 3 and other areas of Big Data.

CA is not writing for BSV, he handed his online accounts to a marketing team

Quote
Calvin Ayre
@CalvinAyre
Founder #AyreGroup and #CoinGeek.com. This account is managed by a social media team to share Enterprise Blockchain news and information.


their latest stupidity and false claim is:

by the judge freezing CSW assets
and those assets being BSV associated
they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009

Thank you for the information. It's really deceptive move though, average reader would wrongfully assume it's written by Calvin himself.

--snip--
To be fair, I visited the BitcoinSV website today for the first time and now I am not shocked by the fact that it is popular. People are too lazy to double-check information and BitcoinSV promotes itself like an original Bitcoin, so I am not surprised if many people got trapped by that. On their timeline, it's written that Dr.Craig Wright is the creator of Bitcoin who was using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, then it says that he got very explicit because Bitcoin was used by criminals and it's a very populist statement because people believe that it's used by criminals.

In overall, he is a liar who lies to everyone.

Many altcoin or token website have similar appearance or marketing word with BSV website though.
legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 03, 2024, 05:22:11 AM
#39

they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009


That sort of gaslighting will not work anymore. How stupid do they actually believe the community currently is after Craig Wright was condemned by the very people who have revolted, in some way, against Bitcoin. I have come to respect Vitalik Buterin, Marc Andresen, and Roger Ver for saying that Craig is NOT Satoshi. That shows that their hearts are in the right place, although opinions, beliefs, and understanding of things in Bitcoin Land differ.

you need to learn alot more about EVERYTHING

gavin andressen wanted to retire from bitcoin.. he said in like 2010-11 that he would only spend 5 more years invovled in bitcoin.... so knowing 2015-16 was his retirement plan he took whatever golden handshake he could find and leave.. knowing his reputation didnt matter
so he took the money to say bullcrap. thinking it would not lead to anything big, and thought the drama would die out in months. so no harm no foul
yes later when he was out of contract he come clean..

R.Ver is a business man and with the troubled of bitinstant debacle he needed to pivot. he didnt intend to create BCH, BCH was created for him via the mandated rejection of old versionbit blocks(via the core sponsores(nya) bait and switch). and so he took that opportunity. and then done a deal with CSW a year later to help break BCH to BSV and was bought into promoting CSW. again for a payday..
even calvin ayres and nguyen and others sponsoring BSV dont truly believe in CSW they are just looking for riches from promoting his schemes with empty promises of huge returns

its obvious no one believed in CSW and then wised up..  but instead they were guided by payouts thinking they can get rich and then CSW drama would kill itself instantly thus not cause long term issues, thus didnt care to promote a nonsense story for a while

even your mentor is not guided by information or proof, nor care for things that actually benefit bitcoiners. he is guided by empty promises of his own possible future riches if he promotes stupid stuff like recruiting people to move to other networks.. as for your motives to ignore actual block data, actual code, actual history, actual things that can benefit bitcoin.. to instead just idolise and trust idiots because they show friendliness(or make promises to you).. well thats your own story to tell one day
full member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 207
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
April 03, 2024, 04:41:44 AM
#38
In the High Court of Justice Business and Property of England and Wales yesterday COPA which is Crypto Open Patent Alliance the team formed by Square, Inc., Payward Ventures, Inc. (DBA Kraken), Microstrategy, Inc., and Coinbase, Inc.
Submitted a claim that Craig Wright lied and double-down on his lies, on a grand scale that he's Satoshi Nakamoto that he has given extensive and elaborate dishonest evidence under oath in multiple sets of proceedings, and also considers that he (Craig Wright) forged documents, plus changed his story several times.

Craig Wright was told to provide Wright with a clear explanation of all his assets as early as possible. The return date is Friday 12 April 2024, with the
provision of information due by 4 pm on Friday 5 April, and the Affidavit due by 4 pm on Wednesday 10 April.

Here is the full detailed pdf file.
This is like Craig is putting Himself to be a Nail that the more  he lies is the more he is being hammered down to the smallest inches , and with that for sure realization will come his way after being put in Jail behind bars lol.
and also  How I wish that he will lose everything because of this  lying and stupidity .
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 03, 2024, 04:18:35 AM
#37

they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009


That sort of gaslighting will not work anymore. How stupid do they actually believe the community currently is after Craig Wright was condemned by the very people who have revolted, in some way, against Bitcoin. I have come to respect Vitalik Buterin, Marc Andresen, and Roger Ver for saying that Craig is NOT Satoshi. That shows that their hearts are in the right place, although opinions, beliefs, and understanding of things in Bitcoin Land differ.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1030
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
April 02, 2024, 05:27:26 PM
#36
HAha, this shit is still ongoing, I was not surprised with the last updates and the narrative he tired to build up, anyway OP thanks for this update as I can discuss this topic with more references while having one on one discussion with the friends and family.

It was already proven that he is indeed not satoshi nakamoto so he has a lot of explaining to do. He will be in even worse trouble if the money he has accumulated came from illegal activities. I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes right now.

Ahh, well you know some people likes to stretch the gum for no reason he's probably one of them not probably definitely he's one of them. Haha I can call it open and shut stupidity.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 1723
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 02, 2024, 01:44:51 PM
#35
Lies are short lived.  Particularly when lies are made on such a big scale.

In the situation of Craig, I wonder how he did not see this coming back when he started the big lie.  He could of even backed out by pretending it was a joke all along, but this could of happened many years ago.  It is too late now.

Unfortunately for him but fortunately for us, he will see the consequence of his actions some day.  Particularly when he offended and tried to taint the reputation of such a large community.

Craig, get yourself ready.  The time for truth may have come, and you will not like it.  In fact.  You never did.
hero member
Activity: 2198
Merit: 847
April 02, 2024, 01:37:23 PM
#34
Even with backing he still have, i doubt 6.2 million Euro is small amount for him. Now i wonder whether he'll sell any BSV he have or even steal other's BSV through centralized confiscation feature[1] in order to cover COPA's legal cost.

[1] https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-sv-hardfork-significant-security-risks/
Bitcoin SV is ranked 62nd out of all listed cryptocurrencies on Coinmarketcap. Super impressive result if we consider that this is a shitcoin run by a scammer that proves again that too many people are dumb. I wouldn't be shocked if Craig Wright confiscates many Bitcoin SV and we will see shocked customers (they deserve to be fair).

BSV rank is partially because he still have some backing, but it's also true some people are dumb or crazy for buying BSV. Anyway, if he decide to perform confiscation stealing and considering BSV is fork of BCH where BCH is fork of BTC, i bet he'll steal BSV from old address which supposed to be owned by Satoshi to make another false claim that he's Satoshi.
To be fair, I visited the BitcoinSV website today for the first time and now I am not shocked by the fact that it is popular. People are too lazy to double-check information and BitcoinSV promotes itself like an original Bitcoin, so I am not surprised if many people got trapped by that. On their timeline, it's written that Dr.Craig Wright is the creator of Bitcoin who was using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, then it says that he got very explicit because Bitcoin was used by criminals and it's a very populist statement because people believe that it's used by criminals.

In overall, he is a liar who lies to everyone.
legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 02, 2024, 09:56:00 AM
#33
Calvin Ayre won't be wasting more of his own money on something that will never make him a return on his investment.

Do you have source for that statement? I just checked coingeek (BSV propaganda website) and it seems Calvin Arye just write another propaganda yesterday.

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1768619693449883862
march 15th

Quote
Good bye everyone.  This is my last post before I take off on an adventure I have been planning for the last year.  I have now handed this account over to a team that will work with the BSV Blockchain Association, London Blockchain conference and other organizations dedicated to educating on how Enterprise Blockchain brings together and completes AI, IoTs, Web 3 and other areas of Big Data.

CA is not writing for BSV, he handed his online accounts to a marketing team

Quote
Calvin Ayre
@CalvinAyre
Founder #AyreGroup and #CoinGeek.com. This account is managed by a social media team to share Enterprise Blockchain news and information.


their latest stupidity and false claim is:

by the judge freezing CSW assets
and those assets being BSV associated
they are again now claiming BSV is bitcoin made by satoshi so pretending the judges freeze of CSW assets is proof of satoshi

they keep forgetting that bsv came into existence in 2018 not 2009
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 7410
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 02, 2024, 06:10:22 AM
#32
--snip--
The backing mostly coming from Calvin Ayre which will not be there anymore now that it has been announced that Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi. "Craig Wright = Satoshi" was they're only leverage against the community to fool people into believing that Bitcoin Cash SV is therefore the "real Bitcoin". Calvin Ayre won't be wasting more of his own money on something that will never make him a return on his investment.

Do you have source for that statement? I just checked coingeek (BSV propaganda website) and it seems Calvin Arye just write another propaganda yesterday.

P.S. i don't include link since i don't want to give free backlink and bumping their position on google search result.
jr. member
Activity: 28
Merit: 5
April 02, 2024, 05:05:02 AM
#31
Craig Wright is a liar and a thief, and I am so glad that the courts have finally publicly denied his claims of being Satoshi. Despite all manipulative evidence that Craig has brought forward over the years, it was always clear from a perspective of character and attitude that he was not Satoshi. The real Satoshi would never sue early Bitcoin developers for defamation and try to ruin their personal lives. It is honestly disgusting behaviour.
legendary
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4458
April 02, 2024, 03:47:12 AM
#30
Craig Wright was told to provide Wright with a clear explanation of all his assets as early as possible. The return date is Friday 12 April 2024, with the
provision of information due by 4 pm on Friday 5 April, and the Affidavit due by 4 pm on Wednesday 10 April.
by losing the case, he has to pay the lawyers costs of COPA, so they want to know his financial position (possibility of being paid £6.7m($8.5m))

12. Understandably, that gave rise to serious concerns on COPA’s part that Dr Wright was
implementing measures to seek to evade the costs consequences of his loss at trial.
I think he has already said he has millions because I saw in today's news headline that "U.K. court freezes £6M of Craig Wright’s assets amid Bitcoin creator claim"

no the actual court order was to do a international court order to freeze all assets before he could put them into other shell/trust/company names. he nor the court implied CSW has £6m .. however the £6m is the amount he owes the court to pay for the court and COPA costs

CSW insinuated that he would move funds into his sisters name to then suggest CSW had no money and his sister was not on trial so (his) her money should not be touched. which was one of the reasons to do the international freeze of all assets
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 01, 2024, 05:16:41 AM
#29
Even with backing he still have, i doubt 6.2 million Euro is small amount for him. Now i wonder whether he'll sell any BSV he have or even steal other's BSV through centralized confiscation feature[1] in order to cover COPA's legal cost.

[1] https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-sv-hardfork-significant-security-risks/

Bitcoin SV is ranked 62nd out of all listed cryptocurrencies on Coinmarketcap. Super impressive result if we consider that this is a shitcoin run by a scammer that proves again that too many people are dumb. I wouldn't be shocked if Craig Wright confiscates many Bitcoin SV and we will see shocked customers (they deserve to be fair).


BSV rank is partially because he still have some backing, but it's also true some people are dumb or crazy for buying BSV. Anyway, if he decide to perform confiscation stealing and considering BSV is fork of BCH where BCH is fork of BTC, i bet he'll steal BSV from old address which supposed to be owned by Satoshi to make another false claim that he's Satoshi.


The backing mostly coming from Calvin Ayre which will not be there anymore now that it has been announced that Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi. "Craig Wright = Satoshi" was they're only leverage against the community to fool people into believing that Bitcoin Cash SV is therefore the "real Bitcoin". Calvin Ayre won't be wasting more of his own money on something that will never make him a return on his investment.
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 7410
Crypto Swap Exchange
April 01, 2024, 04:36:22 AM
#28
Even with backing he still have, i doubt 6.2 million Euro is small amount for him. Now i wonder whether he'll sell any BSV he have or even steal other's BSV through centralized confiscation feature[1] in order to cover COPA's legal cost.

[1] https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-sv-hardfork-significant-security-risks/
Bitcoin SV is ranked 62nd out of all listed cryptocurrencies on Coinmarketcap. Super impressive result if we consider that this is a shitcoin run by a scammer that proves again that too many people are dumb. I wouldn't be shocked if Craig Wright confiscates many Bitcoin SV and we will see shocked customers (they deserve to be fair).

BSV rank is partially because he still have some backing, but it's also true some people are dumb or crazy for buying BSV. Anyway, if he decide to perform confiscation stealing and considering BSV is fork of BCH where BCH is fork of BTC, i bet he'll steal BSV from old address which supposed to be owned by Satoshi to make another false claim that he's Satoshi.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
April 01, 2024, 04:16:34 AM
#27

IMO, the most important part has already happened. Namely, quoting the court document the op shared,
Quote

COPA had established that Dr Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto and had not been the creator of Bitcoin and the early materials.


That's a great judgement, and I'm really happy that the COPA managed to prove it in court (as they were the ones who had to prove Craig was fake, so if they simply hadn't had enough evidence, Craig would've won the case).
The rest, it seems, it about getting Craig to cover the cost of the trial, which amounts to £6 million. The judge recommends freezing Craigs assets to make sure the transfer will happen, and Craig is perhaps trying to evade.


That's probably very relieving for Calvin Ayre, who is said to be paying for everything in the fork of the forked shitcoin Bitcoin Cash SV project. The miners, the website, CoinGeek, the developers, the marketing are all paid with Calvin Ayre's money. I believe one by one they will leave Craig Wright's side and throw him into the fire if the government gos after them for their involvement with a con-artist. Roger Ver was by him fooled once. Nassim Taleb is still being fooled.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Pages:
Jump to: