Topic: Criticisms? - page 6. (Read 11855 times)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

I do, you just don't think it will work. If the dead parent had had a will in the first place (as anyone with enough shit to fight over should), this wouldn't be an issue.

So if the problem didn't exist it would not be a problem?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_people_in_the_US_die_without_a_Will

In the US alone, 55% of families have this problem. Surely you have something to offer by way of justice for the half of American families in this position?

What part of this don't you get?

From Wikipedia:

Quote

It is a resolution technique in which a third party reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding for both sides and enforceable.

In your NAP-Land, there is no enforcement and nothing is legally binding.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: myrkul on June 22, 2012, 03:49:37 PM

Quote from: Hawker on June 22, 2012, 03:46:13 PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

I do, you just don't think it will work. If the dead parent had had a will in the first place (as anyone with enough shit to fight over should), this wouldn't be an issue.

So if the problem didn't exist it would not be a problem?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_people_in_the_US_die_without_a_Will

In the US alone, 55% of families have this problem. Surely you have something to offer by way of justice for the half of American families in this position?

Now you are trying to hide. Grow up and think of an intelligent answer.

I asked you for a just solution for the siblings when the eldest son in possession refuses arbitration. What does your system offer for them to enforce their claims?

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: Hawker on June 22, 2012, 03:46:13 PM

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

I do, you just don't think it will work. If the dead parent had had a will in the first place (as anyone with enough shit to fight over should), this wouldn't be an issue.

So if the problem didn't exist it would not be a problem?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_people_in_the_US_die_without_a_Will

In the US alone, 55% of families have this problem. Surely you have something to offer by way of justice for the half of American families in this position?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

I do, you just don't think it will work. If the dead parent had had a will in the first place (as anyone with enough shit to fight over should), this wouldn't be an issue.

So if the problem didn't exist it would not be a problem?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_people_in_the_US_die_without_a_Will

In the US alone, 55% of families have this problem. Surely you have something to offer by way of justice for the half of American families in this position?

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

I do, you just don't think it will work. If the dead parent had had a will in the first place (as anyone with enough shit to fight over should), this wouldn't be an issue.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

You can't make a will on behalf of a dead parent.

Be honest; you don't have a just solution for them.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: myrkul on June 22, 2012, 02:56:19 PM

Your idea that in cities like London, people care about public opinion is quaint but wrong. You whole idea fails if the people who "cheat" win. Sorry you need to come up with an enforcement system that gives the siblings access to justice or you have nothing.

Make a will.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

FirstAscent

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Hawker on June 22, 2012, 02:52:39 PM

Quote from: myrkul on June 22, 2012, 02:37:05 PM

Quote from: Hawker on June 22, 2012, 02:52:39 PM

We have already established that there can only be 1 arbitration firm; the one that has enforcement powers. If you are saying that the enforcement agency is not a defence agency, that seems very inefficient.

Again with the we. Who the hell is we?

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. Thus, market competition can allow more than one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.978281

We have been through this. You can start with as many as you want but you can only end up with 1.

You quoted me disagreeing with you and then said we agreed. Come on, you can't think anyone is that stupid.

I quoted me proving there can only be 1 court/arbitration agency.

You have to come up with some way for this to work soon. Going in circles where you are wrong all the time is boring me.

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. If you can't get that through your skull, there's nothing I can do to help you.

In NAP-Land, that's all it boils down to (violence and intimidation). Nothing else.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

Quote from: myrkul on June 22, 2012, 02:37:05 PM

Quote from: myrkul on June 22, 2012, 02:37:05 PM

We have already established that there can only be 1 arbitration firm; the one that has enforcement powers. If you are saying that the enforcement agency is not a defence agency, that seems very inefficient.

Again with the we. Who the hell is we?

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. Thus, market competition can allow more than one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.978281

We have been through this. You can start with as many as you want but you can only end up with 1.

You quoted me disagreeing with you and then said we agreed. Come on, you can't think anyone is that stupid.

I quoted me proving there can only be 1 court/arbitration agency.

You have to come up with some way for this to work soon. Going in circles where you are wrong all the time is boring me.

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. If you can't get that through your skull, there's nothing I can do to help you.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: myrkul on June 20, 2012, 05:53:08 PM

We have already established that there can only be 1 arbitration firm; the one that has enforcement powers. If you are saying that the enforcement agency is not a defence agency, that seems very inefficient.

Again with the we. Who the hell is we?

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. Thus, market competition can allow more than one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.978281

We have been through this. You can start with as many as you want but you can only end up with 1.

You quoted me disagreeing with you and then said we agreed. Come on, you can't think anyone is that stupid.

I quoted me proving there can only be 1 court/arbitration agency.

You have to come up with some way for this to work soon. Going in circles where you are wrong all the time is boring me.

FirstAscent

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Hawker on June 20, 2012, 05:42:54 PM

Enforcement requires violence

And this is where you are wrong.

Disagreements are not settled by force in arbitration. They are settled by both parties coming to an agreement.

Incorrect. There is no guarantee that the parties will come to agreement. In fact, in your NAP-Land, due to a general "anything goes", we can be certain that it will be very common that both parties will not come to agreement. It's all about guns and money.

I suspect that a lot of those who do come to 'agreement' will be because one party is very intimidating.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM

We have already established that there can only be 1 arbitration firm; the one that has enforcement powers. If you are saying that the enforcement agency is not a defence agency, that seems very inefficient.

Again with the we. Who the hell is we?

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. Thus, market competition can allow more than one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.978281

We have been through this. You can start with as many as you want but you can only end up with 1.

You quoted me disagreeing with you and then said we agreed. Come on, you can't think anyone is that stupid.

Hawker

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

We have already established that there can only be 1 arbitration firm; the one that has enforcement powers. If you are saying that the enforcement agency is not a defence agency, that seems very inefficient.

Again with the we. Who the hell is we?

Arbitration is not enforced by violence. Thus, market competition can allow more than one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.978281

We have been through this. You can start with as many as you want but you can only end up with 1.

myrkul

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM