Pages:
Author

Topic: Crypto lender Celsius mulls possible restructuring amid financial woes - page 7. (Read 3087 times)

legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
Have you seen any financial disclosures or court filings that suggest that Celsius has a lot of secured creditors?
No, and as far as I am aware, neither a list of secured creditors or a statement that there are none has been made/filed. I'm basing these assumptions on the court documents they filed previous during the bankruptcy proceedings here: https://www.theblock.co/post/157647/celsius-bankruptcy-documents-claim-1-2-billion-balance-sheet-gap. With "Loans" of almost 1 billion dollars, on top of a $1.2 billion hole in their balance sheet, then there is not going to be much left to give back to the users.

I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I think Celsius users shouldn't be holding their breath for a good outcome here.

Besides, if Mt. Gox users had to wait years just to get their coins back, then I don't expect Celsius users to expect their money back after just a few months.

Sure, the Gox distribution was slowed down by lawsuits, but bankruptcy advisors are not known for acting fast.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
Have you seen any financial disclosures or court filings that suggest that Celsius has a lot of secured creditors?
No, and as far as I am aware, neither a list of secured creditors or a statement that there are none has been made/filed. I'm basing these assumptions on the court documents they filed previous during the bankruptcy proceedings here: https://www.theblock.co/post/157647/celsius-bankruptcy-documents-claim-1-2-billion-balance-sheet-gap. With "Loans" of almost 1 billion dollars, on top of a $1.2 billion hole in their balance sheet, then there is not going to be much left to give back to the users.

I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I think Celsius users shouldn't be holding their breath for a good outcome here.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
I would rather describe the process as account holders who had recently withdrawn may have to have the amounts withdrawn comingled with other Celsius assets, and the amount withdrawn would also be added to the claims of debtholders.
Yes, that's what I would expect too. So all money in earn accounts, and all money they can recover which was withdrawn from earn accounts in the previous 90 days, will simply be added to their pool of assets to be redistributed between all stakeholders. I still think the average user will end up with "pennies on the dollar", since all Celsius's big secured investors will take the majority of the funds, leaving little to be distributed among unsecured investors, i.e. regular users.
Have you seen any financial disclosures or court filings that suggest that Celsius has a lot of secured creditors? In bankruptcy, equity holders typically are paid last.

I don't have the data to back this up, however, I think it is likely for many who have withdrawn to have other claims against Celsius, and any amounts demanded to be returned, that are not returned could be offset by other actual recoveries.
And if they refuse to return their withdrawals if ordered, then I suspect they would void any claim they had for other assets still stored on the Celsius platform. What a nightmare for these users, and what despicable behavior from Celsius. Clearly trying to maximize returns for their large investors at the expense of their average users.
Any decision on the legitimacy of claims is up to the bankruptcy court, not Celsius. I think it would be equitable if amounts that are ordered to be returned but are not are offset. So if a user was ordered to return $100, but did not, and unsecured creditors were due to receive $.70 on the dollar, the bankruptcy court would withhold $30 from that user's other recoveries.

I have never heard of a court voiding a debt because the debit holder does not pay their own debts to the party in bankruptcy.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
I would rather describe the process as account holders who had recently withdrawn may have to have the amounts withdrawn comingled with other Celsius assets, and the amount withdrawn would also be added to the claims of debtholders.
Yes, that's what I would expect too. So all money in earn accounts, and all money they can recover which was withdrawn from earn accounts in the previous 90 days, will simply be added to their pool of assets to be redistributed between all stakeholders. I still think the average user will end up with "pennies on the dollar", since all Celsius's big secured investors will take the majority of the funds, leaving little to be distributed among unsecured investors, i.e. regular users.

I don't have the data to back this up, however, I think it is likely for many who have withdrawn to have other claims against Celsius, and any amounts demanded to be returned, that are not returned could be offset by other actual recoveries.
And if they refuse to return their withdrawals if ordered, then I suspect they would void any claim they had for other assets still stored on the Celsius platform. What a nightmare for these users, and what despicable behavior from Celsius. Clearly trying to maximize returns for their large investors at the expense of their average users.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
So, and correct me if I'm wrong here as I've not been keeping up to date with this case, does that not imply Celsius are not only planning to just keep the contents of all earn accounts, but are also planning to try use the 90-day clawback rule to try to recover any withdrawals from earn accounts in the 90 days prior to them filing for bankruptcy? So even if you moved your funds from an earn account to a custody account, if you did it within the 90 day limit then those funds will be forfeited too?
I wouldn't use the word "forfeited", but yes, recent withdrawals from "earn" accounts may be subjected to clackback under bankruptcy laws, and the Celsius bankruptcy estate is going to be obligated to maximize the total return (as a percentage of total claims) of claimaints.

I would rather describe the process as account holders who had recently withdrawn may have to have the amounts withdrawn comingled with other Celsius assets, and the amount withdrawn would also be added to the claims of debtholders. I believe you had previously described the probable outcome of account holders as receiving "pennies on the dollar" of their deposits, however, I think this is unlikely, at least based on current financial statements. Any clawback is also going to be subjected to litigation

From that tweet:
Quote
According to leaked court documents Celsius Network may request that people withdrew 90 days prior to Chapter 11 to return the funds by court order.

This would be something else entirely if it passes. Imagine heeding all the warning signs, getting out of Celsius just in time in the days or weeks leading up to their collapse, and then later getting a court order saying "Sorry, give us back all your money or face charges". We would have to change the phrase to "Not your keys, not your coins. Your keys, maybe still not your coins."

Looking more and more like the only safe way forward is to completely avoid every centralized exchange and lending platform in existence.
I don't have the data to back this up, however, I think it is likely for many who have withdrawn to have other claims against Celsius, and any amounts demanded to be returned, that are not returned could be offset by other actual recoveries. This would be far less expensive than trying to go after individual account holders, although there is the potential that some who are not in the above situation may see their (hypothetical) "court ordered" demand to return coin to the Celsius bankruptcy estate to be sold to debt collectors, who in turn try to independently collect.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
From that tweet:
Quote
According to leaked court documents Celsius Network may request that people withdrew 90 days prior to Chapter 11 to return the funds by court order.

This would be something else entirely if it passes. Imagine heeding all the warning signs, getting out of Celsius just in time in the days or weeks leading up to their collapse, and then later getting a court order saying "Sorry, give us back all your money or face charges". We would have to change the phrase to "Not your keys, not your coins. Your keys, maybe still not your coins."

Looking more and more like the only safe way forward is to completely avoid every centralized exchange and lending platform in existence.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So, and correct me if I'm wrong here as I've not been keeping up to date with this case, does that not imply Celsius are not only planning to just keep the contents of all earn accounts, but are also planning to try use the 90-day clawback rule to try to recover any withdrawals from earn accounts in the 90 days prior to them filing for bankruptcy? So even if you moved your funds from an earn account to a custody account, if you did it within the 90 day limit then those funds will be forfeited too?
Yes, you are right. Also, value must be less than 7575$. At first moment I believed it could incude every customers holding up to 7575$ on their accounts (including Earn program), but it would be too good to be true... Now let's see what is going to be decided by the court.


https://twitter.com/news_whales/status/1566011790277976067
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18711
So, and correct me if I'm wrong here as I've not been keeping up to date with this case, does that not imply Celsius are not only planning to just keep the contents of all earn accounts, but are also planning to try use the 90-day clawback rule to try to recover any withdrawals from earn accounts in the 90 days prior to them filing for bankruptcy? So even if you moved your funds from an earn account to a custody account, if you did it within the 90 day limit then those funds will be forfeited too?
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Third day hearing at the court: Celsius proposes returning money back to customers who had their funds at Custody and Withhold accounts (not Earn and Borrow programs). It must cover a slight percentage of total customers, while the majority who was there obviously to earn interest or borrow money is ignored.

The reason behind the proposal might be this one:


Mashinsky doesn't give one without taking two...
jr. member
Activity: 33
Merit: 3
These companies are a joke. Not backed by real professionals. How can you lose money if you sell at good prices and then be patient to buy. Moon boys celsius.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It shouldn't be risky or hard to lend money and pay dividends to lenders proportionally to the extra % paid back by borrowers... He completely screwed up a viable business model.
The problem is that when a bank lends out money, it is not guaranteed that everyone will repay their loan in full. When that doesn't happen, the bank can have losses.
Here in my country banks don't lend money when the borrower can't put any collaterals on the table. The negotiations are very tied to not let any gaps which may cause losses for the banks. A debtor doesn't have his name cleaned and can't do any other business until he finally pay his currently debts. Theoretically, crypto lending also involves collateral, and in case the person doesn't pay the loan back, it's possible for the company to go after the debtor, since lending platforms enforce KYC.

When a bank crashes and go bankrupt it must be due to bad management. In this case the company Celsius was gambling with investors' funds doing daily trading.
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
It shouldn't be risky or hard to lend money and pay dividends to lenders proportionally to the extra % paid back by borrowers... He completely screwed up a viable business model.
The problem is that when a bank lends out money, it is not guaranteed that everyone will repay their loan in full. When that doesn't happen, the bank can have losses.

Neither Celsius CEO Mashinsky, nor Celsius commented on the article (as of when the archive was pulled), but if the article was accurate, Celsius was speculating with customer money on its own account. I don't know how reliable the reporter is, however, if this is true, Celsius was being very reckless, and I would speculate that the reason for the massive difference between customer deposits and Celsius assets is due to trading losses shortly before Celsius halted withdrawals.
Even if they say its not true, no one will believe them. Just remember that few hours before Celsius stopped withdraws, Mashinsky tweeted that rumors of Celsius having issues is FUD and people shouldn't worry while he obviously knew what's going to happen.
I wouldn't necessarily disbelieve what Celsius says be default, and there may be a reasonable explanation regarding the trading losses. For example, the trades could have been hedging positions, and the trading losses were offset by gains elsewhere on a 1-1 basis. Based on the article, this doesn't appear to be the case, and it appears the trades were speculative in nature.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
I very much agree! 3 Arrows Capital was the most recent example of this that showed that some experienced crypto hedge fund managers are also just gambling on volatile market moves with unsustainably high
It's not so hard to be a successful trader (or at least think that) during bear market, but once we enter bear market its completely different story. I rememebr back in 2017 I thought I am pro just because every shitcoin I bought was pumping but then shit hit the fan and I realized how clueless I was.


Neither Celsius CEO Mashinsky, nor Celsius commented on the article (as of when the archive was pulled), but if the article was accurate, Celsius was speculating with customer money on its own account. I don't know how reliable the reporter is, however, if this is true, Celsius was being very reckless, and I would speculate that the reason for the massive difference between customer deposits and Celsius assets is due to trading losses shortly before Celsius halted withdrawals.
Even if they say its not true, no one will believe them. Just remember that few hours before Celsius stopped withdraws, Mashinsky tweeted that rumors of Celsius having issues is FUD and people shouldn't worry while he obviously knew what's going to happen.


The lack of responsability and empathy for customers' funds must be explained by psychiatry. The way he portrays himself on his twitter account with a picture of himself carved out on a roman bust, making reference to the emperors of ancient times, gives a hint of his delusional, vain and selfish characteristics.
You just described majority of people that are behind these big crypto platforms/projects but more often than not they got served a slice of humble pie, like it happened with Do Kwon.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Here is an archive of the article that is not subject to a paywall.

Neither Celsius CEO Mashinsky, nor Celsius commented on the article (as of when the archive was pulled), but if the article was accurate, Celsius was speculating with customer money on its own account. I don't know how reliable the reporter is, however, if this is true, Celsius was being very reckless, and I would speculate that the reason for the massive difference between customer deposits and Celsius assets is due to trading losses shortly before Celsius halted withdrawals.

I will reserve judgment until more credible information comes out, but in the interim, I would not let my money anywhere near the people involved.
The guy is a megalomaniac who thought he was untouchable at the top of the world. The lack of responsability and empathy for customers' funds must be explained by psychiatry. The way he portrays himself on his twitter account with a picture of himself carved out on a roman bust, making reference to the emperors of ancient times, gives a hint of his delusional, vain and selfish characteristics.

It shouldn't be risky or hard to lend money and pay dividends to lenders proportionally to the extra % paid back by borrowers... He completely screwed up a viable business model.

Won't his patrimony be seized and used to pay Celsius' creditors?
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
Here is an archive of the article that is not subject to a paywall.

Neither Celsius CEO Mashinsky, nor Celsius commented on the article (as of when the archive was pulled), but if the article was accurate, Celsius was speculating with customer money on its own account. I don't know how reliable the reporter is, however, if this is true, Celsius was being very reckless, and I would speculate that the reason for the massive difference between customer deposits and Celsius assets is due to trading losses shortly before Celsius halted withdrawals.

I will reserve judgment until more credible information comes out, but in the interim, I would not let my money anywhere near the people involved.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
It appears it was not only Celsius' involvement with Luna and UST that caused the cryptolender's bankruptcy. Their CEO has made himself the head of their cryptocoin trading strategy. I reckon that we should look around the cryptospace and know which other CEOs or company executives are doing something similar hehehhe.
And yet people still think that those at the top know what they are doing while in reality they are not better than many of us noobs that are buying high and selling low.  Cheesy

I very much agree! 3 Arrows Capital was the most recent example of this that showed that some experienced crypto hedge fund managers are also just gambling on volatile market moves with unsustainably high leverage hehehe. Everyone thought Su Zhu's posts in social media was to trick his followers to buy if he was selling or sell if he was buying, however, what he was posting was the whole truth heehehe.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
It appears it was not only Celsius' involvement with Luna and UST that caused the cryptolender's bankruptcy. Their CEO has made himself the head of their cryptocoin trading strategy. I reckon that we should look around the cryptospace and know which other CEOs or company executives are doing something similar hehehhe.
And yet people still think that those at the top know what they are doing while in reality they are not better than many of us noobs that are buying high and selling low.  Cheesy



They are advertising how much money they've paid back and how much they have recovered. What's next, a shinny bar that says we've lost only 75% of our customer's funds?
Is that the money paid out to small investors, or only to major ones? I know couple of people that have decent amount of money in Celsius and I don't remember anyone saying that they get anything back yet so I guess its the latter.

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
How the mighty have fallen, but they still can't get their shit together:

Back in 2022:


Now:


They are advertising how much money they've paid back and how much they have recovered. What's next, a shinny bar that says we've lost only 75% of our customer's funds?

Btw, here is the magical plan:
https://cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11749/CORRESPONDENCE/1174908162250000000001.pdf
We have some sny numbers and letters, let's make it work somehow.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
News update.

It appears it was not only Celsius' involvement with Luna and UST that caused the cryptolender's bankruptcy. Their CEO has made himself the head of their cryptocoin trading strategy. I reckon that we should look around the cryptospace and know which other CEOs or company executives are doing something similar hehehhe.



Alex Mashinsky took control of Celsius trading strategy months before bankruptcy

In January, Celsius Network boss Alex Mashinsky gathered his investment team to tell it he would be taking control of the crypto lender’s trading strategy ahead of an upcoming US Federal Reserve meeting.

Prices of popular cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and ether had fallen from their all-time highs and the former telecoms entrepreneur said Celsius needed to protect itself from further declines. A hawkish outcome, he was convinced, could crash crypto prices.

In the days before the Fed met, Mashinsky personally directed individual trades and overruled executives with decades of finance experience, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

In one case, Mashinsky ordered the sale of hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of bitcoin, refusing to wait to double check Celsius’s often unreliable information on its own holdings. Celsius — which at the time held $22bn of customer crypto assets — bought the bitcoin back a day later at a loss.


Source https://www.ft.com/content/43d4fb5d-72a1-468c-aac8-9e11c4693f4e
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
To however has a Celsius account, be extra careful with the potential phishing emails in the near future.

Just saw I received this email from them, about how their emails database was compromised through a third-party:

Quote
We are writing to let you know that we were recently informed by our vendor Customer.io that one of their employees accessed a list of Celsius client email addresses held on their platform and transferred those to a third-party.

We do not consider the incident to present any high risks to our clients whose email addresses may have been affected but are releasing this communication to make sure you are aware.

We have been in ongoing communication with Customer.io. They have confirmed that no other Celsius-related data was compromised beyond those identified email addresses.      

To state clearly, Celsius’ systems and security had not been involved or impacted. Celsius’ robust security and data protection management, and our focus on protecting our clients’ data, remain intact.

Context

On 30 June 2022, Celsius identified that one of its vendors, Customer.io, had been involved with a data breach connected to OpenSea. Celsius proceeded to remove all data held with Customer.io. We quickly contacted Customer.io and they responded that, as of that time, no Celsius data had been involved in their breach. Celsius requested all details surrounding the incident.

On 8 July 2022, Customer.io informed us that one of their employees had accessed a list of Celsius client email addresses from Customer.io’s platform, along with lists from several of their clients, and transferred these lists to a third-party bad actor. Customer.io confirmed that, other than the identified email addresses, no other Celsius client data was accessed or taken by the employee.

Evidence of this incident has not yet been provided to us by Customer.io.

Customer.io made a public statement on the matter

https://customer.io/blog/update-to-compromised-email-addresses-incident/

Further Information

Celsius sees this as a severe violation of vendor-client relations, and we have notified the appropriate authorities. Again, we do not consider the incident to present any high risks to our clients whose email addresses may have been affected. Should you wish to contact us for further information regarding the incident, please contact our data protection officer, Charles Roberts, at [email protected] for further information.
            
Sincerely,
Celsius

Note: Celsius will never ask you for private keys or to send funds to external addresses. Always verify that you’re interacting with the celsius.network domain when receiving emails from us.
Pages:
Jump to: