We do have some nice wins today. 
Play now and Enjoy on Crypto-games.net
Play now and Enjoy on Crypto-games.net
Topic: ⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ 0.8% House Edge on Dice ⭐ Largest wagering contest...ever ⭐ - page 57. (Read 345929 times)
March 06, 2020, 05:06:46 AM
March 05, 2020, 02:52:10 PM
Can't say that I've ever seen this strategy before... But hey, it's working!
Don't forget to drop Crypto-games a review guys: https://revain.org/casinos/crypto-games
March 05, 2020, 09:21:11 AM
Results of Ethereum Lottery round #197:
| Place | Nickname | Tickets | Winning Ticket | Chance of winning | Reward in Ethereum |
| 1 | superdicer | 688
March 04, 2020, 10:55:55 AM
ETH Lottery round 197 ends in 15hrs! First place 1.1124 ETH Second place 0.2086 ETH Third place 0.0695 ETH Total tickets (of all players) 927 Price per ticket 0.0015 ETH March 04, 2020, 08:54:51 AM
I was unable to get the calculations to line up with the payouts I was actually getting, even when trying to factor in the house edge, so I'm pry missing something. That being said, here are the payouts I've collected from playing. Each number is the consecutive payouts for each correct square clicked. Let's take some exemplary looks at the calculations:1 Mine: 1.031, 1.076, 1.125, 1.179, 1.238, 1.303, 1.375, 1.456, 1.547, 1.65, 1.768, 1.904, 2.063, 2.25, 2.475, 2.75, 3.094, 3.536, 4.125, 4.95, 6.118, 8.25, 12.375, 24.75 3 Mines: 1.125, 1.286, 1.479, 1.712. 1.997, 2.35, 2.79, 3.349, 4.066, 5.004, 6.255, 7.962, 10.35, 13.8, 18.975, 27.107, 40.661, 65.057, 113.85, 227.7, 569.25, 2277 6 Mines: 1.303, 1.737, 2.35, 3.231, 4.523, 6.462, 9.445, 14.167, 21.894, 35.031, 58.385, 102.173, 189.75, 379.5, 834.9, (Last 4 guessed) 2087.25, 6261.75, 25047, 175329 24 Mines: 24.75 24 mines and one field is the same as 1 mine and 24 fields due to the symmetrical aspect of the payout structure (if you flip uncovered fields and number of mines, you always land at the same payout). I've also color coded all other cases of this that are included in your list (3-1 + 1-3 as well as 1-6 + 6-1, and 3-6 + 6-3). Since the first case is trivial, let us calculate the second one (1 mine, 24 uncovered fields). (25/24)*(24/23)*...*(2/1) = 25, factor in the 1% house edge (same as *0.99) and you get 24.75 Now 6 mines and the last payout you could confirm (834.9), at 15 uncovered fields. (25/19)*(24/18)*...*(11/5) = 843.33, factor in the 1% house edge -> 834.9 Calculations seem to fit the payouts you confirmed. Although I think you skipped one in your lineup for 1 mine, as that only lists 23 numbers. If we want to save some time doing the calculations, we can always flip to the case with less steps involved. Eg let's confirm the 2.75 number for one mine and 16 uncovered fields, flipping it to 16 mines and 1 uncovered field. (25/9) = 2.77 (* 0.99) => 2.75 The basic logic of the calculations is quite simple. You start at (# unknown fields / # non-mine fields) and you reduce both numbers by one with each non-mine field you uncover. In other words, you always start at (25 / 25-#mines). Continue that for as many steps as you want to calculate, or until you hit a base case (your number of non-mine fields hits one). Then, and only then, apply the factor of 0.99 for the house edge (as it is a house edge per game, not per step) and you got your final payout. Yeah, I found my error. I had a wrong number in my first calculation that I based the rest off of. And i added the number missing from the 1 mine list. Also updated the last 4 on 6 mines from Betwrong's calculations. March 04, 2020, 08:30:41 AM
I was unable to get the calculations to line up with the payouts I was actually getting, even when trying to factor in the house edge, so I'm pry missing something. That being said, here are the payouts I've collected from playing. Each number is the consecutive payouts for each correct square clicked. Let's take some exemplary looks at the calculations:1 Mine: 1.031, 1.076, 1.125, 1.179, 1.238, 1.303, 1.375, 1.456, 1.547, 1.65, 1.768, 1.904, 2.063, 2.25, 2.475, 2.75, 3.094, 3.536, 4.125, 4.95, 6.118, 8.25, 24.75 3 Mines: 1.125, 1.286, 1.479, 1.712. 1.997, 2.35, 2.79, 3.349, 4.066, 5.004, 6.255, 7.962, 10.35, 13.8, 18.975, 27.107, 40.661, 65.057, 113.85, 227.7, 569.25, 2277 6 Mines: 1.303, 1.737, 2.35, 3.231, 4.523, 6.462, 9.445, 14.167, 21.894, 35.031, 58.385, 102.173, 189.75, 379.5, 834.9, (Last 4 guessed) 2087.5, 6263, 25052, 175365 24 Mines: 24.75 24 mines and one field is the same as 1 mine and 24 fields due to the symmetrical aspect of the payout structure (if you flip uncovered fields and number of mines, you always land at the same payout). I've also color coded all other cases of this that are included in your list (3-1 + 1-3 as well as 1-6 + 6-1, and 3-6 + 6-3). Since the first case is trivial, let us calculate the second one (1 mine, 24 uncovered fields). (25/24)*(24/23)*...*(2/1) = 25, factor in the 1% house edge (same as *0.99) and you get 24.75 Now 6 mines and the last payout you could confirm (834.9), at 15 uncovered fields. (25/19)*(24/18)*...*(11/5) = 843.33, factor in the 1% house edge -> 834.9 Calculations seem to fit the payouts you confirmed. Although I think you skipped one in your lineup for 1 mine, as that only lists 23 numbers. If we want to save some time doing the calculations, we can always flip to the case with less steps involved. Eg let's confirm the 2.75 number for one mine and 16 uncovered fields, flipping it to 16 mines and 1 uncovered field. (25/9) = 2.77 (* 0.99) => 2.75 The basic logic of the calculations is quite simple. You start at (# unknown fields / # non-mine fields) and you reduce both numbers by one with each non-mine field you uncover. In other words, you always start at (25 / 25-#mines). Continue that for as many steps as you want to calculate, or until you hit a base case (your number of non-mine fields hits one). Then, and only then, apply the factor of 0.99 for the house edge (as it is a house edge per game, not per step) and you got your final payout. March 04, 2020, 06:16:23 AM
~ I was unable to get the calculations to line up with the payouts I was actually getting, even when trying to factor in the house edge, so I'm pry missing something. That being said, here are the payouts I've collected from playing. Each number is the consecutive payouts for each correct square clicked. 1 Mine: 1.031, 1.076, 1.125, 1.179, 1.238, 1.303, 1.375, 1.456, 1.547, 1.65, 1.768, 1.904, 2.063, 2.25, 2.475, 2.75, 3.094, 3.536, 4.125, 4.95, 6.118, 8.25, 24.75 3 Mines: 1.125, 1.286, 1.479, 1.712. 1.997, 2.35, 2.79, 3.349, 4.066, 5.004, 6.255, 7.962, 10.35, 13.8, 18.975, 27.107, 40.661, 65.057, 113.85, 227.7, 569.25, 2277 6 Mines: 1.303, 1.737, 2.35, 3.231, 4.523, 6.462, 9.445, 14.167, 21.894, 35.031, 58.385, 102.173, 189.75, 379.5, 834.9, (Last 4 guessed) 2087.5, 6263, 25052, 175365 24 Mines: 24.75 I will fix the last 4 on 6 Mines if and when I find them, or if anyone else has the info, feel free to comment and I'll update There's a Mines Multiplier Calculator, created for Stake, google it. Idk, maybe Crypto-Games has a slightly lower house edge, but it's really insignificant and so you can get the idea. As for the last 4 cases with 6 mines, here they are:  You guessed them pretty damn close, mate!  March 04, 2020, 06:05:42 AM
With all respect to your legitimacy and thrust-worthiness your UI/UX is one of the worst I ever seen its hard to select currency and game everything is on the new page and very confusing for new users. All games are copied or cheap low-quality scripts (except you implemented provably fair mechanism in them) Slots are primitive and way better looking can be purchased for 10 bucks , same for Plinko,Blackjack and Minesweeper Roulette is ripped from CoinRoyale We are aware that our UI isn't very good and we plan to improve it soon. But right now we are working on other things that users don't even notice. Sure UX is priority too, but I don't think its that bad as you wrote. Yeah it could be better..., much better. We gonna work on it soon. The UI is not that bad in my point of view. I can say that CG looks more traditional compared to other sites that use more modern UI. I also believe that CG can modify it or even rebuild the UI into something new but I do not think that it is a must at the moment. At least not many players are complaining about it so far. I am one of those who love the simple user-friendly UI, which is why I'm stuck on the website for over 3 years now without missing a single day.  But it's a matter of taste I guess. Most players I know love it "oldskool" as it is, and some don't. March 04, 2020, 05:35:53 AM
With all respect to your legitimacy and thrust-worthiness your UI/UX is one of the worst I ever seen its hard to select currency and game everything is on the new page and very confusing for new users. All games are copied or cheap low-quality scripts (except you implemented provably fair mechanism in them) Slots are primitive and way better looking can be purchased for 10 bucks , same for Plinko,Blackjack and Minesweeper Roulette is ripped from CoinRoyale We are aware that our UI isn't very good and we plan to improve it soon. But right now we are working on other things that users don't even notice. Sure UX is priority too, but I don't think its that bad as you wrote. Yeah it could be better..., much better. We gonna work on it soon. The UI is not that bad in my point of view. I can say that CG looks more traditional compared to other sites that use more modern UI. I also believe that CG can modify it or even rebuild the UI into something new but I do not think that it is a must at the moment. At least not many players are complaining about it so far. March 04, 2020, 03:20:57 AM
With all respect to your legitimacy and thrust-worthiness your UI/UX is one of the worst I ever seen its hard to select currency and game everything is on the new page and very confusing for new users. All games are copied or cheap low-quality scripts (except you implemented provably fair mechanism in them) Slots are primitive and way better looking can be purchased for 10 bucks , same for Plinko,Blackjack and Minesweeper Roulette is ripped from CoinRoyale We are aware that our UI isn't very good and we plan to improve it soon. But right now we are working on other things that users don't even notice. Sure UX is priority too, but I don't think its that bad as you wrote. Yeah it could be better..., much better. We gonna work on it soon. March 03, 2020, 10:42:10 PM
At last you guys put new games here, I just wondering om how much multiplier that you can give out? The technical limits for a minesweeper game with 25 fields are multipliers just over 5 million, which can happen with 12 or 13 mines (full field uncovered).For a game with 24 mines, you can only play one round, thus the multiplier would be (25/1) = 25x before the house edge. Compare this to 13 mines, where you have (25/12)*(24/11)*(23/10)*(22/9)*(21/8)*(20/7)*(19/6)*(18/5)*(17/4)*(16/3)*(15/2)*(14/1) = 5,200,300x before the house edge, and you see, that the maximum multiplier relies on both you having many mines and you having the ability to play many rounds. This sweet-spot is hit with 12 mines / 13 rounds and 13 mines / 12 rounds, where the maximum technically possible multiplier is achieved. Adding more mines after that only decreases this limit. If you closely read the How to Play information for minesweeper, you will find that the 4BTC limit is enforced by a stop requirement. "We only accept bets that have a profit smaller than 4 BTC (maximum win per bet), this means your game will not be allowed to uncover additional fields, if your pending win would go over this threshold." You won't be able to play until the technically possible max multiplier, as the game reaches a win state before that, once you cross the 4BTC limit. I was unable to get the calculations to line up with the payouts I was actually getting, even when trying to factor in the house edge, so I'm pry missing something. That being said, here are the payouts I've collected from playing. Each number is the consecutive payouts for each correct square clicked. 1 Mine: 1.031, 1.076, 1.125, 1.179, 1.238, 1.303, 1.375, 1.456, 1.547, 1.65, 1.768, 1.904, 2.063, 2.25, 2.475, 2.75, 3.094, 3.536, 4.125, 4.95, 6.118, 8.25, 12.375, 24.75 3 Mines: 1.125, 1.286, 1.479, 1.712. 1.997, 2.35, 2.79, 3.349, 4.066, 5.004, 6.255, 7.962, 10.35, 13.8, 18.975, 27.107, 40.661, 65.057, 113.85, 227.7, 569.25, 2277 6 Mines: 1.303, 1.737, 2.35, 3.231, 4.523, 6.462, 9.445, 14.167, 21.894, 35.031, 58.385, 102.173, 189.75, 379.5, 834.9, (Last 4 from Betwrong) 2087.25, 6261.75, 25047, 175329 24 Mines: 24.75 I will fix the last 4 on 6 Mines if and when I find them, or if anyone else has the info, feel free to comment and I'll update March 03, 2020, 07:38:07 PM
This is what you can expect on our website: 8 games:
  11 coins: Progressive Dice and Roulette Jackpot:
 Monthly Wagering Contest:  More info about our monthly wagering contest here: https://www.crypto-games.net/contests Voucher, challenges and other giveaways on chat, forum and social media. Public chat with rain on 2-6 active chatters once every 30-90 minutes. Catch the winning spirit! With all respect to your legitimacy and thrust-worthiness your UI/UX is one of the worst I ever seen its hard to select currency and game everything is on the new page and very confusing for new users. All games are copied or cheap low-quality scripts (except you implemented provably fair mechanism in them) Slots are primitive and way better looking can be purchased for 10 bucks , same for Plinko,Blackjack and Minesweeper Roulette is ripped from CoinRoyale March 03, 2020, 03:50:20 PM
This is what you can expect on our website:
8 games:
11 coins: Progressive Dice and Roulette Jackpot:
Monthly Wagering Contest: More info about our monthly wagering contest here: https://www.crypto-games.net/contests Voucher, challenges and other giveaways on chat, forum and social media. Public chat with rain on 2-6 active chatters once every 30-90 minutes. Catch the winning spirit! March 03, 2020, 07:35:48 AM
BTC Lottery round 455 ends in 18hrs! First place 0.076240 BTC Second place 0.014295 BTC Third place 0.004765 BTC Total tickets (of all players) 953 Price per ticket 0.000100 BTC March 02, 2020, 06:08:28 PM
Litecoin Lotto round #139 will close in approx 8 hours! Current prizes: 1st place: 4.104 LTC 2nd place: 0.769 LTC 3rd place: 0.257 LTC Total tickets bought so far: 1,026 Price per ticket: 0.005 LTC Today's Doge Lottery was won by player thenerd314 (first and third place) and Rocati240 (second place). Congrats! Catch the winning spirit! March 02, 2020, 04:52:43 PM
Hi Are bet speed on site changed or same as always?? Crypto-games regularly removes the speed limit for dice. Follow the platform on Twitter to find out when the next event will be; https://twitter.com/Crypto_Games March 01, 2020, 03:08:30 PM
DOGE Lotto Round #227 will close in approx 11 hours! Current prizes: 1st place: 88,000 DOGE 2nd place: 16,400 DOGE 3rd place: 5,500 DOGE Total tickets bought so far: 550 Price per ticket: 200 DOGE All rewards, including lottery tickets and VIP-tag, were dealt to winners of last month's wagering contest. New round has started and these are rewards of this month:  Current leaders on BTC contest after a day:  And it's almost Monday, so another day without speed limit on dice will start at 00.00 UTC and will last for 24 hours! Catch the winning spirit! February 29, 2020, 08:25:50 PM
Hi
Are bet speed on site changed or same as always?? February 29, 2020, 06:07:49 AM
Only 13 hours left for this month's wagering contest, check rankings on our website
Note that upcoming Lottery rounds will be filled with tickets from wagering contest winners, so they will be larger than they usually are. Good luck! February 28, 2020, 06:03:23 PM
BTC Lottery round 454 ends in 8hrs! First place 0.003920 BTC Second place 0.000735 BTC Third place 0.000245 BTC Total tickets (of all players) 49 Price per ticket 0.000100 BTC Jump to:
|
