⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ 0.8% House Edge on Dice ⭐ Largest wagering contest...ever ⭐ - page 59.

DogecoinMachine

legendary

Activity: 2901

Merit: 1135

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple Games, Multiple Coins

Quote from: newbie22 on February 21, 2020, 02:49:49 AM

Accounts are already being blocked just like that, have not been logged in for a long time, I decided to log in - so the account is blocked ..
Great, first block for free games, and now for no reason.
Why are you lying that’s all, write one thing and in the end do it all differently.

Email [email protected] with your nickname.

newbie22

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Accounts are already being blocked just like that, have not been logged in for a long time, I decided to log in - so the account is blocked ..
Great, first block for free games, and now for no reason.
Why are you lying that’s all, write one thing and in the end do it all differently.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Someone just recently hit up a portion of the jackpot.

rexxarofmoknathal

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 260

Quote from: RedJohan on February 20, 2020, 08:21:24 AM

Quote from: Lutpin on February 18, 2020, 12:04:11 PM

Quote from: RedJohan on February 18, 2020, 04:52:29 AM

And also the colors in the menu is not that good, with red/brown (yes, I am slightly colorblind) on dark grey.

There are several additional color schemes for people that prefer different optics or have issues with the default one.
You can find them in the settings, or use the hotkeys for light/dark mode (sun and moon).

Ok, thanks for the information. That will be useful.
What about the "mobile friendly design"? Any suggestions on what to do about that?

You can usually change the resolution your mobile browser displays at if it doesn't display properly on your phone.

This would be found in the display settings of the browser you use.

Crypto-Games.net

sr. member

Activity: 974

Merit: 264

Catch the winning spirit!

Wagering Contest ongoing, only 9 days left and these are current BTC leaders:

RedJohan

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: Lutpin on February 18, 2020, 12:04:11 PM

Quote from: RedJohan on February 18, 2020, 04:52:29 AM

And also the colors in the menu is not that good, with red/brown (yes, I am slightly colorblind) on dark grey.

There are several additional color schemes for people that prefer different optics or have issues with the default one.
You can find them in the settings, or use the hotkeys for light/dark mode (sun and moon).

Ok, thanks for the information. That will be useful.
What about the "mobile friendly design"? Any suggestions on what to do about that?

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

We do have some nice wins at the moment.!

We do still have 10 days left for the monthly wager contest! Come and play in Crypto-games.net.,

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: RedJohan on February 18, 2020, 04:52:29 AM

And also the colors in the menu is not that good, with red/brown (yes, I am slightly colorblind) on dark grey.

There are several additional color schemes for people that prefer different optics or have issues with the default one.
You can find them in the settings, or use the hotkeys for light/dark mode (sun and moon).

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

BTC Lottery round 451 ends in 14hrs!

First place
0.005360 BTC

Second place
0.001005 BTC

Third place
0.000335 BTC

Total tickets (of all players)
67

Price per ticket
0.000100 BTC

DarkDays

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1189

Quote from: Timetwister on February 17, 2020, 10:07:56 PM

My answer is yes, I trust in your ability on using those funds properly, as you have shown to be a well run business and I guess most of the the bankroll is owned by the owners of the site. If I didn't trust you, I would had never invested in your business to begin with.

FYI, I'm not an employee of crypto-games.net, I'm simply stating my opinion on the matter.

It's hard to grow when the marketing and development budget is cut short by splitting the house edge through the bankroll.

Can't wait to see how CG changes in the coming months Grin

RedJohan

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Quote from: DogecoinMachine on August 21, 2014, 01:32:47 PM

~~snip~~

Mobile-friendly design:

https://www.crypto-games.net/images/forums/mobile.png

~~snip~~

Well, I tried your site in mobile. It doesnt break, but claiming that it is a mobile friendly design is probably a little too much to say. Everything is so tiny on mobile, so you need to zoom to see it and especially if you want to click it.
And also the colors in the menu is not that good, with red/brown (yes, I am slightly colorblind) on dark grey.

Hope you can do something about these issues.
Best of luck!

Timetwister

legendary

Activity: 1199

Merit: 1047

Quote from: DarkDays on February 17, 2020, 10:03:08 AM

Quote from: Timetwister on February 16, 2020, 07:45:09 PM

What is beneficial for them would be beneficial too for current investors. There's no need to get rid of those that helped them build this business.

Not really.

Having access to the entire profit is not the same distributing the majority to stakeholders in the bankroll.

In order for Crypto-games to grow, it needs funds. I doubt CG can simply say to the stakeholders, "hey is it OK if we take all the profits for a while to spend on marketing, development and other things needed to grow?"

How do you imagine that conversation would have went? I think you know the answer.

I support this decision, it's for the best in the long-run of the platform. Maybe investments could be re-opened at a later date when Crypto-games is where it wants to be.

My answer is yes, I trust in your ability on using those funds properly, as you have shown to be a well run business and I guess most of the the bankroll is owned by the owners of the site. If I didn't trust you, I would had never invested in your business to begin with.

DarkDays

legendary

Activity: 2030

Merit: 1189

Quote from: Timetwister on February 16, 2020, 07:45:09 PM

What is beneficial for them would be beneficial too for current investors. There's no need to get rid of those that helped them build this business.

Not really.

Having access to the entire profit is not the same distributing the majority to stakeholders in the bankroll.

In order for Crypto-games to grow, it needs funds. I doubt CG can simply say to the stakeholders, "hey is it OK if we take all the profits for a while to spend on marketing, development and other things needed to grow?"

How do you imagine that conversation would have went? I think you know the answer.

I support this decision, it's for the best in the long-run of the platform. Maybe investments could be re-opened at a later date when Crypto-games is where it wants to be.

Timetwister

legendary

Activity: 1199

Merit: 1047

Quote from: rexxarofmoknathal on February 16, 2020, 06:40:33 PM

I'm glad that Crypto-games is pulling public bankroll investments.

This will allow the team behind the platform to earn more money, and can hence spend more money on marketing and a redesign.

Let's face it, the site needs a redesign. Hopefully, it finally gets one now.

What is beneficial for them would be beneficial too for current investors. There's no need to get rid of those that helped them build this business.

Timetwister

legendary

Activity: 1199

Merit: 1047

Quote from: coinfinger on February 16, 2020, 12:29:07 PM

I could totally see why they would want to stay away from the investors and I could also understand why it looked like maybe there could have been better ways as well. If they already have a lot of money of their own that they saved up during this period, why wouldn't they just simply continue to do it all by themselves? It makes sense honestly and I could totally see it being a proper managed if they have enough money.

However, I also do understand that current investors, it is wise to decline new investors however telling the current investors to remove their money in 30 days could be better handled, not that they have to since they have the money for it but they could potentially just let them continue for another 6 months or so while giving them some sort of notification a lot earlier than just 30 days.

They could simply not allow to invest more, just to divest. Eventually they would achieve the same goal but at least they would let those that helped them grow stay with them.

rexxarofmoknathal

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 260

I'm glad that Crypto-games is pulling public bankroll investments.

This will allow the team behind the platform to earn more money, and can hence spend more money on marketing and a redesign.

Let's face it, the site needs a redesign. Hopefully, it finally gets one now.

ultrloa

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1228

Quote from: josephdd1 on February 16, 2020, 05:16:01 PM

Quote from: coinfinger on February 16, 2020, 12:29:07 PM

I could totally see why they would want to stay away from the investors and I could also understand why it looked like maybe there could have been better ways as well. If they already have a lot of money of their own that they saved up during this period, why wouldn't they just simply continue to do it all by themselves? It makes sense honestly and I could totally see it being a proper managed if they have enough money.

However, I also do understand that current investors, it is wise to decline new investors however telling the current investors to remove their money in 30 days could be better handled, not that they have to since they have the money for it but they could potentially just let them continue for another 6 months or so while giving them some sort of notification a lot earlier than just 30 days.

The 30 days notice is just fine, and seems to upheld the normalities of the law not that it matters much on here. I don't see what the point is in complaining about this, they seem to have found money else where and no more investors are needed, or at all for this matter, and informing them it's only reasonable. Another 6 months might be a bit much, don't you think?

Well that would be more better to have since 30 days notice is enough to tell the investors to take out their money on the platform but I don't see a point to argue or complain on what they are doing right now since I think they know what to do and this decision made by them is I for sure studied by them that's why they are confident to run this smoothly since they found that there's no benefit they can get for the existing implementation they do.

josephdd1

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 513

Quote from: coinfinger on February 16, 2020, 12:29:07 PM

I could totally see why they would want to stay away from the investors and I could also understand why it looked like maybe there could have been better ways as well. If they already have a lot of money of their own that they saved up during this period, why wouldn't they just simply continue to do it all by themselves? It makes sense honestly and I could totally see it being a proper managed if they have enough money.

However, I also do understand that current investors, it is wise to decline new investors however telling the current investors to remove their money in 30 days could be better handled, not that they have to since they have the money for it but they could potentially just let them continue for another 6 months or so while giving them some sort of notification a lot earlier than just 30 days.

The 30 days notice is just fine, and seems to upheld the normalities of the law not that it matters much on here. I don't see what the point is in complaining about this, they seem to have found money else where and no more investors are needed, or at all for this matter, and informing them it's only reasonable. Another 6 months might be a bit much, don't you think?

Theb

hero member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 655

Quote from: coinfinger on February 16, 2020, 12:29:07 PM

However, I also do understand that current investors, it is wise to decline new investors however telling the current investors to remove their money in 30 days could be better handled, not that they have to since they have the money for it but they could potentially just let them continue for another 6 months or so while giving them some sort of notification a lot earlier than just 30 days.

Like what they said they no longer see their bankrolls beneficial in their gambling site so I don't think extending it for another 6 months is really an option here. Besides investors in a bankroll isn't the same as being a stockholder of a company, even if they are part in the profit sharing for crypto-games it doesn't make them a shareholder for them so they don't partake in any kind of decision making for their plans. Basically bankroll investors have no say for decisions like this. Bad news as it be there is really nothing left but for you to adjust with their current plans, if the management says 30 days then I do recommend you following their instructions of withdrawing your funds as soon as possible since there will be a lot of your doing so.

coinfinger

sr. member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 278

I could totally see why they would want to stay away from the investors and I could also understand why it looked like maybe there could have been better ways as well. If they already have a lot of money of their own that they saved up during this period, why wouldn't they just simply continue to do it all by themselves? It makes sense honestly and I could totally see it being a proper managed if they have enough money.

However, I also do understand that current investors, it is wise to decline new investors however telling the current investors to remove their money in 30 days could be better handled, not that they have to since they have the money for it but they could potentially just let them continue for another 6 months or so while giving them some sort of notification a lot earlier than just 30 days.

Topic: ⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ 0.8% House Edge on Dice ⭐ Largest wagering contest...ever ⭐ - page 59. (Read 345929 times)