Topic: ⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ 0.8% House Edge on Dice ⭐ Largest wagering contest...ever ⭐ - page 98. (Read 345929 times)

Quote from: stomachgrowls on May 21, 2019, 05:49:19 AM

When will you guys update your design? Any plans on doing that?

Should they update the design? I think they will keep the current design for long time as it looks like a classic design which is not used by most dice sites that uses modern design. I do even think that by having classic design is something that makes them differ from other sites so it can be easily remembered by players.

Maybe ur right in some part but idk this is not rly classic design its just bad design :S .

You can have old fashioned design which is functional and good UI but this has rly ugly design and rly bad UI.

For example i like how just-dice does it its old classic design but its actually functional.

We need to find whether each and every feature and the games were easily accessible. Whether it is classic or contemporary doesn't lead to growth. All that important is the paovably fair and different games to play with instant settlements. Here, it happens without any flaw, along with the same when you make the page heavy it is hard to use with every device. Now it is much easy to use without any lags on any device.

Yeah that is good point. This site is defiantly light weight but i think in modern era it can be bit heavier in favor of better design. Just my opinion.

veleten

legendary

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1107

When will you guys update your design? Any plans on doing that?

Should they update the design? I think they will keep the current design for long time as it looks like a classic design which is not used by most dice sites that uses modern design. I do even think that by having classic design is something that makes them differ from other sites so it can be easily remembered by players.

Maybe ur right in some part but idk this is not rly classic design its just bad design :S .

You can have old fashioned design which is functional and good UI but this has rly ugly design and rly bad UI.

For example i like how just-dice does it its old classic design but its actually functional.

People do have different views towards each gambling site.Some might like or may not like CG design but havent you consider on how long they've been here
on this market? People do still love to play on this site in spite of its UI.Im not defending them coz im a signature participant but gamblers do have its own choice,
it might be too generic compared to new sites design but you cant find anywhere having "no speed limit" feature Grin

We wont know if they would change their design or not
in near future and lets see on Admin's response regarding to this matter.

I'm not biased in any ways towards c-games , but as a gambler with experience
I can say that design is functional and easy to use , thats what counts to me
can be improved as in less clicks to get to some menu points ,but this is not something critical
all in all I think cryptogames design is good enough to not consider any major revamping and changes

romero121

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1214

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

When will you guys update your design? Any plans on doing that?

Should they update the design? I think they will keep the current design for long time as it looks like a classic design which is not used by most dice sites that uses modern design. I do even think that by having classic design is something that makes them differ from other sites so it can be easily remembered by players.

Maybe ur right in some part but idk this is not rly classic design its just bad design :S .

You can have old fashioned design which is functional and good UI but this has rly ugly design and rly bad UI.

For example i like how just-dice does it its old classic design but its actually functional.

We need to find whether each and every feature and the games were easily accessible. Whether it is classic or contemporary doesn't lead to growth. All that important is the paovably fair and different games to play with instant settlements. Here, it happens without any flaw, along with the same when you make the page heavy it is hard to use with every device. Now it is much easy to use without any lags on any device.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Some good hits for this day! Grin

ETH Lottery would end approximately on 14hrs!

First place
0.0684 ETH
Second place
0.0128 ETH
Third place
0.0043 ETH
Total tickets (of all players)
57
Price per ticket
0.0015 ETH

BTCevo

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1008

Quote from: ?? on ??

I made my account on this website for the first time in 2017. And so far I have won a total lottery 6 times. For the first time, I got 0.0012BTC from the lottery. And in all six times, I got 0.0085BTC. Despite the fact that Dice is my favorite game, I could not make any such profit from this website.

May be you should stay on their lottery and go win big instead of losing on their dice game. But let me tell you one thing, winning or losing is depends on your luck, so it is not just you can't win on dice but you are not lucky enough. They have 1% house edge and provably fair system as well. You should checked on them when you bet if you are not believing them. But I am sure the results wont lie to you because they are such a old site which much trust on it, so they are not going to scam people just because of some little money

Crypto-Games.net

sr. member

Activity: 974

Merit: 264

Catch the winning spirit!

Bitcoin Lotto round #373 will close in approx 8 hours!

Current prizes:
1st place: 0.019040 BTC
2nd place: 0.003570 BTC
3rd place: 0.001190 BTC

Total tickets bought so far: 238
Price per ticket: 0.00010 BTC

These are current Litecoin Wagering Contest top players with 10 days to go this month:

Catch the winning spirit!

joter85

sr. member

Activity: 395

Merit: 255

crypto.games: #1 Gambling Site

We don't plan to do any major design changes, but we are working on design of one important part of website. More details when its ready.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794