Got no problems with submitting kyjelly if that's what she wants the lubrication makes for a smoother ride. This will separate the wheat from the chaff, no point crying about pissing in your cornflakes if you don't want your funds back.
Topic: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development - page 43. (Read 173834 times)
September 18, 2019, 04:55:48 PM
September 18, 2019, 03:05:19 PM
Just checked their new update. Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates. Will not perform KYC as I don't trust them after they decided just to declare themselves insolvent but will keep following their updates. Have $400+ stuck there.
So!
"Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates".
This is the problem - they say they want KYC, but they don’t say how and when!
Reasonably, first declare to the community how many and which coins have been preserved.
KYC - this attempt to explore the option "how many affected will refuse to return their money"!
This is the same scam!
Why are they better than Cryptopia scammers?
Do liquidators syncing wallets to network? All that talks but ... no result. Cryptopia is lost in .... <---- WE ARE HERE
September 18, 2019, 02:26:39 PM
Just checked their new update. Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates. Will not perform KYC as I don't trust them after they decided just to declare themselves insolvent but will keep following their updates. Have $400+ stuck there.
So!
"Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates".
This is the problem - they say they want KYC, but they don’t say how and when!
Reasonably, first declare to the community how many and which coins have been preserved.
KYC - this attempt to explore the option "how many affected will refuse to return their money"!
This is the same scam!
Why are they better than Cryptopia scammers?
September 18, 2019, 01:53:35 PM
I posted about nearly a week ago. Yes the auditors made it clear they wanted KYC before releasing any funds whenever they might be able to recover them and be in a position to return some of them to users that lost their funds.
They also require KYC before they release any funds (if any) so that means my few bits and bobs on that exchange from a long time ago will never be returned to me as I will never send KYC to that outfit.
It seems they are asking for KYC stop reduce the number of claims being made because they know many genuine users would rather lose their share of recovered funds but not send their KYC. A tactic which would in the end increase the share received by those that have sent KYC.They may sell our KYC, who knows. And why wouldn't users complete KYC? Many nowadays have to do KYC with exchanges so I don't think it's a big problem but now after they have a tainted image, I don't even feel safe sharing my details with them. Binance itself had their KYC data stolen. They are also asking users who had already completed KYC to again go through the process.
September 18, 2019, 12:00:05 PM
Just checked their new update. Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates. Will not perform KYC as I don't trust them after they decided just to declare themselves insolvent but will keep following their updates. Have $400+ stuck there.
I posted about nearly a week ago. Yes the auditors made it clear they wanted KYC before releasing any funds whenever they might be able to recover them and be in a position to return some of them to users that lost their funds.They also require KYC before they release any funds (if any) so that means my few bits and bobs on that exchange from a long time ago will never be returned to me as I will never send KYC to that outfit.
It seems they are asking for KYC stop reduce the number of claims being made because they know many genuine users would rather lose their share of recovered funds but not send their KYC. A tactic which would in the end increase the share received by those that have sent KYC. September 18, 2019, 11:10:51 AM
Just checked their new update. Now they require KYC for recovering the funds but have not stated how will they perform KYC. Also, they have stopped sending me any emails regarding these updates. Will not perform KYC as I don't trust them after they decided just to declare themselves insolvent but will keep following their updates. Have $400+ stuck there.
September 18, 2019, 11:03:03 AM
It would be very good if Cryptopia were properly punished, both with money and with restriction of freedom. To make this a good example for anyone who wants to do such things in the future.
We have to wait before we discover the whole truth and discover if criminal charges will be brought against any of the Cryptopia owners/operators/employees
Investigation by the police is quiet, at night, under the table, without "lighting"!
The Cryptopia client community needs a joint lawyer or journalist who will not let the case go down the drain.
September 18, 2019, 09:46:50 AM
It would be very good if Cryptopia were properly punished, both with money and with restriction of freedom. To make this a good example for anyone who wants to do such things in the future.
We have to wait before we discover the whole truth and discover if criminal charges will be brought against any of the Cryptopia owners/operators/employees
September 18, 2019, 09:17:23 AM
i want my pakcoins back ! you hold
September 18, 2019, 09:01:59 AM
Thats so long,and we know money is not gone but simply into hand of some tier party data center...
September 18, 2019, 05:22:10 AM
It is sad that in the end it will be most users that will be the ones that miss out on getting their funds returned.
I just do not understand why they would have upgraded and added all those coins an tokens during the first problem and continued allowing users to deposit. Then after that they were 'hacked' and then decided to re-open deposits and that was the part that frustrates me.
It seems they knew they were going to be unable to repay all stolen funds so they decided to re-open with false promises just to allow users to deposit again only to buy time before they closed down permanently.
Unacceptable conduct from what was supposed to be a professional outfit.
I just do not understand why they would have upgraded and added all those coins an tokens during the first problem and continued allowing users to deposit. Then after that they were 'hacked' and then decided to re-open deposits and that was the part that frustrates me.
It seems they knew they were going to be unable to repay all stolen funds so they decided to re-open with false promises just to allow users to deposit again only to buy time before they closed down permanently.
Unacceptable conduct from what was supposed to be a professional outfit.
the company who has buy the brand "cryptopia" has drained allright before the whole money..
the hack was just to let it looks like ..
the company behind it, even hasnt enough money to pay the next loans at the moment when the hack happend
It would be very good if Cryptopia were properly punished, both with money and with restriction of freedom. To make this a good example for anyone who wants to do such things in the future.
September 16, 2019, 04:07:49 PM
Update for Cryptopia account holders 3 July 2019 | Grant Thornton New Zealand
Sounds familiar? Or thats not connected i dont click that type of links ...
September 16, 2019, 05:35:51 AM
It is sad that in the end it will be most users that will be the ones that miss out on getting their funds returned.
I just do not understand why they would have upgraded and added all those coins an tokens during the first problem and continued allowing users to deposit. Then after that they were 'hacked' and then decided to re-open deposits and that was the part that frustrates me.
It seems they knew they were going to be unable to repay all stolen funds so they decided to re-open with false promises just to allow users to deposit again only to buy time before they closed down permanently.
Unacceptable conduct from what was supposed to be a professional outfit.
I just do not understand why they would have upgraded and added all those coins an tokens during the first problem and continued allowing users to deposit. Then after that they were 'hacked' and then decided to re-open deposits and that was the part that frustrates me.
It seems they knew they were going to be unable to repay all stolen funds so they decided to re-open with false promises just to allow users to deposit again only to buy time before they closed down permanently.
Unacceptable conduct from what was supposed to be a professional outfit.
the company who has buy the brand "cryptopia" has drained allright before the whole money..
the hack was just to let it looks like ..
the company behind it, even hasnt enough money to pay the next loans at the moment when the hack happend
September 14, 2019, 04:20:05 AM
...
Quote
The judge ruled that Grant Thornton knowingly sold Mr. Yung a bogus and abusive tax shelter.
Too funny for words (when you get to that point you laugh at how absurd this has become)
It is sad that in the end it will be most users that will be the ones that miss out on getting their funds returned.
I just do not understand why they would have upgraded and added all those coins an tokens during the first problem and continued allowing users to deposit. Then after that they were 'hacked' and then decided to re-open deposits and that was the part that frustrates me.
It seems they knew they were going to be unable to repay all stolen funds so they decided to re-open with false promises just to allow users to deposit again only to buy time before they closed down permanently.
Unacceptable conduct from what was supposed to be a professional outfit.
September 13, 2019, 08:26:14 PM
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
Were it a regulated company, then there would have been overseeing checks and balances to ensure the theft would have been far less than it was (cold wallets, and locking out hackers to name two mind bendingly obvious examples) - feel free to give yourself the finger too...
Funny thing > ctr+f cryptopia > one result in all article page > tabloid call for "hack" Ethereum
Quote
The crypto landscape is littered with the carcasses of ill-fated Ethereum-based ICO
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2018/12/05/cryptopia-in-crisis-billionaire-joe-lubins-ethereum-experiment-is-a-mess-how-long-will-he-prop-it-up/Quote
Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin to call Ethereum a hacker’s paradise.
— July 19, 2017o0 ETH --> https://www.coincache.net/2018/10/29/biggest-cryptocurrency-hacks-ever/
Cryptopia: Listing ETH-> Delisting ETH -> Listing ETH -> Listing ERC-20 -> #Hacked
"Why not relist ifs money on the floor?" And get rekt. Social engineered "hack" (WRU NZ POLICE) to cover crisis. Crytopia made haircuts (BTC,LTC,DOGE) from its users, because "call for hack" tabloid.
Cryptopia scam artist!
It's taking money under false pretences.
The best place for a thief is a prison!
Bump! Do Your own research, i did mine :-)
September 13, 2019, 06:28:29 AM
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
Were it a regulated company, then there would have been overseeing checks and balances to ensure the theft would have been far less than it was (cold wallets, and locking out hackers to name two mind bendingly obvious examples) - feel free to give yourself the finger too...
Funny thing > ctr+f cryptopia > one result in all article page > tabloid call for "hack" Ethereum
Quote
The crypto landscape is littered with the carcasses of ill-fated Ethereum-based ICO
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2018/12/05/cryptopia-in-crisis-billionaire-joe-lubins-ethereum-experiment-is-a-mess-how-long-will-he-prop-it-up/Quote
Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin to call Ethereum a hacker’s paradise.
— July 19, 2017o0 ETH --> https://www.coincache.net/2018/10/29/biggest-cryptocurrency-hacks-ever/
Cryptopia: Listing ETH-> Delisting ETH -> Listing ETH -> Listing ERC-20 -> #Hacked
"Why not relist ifs money on the floor?" And get rekt. Social engineered "hack" (WRU NZ POLICE) to cover crisis. Crytopia made haircuts (BTC,LTC,DOGE) from its users, because "call for hack" tabloid.
Cryptopia scam artist!
It's taking money under false pretences.
The best place for a thief is a prison!
September 12, 2019, 07:37:14 PM
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
Were it a regulated company, then there would have been overseeing checks and balances to ensure the theft would have been far less than it was (cold wallets, and locking out hackers to name two mind bendingly obvious examples) - feel free to give yourself the finger too...
Funny thing > ctr+f cryptopia > one result in all article page > tabloid call for "hack" Ethereum
Quote
The crypto landscape is littered with the carcasses of ill-fated Ethereum-based ICO
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2018/12/05/cryptopia-in-crisis-billionaire-joe-lubins-ethereum-experiment-is-a-mess-how-long-will-he-prop-it-up/Quote
Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin to call Ethereum a hacker’s paradise.
— July 19, 2017o0 ETH --> https://www.coincache.net/2018/10/29/biggest-cryptocurrency-hacks-ever/
Cryptopia: Listing ETH-> Delisting ETH -> Listing ETH -> Listing ERC-20 -> #Hacked
"Why not relist ifs money on the floor?" And get rekt. Social engineered "hack" (WRU NZ POLICE) to cover crisis. Crytopia made haircuts (BTC,LTC,DOGE) from its users, because "call for hack" tabloid.
September 12, 2019, 07:08:32 PM
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
Were it a regulated company, then there would have been overseeing checks and balances to ensure the theft would have been far less than it was (cold wallets, and locking out hackers to name two mind bendingly obvious examples) - feel free to give yourself the finger too...
September 12, 2019, 06:50:17 PM
...
Quote
The judge ruled that Grant Thornton knowingly sold Mr. Yung a bogus and abusive tax shelter.
Too funny for words (when you get to that point you laugh at how absurd this has become)
NZ regulated blockchain biz goes bananas
WRU motherfucking Star Lord?
September 12, 2019, 12:45:32 PM
...
Quote
The judge ruled that Grant Thornton knowingly sold Mr. Yung a bogus and abusive tax shelter.
Too funny for words (when you get to that point you laugh at how absurd this has become)
Jump to: