It is in receivership. *but funds remain unreturned
And the crime was investigated. *but any facts or findings remain unreported
One can only conclude that the STATE of NZ is ripe for FRAUD.
And the crime was investigated. *but any facts or findings remain unreported
One can only conclude that the STATE of NZ is ripe for FRAUD.
A few people with large amounts should sue the grant thornton receivership.
It has become apparent that all they are doing is being a delaying tactic to hold off lawsuits.
FYI:
http://www.ecjlaw.com/can-receivers-be-sued/
Quote
ANSWER: Welcome to the gritty world of receiverships.
While you are a court appointed receiver, and may personally have quasi-judicial immunity, you can still be sued.
While you are a court appointed receiver, and may personally have quasi-judicial immunity, you can still be sued.
FYI2: Past History shows Grant Thornton is full of asshats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2013/11/26/100m-verdict-against-grant-thornton-shows-why-clients-sue-their-advisers/#624ba3d1501a
Quote
$100M Verdict Against Grant Thornton Shows Why Clients Sue Advisers
Quote
The judge ruled that Grant Thornton knowingly sold Mr. Yung a bogus and abusive tax shelter.
They also require KYC before they release any funds (if any) so that means my few bits and bobs on that exchange from a long time ago will never be returned to me as I will never send KYC to that outfit.
?
