Based on Sam's performance before, the possibility that labcoin will success goes lower and lower (1% -> 0.1%).
More and more competent competitors show up with large enough hash power and advanced technology.
Until now, we only have lagged <10TH. I don't know why people are so happy with this short time dividend.
Topic: [CRYPTOSTOCKS] Labcoin Official Thread - Self-Moderated - page 40. (Read 96854 times)
Sam, obviously you don't know what you're doing.
Just stop wasting our money. Just transfer it back to your creditors and be
done with it.
Just stop wasting our money. Just transfer it back to your creditors and be
done with it.
With 200 satoshi daily dividends, if they can mantain this proportion ( by adding some hashpower as the difficulty raises) it adds up to 0,007 btc of dividend per share per year.
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
I think you've made a mathematical error 0.000002 (assuming that's 200 satoshi) x 365 = 0.00073 (or 0.0007). This would mean with the current prices of the stocks, you can atleast expect to get 100% return + assuming that they do increase their hash to their promised TH - taking difficulty into the equation, however with this stated - most investors who bought in at IPO and higher won't be seeing a decent return anytime soon. (maybe?)
Yes sorry, I mean 0,0007.
Just saying that the things are better than what they look. So if they can deploy/Buy hasrate up to 50ish TH that will mean roughly dividends untill february.
So 0.0005- 0.0006 could be the right price
The problem is that Sam has given no indication of a roadmap for future hashing growth.
Investors have no idea what to expect when, so it's impossible to judge what the shares should be valued at.
Combined with the fact that there needs to be some sort of exciting news to get people to put money on cryptoshares in the first place, there's not much hope of the share price increasing any time soon.
If Sam delivered on his promise to have 20 TH of hashing by the end of October, perhaps, but it's looking like he'll fail to deliver yet again.
With 200 satoshi daily dividends, if they can mantain this proportion ( by adding some hashpower as the difficulty raises) it adds up to 0,007 btc of dividend per share per year.
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
I think you've made a mathematical error 0.000002 (assuming that's 200 satoshi) x 365 = 0.00073 (or 0.0007). This would mean with the current prices of the stocks, you can atleast expect to get 100% return + assuming that they do increase their hash to their promised TH - taking difficulty into the equation, however with this stated - most investors who bought in at IPO and higher won't be seeing a decent return anytime soon. (maybe?)
Yes sorry, I mean 0,0007.
Just saying that the things are better than what they look. So if they can deploy/Buy hasrate up to 50ish TH that will mean roughly dividends untill february.
So 0.0005- 0.0006 could be the right price
With 200 satoshi daily dividends, if they can mantain this proportion ( by adding some hashpower as the difficulty raises) it adds up to 0,007 btc of dividend per share per year.
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
I think you've made a mathematical error 0.000002 (assuming that's 200 satoshi) x 365 = 0.00073 (or 0.0007). This would mean with the current prices of the stocks, you can atleast expect to get 100% return + assuming that they do increase their hash to their promised TH - taking difficulty into the equation, however with this stated - most investors who bought in at IPO and higher won't be seeing a decent return anytime soon. (maybe?)
With 200 satoshi daily dividends, if they can mantain this proportion ( by adding some hashpower as the difficulty raises) it adds up to 0,007 btc of dividend per share per year.
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
meaning that at 0.007 is roi 100% in 365 days
Sam,what's the next target of the hashrate?
Second batch,2nd gen chips development，financial report，open-space visit（time？），etc..
Please give us a full update.
thx.
Second batch,2nd gen chips development，financial report，open-space visit（time？），etc..
Please give us a full update.
thx.
+1
Sam,what's the next target of the hashrate?
Second batch,2nd gen chips development，financial report，open-space visit（time？），etc..
Please give us a full update.
thx.
Second batch,2nd gen chips development，financial report，open-space visit（time？），etc..
Please give us a full update.
thx.
We've finally deployed about 10 TH/s of stable hashing output.
Here is the guest account for http://ghash.io, username : labcoin2 password : 12345
Here is the guest account for http://ghash.io, username : labcoin2 password : 12345
What's the schedule for increasing the rate?
The volume at cryptostocks is a joke. We really need to move to havelock.
There not on havelock because they didn't and wouldn't provide any proof, this is also why they are not on Bitfunder.
Cryptostocks added them for the fees,
It would have been simple to list on Bitfunder if they managed to provide any proof, but they didn't. And it looks like they won't.
I personally wouldn't be offering up any details with all the pitch forks that have been flying around here. Would you?
If I had to verify my identity to a trusted 3rd party such as Ukyo to have the value of my stock be several times higher?
You bet your ass I'd do it.
Don't make excuses for him. His actions are taking money out of your pocket.
I could care less if the stock was listed on bitfunder - I'm in the US.
If you're looking for legitimacy, pictures of the miners/chips would be far more valuable than sam's identity, which as I've stated is more of a liability.
If I had to verify my identity to a trusted 3rd party such as Ukyo to have the value of my stock be several times higher?
You bet your ass I'd do it.
You bet your ass I'd do it.
Ukyo, the guy who without explanation banned all US customers causing a massive price crash affecting nearly every stock on the site? I would much rather use something like colored coins or if you want some real legitimate stocks you can have SEC registered ones which you know wont be scams. But no current exchanges will register with SEC nor will the securities because it is expensive and takes time.
The volume at cryptostocks is a joke. We really need to move to havelock.
There not on havelock because they didn't and wouldn't provide any proof, this is also why they are not on Bitfunder.
Cryptostocks added them for the fees,
It would have been simple to list on Bitfunder if they managed to provide any proof, but they didn't. And it looks like they won't.
I personally wouldn't be offering up any details with all the pitch forks that have been flying around here. Would you?
If I had to verify my identity to a trusted 3rd party such as Ukyo to have the value of my stock be several times higher?
You bet your ass I'd do it.
Don't make excuses for him. His actions are taking money out of your pocket.
Hmm.. Where's today's Divs? And since we are now at 10 TH/s, I was expecting to see more than the normalish 12.? BTC in the mining address. That's what it's been the past few days - 12.7ish
https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
Looks like Divs are coming.. 16.85~ BTC this timehttps://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
Hmm.. Where's today's Divs? And since we are now at 10 TH/s, I was expecting to see more than the normalish 12.? BTC in the mining address. That's what it's been the past few days - 12.7ish
https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
Looks like Divs are coming.. 16.85~ BTC this timehttps://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
Especially chips' security depends on that so no pictures of hashing gear either, just to protect their true identities.
No, I'll grant you that it's probably either (unfounded) paranoia or fraud. There's no good reason to not show pictures of the units hashing. That doesn't meant they don't exist though...
I probably wouldn't offer up any details period if I wanted to issue/sell securities to the general public without local regulation compliance.
They didn't have to provide info to us, just to the Bitfunder or Havelock and there would be no reason for us to see this information.
If Labcoin was legit, then proof would be easy and no issue, even to a trusted third party who wouldn't divulge this information to anyone, unless it turns out to be a scam....
If the purpose is evading security regulations, then providing information to the trusted 3rd party wouldn't help as clearly they would divulge if they were forced to by local authorities. Of course, the same tactic could easily be used to support a fraudulent operation, but I'm just saying that there are reasons a security issuer would not want to disclose their identity.
Especially chips' security depends on that so no pictures of hashing gear either, just to protect their true identities.
I probably wouldn't offer up any details period if I wanted to issue/sell securities to the general public without local regulation compliance.
They didn't have to provide info to us, just to the Bitfunder or Havelock and there would be no reason for us to see this information.
If Labcoin was legit, then proof would be easy and no issue, even to a trusted third party who wouldn't divulge this information to anyone, unless it turns out to be a scam....
If the purpose is evading security regulations, then providing information to the trusted 3rd party wouldn't help as clearly they would divulge if they were forced to by local authorities. Of course, the same tactic could easily be used to support a fraudulent operation, but I'm just saying that there are reasons a security issuer would not want to disclose their identity.
The volume at cryptostocks is a joke. We really need to move to havelock.
There not on havelock because they didn't and wouldn't provide any proof, this is also why they are not on Bitfunder.
Cryptostocks added them for the fees,
It would have been simple to list on Bitfunder if they managed to provide any proof, but they didn't. And it looks like they won't.
I personally wouldn't be offering up any details with all the pitch forks that have been flying around here. Would you?
I probably wouldn't offer up any details period if I wanted to issue/sell securities to the general public without local regulation compliance.
They didn't have to provide info to us, just to the Bitfunder or Havelock and there would be no reason for us to see this information.
If Labcoin was legit, then proof would be easy and no issue, even to a trusted third party who wouldn't divulge this information to anyone, unless it turns out to be a scam....
Hmm.. Where's today's Divs? And since we are now at 10 TH/s, I was expecting to see more than the normalish 12.? BTC in the mining address. That's what it's been the past few days - 12.7ish
https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
https://blockchain.info/address/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm
Jump to: