Topic: [CRYPTOSTOCKS] Labcoin Official Thread - Self-Moderated - page 44. (Read 96854 times)

Hang it up Bitchcycle.   

You got scammed and there is nothing you can do about it.

Not even the BITCOIN POLICE will help.

Next time listen to me and don't risk more than you can afford to lose gambling on Chinese scams.

BTW what happened to this?


You haven't posted your sad little list in days, so you have the same zero credibility as LabScam Sam.

Way to fail at failing!

You're cute. Arf!  Arf! Good doggie!

Threatening to hold your breath until compliance is reached, a favorite among young negotiation enthusiasts, has been known to work.
Counting to three, very slowly, including two-and-a-half in extremely problematic cases, has proven to be an effective intimidation tactic.
Varying the font face & text effects, an unconventional approach favored by seasoned negotiators, aims to startle & unnerve your enemy.  See examples below:
Sam, you must!
Sam, you must!
Sam, you must!
Sam, you must!
Sam, you MUST!

When all else fails, have your mom call his mom -- the doomsday weapon of extreme interwebz contract negotiations.
 

Sam-

  If you look at the immediately preceding posts, it's obvious you simply do not have the luxury of waiting weeks to have some sort of "open area" to display your hashing devices.

You must provide photos immediately.  If you do not, the clear assumption among your shareholders is that this project is a fraud.


You cannot wait.  Delay is no longer an option for you.

That is a good thing to do. I would suggest starting with some reminders why action needs to be taken right away in case they try to persuade us with some sweet looking "wait till mid November and take advantage of cheap shares meanwhile" idea.

We have 7 more days until the 31st. Let's get ready to take some kind of action once the 31st hits. It doesn't look like we are making any progress.

That would be different than buying other products then. If you buy in a german shop from the us then it does not mean that you have the rights of a buyer that you would have in a us-shop. But you have the rights of a german buyer. On the other hand its not possible for any onlineshop to provide any customer from other countries the same rights he would have in his own country. No one would try to offer products then. Because that not only would mean a huge amount of rules to check but you were bound to the rules for shops in the buyers country too. For german shops that means certain informations on a page in the shop that can be reachable from every page in the shop including info to the shop, contact details and so on. So the buyer gets the right that the country gives he buys in.

Of course its possible that its not allowed to sell shares to a citizen of another country. But its not enforceable because that negates what shares normally are. Shares are not only digital numbers, they are a bunch of paper at the end. So only because banks are storing these papers in their vaults doesnt mean that you cant get these papers in your own hand and sell these papers to your us-friend. And this whole forbid-system woud be broken already. Shares arent named with the buyer and can be used to pay something with too.

It might be the case that the issuing company has to decide who can buy shares. So if they offer their shares to us-citizens then they have to follow us rules. But if a us-citizen gets shares through other ways that cant mean that this company now is bound to us-rules since this way the US could rule the worlds stock exchanges securities.

Maybe a workaround would be that security issuer set rules, for example no sell to us-citicens, the exchanges check the nationality who to sell to but later us-citizens can buy shares from normal traders too. As long as they dont buy from the issuer because that would mean the issuer says yes to us-regulations. Or would a normal person be fined when he sells a share not registered in the us? I cant believe that. Uncle Joe for sure can inherit the securities only registered in japan from aunt Suzuki in paper form. No bank involved.

I think thats odd alltogether and there has to be a way without bucking before the allmighty uncle sam.

Trading is open. I think he was +1ing the question about being on track to 50TH and 500TH... to which the answer is likely no.

Sam, any SS of current hashrate at least?

Is trading not open?  I purchased a few shares yesterday from my divs.

Thanks for that, must have missed the email, thanks again!

Via mail.

Crypto::Stocks

24 Oct 15:09   16.10771471   8,094,329   0.00000199   BTC
23 Oct 13:23   16.75526103   8,094,329   0.00000207   BTC
21 Oct 15:09   11.25111731   8,094,329   0.00000139   BTC
20 Oct 15:36   11.08923073   8,094,329   0.00000137   BTC
19 Oct 09:32   11.17017402   8,094,329   0.00000138   BTC
18 Oct 04:32   11.97960692   8,094,329   0.00000148   BTC

Havelock

2013-10-18   2013-10-18   0.00000123
2013-10-16   2013-10-16   0.00000052
2013-10-04   2013-10-04   0.00000098
2013-09-24   2013-09-24   0.00000146

More than 2...

Does Havelock Investments operate the Labcoin passthrough on their website?  If I am not mistaken they have 2 dividends that have not been paid out yet.  Please someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think the last 2 div payments have not been paid to Havelock passthrough owners.

Someone posted his contact info and address on the other labcoin thread

It would be nice if you were able to visit the site, if/when available...

They're not hookers, this is normal marketing practice for most products in China. By the way I'm in China at this moment and will be in shenzhen from Monday 28th to Thursday 31st.
If anyone has any info on Fabrizio please pm me the details because you know what will happen in this thread.... 'delete'...

None of that has anything to do with whether or not bitcoin virtual shares are legally considered securities under Hong Kong law.  Simply that if you do sell financial services online, and don't lock out HK residents, you may be targeted for regulatory scrutiny. Not that it's illegal. Apparently you don't understand the distinction between "illegal" and "may be targeted for regulatory scrutiny"

I calcluated from last ghash transaction that hashrate was 7TH/s at ghash.io and eligius has been around 0.6TH/s lately.