Topic: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action - page 172. (Read 1006931 times)

Thats that australian scammer guy that was digital mintsy that ripped cryptsy off isn't it? Well on the bright side they were more honest than garza haha the email dumps show garza trying to be big verns mining operation and swap equity in each others company.

Pretty much paul approved his own 350BTC withdrawal because he's such an honest stand up guy. Wonder if he reported that suspicious withdrawal of his to the authorities?

I've been checking out some other coins. I think Pauls been bleeding them dry over the last few months. Cryptcracker wanker and the apology was just a disguise whilst he slowly filtered it out for sales. I think this is how he's been living after divorce settlements.

Ages ago on cryptsy chat i was trying to find owners of top 10 netcoin wallets and i asked Mullick. He told me that cryptsy's cold wallet address was
n5nZXRojBHjtyE78r8jkemNJbjs1xxMALc which is funny because mullick didn't have access to the wallets directly right? not sure how he knew that. Anyways it rang true because i could see that address link up to withdrawals i did. Now Bao shut his shit down around what mid jan?

Netcoin cold wallet has been bled dry over time... its small amounts here and there and sometimes a larger 1-2 million hit by the looks when prices were more favorable to him. Check it out on the explorer

http://netexplorer.coin-server.com/address/n5nZXRojBHjtyE78r8jkemNJbjs1xxMALc

He stakes here and there as per was the normal cryptsy method though they denied they staked customer coins and if it happened it was an accident when syncing the cold wallet funds to transfer... my fookin arse in a bunch of stake coins you can send without staking... the option is unlock for staking only... when you hit send it prompts for encrypted password and sends im pretty sure it doesn't stake then send.

Anyways the bleeding starts around 2 months after that start point and finishes on 23rd march. I don't know of bittrex cold wallets / hot wallets so can't match the addresses filtered off but im assuming they are either
a) bittrex or
b) Bao is slowly trying to mimmick normal sends and filtering to other wallets in his control that receivers don't have. If this is the case Paul might be banking on the fact that he'll get away with any investigation then pick the wallets up later in his control after its all blown over. I think this might be a case.

Might be worth checking other wallets for coins people have on explorers and see how they progress but i'm willing to bet that asshole opened wallets up that didn't have much value in them to withdraw and he kept closed the ones he was off to steal. Too many coins to keep them all so he prolly decided to take 20-30 wallets of good coins for later.

I want to check DGB next because that 200 million on bittrex is mighty suspicious. Especially when the second biggest holder on there is 13 million!!!

Them KYC restrictions you speaketh of sure the hell worked in Cryptsy's case unless the over-amount was due to an inside hack, then no reporting is required according to the Law of Vernon.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-11/australian-bitcoin-exchange-igot-on-verge-of-collapse/7315894


So funny! Search this thread for Zhenya Tsvetnenko.

One good thing on all this exchange funnelling is that exchanges will be on high alert atm. KYC restrictions will limit what he can pull out per day. Im sure bittrex and poloniex are watching for new accounts depositing in big balances, or even smaller ones. Paul will only be pulling out small amounts per day if he even can.