Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 42. (Read 1601330 times)
March 25, 2013, 06:34:20 AM
damn, will we solve this block? almost 24 hours nothing.
March 21, 2013, 08:38:05 PM
I'm having an issue with one of my payments. It is showing as paid out, and the money was "paid" from the pool, but it never arrived in my wallet.
I look at the details of the transaction, and it says Error - no such transaction. The payment was on the 21st of March.
https://blockexplorer.com/tx/b4df7ca2072beb0974402f855555a26c890b43c2cc7b92c80d1f87f4f456808b
Please let me know if this should be posted elsewhere - i'm new to these forums.
Thanks for the assistance!
EDIT: The issue has been resolved - thanks!
March 13, 2013, 08:00:18 PM
Good news. Glad things are soon in working order.
March 13, 2013, 03:56:35 AM
Mining is fixed now.
Working on the payments system.
Working on the payments system.
March 13, 2013, 02:08:28 AM
Is it 2013.03.13 already? 
March 12, 2013, 09:31:09 PM
Pool mining is paused while I'm moving it to the correct blockchain branch.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Do we have an ETA on when this will be complete? Sorry, but we have to wait.
March 12, 2013, 06:35:12 PM
Pool mining is paused while I'm moving it to the correct blockchain branch.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Thanks much Tycho for the frequent updates.
Yes, thank you Tycho. You the man....
March 12, 2013, 06:16:19 PM
Pool mining is paused while I'm moving it to the correct blockchain branch.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Thanks much Tycho for the frequent updates.
March 12, 2013, 05:20:26 PM
Ah, the silence of the farm is... intolerable!!!
March 12, 2013, 04:44:39 PM
Pool mining is paused while I'm moving it to the correct blockchain branch.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
Sorry, but we have to wait.
March 12, 2013, 04:26:09 PM
Question:
On my screen https://deepbit.net/payments the payment showing up at the top has "12.03.2013 04:00" as date and the amount "1.01"
The transaction link is https://blockexplorer.com/tx/4439404783d82ad06680a0d8d6019b8c2644ca7d7fe45065465cda54e354fce5
But then I go to that link it says
"Error
No such transaction"
Is this transaction going to post eventually or is it lost due to the recent issues?
Thanks,
Nima
On my screen https://deepbit.net/payments the payment showing up at the top has "12.03.2013 04:00" as date and the amount "1.01"
The transaction link is https://blockexplorer.com/tx/4439404783d82ad06680a0d8d6019b8c2644ca7d7fe45065465cda54e354fce5
But then I go to that link it says
"Error
No such transaction"
Is this transaction going to post eventually or is it lost due to the recent issues?
Thanks,
Nima
March 12, 2013, 04:17:10 PM
At this moment our pool created a wrong branch of the blockchain, but not because of being 0.8+.
I'm working on the fix now.
Tycho, this should be really easy to fix. Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I'm working on the fix now.
March 12, 2013, 04:10:19 PM
At this moment our pool created a wrong branch of the blockchain, but not because of being 0.8+.
I'm working on the fix now.
I'm working on the fix now.
March 12, 2013, 01:56:59 PM
Please_wait_for_autopayment!
I get this, hope it is temporary
I get this, hope it is temporary
March 10, 2013, 04:03:30 PM
Tycho,
Could you post your block size and configuration over at organofcorti's new thread?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1606559
It may help alleviate some of the paranoia about your pool. Or it may not.
Thanks,
Sam
Could you post your block size and configuration over at organofcorti's new thread?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1606559
It may help alleviate some of the paranoia about your pool. Or it may not.
Thanks,
Sam
March 09, 2013, 01:13:36 PM
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
Yeah, what I have heard is that there are multiple nodes configured differently. If you look at the sizes of blocks being created by DeepBit it's clear there's a 50kb hard cap somewhere, the sizes are too perfectly close to that boundary to be anything else. Of course other pools also have a variety of nodes configured differently, but 50kb is pretty low.
People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining.
i tghought the pint o fmining is making that coin? lol
loooks i was mistaken;)
Coin generation is only a portion of point of mining. As reward halves it is a smaller portion of the point of mining. Without transaction confirmations there is no Bitcoin system. So transactions are a much more important part of mining in the long term.
Which is why I question the wisdom of modifying block sizes to keep the transaction fees low.
Sam
March 09, 2013, 12:48:53 PM
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
Yeah, what I have heard is that there are multiple nodes configured differently. If you look at the sizes of blocks being created by DeepBit it's clear there's a 50kb hard cap somewhere, the sizes are too perfectly close to that boundary to be anything else. Of course other pools also have a variety of nodes configured differently, but 50kb is pretty low.
People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining.
i tghought the pint o fmining is making that coin? lol
loooks i was mistaken;)
March 09, 2013, 11:24:02 AM
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
Your notifying the community of a pools apparent block size is completely appropriate and probably a good thing.
But please keep your opinions of where a person should be mining and why to yourself and let miners exercise their freedom of choice. Whether you, or others, agree with that choice, or not, is immaterial.
Thanks for the info though.
Take Care,
Sam
sam seems to be a deepbit fan boy taking this agresive stance whats left of deepbit is gpu miners who run on autopilot when asics start to arive in few weeks deepbit is finished peace
sam deepbit and tycho:) so long was nice ride while it lasted
oh and my miners are returning failed shares? si deep bit down?
I'm no Deepbit "fan boy". But I'm not an enemy of Deepbit either.
I don't like it when people try to influence the free market. Let people who use a service decide.
I very much appreciate the information Mr. Hearn supplied and if my words were a bit harsh I apologize for that. But I stand by the basic point I was attempting to make and that is let the free market work.
Thanks,
Sam
March 09, 2013, 10:53:09 AM
People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining.
Sure, I understand that and appreciate the info.
If your analyzing "apparent" pool block size's maybe it would be productive to create a thread with a chart? Then we all could compare and contrast.
Sam
March 08, 2013, 02:26:38 PM
A bug was found and fixed today. This bug possibly caused mining problems for some users since 22-23.02.2013, so now things may get better if you were affected.
I will be nice here , it seems the problem is still around .. I switch pools on the same settings for over 24 hours and not one problem .. here ever few minutes my miners loses connection means i earn less .
So please put more time in or the pool is a lost cause " going going gone " as you have seen it's going down hill for a bit now .
Jump to: