[DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 91.

DeepBit

donator

Activity: 532

Merit: 501

We have cookies

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi, why aren't all pools implementing real accounts (payout AND payin) so that they can act like banks with mobile clients that use QR code scanning and transfer money with a click on your smartphone?

Yes, it's very easy to implement, but I'm intentionally not doing this because it would require a completely different approach on security and responsibility.
I don't want people to store their savings in the pool because it's NOT a bank.

DeepBit

donator

Activity: 532

Merit: 501

We have cookies

Quote from: Definit on February 23, 2012, 09:51:10 AM

why do i have less shares but more gh/s...is that something that im obviously doing wrong, or missing?

4 Definit (You) 287686 9.99 GH/s
5 ****** 33198117 9.53 GH/s

Because it's total figure. He just started earlier :)

Definit

sr. member

Activity: 357

Merit: 250

why do i have less shares but more gh/s...is that something that im obviously doing wrong, or missing?

4 Definit (You) 287686 9.99 GH/s
5 ****** 33198117 9.53 GH/s

slider1978

full member

Activity: 180

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi, why aren't all pools implementing real accounts (payout AND payin) so that they can act like banks with mobile clients that use QR code scanning and transfer money with a click on your smartphone?

Because you haven't started one yet.

That's the beauty of Bitcoin right now...See a need, fill a need, profit. PM me if your interested in a Bitcoin account.

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: makomk on February 21, 2012, 11:28:02 AM

Quote from: finway on February 15, 2012, 09:20:35 AM

There are conscious on supporting BIP16, cause it will make bitcoin more safe.
as you can see, slush & BTCGuild are supporting BIP16,
and more than 5 TOP10 pools are supporting BIP16,
You are acting against it, you're not making bitcoin safe.

Errrm, you might want to read my post in the Technical Discussion subforum. Turns out that once BIP16 is enabled, all other miners will be forced to upgrade pronto or risk losing money. (In fact, arguably it's even worse than that - apparently if BIP16 went live with only 55% of mining power supporting it it'd make 6 confirmation double-spend attacks against old nodes quite a bit easier than they ought to be.)

OP_EVAL are more disruptive,right? why you like it?

makomk

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 564

Quote from: finway on February 15, 2012, 09:20:35 AM

There are conscious on supporting BIP16, cause it will make bitcoin more safe.
as you can see, slush & BTCGuild are supporting BIP16,
and more than 5 TOP10 pools are supporting BIP16,
You are acting against it, you're not making bitcoin safe.

Errrm, you might want to read my post in the Technical Discussion subforum. Turns out that once BIP16 is enabled, all other miners will be forced to upgrade pronto or risk losing money. (In fact, arguably it's even worse than that - apparently if BIP16 went live with only 55% of mining power supporting it it'd make 6 confirmation double-spend attacks against old nodes quite a bit easier than they ought to be.)

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: finway on February 20, 2012, 07:37:26 PM

Quote from: os2sam on February 20, 2012, 12:03:37 AM

Why implement it at all? Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need. So, again, why?

That's you, i guess.

I'm glad to see that you have thought it through so thoroughly. That's about par for the course though.
Sad,
Sam

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: os2sam on February 20, 2012, 12:03:37 AM

Why implement it at all? Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need. So, again, why?

That's you, i guess.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: finway on February 19, 2012, 11:40:16 PM

Because he promised, and this is his duty.

Why implement it at all? Nobody has made a real argument which proves the need. So, again, why?

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Because he promised, and this is his duty.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: finway on February 19, 2012, 10:35:33 PM

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].

Why?

rjk

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

1ngldh

Quote from: finway on February 19, 2012, 10:35:33 PM

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].

Why do you insist on repeating yourself ad nauseum? All you are doing is being annoying.

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

It's time to support BIP16, [Tycho].

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: finway on February 19, 2012, 02:39:38 AM

Quote from: finway on February 15, 2012, 08:46:13 PM

Then, how many blocks exactly? it's 268(26%) already.
How many do you need? may be 300?

It's 366 blocks now,
more than 50% or other 70% of mining power.

When will you support BIP16, DeepBit?

Why?

dishwara

legendary

Activity: 1855

Merit: 1016

Quote from: BTC guy on February 19, 2012, 03:59:35 AM

AMERICANS - JOIN team AMERICA. We MUST beat the RUSSIANS.

The main reason for Bitcoin creation is decentralized & independent of countries or continents...

BTC guy

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

AMERICANS - JOIN team AMERICA. We MUST beat the RUSSIANS.

finway

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: finway on February 15, 2012, 08:46:13 PM

Then, how many blocks exactly? it's 268(26%) already.
How many do you need? may be 300?

It's 366 blocks now,
more than 50% or other 70% of mining power.

When will you support BIP16, DeepBit?

DeepBit

donator

Activity: 532

Merit: 501

We have cookies

Quote from: iamapi on February 16, 2012, 01:30:02 AM

I found connect to http://f1.deepbit.net always failed while connect to http://f2.deepbit.net always succeeded.

Actually there is no f2 at this moment, so you are effectively connecting deepbit.net when requesting f2.deepbit.net

iamapi

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

I found connect to http://f1.deepbit.net always failed while connect to http://f2.deepbit.net always succeeded.

Quote from: iamapi on February 15, 2012, 04:10:45 AM

I suffered from the connection problem as you.

Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out

Quote from: CA Coins on February 14, 2012, 02:18:30 PM

Anybody having connection problems? I am getting really long getwork and submit times (each 300ms+) vs. typically 200ms. Average hashrate has fallen from 4GH to around 3GH over the last 12 hours (with 3 intermittent outages having to go to backup pool).

os008

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

Indeed, just needed to wait a bit more. Received it, thanks.

Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 91. (Read 1601330 times)