A few people will, from time to time misinterpret my findings and instead of discussing the issue will simply state such chants as "you're wrong" or "here we go again" or "he's just a troll, ignore him" or even "he used to be good, but now..." yet none of those who say these things will ever take the time to show where they think that I am wrong. Sometimes when a person has a different interpretation, they will dig there heals in. I'm not the only one guilty of that.
Saying "You are wrong" ≠ "You are actually wrong and here is the proof of where you are wrong".
Blah...last time I checked, you mentioned something in one of your "investigatory" topics and then you ignored me, trolled me etc etc:
Why is my nick in this thread?
So if you don't mind explain what is my nick doing in this thread
What is this now?
Why are you defaming me in this topic Timelord2067? Why do you write lies in my trust feedback?
Where did I abuse merit?
Post proofs for your claims timelord2067
Memory lost or something?
How surprising! The ones in the "untrusted feedback" are the very ones who say that I am wrong - that I am crazy, that I am a Troll... yet here they are doing the exact same thing - identifying alts and slapping them with negatives.
You just don't get it, right?
Speaking of on-topic thingies, Timelord attacked someone because they had irrelevant alt account in their trust network, surprisingly, timelord included his own alt account to his trust network
http://loyce.club/trust/2020-06-27_Sat_05.02h/131361.html. @Timelord2067, Isn't that something you called abuse?