A quote literally answering the question you were presenting is not good enough?
I addressed that quote here and also in my follow up question here:Last of the V8s is an official owner of an extra large tin of ball polish, he gets a pass.
I'm still unsure what exactly he's being accused of. Wiping his Trust list, using only DefaultTrust, and then making a new Trust list doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me.I commend you and several other members that continue to engage with them in a civil manner even though you get next to nothing in return from them in simple coherent messages. I wish I had your temperament and patience to deal with these attention seeking good-for-nothing members that have created their own gang within a gang to cause disruption to the forum but it was easier for me to simply give up and IGNORE them all.
I've put some users on ignore, but TECSHARE isn't one of them, I don't consider him to be "bad". He seems to be on a mission to improve the Trust system, I think his intentions are good, and he sticks to his believes even though many people seem to disagree.I want there to be consistent, objective, and equitable rules, not purely a popularity contest which currently determines the current trust system.
