Topic: deleted - page 80. (Read 8071 times)
How do you assess the growth potential of this token?
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .
how much you give coins for translation into 5 languages by the one user?
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .
excellent project and innovative, many benefits will be gained by people from this project. hopefully, for the progress will be smooth and many people who are interested in your project.
Thanks for offering a good airdrop. This will keep people focused on your project.
hope this coin success dev, and go to the moon!!
hope this coin success dev, and go to the moon!!
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
It's very simple, POS requires a lot less processing power than POW and other analogs of proofs of importance. Another important feature is that the number of hacker attacks will be significantly less because the attacker will not be able to screw up without having more than 51% of the total pool of coins .
Why developers use pure POS instead of POW or some mixed types of proof of importance?
I do not think that this project is a dummy , in theory it has a future and practical application. I do not argue that in the world of cryptocurrencies, a very large part is played by a well-built marketing company and PR of its project but the idea plays a very important role.
Above I about it already wrote. Developers need to approach this issue as seriously as possible. Otherwise, their coin and multi-level master node system will simply not be noticed.I do not think that this project is a dummy , in theory it has a future and practical application. I do not argue that in the world of cryptocurrencies, a very large part is played by a well-built marketing company and PR of its project but the idea plays a very important role.
Above I about it already wrote. Developers need to approach this issue as seriously as possible. Otherwise, their coin and multi-level master node system will simply not be noticed.I do not think that this project is a dummy , in theory it has a future and practical application. I do not argue that in the world of cryptocurrencies, a very large part is played by a well-built marketing company and PR of its project but the idea plays a very important role.
Above I about it already wrote. Developers need to approach this issue as seriously as possible. Otherwise, their coin and multi-level master node system will simply not be noticed.I do not think that this project is a dummy , in theory it has a future and practical application. I do not argue that in the world of cryptocurrencies, a very large part is played by a well-built marketing company and PR of its project but the idea plays a very important role.
Above I about it already wrote. Developers need to approach this issue as seriously as possible. Otherwise, their coin and multi-level master node system will simply not be noticed.I do not think that this project is a dummy , in theory it has a future and practical application. I do not argue that in the world of cryptocurrencies, a very large part is played by a well-built marketing company and PR of its project but the idea plays a very important role.
Above I about it already wrote. Developers need to approach this issue as seriously as possible. Otherwise, their coin and multi-level master node system will simply not be noticed. Jump to: