Pages:
Author

Topic: Δ DeltaCredits - Trade-in ends in less than 24 hours - page 13. (Read 81047 times)

sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Ah, good find, didn't notice this here but noticed similar behavior in STEPS staking though. There altcoinsteps answered with this:

to address the staking fuze/split

there are 2 lines in code that define this:

unsigned int nStakeSplitAge = 1 * 24 * 60 * 60;
int64_t nStakeCombineThreshold = 1000 * COIN;

the nStakeSplitAge = 1 * 24 * 60 * 60; means that the pos reward gets split into 2 outputs if the stake was younger than nStakeSplitAge(24 hours for STEPS)
the nStakeCombineThreshold = 1000 * COIN; means that if there are multiple sub-1000 STEPS coins at the staking address they should be recombined.

Given your find I assume these lines, or some with similar functionality, but perhaps different values are present for DeltaCredits as well. Since one of your examples fused inputs into one 1014 coins input I guess if you want smaller inputs these should be separated into different addresses to avoid fusing.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
Sure there are not enough staking wallets, but there may be another reason for network not staking well too.

If you look on block 22101, you could see a strange picture:  http://cryptobe.com/block/f4d0e725f0192d6a09aa9440b636de71a37b22147a140e319dc4d84a6dcd891c

It looks like 9 inputs were consolidated into one single input after the staking! It means next time instead of 9 blocks those coins could generate just 1 block.
Even worse is on block 22100 (http://cryptobe.com/block/54310354d8df0be1f957e03e4ad9a32fe9ed606d5a3488b356618314ad57c19d) - about 30 inputs were consolidated into one.

I am not sure why this happened, but if the wallet does it itself, then after some time there will be very few inputs to stake.

I have seen wallets dividing coins after the staking (that creates many small inputs, which could be inconvenient, but it definitely supports the network). For example CoinAid wallet does that. But here it looks we have the opposite, and this could be a problem.

These are just my observations and assumptions. They might be wrong, but if they are correct, then wallet code could need to be tweaked.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I will be transferring a relatively significant amount of DCR from an exchange to my home wallet to help out the network.


Look out for a decent SRF buy in the coming days also.
legendary
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
yep, 22103, all coins staking here also...
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
i am also on block 22102 but my wallet says: not sync.
i have 2 connections, maybe i should add some more if possible...
The 'not sync'-message is a bit misleading, it says that if the last block time is too far in the past too. As long as you've got some connections (4 here right now) and the last block number is up to date (shows 22103 here) there is nothing much you can do.

The input managed to stake and my coins are all stake locked again. Given the confirmations I hoped another would unlock but it did not. Should have paid more attention, looks like the coins are in only 7 inputs/chunks here. But then it's not that many coins in the first place.
legendary
Activity: 957
Merit: 1006
i am also on block 22102 but my wallet says: not sync.
i have 2 connections, maybe i should add some more if possible...
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
Not sadly, it's 3 more blocks now. Every blocks has quite some chance now to move some coins out of Stake elsewhere.
Edit: Actually a small 12 coin input is freed here, now it must just beat the diff and the network shows some more weight present (42 me, 252 network).
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
Same here, all coins locked in Stake. Blockchain is stuck at 22099.

I'm curious, have you moved to 102 now? I think I know the problem, not enough people staking.
Sorry for the late reply, went to bed. Smiley Yes, block 22102 now as well.
sr. member
Activity: 345
Merit: 250
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
Same here, all coins locked in Stake. Blockchain is stuck at 22099.

I'm curious, have you moved to 102 now? I think I know the problem, not enough people staking.

22102 here, looks like enough people got their wallets running.

Sadly those 3 blocks were me staking.
hero member
Activity: 945
Merit: 1000
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
Same here, all coins locked in Stake. Blockchain is stuck at 22099.

I'm curious, have you moved to 102 now? I think I know the problem, not enough people staking.

22102 here, looks like enough people got their wallets running.
sr. member
Activity: 345
Merit: 250
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
Same here, all coins locked in Stake. Blockchain is stuck at 22099.

I'm curious, have you moved to 102 now? I think I know the problem, not enough people staking.
sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
Same here, all coins locked in Stake. Blockchain is stuck at 22099.
sr. member
Activity: 433
Merit: 250
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
After reading this, i checked my wallet as well and my Coins are stucked in Stake and i can confirm blockchain is stuck at block 22099.   Huh Huh
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
The blockchain is stuck at block 22099. Not moving for more than 10 hours already. Nobody staking?
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
It would be nice if Gladimor could provide a weekly status update regarding the SRF to keep us DCR investors updated from now on. Something like BTC value of the SRF, ROI, allocation of investments and the amount of funds set aside for reinvestment or buying and burning.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I have a temporary solution to allow more liquidity with the SRF.

Right now, the entire SRF is fixed into mid-long positions in altcoins. My solution proposes that we allow people to INVEST into the SRF. That means, an investor can deposit BTC to an SR-fund address, and wait for 2 or so weeks while the SRF generates a revenue based off of the deposit. At the end, the BTC will be returned, and half of the revenue will be used to buy DCR and burn it, while the other half will be used to buy DCR and be sent to the investor as a token of reward. It generally is a win-win situation. For the case of this, the entirety of the investors' deposit will be invested into S5 and S7 mining shares on HashNest, so we can return to the days where the SRF did a buy every 24-48 hours, while there will be a weekly big buy by the original SRF fund, with revenue generated from trading.

This would be a completely transparent process, and every week I will provide screenshots of the mining fund and progression of hashrate/revenue.

All the best,
Adam

This is actually a decent idea. Why not post more details.


So basically, you send BTC to an SRF deposit fund, and specify after how long you want the BTC returned. For example, if you want your BTC back within a week, the SRF will immediately transfer all funds to HashNest, invest in S5 and S7 mining shares, and do a daily SRF buy with revenue generated from those shares. Half of the buy will be burned, while the other half of the buy will be sent to the investor as a token of reward. After 7 days, the BTC will be returned to the depositor.

If you would like to make this plan a reality, send a deposit to the aforementioned address, and message me the following details:
SRF Deposit Fund (BTC) address: 19ifAsHH1gH9ocJiZqCWA8A2Mk7oJ28H8e
Your BTC return address:
Your DCR address:
TXID of deposit:

If there is any additional information required, please feel free to ask.

Best,
Adam
sr. member
Activity: 345
Merit: 250
I have a temporary solution to allow more liquidity with the SRF.

Right now, the entire SRF is fixed into mid-long positions in altcoins. My solution proposes that we allow people to INVEST into the SRF. That means, an investor can deposit BTC to an SR-fund address, and wait for 2 or so weeks while the SRF generates a revenue based off of the deposit. At the end, the BTC will be returned, and half of the revenue will be used to buy DCR and burn it, while the other half will be used to buy DCR and be sent to the investor as a token of reward. It generally is a win-win situation. For the case of this, the entirety of the investors' deposit will be invested into S5 and S7 mining shares on HashNest, so we can return to the days where the SRF did a buy every 24-48 hours, while there will be a weekly big buy by the original SRF fund, with revenue generated from trading.

This would be a completely transparent process, and every week I will provide screenshots of the mining fund and progression of hashrate/revenue.

All the best,
Adam

This is actually a decent idea. Why not post more details.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I have a temporary solution to allow more liquidity with the SRF.

Right now, the entire SRF is fixed into mid-long positions in altcoins. My solution proposes that we allow people to INVEST into the SRF. That means, an investor can deposit BTC to an SR-fund address, and wait for 2 or so weeks while the SRF generates a revenue based off of the deposit. At the end, the BTC will be returned, and half of the revenue will be used to buy DCR and burn it, while the other half will be used to buy DCR and be sent to the investor as a token of reward. It generally is a win-win situation. For the case of this, the entirety of the investors' deposit will be invested into S5 and S7 mining shares on HashNest, so we can return to the days where the SRF did a buy every 24-48 hours, while there will be a weekly big buy by the original SRF fund, with revenue generated from trading.

This would be a completely transparent process, and every week I will provide screenshots of the mining fund and progression of hashrate/revenue.

All the best,
Adam
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
been trying to get my wallet to sync for the past two days still can't get any active connections  Huh
Code:
addnode add 85.25.199.215:31414
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 520
been trying to get my wallet to sync for the past two days still can't get any active connections  Huh
hero member
Activity: 945
Merit: 1000
Amount sent to burn address: 335.03718929 DCR

http://cryptobe.com/address/DBurnAddressDELTACreditsDCR1MHEkpR


It's nice to see some action again after a small hiatus .
Pages:
Jump to: