Topic: [DeM] Deutsche eMark - DEM - cryptocoin SHA256 POS/POW - page 96. (Read 237393 times)

Hi Cleric,

Please don't use your cpu miner (minerd) for mining. Those days are over. If you want to try mining yourself please consider purchasing a couple of Bitmain U1 Antminers. They can be plugged straight into your USB port, hash at least at around 1.6 Giga Hash per second per device at 2.5W power usage. Your cpu miner now hashes around 5 kilo hash in sCrypt (!! That should be in SHA256 and that would then be approximately 5 mega hash , DEM uses this SHA256-algorithm) at approximately 80W (@ 100% cpu utilisation). So one Antminer U1 hashes around 1000 as fast as your computer and uses only 4% of the power. Antminer U1 can be bought second hand for about 10 - 15 euro. You can (and should) use multiple.

Please note that MINERD can not be trusted and is often infected with viruses or malware. Be advised to check your system's integrity.

The correct systax should be: -a sha256d

Good luck!
______________________________

Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
 -a, --algo=ALGO       specify the algorithm to use
                          scrypt    scrypt(1024, 1, 1) (default)
                          sha256d   SHA-256d
  

Thanks for reply , could you provide me a cpu coin to mine ?

Thx in advance !

It looks like you are trying to mine using “scrypt” on a “sha256” based coin.  Even if configured properly you won't be getting much DEM at that hash rate.  Are you mining on the CPU?  You could try a CPU based coin or purchase DEM and run PoS.

Hi

I am new to mining and just trying with DEM .

I made an account to coin-base.info and added a new worker .

when i run minerd i get these :

C:\Users\------\----------\eMark-Qt-1.0-Win>minerd -o stratum+tcp://coin-base.info
:3453 -u 12345677.1234567 -p 1234567
[2014-11-03 18:59:51] 2 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm.
[2014-11-03 18:59:51] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coin-base.info:3453
[2014-11-03 18:59:51] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-11-03 18:59:51] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-11-03 19:00:56] accepted: 0/1 (0.00%), 10.09 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-11-03 19:01:40] thread 1: 232548 hashes, 4.96 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:01:40] accepted: 0/2 (0.00%), 10.01 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-11-03 19:01:59] thread 0: 303084 hashes, 4.81 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:35] thread 0: 175212 hashes, 4.91 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:35] accepted: 0/3 (0.00%), 9.87 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-11-03 19:02:46] thread 1: 297528 hashes, 4.54 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:46] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-11-03 19:02:46] thread 1: 3300 hashes, 5.01 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:46] thread 0: 53412 hashes, 4.65 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:48] thread 1: 8556 hashes, 4.69 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:02:48] accepted: 0/4 (0.00%), 9.34 khash/s (booooo)
[2014-11-03 19:03:44] thread 1: 281364 hashes, 5.01 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:03:47] thread 0: 278964 hashes, 4.59 khash/s
[2014-11-03 19:04:03] thread 0: 69828 hashes, 4.53 khash/s

In coin-base site in dashboard  i get 0 % in shares info and my worker is not active  any one can help ?

Darn! I thought there was no reply and I learned the problem is indeed associated with CK, so I just deleted the post.  Sorry about that and thanks for the response!

Yes, I'm trying them now and so far, it seems to go smoothly.  I'm trying to work with CK to solve a few issues using their support ticket system, but I get the impression they are very laid back regarding verifying their work before putting it online.  The users shouldn't be the testers.  I'm going to have to take a crash course in coin exchanges in order to truly use iSpace.  Never done any trading.

I don't trust COINKING had several problems try mining on ispace.co.uk

was about time. Was massively oversold by people exiting coinex via dem and miners dumping like blind.

Guess who bought at bottom 

DEM is rising and rising... great 

¡¿ Whats up with the block chain explorer ?!  It's just returning a blank page ...

http://blockchain.deutsche-emark.org

As alicea said " Show me a person or a dev without disadvantages/errors!"

 

Suddenly started getting these errors today, any idea's:

ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED

LOL.


Well i suggest you to restart from scratch. 

Alicea said it all. This coin is running around for a year now and hasn't been serviced in this period. And still everything is well! A new face is maybe more attractive but doesn't add any functionality. And POS stinks. Real life test: put a 10 euro note on the table, wait a year and check if after this year there is an extra 30 cents beside the note. Money needs to work, just like people.

Over the past months I learned a lot about coins, mining and markets. If you take a "dead" coin with a relatively small community and you bring down the exchange rate you will see miners (especially auto-switching multi pools) leaving and the difficulty dropping. In return the reward for your mining activities will rise. In the time you can buy other miners' (especially the auto-selling) eMarks at junk prices. From that viewpoint it was a very interesting summer. Now prices are (being brought) up, another and more rewarding time has arrived. This growth / phase will attract new attention and new capital. And early adopters will have an opportunity to cash in and get rewarded for all their investments and efforts.

And with a market cap of still only 60k USD it is very easy to own (and control) a serious part of the eMark market with only limited amount of Bitcoins.

No, i think there's a problem with the POS and when there's no Dev intervention is not a good thing, it's only lack of interest. there's always something to fix or to improve (or to copy/paste from BTC Main client).


Don't say bullshit please. Satoshi Nakamoto and DEM in the same topic are the words that doesn't fit.


Bittrex is as good as cryptsy, and volumes are higher.
99% Of alt.coins is shit, so if you have an Alt. Exchange, you trade shit.
Price with a volume of less than 3 BTC doesn't mean nothing.

With current DEM Book Orders do you know that if i sell 3.5 BTC Values in Dem, i destroy values to 200 Satoshi?
And if i buy 5 BTC DEM, price will be 3500 SAT

Do you have any idea on how an Alt Exchange Market works? And how much volumes are important?


When there's a problem a Dev must fix a soon as possible. If not, you're not a Dev. Probably DEM Dev, dump coins when price was near 70K


I'm out of alt-currency, i have other ways to make profit, more than trade.
DEM is an old coin, this is why i'm able to speak about.

Peace 

Does it work right? It does. What do you need the news for? For forks? Or for trouble? It's so good coin that lasts over a year without dev intervention! This is rare!
Compare it with Satoshi Nakamoto's forum activity, please.
Yes, but you say "cryptsy". It's not bittrex who add coins as quickly as possible and delist even faster And it's not the shitexchange that disapears in 3 months. The price goes up. This is the concrete information

Probably yes it is! Show me a person or a dev without disadvantages/errors!
Have you seen new coins last months? Don't say it, just compare silently and say it in your soul/wallet.

- Github source is older than 1 year -> No code news
- No Activity on DEM Forum (http://forum.deutsche-emark.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=flvg4j1vajk5upcmej4h0tgfk0&)
- Main Page last news (and probably update https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3341171) is 06.12.2013
- This coin is only on 2 exchange : On cryptsy daily volume is 2.3 BTC, on Coins-E is probably near 0
- Probably POS is bugged (and never fixed)

So what do you think?
I follow this coin from near the first day. I was hoping something different, but actually it's only a speculation dead coin (until cryptsy will remove from the list)
 

The **question** was if there's any "fundamental" news behind e-marks and its recent price activity. Plain and simple, eh. No flaming, no hearsay, no garbage, please. Straight question, straight answer.

So if anyone could come forward and enlighten me, that would be much appreciated. **Real** answers only please, no FUD, no second-rate gossip.

Thanks again.

What's your question?

that doesn't answer my questions -- as usual here (what a waste of time)! Wonder why I'm only a "full member" at this stupid outift???

Oh my.

Thanks -- if that's the best you all can do...

it's  T H A N (and then some) -- learn some English first, man.