Topic: Democracy Yes OR No ??? (Read 16612 times)

Parents, children and democracy ?

How about a single parent with two children? I would love to see their democracy

There are so many countries in the world where people do not know the meaning of democracy word !! Such as North Korean. In my opinion , Democracy helps to make a good decision and the difference between the wrong and the right.When a child encounters some problem and tries to solve it then it is bad, if his parents allow him with democracy then he won't had such issues. !!!

Lol.
 
I don't disagree. By your point, I conclude that there can't be any ideal democracy because at the end, it's mob rule and majority will have a say even if majority is wrong.
Democracy has so many flaws that we neglect haha.

Even in it, the system is broken. Let's say California has 100 people in it and has 50 electorate seats. 51 voted for Hillary and 49 for trump. Wouldn't it be mob justice to give all the 50 seats of California to Hillary? Or say Texas has 50 seats and 51 voted for trump and thus trump gets all 50 seats of Texas. How about alloting number of seats in proportional to percentage of voters from a state?

I cannot live in a country where democracy doesn't exist. Never!!!! There are most times you would want to voice out issues that are very pressing and through democracy, you will be there to hit up.

This is a cut and dried scientific and economic fraud funded by a likely bribed USA government.  there is zero grey area in the whole situation.  The whistle blowers were part of the scheme.
 
I do want you to understand something.  The whole Vaccine racket will be crushed late this year. This specifically gives us the core case in black and white.  If you are an investor, this looks grim for Merck. 
 
Have you been watching the corporate marriage of Bayer and Monsanto?  Roundup is now destroying both of them while the chinese continue pushing the chemicals, now out of patent.
 
Expect all the Vaccine laws to be repealed with prejudice....

1       Consider that it is reasonable to posit that all infectious disease collapsed thanks to universal access to clean water and sanitation.
2       Consider that the Spanish flue was a failed vaccination experiment.
3       Consider that Merck is running a fraud.
4       Consider that the gold rush underway merely recklessly increases dosages of foreign agents into the blood stream.

You see the emerging picture?  What still appears tangible keeps fading away.  Successes are possible for local events judiciously applied.  The big successes were the application of cow pox to prevent human small pox.  Do the rest have a similar clear biological pathway to success?

Consider the following quote, widely attributed to the USSR's Communist leader Joseph Stalin: "It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." At first blush, it seems curious as to why a totalitarian dictator, who never had to stand for public election, would even care about votes at all. But is it just another net hoax, or could the quote have some context to actually be attributed to the strongarm leader?

...

Variations on the Stalin Quote

It bears noting that more than one version of the attributed statement exists. For example, this more formal variant is cited at least as often as the one we've been discussing: "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything."

One historical source for a version of the quote comes from Boris Bazhanov's "Memoirs of Stalin's Former Secretary," published in 1980 in Paris and 2002 in Moscow and appearing to be available only in French and in Russian.

The pertinent passage, which appears near the end of chapter five, reads as follows (loosely translated with the help of Google):

"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how." A search of the Stalin Internet Library yielded nothing resembling the quote in the Soviet leader's published writings, though the possibility remains that it could have been excerpted from an unpublished speech or private conversation.

People can determine who lead them in democracy and I strongly believe that during democracy country do wetness growth and development compared to other form of government.  If the whole world embracing democracy we would have developments and the level of poverty will reduce.

There is no perfect type of government, but I do prefer democracy over any others.  At least democracy give the people a voice in how they should be governed.