Topic: Democracy Yes OR No ??? - page 3. (Read 16571 times)
Democracy means of the people, by the people, for the people. This isn't possibly found on most of the democratic country. This way pure democracy at present isn't found anywhere. If the democratic governance is followed in the right way surely people will be experiencing a better living.
Here are some merits of democracy :
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
The things is, democracy would only work in a country wherr leaderd and the population are responsible in majority. It's very easy to manipulate democracy and turn it into something that gives control to a few greedy people. Technicalities can be used to twist the laws and take advantage of what seem to be freedom. To put it simply, it can be manipulated and abused.
^^^ However, if you get freedom rather than democracy, you will be able to throw it (freedom) away and get democracy back any time you want... simply because you are free.
once you loose democracy you wont get it back anymore, it might take even millenias to get it back
Democracy is socialism among a group of people, so that the wise can reign over the dull-minded through capitalism.
Democracy is a scam in some countries where the will of the people does not prevail against the will of the leader who does not enjoy the legitimacy from the people but force him self on the all through the instrumentality of democracy.
^^^ Except for very small groups, the benefits of democracy are only two:
1. The dictators within can slip up more easily;
2. Ignorance is bliss... ignorance that the democracy is simply a dictatorship of a different style than one that is formally a dictatorship.
BTW, the USA is not a democracy, even though it appears to be, and even though few people know how to effectively use their freedom in it.
1. The dictators within can slip up more easily;
2. Ignorance is bliss... ignorance that the democracy is simply a dictatorship of a different style than one that is formally a dictatorship.
BTW, the USA is not a democracy, even though it appears to be, and even though few people know how to effectively use their freedom in it.
^^^ But only if we have a minimum of 12 popular candidates for each office, without voters knowing the number of votes anybody gets until after the election, and only if the winner gets at least a 50% majority of the votes, but if nobody gets 50% or more, nobody gets told how many votes anybody got.
Democracy will always be the best way, if you work more, you gain more, and you have freedom of expression and at the same time a stable economy is generated, those conditions are those necessary to be able to live in progress and under which, all technology is accepted and well received.
Governments working under the kings are far better than by the democratic leaders so democracy is like a cheat and not a common citizen can become a leader on any country.
You have the chance to get rid of bad leader with democracy. Democracy country citizen have more right and choice, there are nothing perfect, for the right it need also time, money involved, but even a bad leader voted in, with democracy you can vote them out next time Without democracy citizen voice isn’t important anymore, if lucky you get a good leader, if unlucky you get a bad leader who you can’t get rid of in a life time.
I would like to go with democracy as also I'm from the world's bigger democracy I strongly support democracy. If not democracy it will be dictatorship sort of rule where the freedom of an individual gets limited. In a democracy everyone gets a chance to do what they want a sense of freedom which every being wants.
Here are some merits of democracy :
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
You have to understand something here.
If there is no ideal or perfect individuals, than we can't have ideal or perfect families, society or nation.
So, on ''the paper'' we can make perfect plan for the perfect society but in reality people decide with their everyday actions.
So, in my opinion, without strict control we can't have good political system.
So, I believe in democracy but not unconditionally.
Of course with democracy.
Because they are engaged in the protection of human rights and public freedom.
Democratic States are among the most developed countries in the political and economic sphere.
Because they are engaged in the protection of human rights and public freedom.
Democratic States are among the most developed countries in the political and economic sphere.
The question is, Do we really have a functioning democracy, where the vote of the citizen really does anything significant?
This Is How AIPAC Really Works
Check out the site. There are links that you might want to read.
This Is How AIPAC Really Works
An AIPAC and Capitol Hill veteran explains the lobby’s tactics of reward and retribution.
One thing that should be said about Representative Ilhan Omar’s tweet about the power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (more commonly known as AIPAC, or the “Israel lobby”) is that the hysterical reaction to it proved her main point: The power of AIPAC over members of Congress is literally awesome, although not in a good way. Has anyone ever seen so many members of Congress, of both parties, running to the microphones and sending out press releases to denounce one first-termer for criticizing the power of… a lobby?
Somehow, I don’t think the reaction would have been the same if she had tweeted that Congress still supports the ethanol subsidy because the American Farm Bureau and other components of the corn/ethanol lobby spend millions to keep this agribusiness bonanza going (which they do). Or that if she had opposed the ethanol subsidy, she would have been accused of hating farmers.
One thing that should be said about Representative Ilhan Omar’s tweet about the power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (more commonly known as AIPAC, or the “Israel lobby”) is that the hysterical reaction to it proved her main point: The power of AIPAC over members of Congress is literally awesome, although not in a good way. Has anyone ever seen so many members of Congress, of both parties, running to the microphones and sending out press releases to denounce one first-termer for criticizing the power of… a lobby?
Somehow, I don’t think the reaction would have been the same if she had tweeted that Congress still supports the ethanol subsidy because the American Farm Bureau and other components of the corn/ethanol lobby spend millions to keep this agribusiness bonanza going (which they do). Or that if she had opposed the ethanol subsidy, she would have been accused of hating farmers.
Check out the site. There are links that you might want to read.
Yes democracy is helpful to prosper the people by applying their potential to grow in every field of life as compare to non democratic system wherein hard rules are applied and people fight for their rights rather to blossom.
In addition, democracy is something that you can show to people as a leader and also stuff to hide your dirty movements. In a democracy, you will be able to get things easy and make your profile nice to the people of your nation. In my country, as a citizen, I have seen my country went down because of this democracy because the leaders of the nation also had the chance and democracy to corrupt billions of billions of dollars. They have taken advantages that abide by the law and that is the true thief.The success of democracy is the active involvement of the citizens in the affairs of the government, when this is right is been violated then the reasons for adopting a democratic system of government is not reached. Then what's the need. As for me i personally will opt for a "NO" democracy.
Here are some merits of democracy :
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
1)It is more accountable
2)The elected leaders need to perform better for their stability
3)Gives the people right to choose among the best
4)It enhances the dignity of a citizen
Demerits of democracy :
1)Leaders keep on changing leads to instability
2)It is all about political competition and power play
3)Elected leaders do not know the best interests of people
4)Democracy leads to corruption.
So which country would you prefer a democratic or non-democratic ?
Democracy is just a word from the book,
So many citizens know about democracy but, just from the cover. They don't look inside what is the meaning of that.
Yes democracy is helpful to prosper the people by applying their potential to grow in every field of life as compare to non democratic system wherein hard rules are applied and people fight for their rights rather to blossom.
In addition, democracy is something that you can show to people as a leader and also stuff to hide your dirty movements. In a democracy, you will be able to get things easy and make your profile nice to the people of your nation. In my country, as a citizen, I have seen my country went down because of this democracy because the leaders of the nation also had the chance and democracy to corrupt billions of billions of dollars. They have taken advantages that abide by the law and that is the true thief.
Yes democracy is helpful to prosper the people by applying their potential to grow in every field of life as compare to non democratic system wherein hard rules are applied and people fight for their rights rather to blossom.
Consider the 51% to 49% vote in democracy. Both sides vote for the other side to support them entirely. I mean, literally, the losing side has to support the winning side in style. Because that's all it is. Democracy is slavery in the making.
In practice, the democratically elected leaders make slaves of everybody else. Of course... they do it shrewdly so that the rest of the people don't understand what they are doing, but continue to fight it out between themselves in the next election.
The joke is on all those people who love to vote and fight. They all lose to the elected leaders... who live in style.
In practice, the democratically elected leaders make slaves of everybody else. Of course... they do it shrewdly so that the rest of the people don't understand what they are doing, but continue to fight it out between themselves in the next election.
The joke is on all those people who love to vote and fight. They all lose to the elected leaders... who live in style.
Sucks this is clearly what happens to my countty. That is the reason why i really support the change of governance style into other categories. Just like federalism this might atleast lessen the corruption problem. Or should i see atleast we have tried
Jump to: