★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1246.

bogglor

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

DigiByte? Yes!

Quote from: Meeren on September 08, 2014, 08:07:47 AM

I read this forum every day since the creation of digibyte, mined every day since the creation of digibyte, bought some digibyte. But most of all i believe in digibyte to be the nr. 1 altcoin.

I never respond on this forum, but I really think digibyte need to take some action. Every day so mutch coin's are generated that it has to much effect on the market right now, can you do something about this? A limit or something?

Everyone keeps mentioning the number of coins being mined. The number of coins isn't the problem. Look at DOGE...they have 65 times the number of coins and they have a higher per-coin value.

Here's the problem as I see it: Sorry, this may sound a little blunt - Digibyte can't be used for anything except a few fringe merchant websites that nobody needs or has ever heard of. There needs to be some sort of reason for people to accept/use Digibyte. Until that happens, the coin value will stay at these levels (or lower).

I've only been mining for about 10 months (DGB for about 5 months). It's a very interesting, annoying, exciting, (insert adjective here), and frustrating hobby.

Meeren

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

I read this forum every day since the creation of digibyte, mined every day since the creation of digibyte, bought some digibyte. But most of all i believe in digibyte to be the nr. 1 altcoin.

I never respond on this forum, but I really think digibyte need to take some action. Every day so mutch coin's are generated that it has to much effect on the market right now, can you do something about this? A limit or something?

SaveForrest

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: lucazane on September 06, 2014, 08:34:47 AM

I'am using OVH too for more than 6 years, they are cheap and reliable.

thank you good idea.
I agree they are cheap and reliable.

istvandv

sr. member

Activity: 342

Merit: 250

Quote from: HR on September 08, 2014, 03:04:12 AM

New money trail for newly skimmed DGB:

Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6

These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.

DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.

most likely boostpool mining DGB to be sold and converted to GRS or BTC payout

tyson187

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: istvandv on September 07, 2014, 08:33:58 PM

Quote from: tyson187 on September 07, 2014, 11:07:14 AM

it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.

I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,

but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,

so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .

i quote srcxxx "What you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for (your displayed hashrate is premultiplied by the fee). No other fees on top of that."

in other words, you are paid in full for the 26MH/s displayed on grs-sgminer
the fee has already been pre-calculated meaning your real hash is more than 26MH/s and that is where the fee is taken from

this is an optimized kernel and as such, it draws more power, as HR has pointed out, you have to consider if the power vs the additional 5Mh/s is cost efficient

if you have doubts, mine at cryptohunger for at least 24hrs and mine at other groestl pool ofr 24hrs and compare payout

it doesn`t matter at all , he steals from people and is proud of it ,

bitcointalk should ban him , but I doubt they will do anything like always .

HR

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1011

Transparency & Integrity

Quote from: ?? on ??

New money trail for newly skimmed DGB:

Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6

These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.

DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.

Do you think he's going to send you a thank you note at Christmas for being so nice and letting him rob you blind?

srcxxx's future of mining: bend over, grab your ankles . . . Cheesy

istvandv

sr. member

Activity: 342

Merit: 250

Quote from: tyson187 on September 07, 2014, 11:07:14 AM

it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.

I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,

but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,

so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .

i quote srcxxx "What you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for (your displayed hashrate is premultiplied by the fee). No other fees on top of that."

in other words, you are paid in full for the 26MH/s displayed on grs-sgminer
the fee has already been pre-calculated meaning your real hash is more than 26MH/s and that is where the fee is taken from

this is an optimized kernel and as such, it draws more power, as HR has pointed out, you have to consider if the power vs the additional 5Mh/s is cost efficient

if you have doubts, mine at cryptohunger for at least 24hrs and mine at other groestl pool ofr 24hrs and compare payout

mintzone

sr. member

Activity: 285

Merit: 250

Quote from: bogglor on September 07, 2014, 05:28:09 PM

Quote from: lionhead666 on September 07, 2014, 04:09:32 PM

Quote from: tarzanbigcity on September 07, 2014, 03:44:23 PM

Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.

Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.

He's probably talking about one of the other algorithms, there still hasn't been a Scrypt DGB block found by any pool for about two days.

I'm assuming that it's the difficulty causing that to happen... Here's hoping that'll fix itself in the future.
I have my fury pointed towards love2hash, going to switch to the other pool whenever love2hash goes down.

bogglor

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

DigiByte? Yes!

Quote from: lionhead666 on September 07, 2014, 04:09:32 PM

Quote from: tarzanbigcity on September 07, 2014, 03:44:23 PM

Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.

Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.

He's probably talking about one of the other algorithms, there still hasn't been a Scrypt DGB block found by any pool for about two days.

lionhead666

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: tarzanbigcity on September 07, 2014, 03:44:23 PM

Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.

Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.

tarzanbigcity

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 250

Quote from: lionhead666 on September 07, 2014, 02:14:49 PM

Quote from: DigiByte on September 07, 2014, 11:49:41 AM

Quote from: bogglor on September 07, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct

155713   09/05/14 07:27 PM   scrypt
155712   09/05/14 07:26 PM   qubit
155711   09/05/14 07:25 PM   skein
155710   09/05/14 07:24 PM   skein
155709   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155708   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155707   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155706   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155705   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155704   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155703   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155702   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155701   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155700   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155698   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155697   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155696   09/05/14 07:18 PM   skein
155695   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155694   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155693   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155692   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155691   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155690   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt

We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.

Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found Sad

Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrate

Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.

24hralttrade

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Community Liaison,How can i help you?

Quote from: lionhead666 on September 07, 2014, 02:14:49 PM

Quote from: DigiByte on September 07, 2014, 11:49:41 AM

Quote from: bogglor on September 07, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct

155713   09/05/14 07:27 PM   scrypt
155712   09/05/14 07:26 PM   qubit
155711   09/05/14 07:25 PM   skein
155710   09/05/14 07:24 PM   skein
155709   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155708   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155707   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155706   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155705   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155704   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155703   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155702   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155701   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155700   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155698   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155697   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155696   09/05/14 07:18 PM   skein
155695   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155694   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155693   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155692   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155691   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155690   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt

We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.

Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found Sad

Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrate

Getting some hashes rented maybe we can push some blocks.
PM me your dgb adress and will send you some to compensate.

thank you for mining and further information will come.

24

lionhead666

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: DigiByte on September 07, 2014, 11:49:41 AM

Quote from: bogglor on September 07, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct

155713   09/05/14 07:27 PM   scrypt
155712   09/05/14 07:26 PM   qubit
155711   09/05/14 07:25 PM   skein
155710   09/05/14 07:24 PM   skein
155709   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155708   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155707   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155706   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155705   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155704   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155703   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155702   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155701   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155700   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155698   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155697   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155696   09/05/14 07:18 PM   skein
155695   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155694   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155693   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155692   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155691   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155690   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt

We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.

Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found Sad

Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrate

HR

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1011

Transparency & Integrity

srcxxx,

Since that was your last on the subject, this is my last as well (I've done enough of my good citizen's good deeds in this regard and frankly I'm also a bit bored with your childish evasiveness . . . but I can only speak for myself as perhaps others might want to voice their concerns, anger, whatever, as they discover having been deceived).

The data speaks for itself. A full 20% of all your DGB pool's block rewards is automatically taken off the top and sent to one of two separate addresses where those DGB are "parked".

That's 20% of rewards that is not paid to miners.

PERIOD!

If you ever want to take the issue up again by addressing those facts, I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing you out.

Everything else is diversionary BS.

srcxxx

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: HR on September 06, 2014, 08:12:23 AM

Quote from: 24hralttrade on September 06, 2014, 05:34:05 AM

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8696082

srcxxx is removing his cryptohunger groestl pool.

Hmmm why?
I know why. I think we all do.

Yeah, with his kind of "transparency" and data reporting:

"You need to understand that daily profits will be different each day.
There is a fee that pool operator takes and it is undisclosed currently. Our pool likes to keep things simple.

Q: Why is my hashrate so low? I used to have 16.7MH/s on R9 290 and now I have like 930KH/s
A: That is normal. Because boostpool can switch netween different algorithms, you would be getting different hashrate otherwise (depending on current algo). So it was decided to scale the hashrate to be consistent. So grs-sgminer shows hashrate similar to Scrypt hashrate on the same equipment."
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959

It's sooooo much easier to scam. Cheesy

Hi HR!

First of all, thank you for promoting my pools here and on other forums, like DMD. And BTW, they figured out their 8% fee long time ago and it is even posted on OP.

> It's sooooo much easier to scam
With this form it is easier to avoid questions from guys like you, who think that somebody owes them something.

I'm not sure why you call this a scam, but I don't care, since this is my last post in this topic...
You've already delisted me and I already have enough miners, and DGB is not much profitable now anyways (it's on par with SFR).

I think that scam is when somebody lies to you. I never lied. The displayed hashrate is what you are paid for. Just see the wording from my site "No extra pool fees (what you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for)".

I am not sure why people think that my pool fee must be like 2%. I never said that.
If I could make a miner that is 10X times faster than sph-sgminer, I'd probably set the fee to 80% and it would still be more profitable for the miners.
After all, it took me 3 months to work on this optimized kernel.

PS: You don't come to a restaurant and say "The beer is two times cheaper in the supermarket, I demand an explanation". :-)

srcxxx

DigiByte

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1051

Official DigiByte Account

Quote from: 24hralttrade on September 07, 2014, 12:18:59 PM

https://altcoinherald.com/trusted-dev-team-adoption-sought-features-altcoin/

Trusted dev team: ✔

Interesting article, thanks for sharing!

24hralttrade

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Community Liaison,How can i help you?

https://altcoinherald.com/trusted-dev-team-adoption-sought-features-altcoin/

Trusted dev team: ✔

DigiByte

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1051

Official DigiByte Account

Still no word from scrxxx. We removed all references to his pool a couple days ago.

DigiByte

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1051

Official DigiByte Account

Quote from: bogglor on September 07, 2014, 10:47:00 AM

Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct

155713   09/05/14 07:27 PM   scrypt
155712   09/05/14 07:26 PM   qubit
155711   09/05/14 07:25 PM   skein
155710   09/05/14 07:24 PM   skein
155709   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155708   09/05/14 07:22 PM   skein
155707   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155706   09/05/14 07:22 PM   scrypt
155705   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155704   09/05/14 07:21 PM   scrypt
155703   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155702   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155701   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155700   09/05/14 07:19 PM   scrypt
155698   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155697   09/05/14 07:18 PM   groestl
155696   09/05/14 07:18 PM   skein
155695   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155694   09/05/14 07:18 PM   scrypt
155693   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155692   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155691   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt
155690   09/05/14 07:17 PM   scrypt

We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.

tyson187

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

[/quote]

Hmm that´s strange indead.
Maybe Digibyte have something to say about this?

About the cryptohunger pool.
I posted on the thread that there is something not right going on with the 20% hidden fee and they deleted my post and somebody else his post mentioning the 20%fee problem.
The owner of the pool scrxxx is deleting his pool on 31 October 2014. Fealing some heat now we know this about the fee?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anngroestlmyriadgroestl-pool-closed-652849

Don't we need to get some word out about this? We are talking about serieus money!

Does the the Multipool, Boostpool.com use the same algorithm? ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959 )
Owner scrxxx not saying anything about what algorithm he is using ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959.msg8710436#msg8710436 )

Digibyte, Still no word from scrxxx?

,24

Edit:
HR, just reading this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8677638 good job.

[/quote]

it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.

I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,

but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,

so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1246. (Read 3058926 times)