I'am using OVH too for more than 6 years, they are cheap and reliable.
thank you good idea.
I agree they are cheap and reliable.
Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1246. (Read 3058816 times)
September 08, 2014, 07:21:52 AM
thank you good idea.
I agree they are cheap and reliable.
September 08, 2014, 07:15:20 AM
New money trail for newly skimmed DGB:
Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6
These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.
Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6
These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.
most likely boostpool mining DGB to be sold and converted to GRS or BTC payout
September 08, 2014, 04:08:59 AM
it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.
I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,
but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,
so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .
I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,
but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,
so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .
i quote srcxxx "What you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for (your displayed hashrate is premultiplied by the fee). No other fees on top of that."
in other words, you are paid in full for the 26MH/s displayed on grs-sgminer
the fee has already been pre-calculated meaning your real hash is more than 26MH/s and that is where the fee is taken from
this is an optimized kernel and as such, it draws more power, as HR has pointed out, you have to consider if the power vs the additional 5Mh/s is cost efficient
if you have doubts, mine at cryptohunger for at least 24hrs and mine at other groestl pool ofr 24hrs and compare payout
it doesn`t matter at all , he steals from people and is proud of it ,
bitcointalk should ban him , but I doubt they will do anything like always .
September 08, 2014, 04:04:12 AM
New money trail for newly skimmed DGB:
Newly Generated Coins
to
DFkpdefR47BRfa4AU2zdEXup6aCtt9VSy7
to
DT3qxDjbtzrG5skLX2fi5c9xCWCtvS3XCj
to
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6
These are not 20% amounts. These are entire block find amounts.
DRykTe2nXZpSX1KytPXjvPhGfCAXb4ZBM6 now has a nice final balance of 6,846,600 DGB.
Do you think he's going to send you a thank you note at Christmas for being so nice and letting him rob you blind?
srcxxx's future of mining: bend over, grab your ankles . . .
September 07, 2014, 09:33:58 PM
it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.
I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,
but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,
so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .
I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,
but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,
so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .
i quote srcxxx "What you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for (your displayed hashrate is premultiplied by the fee). No other fees on top of that."
in other words, you are paid in full for the 26MH/s displayed on grs-sgminer
the fee has already been pre-calculated meaning your real hash is more than 26MH/s and that is where the fee is taken from
this is an optimized kernel and as such, it draws more power, as HR has pointed out, you have to consider if the power vs the additional 5Mh/s is cost efficient
if you have doubts, mine at cryptohunger for at least 24hrs and mine at other groestl pool ofr 24hrs and compare payout
September 07, 2014, 09:31:04 PM
Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.
Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.
He's probably talking about one of the other algorithms, there still hasn't been a Scrypt DGB block found by any pool for about two days.
I'm assuming that it's the difficulty causing that to happen... Here's hoping that'll fix itself in the future.
I have my fury pointed towards love2hash, going to switch to the other pool whenever love2hash goes down.
September 07, 2014, 06:28:09 PM
Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.
Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.
He's probably talking about one of the other algorithms, there still hasn't been a Scrypt DGB block found by any pool for about two days.
September 07, 2014, 05:09:32 PM
Come over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.
Do you have a scrypt pool? Didn't find any link.
September 07, 2014, 04:44:23 PM
Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found
Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrateCome over to Birds pool. We have a large enough hashrate where we are finding blocks all the time.
September 07, 2014, 04:13:34 PM
Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found
Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrateGetting some hashes rented maybe we can push some blocks.
PM me your dgb adress and will send you some to compensate.
thank you for mining and further information will come.
24
September 07, 2014, 03:14:49 PM
Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again.155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
Any news about that? I'm mining 2 days now on a p2pool and no block where found
Instead I should have 20000 DGB according to my hashrate September 07, 2014, 02:47:33 PM
srcxxx,
Since that was your last on the subject, this is my last as well (I've done enough of my good citizen's good deeds in this regard and frankly I'm also a bit bored with your childish evasiveness . . . but I can only speak for myself as perhaps others might want to voice their concerns, anger, whatever, as they discover having been deceived).
The data speaks for itself. A full 20% of all your DGB pool's block rewards is automatically taken off the top and sent to one of two separate addresses where those DGB are "parked".
That's 20% of rewards that is not paid to miners.
PERIOD!
If you ever want to take the issue up again by addressing those facts, I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing you out.
Everything else is diversionary BS.
Since that was your last on the subject, this is my last as well (I've done enough of my good citizen's good deeds in this regard and frankly I'm also a bit bored with your childish evasiveness . . . but I can only speak for myself as perhaps others might want to voice their concerns, anger, whatever, as they discover having been deceived).
The data speaks for itself. A full 20% of all your DGB pool's block rewards is automatically taken off the top and sent to one of two separate addresses where those DGB are "parked".
That's 20% of rewards that is not paid to miners.
PERIOD!
If you ever want to take the issue up again by addressing those facts, I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing you out.
Everything else is diversionary BS.
September 07, 2014, 02:09:07 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8696082
srcxxx is removing his cryptohunger groestl pool.
Hmmm why?
I know why. I think we all do.
srcxxx is removing his cryptohunger groestl pool.
Hmmm why?
I know why. I think we all do.
Yeah, with his kind of "transparency" and data reporting:
"You need to understand that daily profits will be different each day.
There is a fee that pool operator takes and it is undisclosed currently. Our pool likes to keep things simple.
Q: Why is my hashrate so low? I used to have 16.7MH/s on R9 290 and now I have like 930KH/s
A: That is normal. Because boostpool can switch netween different algorithms, you would be getting different hashrate otherwise (depending on current algo). So it was decided to scale the hashrate to be consistent. So grs-sgminer shows hashrate similar to Scrypt hashrate on the same equipment."
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959
It's sooooo much easier to scam.
Hi HR!
First of all, thank you for promoting my pools here and on other forums, like DMD. And BTW, they figured out their 8% fee long time ago and it is even posted on OP.
> It's sooooo much easier to scam
With this form it is easier to avoid questions from guys like you, who think that somebody owes them something.
I'm not sure why you call this a scam, but I don't care, since this is my last post in this topic...
You've already delisted me and I already have enough miners, and DGB is not much profitable now anyways (it's on par with SFR).
I think that scam is when somebody lies to you. I never lied. The displayed hashrate is what you are paid for. Just see the wording from my site "No extra pool fees (what you see in grs-sgminer is what you are paid for)".
I am not sure why people think that my pool fee must be like 2%. I never said that.
If I could make a miner that is 10X times faster than sph-sgminer, I'd probably set the fee to 80% and it would still be more profitable for the miners.
After all, it took me 3 months to work on this optimized kernel.
PS: You don't come to a restaurant and say "The beer is two times cheaper in the supermarket, I demand an explanation". :-)
srcxxx
September 07, 2014, 01:45:49 PM
Interesting article, thanks for sharing! 
September 07, 2014, 01:18:59 PM
September 07, 2014, 12:50:44 PM
Still no word from scrxxx. We removed all references to his pool a couple days ago.
September 07, 2014, 12:49:41 PM
Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
We are taking a closer look into this. Our initial take is this is a temporary phenomena while multi-algo mining hash-rates stabilize. There was many back to back blocks so that will cause the difficulty to go higher than it should. It also may be the same party who was attempting to manipulate the chain with an ASIC before the switch could be attempting to do something similar again. 155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
September 07, 2014, 12:07:14 PM
[/quote]
Hmm that´s strange indead.
Maybe Digibyte have something to say about this?
About the cryptohunger pool.
I posted on the thread that there is something not right going on with the 20% hidden fee and they deleted my post and somebody else his post mentioning the 20%fee problem.
The owner of the pool scrxxx is deleting his pool on 31 October 2014. Fealing some heat now we know this about the fee?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anngroestlmyriadgroestl-pool-closed-652849
Don't we need to get some word out about this? We are talking about serieus money!
Does the the Multipool, Boostpool.com use the same algorithm? ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959 )
Owner scrxxx not saying anything about what algorithm he is using ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959.msg8710436#msg8710436 )
Digibyte, Still no word from scrxxx?
,24
Edit:
HR, just reading this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8677638 good job.
[/quote]
it was my post he deleted , that means it`s true , but people are still mining at his pool regardless of the fee which I don`t get it.
I have a 280x and get at his pool 26MH minus the 20% that is ~ 21MH ,
but at the https://v2.cryptopoolmining.com/dgb-groestl/ my hashrate is 21MH minus 1% fee ,
so in the end it`s not that much of a profit mining at his pool .
September 07, 2014, 11:47:00 AM
Maybe I should have said it doesn't seem to be a difficulty problem. But, looking a little closer it shows that 15 out of the 23 blocks found leading up to the last scrypt block were scrypt. Maybe that really skewed the difficulty algorithm and the current reported difficulty of 87.16752915 isn't correct
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155713 09/05/14 07:27 PM scrypt
155712 09/05/14 07:26 PM qubit
155711 09/05/14 07:25 PM skein
155710 09/05/14 07:24 PM skein
155709 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155708 09/05/14 07:22 PM skein
155707 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155706 09/05/14 07:22 PM scrypt
155705 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155704 09/05/14 07:21 PM scrypt
155703 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155702 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155701 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155700 09/05/14 07:19 PM scrypt
155698 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155697 09/05/14 07:18 PM groestl
155696 09/05/14 07:18 PM skein
155695 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155694 09/05/14 07:18 PM scrypt
155693 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155692 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155691 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
155690 09/05/14 07:17 PM scrypt
September 07, 2014, 11:38:40 AM
Wow, I was going to ask if anyone knew how to buy BTC in Europe with fiat, and https://www.litebit.eu/en/ looks really interesting. Now, I've got to take a closer look. Don't have much time this weekend, but I'll have to make some time because I really want to get aggressively on the buy side of all that dumping!
I finally got around to doing a 24 hour analysis comparing the block find numbers between algos (much easier that I thought due to some block explorer features I was overlooking).
Groest........541
Qubit..........556
Scrypt.........177
SHA-256.....515
Skein..........572
Total blocks found 2361.
If we add the averaged 369 blocks that scrypt should also be finding to that total, we’d we looking at a total of 2730, which would be very close to theoretical.
I’m not at all sure about what could be causing this, but with the issue having to do with scrypt, and with scrypt being the “old” algo, my first inclination is to ask if active “old” wallets, or previously configured and still not updated pool servers, or exchanges, or the like, might not be causing this.
It because of the multipool mining scrypt, they put the difficulty so high that it take hours to generate a block when they leave.
So renting some scrypt mining will help this issue?
No Scrypt blocks have been found since block 155713.
Starting at 155713 until now, here's the count of each algorithm found:
837 groestl
1 scrypt
835 sha256d
845 skein
850 qubit
Something is definitely not right... and it's not a difficulty problem:
Mining Difficulty: Scrypt 87.16752915
Mining Difficulty: Sha256d 1306958.89099947
Mining Difficulty: Groestl 601.99800068
Mining Difficulty: Skein 2564.90447229
Mining Difficulty: Qubit 28.76510527
Hmm that´s strange indead.
Maybe Digibyte have something to say about this?
About the cryptohunger pool.
I posted on the thread that there is something not right going on with the 20% hidden fee and they deleted my post and somebody else his post mentioning the 20%fee problem.
The owner of the pool scrxxx is deleting his pool on 31 October 2014. Fealing some heat now we know this about the fee?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anngroestlmyriadgroestl-pool-closed-652849
Don't we need to get some word out about this? We are talking about serieus money!
Does the the Multipool, Boostpool.com use the same algorithm? ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959 )
Owner scrxxx not saying anything about what algorithm he is using ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-closed-boostpoolcom-groestlcoin-payouts-770959.msg8710436#msg8710436 )
Digibyte, Still no word from scrxxx?
,24
Edit:
HR, just reading this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8677638 good job.
Jump to: