Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1419. (Read 3058921 times)
March 29, 2014, 03:05:05 AM
****digibyte promo video ****
give feedback and I will chance it
do you like it and will you give some back?
- like it
- follow me on youtube
- like other videos from me
- tell it to everyone who you know
March 29, 2014, 01:44:39 AM
Better rewards
DDoS resistant
Coins deposited directly in your wallet
No registration needed, just a DigiByte address as username
If node is down, you don't lose your DigiByte, your work is saved on network.
JOIN US TO MINE
March 28, 2014, 11:57:16 PM
As far as we know we are the first Alt Coin to implement the Bitcoin v0.9.0 Protocol. We would love to have you help us test the Scrypt implementation out before we replace the main download link on the Digibyte.co website.
We have done initial testing and everything appears to be working well. We appreciate any and all feedback.
DigiByte v 2.9 Facts:
*Not a mandatory update
*Backwards compatible
*Includes exe installer
*Implements the latest Bitcoin 0.9 protocol features into DigiByte.
Windows x64 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
Windows x32 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
As always BACK UP your wallet.dat before upgrading!
We have done initial testing and everything appears to be working well. We appreciate any and all feedback.
DigiByte v 2.9 Facts:
*Not a mandatory update
*Backwards compatible
*Includes exe installer
*Implements the latest Bitcoin 0.9 protocol features into DigiByte.
Windows x64 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
Windows x32 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
As always BACK UP your wallet.dat before upgrading!
I'm testing currently this release , exactly x64 build :
- I can receive and sent DGB to others accounts (My main testing receiver DGB account was AGX.io and my secondary is a Android Wallet)
- Wallet backup & restore working perfectly
- Synchronize with DGB network without issue, I feel this version sync more fast with DGB network compared with v2.0.
- Ui Improvements are welcome
Only one minor issue in UI, but not affect wallet functionality : http://s27.postimg.org/ewdnbld03/ui_bug.png -- the html code in the message "
Thanks for this RC Dev Team...
Greetings from Venezuela
March 28, 2014, 11:31:28 PM
I fear it's quite possible that in few months months there are 2 people mining DGB, and both have 300mh/s asics.
I fear that no one with asics are mining DGB...that would mean its not worth anyone's hashes...
both of these are real possibilities and are my fears as well if no new algorithm is applied...in fact the 2 people mining DGB with ASICS will mine the life out of DGB then dump coins on an exchange....end result is that price keeps plummeting yet difficulty has risen, DGB would then be toast since there is no incentive to mine anymore....this is all of course hypothetical, DGB will be modified well before this will happen but it's unfortunately the reality that all scrypt coins are facing
March 28, 2014, 11:16:57 PM
As far as we know we are the first Alt Coin to implement the Bitcoin v0.9.0 Protocol. We would love to have you help us test the Scrypt implementation out before we replace the main download link on the Digibyte.co website.
We have done initial testing and everything appears to be working well. We appreciate any and all feedback.
DigiByte v 2.9 Facts:
*Not a mandatory update
*Backwards compatible
*Includes exe installer
*Implements the latest Bitcoin 0.9 protocol features into DigiByte.
Windows x64 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
Windows x32 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
As always BACK UP your wallet.dat before upgrading!
We have done initial testing and everything appears to be working well. We appreciate any and all feedback.
DigiByte v 2.9 Facts:
*Not a mandatory update
*Backwards compatible
*Includes exe installer
*Implements the latest Bitcoin 0.9 protocol features into DigiByte.
Windows x64 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
Windows x32 bit version: http[Suspicious link removed]
As always BACK UP your wallet.dat before upgrading!
I'm testing currently this release , exactly x64 build :
- I can receive and sent DGB to others accounts (My main testing receiver DGB account was AGX.io and my secondary is a Android Wallet)
- Wallet backup & restore working perfectly
- Synchronize with DGB network without issue, I feel this version sync more fast with DGB network compared with v2.0.
- Ui Improvements are welcome
Only one minor issue in UI, but not affect wallet functionality : http://s27.postimg.org/ewdnbld03/ui_bug.png -- the html code in the message "
Thanks for this RC Dev Team...
Greetings from Venezuela
March 28, 2014, 10:08:47 PM
P2pool using DigiByte v2.0. Now with Cryptsy price displayed
Address: dgb.p2phash.com
P2Pool benefits:
* No registration required
* Distributed hashrate
* Immediate payouts after a block is found
* Higher payouts with transaction fees paid to miners
* No account hack possible
Fee: only 0.5%
Start mining within seconds! Just point your miner to p2phash.com:9022 and use the DigiByte address from your wallet for username, the password doesn't matter.
You can now follow us on twitter: https://twitter.com/P2PHash
March 28, 2014, 09:24:55 PM
Does anyone have any feed back on mining Maxcoin?
March 28, 2014, 09:20:44 PM
We are taking a very hard look at SHA-3 Keccak.
SHA stands for "Secure Hashing Algorithm" and is set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithm
SHA-0 Has been exploited.
SHA-1 Has been exploited.
SHA-2 What Bitcoin uses & most cryptos.
SHA-3 Next generation super secure hash. Maxcoin implemented SHA-3 Keccak
We have been researching much more into Keccak.
http://keccak.noekeon.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3
What really caught our attention:
Rumor has it a GPU miner for Keccak has already been developed. We are thinking we can modify Keccak for GPUs.
SHA stands for "Secure Hashing Algorithm" and is set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithm
SHA-0 Has been exploited.
SHA-1 Has been exploited.
SHA-2 What Bitcoin uses & most cryptos.
SHA-3 Next generation super secure hash. Maxcoin implemented SHA-3 Keccak
We have been researching much more into Keccak.
http://keccak.noekeon.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3
What really caught our attention:
Quote
Keccak excels in hardware performance, with speed/area trade-offs, and outperforms SHA-2 by an order of magnitude.
Quote
Keccak has overall good software performance. It is faster than SHA-2 on modern PCs and shines when used in a mode exploiting parallelism.
Rumor has it a GPU miner for Keccak has already been developed. We are thinking we can modify Keccak for GPUs.
March 28, 2014, 08:11:37 PM
We hate most is liar
The community should not deceive
Thank you for your reminding me
The community should not deceive
Thank you for your reminding me
Huh?
March 28, 2014, 07:43:20 PM
We hate most is liar
The community should not deceive
Thank you for your reminding me
The community should not deceive
Thank you for your reminding me
March 28, 2014, 07:26:14 PM
I'm not saying we should switch as I'm still largely undecided, its a difficult problem. If we were to change I'm personally becoming a fan of the approach that myriadcoin has taken with there algo design (at least on paper). To me it seems like a balanced approach and could be tweaked for digibyte and accommodate other algos if we so desired.
It would require some changes to infrastructure where we would need pools for each algorithm and depending on which algo you mined you would use a different mining program.
It needs more research but its an interesting idea and worth exploring
Quote
Scypt, SHA256D, Qubit, Skein or Groestl
How it works
Each proof of work algorithm has its own independent difficulty.
Any algorithm can find the next block.
All the algorithms use the same difficulty adjustment method.
On average, each algorithm has the same chance of finding the next block.
Each algorithm aims for a block generation time of 2.5 minutes.
Over the five algorithms, a block should be found on average every 30 seconds.
How it works
Each proof of work algorithm has its own independent difficulty.
Any algorithm can find the next block.
All the algorithms use the same difficulty adjustment method.
On average, each algorithm has the same chance of finding the next block.
Each algorithm aims for a block generation time of 2.5 minutes.
Over the five algorithms, a block should be found on average every 30 seconds.
It would require some changes to infrastructure where we would need pools for each algorithm and depending on which algo you mined you would use a different mining program.
It needs more research but its an interesting idea and worth exploring
March 28, 2014, 06:30:06 PM
March 28, 2014, 06:06:56 PM
Which algorithm should DigiByte switch to? Vote here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-which-algorithim-should-digibyte-switch-to-545759
March 28, 2014, 04:28:01 PM
In the end we definitely do not want hashing power to become centralized & we like the idea that anyone should be able to mine DigiByte with very little associated costs.
The question is in the future how many people are actually going to be mining when we achieve main stream adoption? Maybe 5% of users a year from now? What are your thoughts?
The question is in the future how many people are actually going to be mining when we achieve main stream adoption? Maybe 5% of users a year from now? What are your thoughts?
Impossible to answer imo, this depends on how Digibyte will grow or decline. If all your efforts, dev's and community's efforts, will be rewarded by a huge amount of trade and nice value per coin in few months, lot of people will probably mine DGB as a standard, and it's not impossible to see an average net hashrate of 30 Ghs+ like the DOGE community.
Regarding the algorythm, I have a question because i have no knowledge in programming : is there any way to have a fast and secure algo which will give a maximum fixed amount of shares per minute/kilohash per minute AND per device?
Imagine an algo which will fix a maximum hashing power per devices (GPU Card/ASICS/Grid Seed/CPU etc...) at, for example, 200 Khs. Limited at something like 8 devices per IP/MAC adress, all people will have a proportionnal amount of coins, and will save a lot of electricity because running a Graphic card at lower intensity will bring the electricity bill lower.
I'm just suggesting a beginning of reflexion, this is maybe not possible. Please gimme some light in this darkness
March 28, 2014, 04:26:59 PM
Better rewards
Coins deposited directly in your wallet
DDoS resistant
No registration needed, just a DigiByte address as username
If node is down, you don't lose your DigiByte, your work is saved on network.
JOIN US TO MINE
March 28, 2014, 04:20:19 PM
People will always mine, if, they can afford to. With BTC value going down, and all the alts ( at the moment ), many many people whom bought into mining hard core ( possibly foolishly & too heavily ), are either turning rigs off due to operating costs, or the inability to ROI, many are just selling. As long as people can afford to, they will, new algos, that make better use of energy & operating costs are very attractive. At the moment, I hash scrypt , N & X11, with scrypt being a very low percentage. I can buy coin cheaper than it is to mine it in many cases ( with reg scrypt )
March 28, 2014, 03:51:14 PM
In the end we definitely do not want hashing power to become centralized & we like the idea that anyone should be able to mine DigiByte with very little associated costs.
The question is in the future how many people are actually going to be mining when we achieve main stream adoption? Maybe 5% of users a year from now? What are your thoughts?
The question is in the future how many people are actually going to be mining when we achieve main stream adoption? Maybe 5% of users a year from now? What are your thoughts?
March 28, 2014, 03:47:29 PM
They still put out Sha256 coins with thousands of THS of asics out there ... What will kill a coin is a lack of community , Lack of smart marketing , Lack of market cap , while asics have changed the bitcoin market and difficulty I think the value has clearly increased over the last two years .... these mega asics won't be prevalent for a few more months if at all and the little gridseeds haven't effected any coins in any substantial way, but have saved the world a lot of electrical usage to support the crypto mining required for coins ..... What would kill a coin fast is a bad transition to another algo ... People dump coins with problems and Id hate for that to happen to Digibyte.
(plus what would i do with all my asics?)
(plus what would i do with all my asics?
)Apparently he does. ^^
March 28, 2014, 03:40:25 PM
I fear it's quite possible that in few months months there are 2 people mining DGB, and both have 300mh/s asics.
I fear that no one with asics are mining DGB...that would mean its not worth anyone's hashes...
March 28, 2014, 03:24:03 PM
I fear it's quite possible that in few months months there are 2 people mining DGB, and both have 300mh/s asics.
Jump to: