I need some node?
You can see it on C-CEX 
Topic: 💸 DigiCube 🔷 NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW) 💸 EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER! - page 252. (Read 460480 times)
January 27, 2016, 11:00:24 AM
January 27, 2016, 10:56:41 AM
I need some node?
January 27, 2016, 10:49:07 AM
Option4: The better way tostop inflation of the coin is to reduce the staking rate in different stage up to 1%:
March 4%
May 3%
July 2%
November 1%
March 4%
May 3%
July 2%
November 1%
January 27, 2016, 10:44:32 AM
i have 1000 cube so i earn 10 cube daily or what
i vote for the option 1 
It's not 10 cube/day, it's 10cube/block.splitting coins would give more chance of higher stake/day.
how to calculate it? if i have 1k cube and split it into 5 wallet
January 27, 2016, 10:31:28 AM
Inflation controls of some sort definitely needed. Perhaps POS master PressTab could offer some suggestions.
This is a very smart solution to keep the stake rate intact for small holders while capping the maximum that can be earned per input. The only thing we need to decide on is what the cap will be. I can also make a sliding cap that changes based on block number or something. I am open to suggestions on how to cap it and when, but I don't think there will be a better option available. Capping input size or coinage will confuse people; this is a much simpler system to explain to new users than over-complicating it to do the same thing
I like it, like the way Hyperstake stakes?
Hyp is a bad example. No one would invest in it now. Inflation is much more than you could get with staking by the very high difficulty.
I was referring to the context of this post, capping the maximum that can be earned per input but thanks for playing.
January 27, 2016, 10:18:17 AM
i have 1000 cube so i earn 10 cube daily or what
i vote for the option 1 It's not 10 cube/day, it's 10cube/block.splitting coins would give more chance of higher stake/day.
January 27, 2016, 10:12:33 AM
Hi Guys
Today I sent 101 CUBE from my wallet to C-Cex.
Now 5 hours later it is still not confirmed.
Does anyone have the same problems? What is to do?
EDIT:
All good, It's confirmed now.
Today I sent 101 CUBE from my wallet to C-Cex.
Now 5 hours later it is still not confirmed.
Does anyone have the same problems? What is to do?
EDIT:
All good, It's confirmed now.
everything based on your CONNECTION
January 27, 2016, 10:07:08 AM
i have 1000 cube so i earn 10 cube daily or what
i vote for the option 1 1000 CUBE will earn ~50 CUBE a day ...
January 27, 2016, 09:59:21 AM
I just got my StakeStick today.
Thanks!
Thanks!
U can do a photo from unboxing?
Awesome, thanks for posting pictures
Enjoy!
i vote for the option 1 January 27, 2016, 09:27:03 AM
Hi Guys
Today I sent 101 CUBE from my wallet to C-Cex.
Now 5 hours later it is still not confirmed.
Does anyone have the same problems? What is to do?
EDIT:
All good, It's confirmed now.
Today I sent 101 CUBE from my wallet to C-Cex.
Now 5 hours later it is still not confirmed.
Does anyone have the same problems? What is to do?
EDIT:
All good, It's confirmed now.
January 27, 2016, 05:41:04 AM
So let's put also a vote. I like option 4 for now!
Agree we need to control the inflation, but we can try to spread the coin around and get new investors. The most attractive here is the high stake, so why should we reduce it and lose investors.
Agree we need to control the inflation, but we can try to spread the coin around and get new investors. The most attractive here is the high stake, so why should we reduce it and lose investors.
the majority of current stakes are below 10 coins, you can keep your stupidly unsustainable inflation rate and still cap it.
to give some sense of control for the future.
--
edit
if anyone wants an actual sustainably useful coin anyway? it's all about mad profits vs bagholders at this point.
does anyone even understand exponential growth?
look at this beautiful graph and watch it keep growing ... http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/charts.php?type=supply&startheight=100&endheight=344684
January 27, 2016, 05:11:53 AM
So let's put also a vote. I like option 4 for now!
Agree we need to control the inflation, but we can try to spread the coin around and get new investors. The most attractive here is the high stake, so why should we reduce it and lose investors.
Agree we need to control the inflation, but we can try to spread the coin around and get new investors. The most attractive here is the high stake, so why should we reduce it and lose investors.
January 27, 2016, 03:20:53 AM
I say option 4 leave it how it is because I don't understand what the rest mean.
January 27, 2016, 02:45:02 AM
Which of the options is best for the integrity and strength of the network as a whole?
Not fussed which of the options is chosen - as long as it is for the right reasons.
Are the Stakesticks available for international shipping? I noticed that the box contains a two-pin plug, will there be options for a three pin one for the UK (or is it capable of being powered by a different power supply?)
Not fussed which of the options is chosen - as long as it is for the right reasons.
Are the Stakesticks available for international shipping? I noticed that the box contains a two-pin plug, will there be options for a three pin one for the UK (or is it capable of being powered by a different power supply?)
January 27, 2016, 12:51:20 AM
Option 1.
to prevent hyperinflation and make a coin more value
to prevent hyperinflation and make a coin more value
January 27, 2016, 12:50:04 AM
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4, CUBE seems way why change it?
something like option 1 seems too low, in a few months everyone will be above the threshold and then most likely the community will want to change the cap again to something different ...
That's why I mentioned a sliding cap earlier. The cap could be, for example, a % of the block number, which would increase over time. But then why change it at all if we are going to allow inflation, just in a different way. I am perfectly fine with leaving it how it is; other people were complaining, not me
January 27, 2016, 12:28:53 AM
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4, CUBE seems way why change it?
something like option 1 seems too low, in a few months everyone will be above the threshold and then most likely the community will want to change the cap again to something different ...
January 26, 2016, 11:43:00 PM
I do not regret the way CUBE was handled. The coin is still the same as it was last week. If you have a problem with CUBE, it's because you don't like me personally. Simple as that
lol. so the fact that it has an obvious destiny of being a hyperinflated valueless coin is only because i dont like you.
also that you refuse to own #1 address is also because i don't like you. such spite
dude shut the fuck up you probably have zero cube invested, the dev did nothing illegal or devious
devious like not owning up to being Spots ?
or devious like owning #1 richlist and not owning up to it?
devious is devious
just have a look at the transactions on the top wallet.
deposits totalling 1281 on 27th oct.
unfortunately the explorer is a bit skewiff and the link might not work to the correct page ??
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/address.php?address=CZDkAUACJ1ntNdxhbpo4ut8eVDiymfd7NC&txstart=12000
the first deposit is in block
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/block.php?height=19569 transaction http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=c94736702d9466436e027ecd4a20d7981bf21b383a4f068e2375c5e4620e3976
with the then total coin count of 15,425
then the address #1 on the richlist received 8.3% of total coins on that date.
why isnt it listed as dev wallet ?
deposits totalling 1281 on 27th oct.
unfortunately the explorer is a bit skewiff and the link might not work to the correct page ??
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/address.php?address=CZDkAUACJ1ntNdxhbpo4ut8eVDiymfd7NC&txstart=12000
the first deposit is in block
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/block.php?height=19569 transaction http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/tx.php?tx=c94736702d9466436e027ecd4a20d7981bf21b383a4f068e2375c5e4620e3976
with the then total coin count of 15,425
then the address #1 on the richlist received 8.3% of total coins on that date.
why isnt it listed as dev wallet ?
so is Spots ready to claim #1 yet ?
who else would have access to so many coins so early on ?
unless you were scammed by killerjoegreece of course, which is another good answer.
edit.
and for more amusement, the first deposit of those six transactions came at 27 Oct 2015 06:34:54
meanwhile here in the thread at October 27, 2015, 06:25:17 AM
Caught up on all the sig campaign participants. Thanks everyone, approaching 60!
.
note to presstab,
please add to your explorer more information on block pages as to amount of coins transacted (to prevent the need to go into individual transactions to find out)
also add a previous block and next block link.
January 26, 2016, 11:37:14 PM
If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen
I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.
If every block staked for 100 (long-term talk), then it would be creating 288,000 new coins per day
most stakes are currently less than 1 coin reward atm. a 100 coin cap is pretty meaningless
doing a 10 coin cap would be interesting enough in that most people wouldnt give a shit and would leave their wallet staking by itself.
others would have fun crafting input sizes to maximise returns.
would be useful then to add manual split/combine values.
--
have a look at http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CUBE/chain.php to see the last 100 stake amounts,
here are the highest rewards from those in descending order
113.35
60.84
58.97
12.38
12.16
11.55
over 90 out of the last 100 are valued under 10
the majority are under 1 coin.
.
an interesting point on that 113 coin stake, is that it was a greater than 100% reward. initial stake was 85.4736 coins, and it was about 25 days old.
that's pretty cool, and it seems that that wallet is not a regular staker.
January 26, 2016, 10:57:59 PM
Wow awesome. So they do in fact exist, I guess we can put the rumor that it was a "scam" to bed now. How does it work, does it come with the wallet already on it ?
And yes, they are real. I told you guys they were coming
Jump to: